TJP_FULL_Episode_1520_Tuesday_121625_Tuesday_News_Breakdown episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 16, 2025 · 1H 21M

TJP_FULL_Episode_1520_Tuesday_121625_Tuesday_News_Breakdown

from The James Perspective · host James Wilkerson

On today’s episode, we discuss the infamous Dred Scott decision with future law student Madeline, unpacking how questions of citizenship, jurisdiction, and property rights produced one of the Supreme Court’s most morally repugnant yet technically intricate rulings. The conversation probes whether Chief Justice Taney applied the law as it then stood or twisted it to entrench slavery, how states and the federal government once shared power to define citizenship, and why subject-matter jurisdiction can make an entire case legally void. The hosts then discuss the legality of a pardon by President Trump for Tina Peters, specifically whether federal "crimes against the United States" could extend presidential pardon authority to state-level convictions. Particularly in the context of Biden-era election-related tactics. Don't miss it!

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 16, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

TJP_FULL_Episode_1520_Tuesday_121625_Tuesday_News_Breakdown

0:00 1:21:50

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The James Perspective?

This episode is 1 hour and 21 minutes long.

When was this The James Perspective episode published?

This episode was published on December 16, 2025.

Can I download this The James Perspective episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!