TRAPPED IN SIN PT 21 OF NOT BELIEVING FOLLOWING GODS COMMANDS BRINGS KNOWLEDGE SIN BUT NOT VIRTUE!

IN THIS MESSAGE WE WILL FURTHER EXPLAIN THE TWO QUESTIONS WHICH COMPLETELY TURN THE APPLECART OF OUR FASTFOOD FREEWILL FRIENDS AND THEOLOGIANS UPSIDE DOWN. THESE QUESTIONS ARE AXIOMATIC QUESTIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, WHAT IS A SIMPLE AXIOMATIC QUESTION THAT ALL OF US AMERICANS KNOW THE UNDENIABLE ANSWER TO? WHAT IS THAT QUESTION BUT WHEN WE ASK OUR FELLOW AMERICANS THE FOLLIWING QUESTION: ARE YOU A LIAR? THAT IS AN AXIOMATIC QUESTION THAT NONE OF US AMERICANS CAN SAY NO TO, AS LONG AS WE ARE IN OUR RIGHT MIND. THE TWO QUESTIONS WHICH DESTROY OUR FASTFOOD FREEWILL FRIENDS AND THEOLOGIANS DOCTRINE OF SALVATION ARE:​DO WE AS AMERICANS HAVE A FREEWILL TO ACCEPT OR REJECT JESUS OR IS OUR WILL BOUND IN SALVATION?​WHAT IS THE FUNCTION OF LAW AFTER WE ARE MADE A NEW CREATION WHEN WORKS CANCELS GRACE AND GRACE CANCELS WORKS? THIS QUESTIONS JUST DEMOLISHES THE FREEWILL DOCTRINE AND THE KING OF THE REFORMATION , LUTHER ADDRESSES THIS QUESTION IN HIS BOOK ENTITLED ‘ BONDAGE OF THE WILL’ IN RESPONSE TO ERASMUS WHO WROTE THE BOOK ENTITLED ‘FREEDOM OF THE WILL’ IN 1524. THE NATURE OF THE SPIRITUAL NEW CREATION IS TOTALLY PARADOXICAL IN NATURE. THE SPIRITUAL NEW CREATION KNOWS INNATELY HOW TO USE THE LAW AND DOES NOT NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO USE THE FOR IT IS AS EASY FOR HIM AS IT IS FOR A BABY TO BREAST FEED. IN ROMANS 7:14 FORMER MR. MORALITY WRITES THAT THE LAW OF THE NEW CREATION IS SPIRITUAL AND THAT IS WHY THE NATURAL MAN CHRISTIAN IS CLUELESS OF THE TRUE FUNCTION OF THE LAW FOR THE NATURAL MAN CHRISTIAN IS NOT SPIRITUAL AND ONLY THE SPIRITUAL KNOW HOW TO INNATELY USE THE LAW. MARTIN LUTHER, WHO WAS KING OF THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW AMONGST THE REFORMERS WRITES: “Wherefore, the WORDS of the LAW are SPOKEN, NOT that they MIGHT ASSERT a. the POWER of the (FREE)WILL, but that they might ILLUMINATE the BLINDNESS of REASON, that it MIGHT SEE that its OWN LIGHT is NOTHING, and that the POWER of the WILL is nothing. "BY the LAW (saith Paul) is the KNOWLEDGE of sin," (Rom. iii. 20.): he does NOT SAY-is the ABOLITION of, or the ESCAPE from SIN. The WHOLE NATURE and DESIGN of the LAW is to GIVE KNOWLEDGE ONLY, and that of NOTHING ELSE ‘EXCEPT of sin, but NOT to DISCOVER or COMMUNICATE any POWER whatever. For KNOWLEDGE is NOT POWER, NOR does it COMMUNICATE POWER, but it TEACHES and SHOWS how GREAT the IMPOTENCY must there be, where there is NO POWER. And WHAT ELSE can the KNOWLEDGE of SIN BE, but the KNOWLEDGE of our EVIL and INFIRMITY? For he DOES NOT SAY-by the LAW comes the KNOWLEDGE of STRENGTHor of GOOD. The WHOLE that the LAW DOES, according to the testimony of Paul, is to MAKEKNOWN SIN. that man, by the WORDS of the LAW, is ADMONISHED and TAUGHT what he OUGHT to DO, ALSO NOT WHAT he CAN DO: that is, that he is BROUGHT to KNOW his SIN, but NOT to BELIEVE that HE HAS any STRENGTH in HIMSELF. Wherefore, FREIND Erasmus, as often as you THROW in my TEETH the Words of the LAW, so often I throw in yours that of Paul, "BY the LAW is the KNOWLEDGE of SIN,"-NOT of the POWER of the WILL. Heap together, therefore, out of the large Concordances all the IMPERATIVE WORDS, (COMMANDS) into one chaos, provided that, they be not WORDS of the PROMISE but of the REQUIREMENT of the LAW ONLY, and I will immediately declare, that by them is always shewn what men OUGHT to DO, not what THEY CAN do, or DO DO, And even common grammarians and EVERY LITTLE SCHOOL-BOY in the street knows, that by VERBS of the imperative mood, nothing else is signified than that which OUGHT to be DONE, and that, WHAT “IS” DONE or can be done, is expressed by verbs of the INDICATIVE mood. Thus, therefore, it comes to pass, that YOU THEOLOGIANS, are so SENSELESS and so many degrees BELOW EVEN SCHOOL-BOYS, that when you have CAUGHT HOLD of one IMPERATIVE verb you INFER an INDICATIVE sense, as though WHAT was COMMENDED were immediately and even necessarily DONE, or POSSIBLE to be DONE. But how many slips are there between the cup and the lip! So that, what you command to be done,therefore..