Tribes and Textualism episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 16, 2023 · 17 MIN

Tribes and Textualism

from Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture · host The Heritage Foundation

This week the Court handed down five opinions, two of which involved questions related to Indian Tribes, including one of the term's major cases, Haaland v. Brackeen. The decisions are heavy on textual analysis, showing that Justice Kagan was right when she said "we're all textualists now." Your hosts discuss the opinions, and then Zack tests GianCarlo's knowledge of some lesser-known facts about the Supreme Court's history.Further reading and listening:Professor Natelson on the Indian Child Welfare Act.Zack on Lac du Flambeau.Cully Stimson and Paul Larkin on Smith.Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected]'t forget to leave a 5-star rating.Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 16, 2023

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Tribes and Textualism

0:00 17:56

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture?

This episode is 17 minutes long.

When was this Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture episode published?

This episode was published on June 16, 2023.

Can I download this Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!