Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024]

Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efdTruck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024]Issue(s): Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. I was particularly interested in this, as an industrial Chemist, because of litigation years ago that had to do with Asbestos remediation and liability.The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe