On Consider This NPR's Afternoon News Podcast, we cover everything from politics to the economy to the world, but every story starts with a question. At NPR, we stand for your right to be curious. It makes sense of the biggest story of the day and what it means for you. Follow Consider This, wherever you get your podcasts.
I appreciate how topics are broken down in an accessible way. And we appreciate the note, Perry, and the support. It means a lot, especially this year. Because as of October 1st, as you have probably heard, NPR is now operating without federal funding for the first time in more than 50 years.
We know you value the NPR Politics Podcast. Maybe like Perry, it's how we break down the big political stories, or it's our on-the-ground reporting in Washington and around the country, or our election coverage that tells you what you need to know. Whatever the reason, you can help us keep going. Please make your Giving Tuesday gift now by signing up for NPR Plus.
It's a simple recurring donation that gets you the perks of over 25 of NPR's podcasts and bonus episodes to some shows, including this one. If you've already joined, thank you. If not, just head to plus.npr.org. Now on to the show.
This is Maria from Windsor, California. Currently walking the Shikoku pilgrimage in Japan, a 750-mile, 1200-year-old walking pilgrimage. I'm currently at Temple Number 46. This podcast was recorded at 135 p.m.
on Tuesday, December 2nd. Things may have changed, but I will still be looking for the common serenity here in Japan. Enjoy the show. You know, walking in here, I literally said serenity now, and then we were delivered serenity.
She's like trying to find a higher calling, but then she still wants to sort of peek in by listening to NPR Politics Podcast and find out what the heck is going on with her politics here. Serendity now. Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Tamara Keith.
I cover the White House. I'm Kimene Bucio, and I cover immigration policy. And I'm Tamanaka Mottanar, senior political editor and correspondent. Today on the show, the Trump administration was making big changes to legal immigration to the United States, then an immigrant from Afghanistan allegedly shot two members of the National Guard serving in Washington, D.C., and now the administration is doubling down.
In a minute, before we get to the changes, how did the alleged shooter come to the U.S.? So the alleged shooter came to the United States on a temporary parole program because he had helped the United States military, particularly the CIA abroad, and there were several programs stood up to assist particularly people from Afghanistan that helped the U.S. military and its allies. One of those programs allowed for him to come to the United States temporarily for two years, and then it was up to him to pursue further form of legal status.
And this all happened as the Taliban took back control of Kabul during the early part of the Biden administration. The Trump administration then granted him asylum this past April. So is that how the process normally works for asylum seekers? It can.
You know, the thing with asylum is you have to come to the country, you are seeking asylum in in order to seek that asylum. So he was able to come on this temporary program that allowed him to live and work in the United States temporarily for two years, and then he was able to apply for asylum and request asylum. Typically, the process is you come here, you apply, you go through a vetting process, eventually an interview. And that's one of the ways that you can seek asylum.
Typically, you have to do it pretty quickly within a year of being in the country. In theory, you have to have a credible fear of being in danger in your home country and helping the CIA would certainly make you a target in Afghanistan. There's even this thing called the critical fear assessment that the Department of Homeland Security officials will give people often before they're allowed to seek asylum to see if they're going to have a claim that can be marous in order to stand up to the very rigorous tests and complicated thing that is asylum law. So this is all very complicated.
I'm hoping you can kind of walk us through it. Has the Trump administration made changes to the asylum process since coming into office? Since day one, we saw a slew of initial executive orders related to immigration, and one of those executive orders essentially shut down the ability to request asylum at the southern border of the United States, which is how a lot of people were coming through. It's not how this individual came through to seek asylum, but anywhere.
We saw the closing of the CBP one app, which is how a lot of people were requesting those appointments to do those initial credible fear assessments and get the applications to physically apply for asylum. Well, I'm going to, you know, Trump officials seem to be talking a lot about new changes after the shooting. Did the shooting really change anything? Like what fundamentally are they talking about doing?
So right after the shooting, the administration said that they were pausing asylum decisions and separately visa reviews. So the visa reviews specifically for people from Afghanistan, but they did put a pause on all asylum decisions, you know, a separate order from the State Department paused other visas and programming specifically targeting people from Afghanistan. And then they said that there was going to be higher scrutiny on green card applications from people who come from one of 19 countries that are on a travel ban list. That includes Afghanistan.
But then after people become a silays and they're granted asylum, they typically seek green cards and even citizenship. And so we are seeing kind of a trickle down impact on then those processes that not just those people, but all people are going through and then particularly targeting in some instances, programs that go towards people from Afghanistan. But really, this also broader approach. And I have to say, you know, it's not just for asylum seekers, you know, Hemena, there are other forms of legal migration that Trump has been targeting.
Sometimes people get asylum seeking and refugees confused. How is the Trump administration changing the rules for refugees here? If you're an asylum seeker, you're in the country already, you are requesting asylum. If you're a refugee, you're still outside of the country in which you're trying to seek refuge into.
They have to request to be a refugee. They go through a different screening process with the State Department. You know, other agencies in the government are involved with vetting with interviews. And then once the United States decides that individual person can be a refugee, then they are facilitated and entry into the United States by the government.
The pause on the refugee program was like pretty much day one, like a really, really early on. And that created an immediate stop to a legal flow of migration. And then since then, we have most recently seen the fiscal year 2026 numbers, the Trump administration only wants to let in 7,500 refugees in this upcoming year. The priority, as administration has said, is going to be white South Africans.
And then even then before this shooting, we saw an announcement coming out of the Department of Homeland Security that they're going to actually go back and revet and even re interview anyone that had been brought in as a refugee during the Biden administration. All right. Well, there's a lot more to talk about. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
And we're back. And dialing back legal immigration isn't a new goal for President Trump and his administration. Domenico, I am remembering another attack, a terrible mass shooting in San Bernardino, California in 2015 that was during the presidential campaign. And that is when then candidate Trump announced his so-called Muslim ban shot to the top of the Republican field and never lost the lead.
So how is Trump now leveraging this recent shooting to achieve his goals? Yeah, I think he's leveraging it to achieve his goals, but he's also leveraging it to fit in and shoehorn in his worldview. So anytime there's the opportunity to say, see, I told you so about these people, there then becomes this operationalization based around Trump's culture war that he's been waging, frankly, since he became a candidate in 2015. And in this case, you think about like one person that does a thing came through this program, then they say, shut down the entire thing.
That's just not the reason why this is being done from a serious policy standpoint. It's to say this now shoe horns into a previously held worldview. And there's a relatively new social media post from Secretary of Homeland Security, Christine Ohm, where she says, I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies. I'm not quite sure how that would work, but President Trump seems to be endorsing this through social media.
Yeah, and she said in a very nativist way, in all caps, we don't want them not one. And I think that that that really underscores this culture war, that Trump and a lot of the political and his administration have been waging and has been really the binding element of MAGA that has echoed all throughout conservative media. And we've seen members, you know, officials at DHS who have gone on social media to post things like we are not a nation of immigrants, we're a nation of citizens. And you know, really emphasizing that distinction of us versus them, you know, the foreign born versus the native born, which can tie into efforts to dismantle birthright citizenship, right?
That we also saw at the start of the year, the broader questions of who is using American programs, who is living in American homes, who is working American jobs, you know, kind of like all of that rhetoric really bundles together. And this administration, and particularly this president is continuing that trend of, you know, the negative stereotypes of immigrants, what they're using, what they're doing in the country, who they are, where they're coming from, and really pushing that message out. Yeah, I mean, this does make me think of a recent press release. I got from the White House that had the headline.
It was about the jobs report. Jobs report shows private sector gains wage growth for American born workers. There's a real emphasis on, look, we are creating jobs for American born people. I mean, yeah, I mean, we have seen this rhetoric grow and grow over the course of the year, right?
Like first it was we are going to deport the people who are here illegally and have committed crimes and worse to the worst of the worst and, you know, through policy that has expanded. And now rhetorically that has expanded as well, you know, after the New York City mayoral race, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller made sure to tweet out the statistics of mixed status families and also just immigrant families that live in the city. And you know, it was kind of ominous, not much context to that ex post, but I think, you know, it again starts to grow the narrative of who we're counting as American, who we're talking about as American politically and what serves our society. Yeah, I think that broadly here is really about where and with whom this administration sympathies lie.
I think that this is another area where the Republican Party has sort of been fractured because, you know, the sort of Bush era of compassionate conservatism is certainly not what we're seeing here with this administration. I mean, I knew Republican attorneys who had big, you know, private sector jobs, but then would do work on the side pro bono for refugee work because they had, you know, a religious feeling of people who have been tortured in other countries and being able to shed that light of American patriotism and openness and opportunity and opportunity and the goals that the United States is supposed to stand for, you know, and I think it extends beyond, you know, just people who are running from war or famine, but also that America used to embrace political dissidents because the US stood for freedom of to voice criticism of power. But not anymore, really in a country where Trump is seeking retribution against perceived political enemies. I think that the idea of who is American, who belongs here is very different.
And it really is starting to move this to a clash of the question of kind of like political rhetorical differences, this question of who can assimilate, which we are seeing written in policy memos and we are seen spoken by administration officials that we, you know, the country wants people that can assimilate into it very easily. And then also almost what Dominican is talking about right now, which is the practical political realities where there are members and now former members of Congress that have spoken out against this broader mass deportation policy than broader anti-migration agenda because it just simply doesn't square up for certain sectors of the economy that do rely on immigrant labor that have grown because of growing rural communities bolstered by immigration. And you know, we're seeing those sides continue to struggle and push and pull and that'll be a question probably for next year on who wins, like what is the ultimate reality that the Republican Party chooses to go with. Well, and President Trump himself has even had a little bit of an internal conflict where he's like, well, we may need some H1B visas for some people or we can make money on giving people these golden tickets to the US.
He personally has different messages at different times. But De Minico, I do want to ask about public sentiment here. And you know, President Trump, there is zero question. He was elected talking about immigration, talking about these countries, sending their worst people.
That is a fundamental core part of his campaign message. And his administration would argue they are delivering on that in a big way. How is the public receiving it? Well, I think particularly when it comes to deportations, people think that the administration has gone too far.
We've seen that in majorities of polling, you know, showing that they think that the administration has gone too far and how they've conducted those. Immigration has been something that was one of Trump's best issues. But we've seen that slowly decline since he got into office for the second term. There's very little polling on refugees and refugee status and whether or not people support those programs.
There was one sort of major poll from a democratic group data for progress that showed significant majorities of people, including majority of Republicans, support maintaining a refugee program. Now, what that means, who they let in, that's very different. And then you have a news event like this happen. And that can often move public opinion.
And that's part of what the administration is trying to do politically is home in on this event to be able to push that public opinion down more in their favor. And trying to find something where they can have like sort of a more purely popular approach. Yeah, you hang your hat on it and you essentially say, see, this is it. You can go into as much detail as you want to try to encourage people to feel differently about a program like refugees or asylum status.
All right, well, we are going to leave it there for today. I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House. I'm Jimin Obustio and I cover immigration.
And I'm Samantha Muncio. I'm your political editor and correspondent. Thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.