Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Vance - Post-Argument SCOTUScast episode artwork

EPISODE · May 21, 2020 · 19 MIN

Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Vance - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society

Three cases before the Supreme Court consider the ability of grand juries and congressional committees to subpoena the personal tax records of the President. In Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, three House committees subpoenaed the President’s tax records. In Trump v. Vance, a local grand jury has subpoenaed these tax documents as well. There are several issues at play in determining if these subpoenas are valid. The Supreme Court has also asked the parties to brief whether these congressional subpoenas are the kind of dispute between the branches that the court should avoid.To discuss the case, we have Devin Watkins, Attorney at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 21, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Vance - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

0:00 19:05

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of SCOTUScast?

This episode is 19 minutes long.

When was this SCOTUScast episode published?

This episode was published on May 21, 2020.

Can I download this SCOTUScast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!