I spend a big part of my day in meetings and sometimes I'll jump off a call knowing my action items but later I'm reconstructing details and realising things slipped. Honestly, it can be super frustrating. That's when I heard about Plored PLAUD. They're not just an AI company.
They're an AI company that's hardware first. Their devices capture real conversations, meetings, calls and turn them into clear executive summaries with actionable next steps. And whether you're working in person, on the phone or online, Plored is right there with you. For more structured meetings, I'm told the Note Pro works best.
It remembers everything. So you can be present in the moment, the most authentic you possible. If your work runs on relationships and that's face it, most people does, Plored will forever change your game. Check it out at plored.ai slash Daily Beast and use beast for 10% off.
That's PLAUD.ai slash Daily Beast and use code beast for 10% off. If they lose the election, if they lose in 2026, they are finished politically but so much else. It's been a disaster date with a White House person. And this person expressed alarm.
And I think reflected the alarm that went through the White House on Tuesday night. They're up against their candidate. Their reason for being cannot course correct. They're heading into disaster.
Michael. Joanna. What are you hearing? I think that this is an interesting moment which we should put opinion.
Really for one thing, it begins this, we've just come through one year, this horrendous and shattering year. And now we enter this other year which is really going to be all about the midterms. And it officially begins now. And I had a conversation yesterday with a White House person.
And that was revealing. I mean, this person expressed alarm. I think reflected the alarm that went through the White House on Tuesday night. They're up against it.
And they may have known that before but this became crystal clear on Tuesday night. And it's not just that this election was bad for them. But the understanding that Trump, their standard bearer, their candidate, their reason for being cannot course correct. Cannot course correct.
Cannot course correct. Doesn't even, I think, understand the concept of a course correction. So therefore what they do, they're heading into disaster. That's what this election said.
This is not working. And Donald Trump understands even that he needs to course correct. Or is he just saying I wasn't on the ballot? So no one would say that to him.
No one would say you've been wrong. I don't think just even imagine the conversation is impossible. You know, you've been wrong. What you've done hasn't been working.
There's no context in which you can have that conversation. Actually, you have to have the exact opposite conversation Tuesday, Tuesday night. The results of Tuesday night prove that everything you've done is working. OK, so Michael, I wanted to get your thoughts on what Steve Bannon is saying.
And I will tell you right now, as God is my witness, if we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included. They're not going to stop. They're getting more and more and more radical. And we have to counter that.
And what do we have to counter it with? We have to counter it with more action, more intense action, more urgency. We're burning daylight. We're burning daylight.
What does that mean? What does burning daylight mean? I don't know what it is. God is his witness.
I don't know. But I love to hear whatever Steve says. It's always vivid. And this is probably part of what my conversation yesterday with a White House person was reflecting this.
And one of the things about Bannon, I mean, the president doesn't speak to him. And no one can speak to the president about what Bannon says. But Bannon is always on the phone with people in the, whoever he can get on the phone in the White House. And I think that he is probably delivering this dire warning.
And I think it has some effect. People within the White House are rightly wary, or at least beginning to worry. Yes. What does he mean that he might be going to jail?
Why would he be going to prison? Well, he's always on the verge of going to prison. He has been to prison. I remember he went to jail in Connecticut.
Yeah, no, no. Yeah. In his world, of course. I remember his world, the Bannon world is a world of hydrrama at all times.
So it is always the Democrats are going to come crashing through our doors and take us away. But I think that that is a part of that is probably true. And of course, a part of it is that these people deserve to be taken away. In another world, he would have been one of those preachers selling an elixir off the back of a wagon.
Certainly, certainly. He's sort of wasted. He's a man out of his time in many ways. And it's, you know, when you sit with him, which I have done hours and hours and hours and not one hour to regret, you want to buy whatever he's selling.
I mean, it's so much fun to listen to him. And I think he finds it's for him. It's so much fun to be able to talk in these vivid, dramatic, apocalyptic turns. Well, Burning Daylight does sound like a movie that Brett and I should turn his attention to, perhaps when he's finished the Melania documentary, which we can come on to a bit later.
Let's come to what was a remarkable moment yesterday in the White House. They're having a press conference for the announcement of the reduction of the cost of GLP-1 drugs when a man, one assumes, who's on a GLP-1 drug appears to faint in the office. Dr. Ors, thank God, actually a doctor.
He doesn't just play one on television. He used to be, I think, head of cardiac surgery at Columbia. Rushes to help the guy. And Trump just stands there, looking irritated as if the center of attention is no longer on him and waiting for the cameras to swivel back.
Meanwhile, there is literally a man in the background with his legs in the air. RFK, your old friend, we can come back to him, has run off stage. We have no idea where he's gone. But if he's gone to get a doctor, there is a doctor in the house, Dr.
Ors. It's chaos. I mean, it couldn't be a better scene from his reality show. You know, Trump really, I mean, it's a, it's a, it's a theme and has always been a theme of hate sick people.
Yes, I mean, he hates people with any kind of physical vulnerability. And to display that and to take attention from him is even, is even worse. So yeah, he would be, he would be irritated to say the least that that's something like that. Yeah.
And you could see that he was, I mean, he just stood there. There was literally a man, not even five yards from him with his legs up in the air. Everybody's giving him their attention. And Donald is just standing there still as if for the camera, looking, I think, a little grey.
I thought he looked, I don't know if it's the new hair color, but his face looks a bit like he seemed fatigued this week. We ought to call this out. I think this could be the signature accomplishment of the Trump administration. And I'm not being facetious here.
This is to have, to have lowered these drugs, which people have been talking about for some time and not accomplishing. But if he truly accomplishes this, this is, you know, a kind of kind of game changing for the health system, for healthcare costs, for healthcare policy, to, to create, to, to make, to make these drugs affordable to, and with the prospect of, of, of literally, of, of that creating a revolution in the health of people who are, who are overweight, which is most Americans, is kind of amazing. I think, I think Trump, Trump could be, when all of this is said and done and it all passes, he could be remembered as the, you know, as a guy who did the fat drugs. And I want to say that the other thing is that was, that was also a kind of perfect Trump to touch, to call them the fat drugs.
And it just, and it just kind of cuts through everything. Everybody understands what that means. It's not the Democrats with their blah, blah, blah, blah. And you don't know what they're talking about.
Everybody knows fat drugs. Got it. Well, and his own press spokesperson, Stephen Charna, who's called us both actually lying bags of shit. And I think he's also called both of us blithering idiots actually is now apparently on a GLP one.
And then Stephen, you have said was 400 pounds and during the campaign at one point was fainting, it was so hot and had to be carried out. He went down in Union Station. Yeah, no, no, I mean, Stephen is, who calls us these things, but again, he is actually a nice guy and someone I've always liked. So I forgive him.
But he's super fat. And you know, and this has been a career problem for him. Why is he not the press secretary? Because the idea of Trump having a 400 pound press secretary doesn't, just doesn't even exist.
That possibility doesn't exist in nature. And he's unhealthy. So, yeah, more power to him. And unless we can watch it, we can see the, I mean, this is a, could be one of the greatest advertisements for fat drugs to watch Stephen Charna melt away.
So I think the figure is 64% of Americans are overweight. I think it's 36% obese. You're right that this could be Trump's seminal impact if he helps America lose weight because then you impact the entire health system. And is there also a sense in which the country, and I say this not facetiously, but with the idea of him being a TV producer that he then has a much more attractive America.
Yeah, make America thin again. Make America beautiful again. He can have that slogan. You know, interesting though, there's part of the, the throughout the campaign, the chatter on the Mar-a-Lago terrorist was about whether or not Trump was on ozempic.
And a lot of, a lot of passionate belief that indeed he was. That is interesting. And there's such an irony here that on the one hand people can't get enough food because the snap benefits have been suspended. And then on the other, Trump is surrounded by actually a man who looked pretty thin, fainting as he discussed the possibility of reducing the price of GLP ones.
Yeah, and Trump has, I mean, that's also a kind of, been a constant refrain of Trump noting how fat Americans are and how fat, you know, that in many of his, you know, talking about when people turn out for rallies, all of the fat people who have come out to see me as a Trump line. Interesting. Well, his wife isn't fat. And his wife, Melania, of course, who you are suing, received an award this week.
And we had a rather good headline at the beast, Magacroud Gefours as Melania Trump delivers weird word salad. So she's at least having some salad. It's a word salad. So she's receiving the Patriot of the Year award.
Just clarify who that award is for me because I'm a little confused about who's giving this award, not the Oscars. It's not the Oscars. It's, she appeared on stage to accept the Patriot of the Year award at Fox Nations 7th Annual Patriot Awards. And she got up on the stage and she said, there asked me, I know a little bit about challenging convention.
Did that, I don't know if that sounded civilian at all. It sounded odd to me. It sounded like you. Okay, it sounded like me.
You and you do an accent. When you subpoena her, you could ask her, what did she mean when she said she understands a little bit about challenging convention? Yes, no. What convention is she referring?
Perhaps a convention that a first lady lives with her husband and the president in the White House? Well, we're going to get some more questions for us, Melania. Again, the episode. Just let me understand this award.
So this is Fox Nation. And Fox Nation is the digital arm, the never really rising to the level of success of any other news digital arm. Right. Digital arm.
Right. And so this is like, we need a little press. Let's give the first lady an award. Exactly.
And she was given her award. I just want to be specific here. Her advocacy work for Children Around the Globe, which of course included sending a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, asking him to protect children in Ukraine, where of course, you know, his country, Russia has abducted tens of thousands of children. I'll give you one more line.
I will do it in my bad, Slovenia, and accent. I applaud American Bremas and Inovatas, Inovatas, who embrace originality. Benjamin Franklin got a shout out. Hamilton got a shout out and said to Thomas Jefferson.
And let's see this again in the context of the rollout of her $40 million documentary with a 70% back end and her corporate $10 million corporate sponsorships. And that will happen. Melania the movie at the end of January. So that might be what she means about bucking convention too.
That as a first lady, she's actually making sure she gets well paid. Well, yes. But that does not buck the convention of anyone else in the Trump White House or Trump family. True, but it bucks the convention of other first ladies.
It certainly does. All right, moving swiftly on, we should thank the Museum of the City of New York for having us on Wednesday evening. That was a gas. I mean, it really is fun to be in front of a live audience.
It was very confusing because for us, it was a bit like doing a podcast, but suddenly there were real life responses to what we were saying. In the old days of television when there was a studio audience, you know, then a tumbler would come out and to prime the audience and make them laugh. That's what we need someone like that. We need a tumbler.
But I do live anytime. Well, it was really fun. It was interesting was people had come. There was a lady had come from Michigan.
There was a gentleman who'd come from North Carolina. And they really, they were really engaged with what's going on. And as you say, it felt like the perfect moment because there's a moment happening this week. You saw it on your go fund me, which I think is now up to 600,000.
You saw it in the results of the election and the record votes, certainly in New York since the 60s, the biggest vote for a mayor since the 1960s. So people reengaging, which also may be one of Trump's legacies, that he's got people interested in politics as if it were a reality television show. I think there's a more complicated thing here. I mean, we've gone through this year, this unprecedented year.
I mean, a year, I mean, just shocking in every respect. And nobody has done anything. And actually, it's been characterized by, not least of all, by the institutions that we expect to do something kind of folding. And this is media outlets, news outlets who have groveled courts who have succumbed.
I mean, if you're a good half of the country that is passionately opposed to Trump, you've had nowhere to turn. Well, hold on a minute. We had 7 million people marched for No Kings. There have been some very determined judges who've called him out and who've stopped him exporting people to El Salvador.
I mean, there have been all sorts of judges who've said, no, you can't do this. You can't suspend SNAP benefits. We've had a No Kings protest that the administration seemed very ably to ignore in every way, to shrug off. It's no sweat off of us.
You have a justice system, which is run amok, without restraints, which no courts have been able to effectively restrain. Plus you have a Supreme Court, which has basically in every instance. I mean, it's not even that they have decided in the Trump administration's favor because then you might precipitate something. They've done this other thing of allowing things to go on and then putting their decision off.
They have not even assumed responsibility for this. I think at this moment, having seen that institutional failure, there is this moment. The election now has given people's individual votes. I think it's this moment when people say, maybe we have to take this into our own hands.
And I take this personally because I think that's what people shelling out all this money for this legal case that I've been involved in is about. People want to do something. Put their $10 or $15 or $100. And most of the contributions have been under that.
They want to put that down. Yes, I want to do something. Take my money. I need to be a part of something.
So to harness that, and I wish I knew how to harness things. I wish I were a person with an organizational background because I think this could come together in something. And I think this is something that makes these, you know, that you could confront this despicable gang. I do think it's fair to say, especially after the election on Tuesday and the vote for the redistricting of California, that Governor Newsom is clearly at this stage, and of course it's early, ahead in the race in terms of democratic leadership.
And he was posting yesterday pictures of what appeared to be Donald Trump asleep. And you will have heard in the press conference that he gave that every time Donald Trump got a question, he just threw it to JD Vance. So it seemed that he looked exhausted this week. He looked exhausted.
His cancles were playing up. I'm not saying the guy hasn't been running around the world. He hasn't for someone who's 79. His schedule is incredible.
But he looks ill. Well, you're always killing him off. I'm not killing him off. I'm just saying that Governor Newsom pointed out that he was asleep and he was like, do you see, Don, is back.
So in terms of your point that nobody's doing anything and nobody's cutting through, actually people did cut through at the election in the off-year elections. There was a rousing. I am saying that this is that there does seem at this moment, and that could go away to be a the ground seems to be shifting. And it could shift very fast.
You pull the thread and things sometimes unravel very quickly. So this is the moment that we're in. And it is the moment the people in the White House, who I was speaking to yesterday, the person, I only spoke to one person, let me clarify. I think that's what was on this person's mind.
And that's what this person represented was on a lot of people's minds in the White House, that the unraveling may have begun. And the unraveling, and even to the extent of this person talking about a scenario going around the White House in which they lose both houses, they actually lose the Senate, which is a leap, as well as the House. Now that becomes existential, because if that happens, all of the people in it's not just Trump, the people in the White House, their careers, possibly their lives are destroyed. I mean, you're suddenly looking at a scenario in which there is impeachment and finally a conviction if were that to happen.
So within the White House, the fact that they have to consider that and the fact that they are considering that is a moment. And let's go to our sponsors. And Michael Wolf and I are back inside Trump's head. We're recording this on Friday, and there's a new movie opening tonight called Nuremberg, which is about the Nuremberg Trials.
I went to a screening of it earlier this week, and it couldn't be more apropos for the moment. And you have that whole sense of, you know, this is Hitler's cabinet sitting there. He's died by suicide at this stage, as have various other people around him. But some of the people who believed in him are sitting there and justice has caught up with them.
And it's very well done. It's Russell Crow back in a role that really suits him as Hermann Goering. And I really recommend people go and see it if you want to see what happens after the tyrant has left the stage. I'm going to push back in love to make that comparison.
Of course, he don't push back. I don't think it's helpful for a variety of reasons among which, you know, there are many things about the Trump administration, but the Jews are still alive. Well, of course the Jews are still alive. And we have social media and we're all running around saying, is it an autocracy?
Is it an autocracy? Which obviously you can't do in an autocracy. But my point is, it's this notion of a charismatic leader and what happens when he exits the stage and the people that are left behind. I just think that's unhelpful.
And if Russell Crow and Hollywood are doing that's an indication of how unhelpful it is, and let's hammer a point into the ground. There is an element of the sledgehammer about it, but it's never a bad thing to see Michael Shannon and Ramy Malik and Russell Crow together. And Richard E. Grant, by the way, who delivers the stinging prosecutorial moment as the, as Maxwell Fry, the British prosecutor.
Anyway, I enjoyed it. It was two hours of complete escape, oddly, into the new urban divide when we realize what's at stake for these people. I mean, if they lose the election, if they lose in 2026, they are finished, finished politically, but you know, so much else. I mean, the balance of power is at this point, if it flips against them, it flips on them.
And so they have to be thinking, and I know that they are thinking, and this person that I spoke to in the White House said, this will be because, again, Donald Trump can't course correct. This person said this will be an election, 2026 of lawyers. An election of lawyers, what does that mean? They're just going to challenge all the results.
Well, I think it begins now. I mean, the program to gerrymander as many congressional seats as they possibly can is essentially a looking at this through a lawyer's lens. Can we do this? How do we do this?
How do we create the laws, pass the laws in the variety of states to make this happen? There is the, before the Supreme Court. So the Supreme Court is now, and has been considering for some time, dismantling the final guardrails of the Voting Rights Act. That will have a significant impact.
And there's a whole range of legal maneuvers that cut down on the ability to get to the polls and who gets to the polls, all of this. So in other words, we're not talking about politics anymore. We're talking about how you harness the voting system to your advantage. Now, that while that always goes on to some degree, it has probably never gone on as aggressively as it is now, and I think it probably even more so as this election year rolls on.
This is the only way the Trump people hold the House. It may be the only way they hold the Senate, is the only way they hold their jobs and their livelihoods. Is there also a sense in which they may know that they have only got a year left, and so they're going to speed up even more? I mean, what more can they do?
We've talked about the redistricting, and in particular, the southern states, which might give them another 15, 12 to 15 votes, it's thought in the southern states. But what else is on his plan that he could do, which would be very difficult to undo, or take a long time to rebuild? I mean, we've seen the demolition of the East Wing, which we've all forgotten about, even though it's still lying there as a pile of rubble. But what else do you think is on the project 2025 agenda that he can whip up in the next year?
Yeah, no. And I think you have to see that in a different way. I mean, curiously, I think there will be some restraint on him or efforts to restrain him, but I think that that usually doesn't work. And he just continues on doubling down and to doing what he wants to do.
I mean, this is fundamental. Who would be the restraining voices? There are no restraining voices because he doesn't listen to anyone, and because people know that the way you have to deal with him is that's a bad way to deal with him, to say, hey, this may not be working. But I think there will be restraining voices outside of his hearing.
So in other words, there are political staffers who are trying to say, OK, you know, this is a how do we do what we do with some hope of countering what he does? So is this the equivalent of what Gary Cohn said he did in the previous administration, where he would just remove papers from Trump's desk? And Trump never got to see them. They call it slow walking.
Slow walking. And then he's moved on. His attention is is vibing on something else. Right.
Now, there are other people. I mean, the Stephen Millers of this, of this White House, of this, this world, will look at this as their opportunity to press forward to seize more, to speak to Trump's inclination always to double down. And that will be to Stephen Millers' advantage, because Stephen Millers is not really in the White House as a political person. He's in the White House as a policy slash ideological person.
Do you think they will double down on what's going on with these little boats that they're taking out in the Caribbean? I think that's, and I think Venezuela is a very alarming scenario. I mean, he could very well go to work in Venezuela. I mean, he is going, you know, within, he'll get up in the morning.
And what is on his mind is what do I do? I am unhappy with this, that, the other thing. What do I do to distract from that, to create another situation in which I am in control of? And once again, a message from our sponsors.
And Michael Wolf and I are here again inside Trump's head. OK, so we've still got the longest government shutdown ever, which we haven't even gotten to yet. And we've still got the Epstein files. No, and I think that the Epstein files are going to come back with some intensity now that the election is over.
And again, it is the thing. It may well be the thing that he can't escape, that brings him, I hesitate to say, that brings him down, but brings him the most pain. That brings him the most pain. OK, so I think it's time that brings us neatly to our Ask Melania section.
We have some questions for you to ask Melania and some questions for you about what's going on. This is from Monica 16 V. Has Melania or her lawyers responded yet to Michael Wolf's lawsuit? And if yes, what was her defense?
If no, when does Michael expect a response? They have, I believe, 90 days from now to get respond. But she will be, subpoenas will start to go out almost immediately. And then the response time is much shorter.
And the action starts. You know, and we are now, I think I can safely say, this is a fully funded lawsuit. A fully funded lawsuit. We have a war chest, and so we can go to war.
So full steam ahead. OK, so here's someone whose name I can't pronounce. I think it's S, clogsy, S, clogsy, or sclogsy, perhaps. I should ask, if Michael wins, does Melania have to pay for his lawyers' fees?
And if so, does Michael then start paying people back? Have you thought about that possibility yet? Yeah, there are some scenarios in which she does have to pay legal fees. And I think for our position on the money we've raised is that we will pay it forward.
So we will then begin to fund other efforts to protect free speech from the Trump gang. OK, and here's another question which I like very much. Cat Lady 5398 says, Melania questions, how did she begin to talk to Putin? What does she talk to him about?
How often do they talk? Well, since Putin does not speak English, this is, I don't know the answer to that. Now does Melania speak Russian? Doesn't she claims to speak?
Well, she speaks Italian, she speaks German, she speaks French. But we have never heard her speak these languages. Ugh, potatoes, potatoes. OK, and final question, which is actually more of a point from someone called High Life, Romania.
Sorry, Michael, you are wrong. Joanna, once again you are spot on. Usher is miserable AF. I think that means as fuck.
Ask any woman. OK, could be. She's either miserable or plotting. It's kind of one or the other.
It's binary, miserable or plotting. Michael, good to see you as always. We can discuss all bands visit next time, perhaps. We promise people we were going to talk about Russell vote and we haven't done and we should come back to him.
And what do you think RFK Jr was doing when he fled the room after the man collapsed? I mean, he is the Minister for Health and he fled the room at the site of someone fainting. Shooting up, I suppose. You think he was shooting up?
You think he was having his own medical emergency? All right, if you have been, thank you for joining us. Don't forget to subscribe to our podcast, wherever you get your podcasts. Leave us a comment on YouTube and please join our community where you can share a sense of community with other beast listeners and to remind people of our first lady would have us do even as she's armed with her Patriot Award from Fox Nation and she's confused about.
Have we seen the award? Is it a statue? Is it a what is it? I don't know, but I'm going to get a photo of the award for.
We'll put a photo of her, I hope, accepting the award. And again, just to remind you, add to your questions for Melania. What does she mean when she says she's used to Buckingham Convention? And I think we should continue to come back to Melania the movie and the director Brett Ratner, who is one of the early Me Too people in Hollywood.
This restores him to back to his respect, I guess, respectability. And what was his famous, remind me what his famous movie was again? Or he's, I know he was a very successful director before he got Me Too. Did the Rush Hour series?
The Rush Hour series. Hugely successful. The Rush Hour series, which would be a great series for Mam Darnie to watch as he's going to put on free buses and they're going to be much faster. And the whole idea of Melania as an action hero was kind of fascinating.
She does look a bit like Barbie's I had when I was growing up. She does. Yeah, she does. Well, I'm sure that that was, but she was sculpted that way in that model.
As she's always telling us, we must be best and we must be beast. Michael, I will see you on Tuesday. Fantastic. And a shout out to our special beast members, Herbie, Andrew Melor, Fulvia Orlando, La Zkonde, Sandra Clark, Bonzo, Val Loef Francesco, Bobcock DC, Karen White, Heidi Riley, Connie Rutherford, Sharon Shipley, and Andrea Haudel.
Michael, what have I forgotten? That's a thank Devin, Anna, and Jesse. Want more great listens? Check out our comedy podcast, The Last Laugh, and our store started the Daily Beast podcast at thedallybeast.com slash podcast.
If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a Daily Beast subscriber. Everything is the best way to feed the beast and support all of your podcast as we cover what might become the darkest timeline. Head to thedallybeast.com slash membership slash podcast and sign up today.