U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club - Post-Argument SCOTUScast episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 6, 2020 · 19 MIN

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society

On November 2, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club. This case addresses the scope of transparency under the Freedom of Information Act’s key “deliberative process” privilege. More specifically, oral argument addressed whether documents drafted as part of a statutorily required interagency consultation process between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries fall under exemption 5 of FOIA. This exemption grants that records that are “inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency” are protected from disclosure.Joining us today to discuss this case’s oral argument are Nancie Marzulla and Damien Schiff. Ms. Marzulla is Partner at Marzulla Law, and Mr. Schiff is a Senior Attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 6, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

0:00 19:31

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of SCOTUScast?

This episode is 19 minutes long.

When was this SCOTUScast episode published?

This episode was published on November 6, 2020.

Can I download this SCOTUScast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!