U.S. Supreme Court BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, Case No. 23-1259 episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, Case No. 23-1259

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Civil Procedure: Must a plaintiff show extraordinary circumstances when making a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint? - Argued: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:8:58 EDT

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, Case No. 23-1259

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on March 3, 2025.

What is this episode about?

Civil Procedure: Must a plaintiff show extraordinary circumstances when making a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint? - Argued: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:8:58 EDT

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!