U.S. Supreme Court BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, Case No. 23-1259

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Civil Procedure: Must a plaintiff show extraordinary circumstances when making a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint? - Argued: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:8:58 EDT

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 3, 2025

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, Case No. 23-1259

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on March 3, 2025.

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!