U.S. Supreme Court Royal Canin v. Wullschleger, Case No. 23-677

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Civil Procedure: Is remand to a state court required when a case has been removed to federal court based upon the federal question statute and the plaintiff amends their complaint to remove their federal claims? - Argued: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:2:14 EDT

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 7, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court Royal Canin v. Wullschleger, Case No. 23-677

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on October 7, 2024.

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!