U.S. Supreme Court SAS Institute v. Matal, Case No. 16-969 episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 1, 2017

U.S. Supreme Court SAS Institute v. Matal, Case No. 16-969

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Intellectual Property: Does 35 U.S.C. § 318(a), which provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review "shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner," require that Board to issue a final written decision as to every claim challenged by the petitioner, or does it allow that Board to issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of only some of the patent claims challenged by the petitioner, as the Federal Circuit held? - Argued: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 EST

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court SAS Institute v. Matal, Case No. 16-969

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on December 1, 2017.

What is this episode about?

Intellectual Property: Does 35 U.S.C. § 318(a), which provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review "shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the...

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!