U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Criminal Procedure: The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst? - Argued: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:0:9 EDT

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 11, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on January 11, 2024.

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!