U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899 episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 11, 2024

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Criminal Procedure: The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst? - Argued: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:0:9 EDT

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on January 11, 2024.

What is this episode about?

Criminal Procedure: The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst? - Argued: Wed, 10...

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!