United States v. Marcus episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 24, 2010

United States v. Marcus

from U.S. Supreme Court 2009 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that an appellate court may correct an error not raised at trial only when the appellant demonstrates that: (1) there is an error; (2) the error is clear and obvious; (3) the error affected the appellant's substantial rights; and (4) the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 24, 2010

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

United States v. Marcus

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2009 Term Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on February 24, 2010.

Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2009 Term Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!