EPISODE · Jan 28, 2022 · 22 MIN
United States v Quezada and MRE 803(3)
from Litigator Libations · host Darrel-the-DCAP
Send us Fan MailIn this episode we discuss the case of United States v. Quezada, where the appellant was convicted of a sexual assault (Article 120) and of false official statement (Article 107) for denying that the sex act that amounted to the sexual assault occurred. The issue is whether the "false exculpatory statement" instruction undermined the appellant's presumption of innocence and right to due process . . . it didn't. We then move on to discuss the hearsay exception for declarations of a then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition.
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail In this episode we discuss the case of United States v. Quezada, where the appellant was convicted of a sexual assault (Article 120) and of false official statement (Article 107) for denying that the sex act that amounted to the sexual assault occurred. The issue is whether the "false exculpatory statement" instruction undermined the appellant's presumption of innocence and right to due process . . . it didn't. We then move on to discuss the hearsay exception for ...
NOW PLAYING
United States v Quezada and MRE 803(3)
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 19, 2026 ·107m
Jun 19, 2026 ·35m
Jun 19, 2026 ·35m
Jun 19, 2026 ·35m
Jun 18, 2026 ·108m