EPISODE · Sep 19, 2022 · 52 MIN
Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans
from Strict Scrutiny · host Strict Scrutiny
Leah talks with Wilfred Codrington III about his article, "Purcell in Pandemic," which appeared in the NYU Law Review. The Purcell Principle comes from a 2006 Supreme Court case about what makes an appropriate timeline for changing election laws. The principle wasn't clear to begin with, and has only gotten more confusing in litigation surrounding the 2020 election. Will we see it continue to play out in this year's midterms?Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! 3/6/26 – San Francisco 3/7/26 – Los Angeles Learn more: http://crooked.com/eventsOrder your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad VibesFollow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky
What this episode covers
Leah talks with Wilfred Codrington III about his article, "Purcell in Pandemic," which appeared in the NYU Law Review. The Purcell Principle comes from a 2006 Supreme Court case about what makes an appropriate timeline for changing election laws. The principle wasn't clear to begin with, and has only gotten more confusing in litigation surrounding the 2020 election. Will we see it continue to play out in this year's midterms?
NOW PLAYING
Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 26, 2026 ·21m
Jun 25, 2026 ·35m
Jun 24, 2026 ·45m
Jun 23, 2026 ·46m