USCA, Federal Circuit Crocs v. Effervescent, Case No. 22-2160

from Audio Arguendo · host USCA, Federal Circuit

Intellectual Property: Does Crocs use of the word "patented" in its advertising constitute a deceptive trade practice? - Argued: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:45:37 EDT

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 5, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

USCA, Federal Circuit Crocs v. Effervescent, Case No. 22-2160

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on April 5, 2024.

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!