USCA, Federal Circuit Crocs v. Effervescent, Case No. 22-2160 episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 5, 2024

USCA, Federal Circuit Crocs v. Effervescent, Case No. 22-2160

from Audio Arguendo · host USCA, Federal Circuit

Intellectual Property: Does Crocs use of the word "patented" in its advertising constitute a deceptive trade practice? - Argued: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:45:37 EDT

NOW PLAYING

USCA, Federal Circuit Crocs v. Effervescent, Case No. 22-2160

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on April 5, 2024.

What is this episode about?

Intellectual Property: Does Crocs use of the word "patented" in its advertising constitute a deceptive trade practice? - Argued: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:45:37 EDT

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!