USCA, Ninth Circuit Kim v. Benihana, Case No. 22-55529

from Audio Arguendo · host USCA, Ninth Circuit

Civil Procedure: Are consumers who were misled by Benihana's inclusion of imitation crab in their sushi sufficiently common to mount a class action? - Argued: Mon, 08 May 2023 14:41:58 EDT

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 12, 2023

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

USCA, Ninth Circuit Kim v. Benihana, Case No. 22-55529

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on May 12, 2023.

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!