USCA, Sixth Circuit Crosby v. Twitter, Case No. 18-1426 episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 20, 2019

USCA, Sixth Circuit Crosby v. Twitter, Case No. 18-1426

from Audio Arguendo · host USCA, Sixth Circuit

Civil Procedure: Was the Pulse Nightclub shooting an act of international terrorism and are social media companies liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act for allegedly allowing ISIS sympathizers to use their platforms? - Argued: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:38:57 EDT

NOW PLAYING

USCA, Sixth Circuit Crosby v. Twitter, Case No. 18-1426

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on February 20, 2019.

What is this episode about?

Civil Procedure: Was the Pulse Nightclub shooting an act of international terrorism and are social media companies liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act for allegedly allowing ISIS sympathizers to use their platforms? - Argued: Tue, 15 Jan 2019...

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!