Using the Word "Further" In Reports

Words matter in home inspection reports - especially when those reports might end up scrutinized in court. This eye-opening discussion with Mike Marlow of Veteran Home Inspections reveals why the seemingly innocuous phrase "further evaluation" could be the most dangerous term in your reporting vocabulary.

Mike and Ian break down why saying "further evaluation recommended" could cause issues by effectively saying you started evaluating something but didn't finish. The conversation takes fascinating turns through the dramatically different regulatory approaches between states like Texas (where standard forms actually include the problematic language) and New York (where "evaluation" itself might constitute practicing engineering without a license). We share practical alternatives that better protect both inspectors and clients while maintaining professional boundaries.

Perhaps most valuable are the real-world examples of how these semantic choices play out in high-stakes situations - including a devastating house fire where report language became a critical factor. You'll walk away with immediate, actionable changes you can make to your reports that could save you thousands in potential legal fees.

Whether you're a seasoned inspector or just starting your career, this episode provides essential insights into positioning yourself as a defect recognizer rather than an evaluator - a distinction that could make all the difference when your work faces legal scrutiny. Listen, learn, and then go update your templates!

*We are not attorneys - please get proper legal advice for anything here or in any of our podcasts.

Check out our home inspection app at www.inspectortoolbelt.com
Need a home inspection website? See samples of our website at www.inspectortoolbelt.com/home-inspection-websites

*The views and opinions expressed in this podcast, and the guests on it, do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Inspector Toolbelt and its associates.