Was 2 John Written to a Woman? The Story of Lady Eclecte | Dr. Lincoln Blumell | Ep. 29

For nearly a hundred and fifty years, English Bibles have rendered the opening of 2 John as an address to the “elect lady,” a phrase most interpreters have taken as a poetic stand-in for a church rather than an actual person. Brigham Young University Papyrologist Lincoln Blumell argues that reading rests on a textual accident. In his new book, Lady Eclecte: The Lost Woman of the New Testament, Blumell traces how a common scribal error—two duplicated Greek letters dropped through haplography—erased a woman's name from the manuscript tradition. Working from his expertise in documentary papyri, he shows that the standard epistolary formula found in 3 John (“to Gaius, the beloved”) points toward a parallel structure in 2 John that the received text doesn't actually preserve. Clement of Alexandria's commentary, overlooked for generations, names her directly: Eclecte. This is more than a footnote in textual criticism. Restoring “Eclecte, the lady” changes who stands at the center of 2 John: not a metaphorical congregation, but a named woman exercising real authority over a house church, entrusted by the elder to guard its teaching and hospitality. Blumell walks through the manuscript evidence across papyri, uncials, and minuscules, and explains why this reading reshapes how interpreters should think about women's leadership in early Christian communities, alongside figures like Nympha and Phoebe. The episode offers a model of how grammar, papyrology, and patristic testimony combine to correct an inherited misreading—essential listening for anyone teaching 2 John, training in New Testament textual criticism, or rethinking the historical context of women's roles in the early church. BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Lady-Eclecte-Lost-Woman-Testament/dp/B0DST8F9QG/ref=sr_1_1 WEBSITE: https://lincolnhblumell.com/