Was the claimant "actively at work" or not when he became disabled?

This is the appellate argument of a marketing executive who was either working or not working when he became disabled. The claimant was grappling with a life-altering illness amidst the uncertainty of his employment status. His fight against the insurance giant Reliance Standard insurance company centers on the interpretation of 'active, full-time employee' status in the context of his impending job termination. The story unfolds in this argument, where the ambiguity of policy language and the definition of 'active' become pivotal in determining his rightful claim to benefits.These public domain recordings are brought to you by Ben Glass Law, a national long term disability and life insurance firm headquartered in Fairfax, VA.By making these recordings into a "podcast," we've made the listening easier for claimants, attorneys and claims adjusters alike. If long term disability or life insurance benefits have been denied, we'd love to review your denial letter and give you a strategy for moving forward. This is a free service and you can go here to begin submitting your denial letter.