Was there no case to answer? Strachan v Albany Resort (Bahamas) in the Privy Council. episode artwork

EPISODE · May 6, 2026 · 51 MIN

Was there no case to answer? Strachan v Albany Resort (Bahamas) in the Privy Council.

from The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast · host Gatehouse Chambers

A podcast exploring the Privy Council’s decision touching on no case to answer submissions in civil claims, in Tyson Strachan (Appellant) v Albany Resort Operators Ltd (Respondent) (The Bahamas) [2026] UKPC 5, as well as effective teamwork in Privy Council appeals.The judgment is interesting as it is an unusual analysis at Privy Council level of:the necessary ingredients legally and evidentially for a viable tort claim for damages (here by an employee for personal injury);the pleading and particularisation requirements for a viable employment claim; as well asthe appropriate procedure and threshold associated with a submission of no case to answer in a civil claim.Speakers: the advocates who acted for the successful Respondent in the Privy Council- Charles Bagot KC and Sara Ibrahim of Gatehouse Chambers, London and their Instructing Attorney, Giahna-Soles Hunt from Glinton Sweeting O’Brien in the Bahamas. 

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 6, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Was there no case to answer? Strachan v Albany Resort (Bahamas) in the Privy Council.

0:00 51:19

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast?

This episode is 51 minutes long.

When was this The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on May 6, 2026.

Can I download this The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!