We Took the Strengths Test. His Tops Are Her Bottoms. episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 31, 2026 · 32 MIN

We Took the Strengths Test. His Tops Are Her Bottoms.

from We Should Probably Edit This — But We Won't

Ever wonder why your partner thinks the way they do — and why no amount of explaining seems to change it? Matthew and Nancy took the Gallup CliftonStrengths assessment through a leadership class at their church, and the results were equal parts validating and hilarious. Matthew's strengths — Learner, Achiever, Futuristic, Belief, and Responsibility — put him squarely in strategic thinking mode, always planning, always visioning, always reaching for what's next. Nancy's strengths — Communication, Consistency, Significance, Harmony, and Responsibility — make her a powerhouse of influence, relationship, and execution. The twist? His top two are her bottom two. Her influencing strengths are nowhere in his top 10. And somehow they've been making it work for 37+ years without knowing why.In this episode they unpack the four quadrants — executing, influencing, relationship building, and strategic thinking — and what it looks like when a couple brings completely different ones to the table. About why Nancy doesn't need to be a strategic thinker, and why Matthew needs to stop requiring her to be one. And yes — about the moment Nancy dictated an entire list to Claude AI during a 45-minute drive just to get Matthew his beloved bullet points.Stop trying to fix your weaknesses. Stop trying to change your partner's wiring. This episode makes the case for leaning hard into what you're actually great at — together.📋 TakeawaysHis tops are her bottoms — and that's actually the pointWeaknesses aren't meant to be fixed, they're meant to be acknowledged and handed offFour quadrants: executing, influencing, relationship building, strategic thinking — and most couples don't bring the same onesWhen you stop trying to change your partner's wiring and start working with it, everything gets easierHire, delegate, or partner to cover what you're not wired forNancy's son called her "spicy" years ago — turns out Harmony's description of "straightforward" basically confirms itMatthew has been futuristic and strategic since 2014 — the top two just swappedExecuting is where they both shine and where they get things done together — selling the house proved it🧑‍🤝‍🧑 People Mentioned:Mel Robbins — mentioned in reference to the 5-4-3-2-1 rule🏢 Companies/Organizations Mentioned:Gallup CliftonStrengths — the assessment Matthew and Nancy tookGrowthDay — referenced as a past personal development experienceClaude — Nancy's shortcut to making Matthew's beloved list (yes, really)

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 31, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

We Took the Strengths Test. His Tops Are Her Bottoms.

0:00 32:08

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of We Should Probably Edit This — But We Won't?

This episode is 32 minutes long.

When was this We Should Probably Edit This — But We Won't episode published?

This episode was published on March 31, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this We Should Probably Edit This — But We Won't episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!