“We’re Arguing About AI Safety Wrong” by Helen Toner

This post was cross-published on the author's Substack, Rising Tide. ____ ‍ Historically, the way we’ve dealt well with rapidly evolving uncertain processes is classical liberalism. -Dwarkesh Patel, X I wasn’t expecting a book from 1998 to explain the 2023-2024 AI safety wars, but Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies — which I picked up at the recommendation of libertarian AI policy wonk Adam Thierer — does a surprisingly good job. Postrel's book helped reframe something that had been bothering me. I think there's plenty to critique about AI safety ideas and the AI safety community, but when they come under fire — as has happened a lot over the past couple of years — the critiques often miss the mark. One common theme is portraying AI safety advocates as anti-technology, which is totally out of step with the nerdy, early-adopter, industrial-revolution-enthusiast crowd I know. Another recurring criticism [...] ---Outline:(02:54) Stasism: Finding the One Best Way(08:13) Advanced AI as a threat to a dynamic future(10:40) Dynamism: An open-ended future --- First published: May 12th, 2025 Source: https://aifrontiersmedia.substack.com/p/were-arguing-about-ai-safety-wrong --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.