What Got Removed From Lindsay Clancy's Case In Eleven Days

The pattern matters more than any single ruling. In eleven days, the prosecution in the Lindsay Clancy trial made three moves that all point the same direction: narrowing who gets to explain her mind to the jury.On July 9, prosecutors dropped all three strangulation charges. They called them redundant, and legally that is correct. But strangulation charges sitting next to murder charges give a jury room to land somewhere in the middle. Without them the only options are first-degree murder, life, mandatory — or not criminally responsible.On July 13, Judge William Sullivan blocked the defense from calling women who survived postpartum psychosis to testify about their experience. Reddington wanted them on the stand. Prosecutors argued it would open the door to women who suffered the same illness and did not kill their children. The judge agreed and said experts can cover it.On July 20, the first morning of jury selection, the prosecution moved to exclude defense expert witnesses before a single juror was seated. The judge allowed the motion but called it premature. It can be renewed at any time.Tony explains what the pattern reveals about the Commonwealth's strategy. Why the reversed burden of proof in Massachusetts makes every blocked witness a tactical win for the prosecution. What Reddington tried to do about it and why the judge turned him down. And what the defense has left to put in front of eighteen strangers who will decide what happened inside a woman's mind.END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #DuxburyMassachusetts #InsanityDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #KevinReddington