What is really wrong with the Habitats Regulations?

DEFRA recently launched a consultation on significant changes to it’s guidance on how Habitat Regulations Assessments should be carried out, which comes at an interesting time. It is, firstly, not long since DEFRA announced that Natural England and the Environment Agency have been given a new mandate to “prioritise outcomes over process” and “speed up decision-making while maintaining high environmental standards”. Secondly, Part 3 of the Planning & Infrastructure Act is in the process of being rolled out. Thirdly, it comes shortly after MHCLG’s announcement of an intention to transition from Environmental Impact Assessments to Environmental Outcomes Reports within the next year. As it so happens, five people with expertise in this area kindly accepted an invitation from Sam Stafford to convene online just last month to discuss these very themes. Those five people are old friends of the podcast Nina Pindham and Julian Arthur and new friends of the podcast Charlie Banner, Sally Hayns and Sam Dumitriu. Listeners will hear them talk about bat tunnels and fish discos; Environmental Delivery Plans (EDPs) and the Nature Restoration Fund (NRF); capacity, competence and confidence; and the precautionary principle. Regular listeners will know that Sam would usually wait until the end of the episode to flag the links to background reading that he includes in the description, but he thought that it might be helpful to highlight a couple at the start. EDPs, the NRF and the precautionary principle are terms that most planners are probably familiar with. There is though also mention of ‘People over Wind’, an EU Court of Justice ruling of relevance to the Habitats Directive, and to the Fingleton Review, which was a report on speeding up nuclear delivery by an independent Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce led by John Fingleton. If, like Sam, listeners are less familiar with those terms then links about them might be of interest before pressing play. Some accompanying reading. Meanwhile, at DEFRA: Changes to Habitats Regulations Assessments Guidance proposed ‘People Over Wind’ ruling blows a hole in the habitats regulations Overhaul of nuclear system to speed up building and cut costs What's really wrong with the Habitats Regulations? Build the Rail! Save the Snails! Picking Up The Bill: What Are We Now Thinking About Part 3? Public Sector RTPI Survey Private Sector RTPI Survey Some accompanying listening. Habitat – Mos Def Any other business. If you enjoy the episode do please consider bolstering Sam's fragile self-esteem by leaving the podcast a nice rating and a nice review wherever you listened to it. Obviously though if you have not enjoyed it then please do not leave a review, but do please feel free to let Sam know why (via [email protected]). Feedback on 50 Shades episodes is always welcome. If you have enjoyed to the extent that you feel compelled to share the podcast on one your social platforms then, if you tag Sam, you will be entitled to an exclusive and much-sought after 50 Shades of Planning mug. If you are a new listener do please check out the back catalogue where you will find episodes on myriad planning topics, as well as the Hitting The High Notes and All Around the World series, and remember that by subscribing new episodes will magically appear in your phone as soon as Sam has published them. 50 Shades of Planning is the podcast by planners and for planners and so if you would like to use it as a platform for sharing anything you think that the sector needs to be talking about then you are also very welcome to get in touch with Sam. Sam is grateful to Richborough, Town Legal and Tyler Grange for supporting the podcast; to Vistry for sponsoring the 50 Shades mugs; and to Adrian Meehan for recording and editing this episode.