EPISODE · Sep 14, 2025
What is the Unforgivable Sin
from SonRise Community Church Evening Seminars · host Adam Powers
Matthew 12:22-32, Then a demon-oppressed man who was blind and mute was brought to him, and he healed him, so that the man spoke and saw.And all the people were amazed, and said,Can this be the Son of David?But when the Pharisees heard it, they said,It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this man casts out demons.Knowing their thoughts,he said to them,Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand.And if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand?And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul,by whom doyour sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges.But if it isby the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, thenthe kingdom of God has come upon you.Orhow can someone enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? Then indeedhe may plunder his house.Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, butthe blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.And whoever speaks a wordagainst the Son of Manwill be forgiven, butwhoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either inthis age or in the age to come. Why is this text a tough text? When reading this passage its clear the difficulty comes from v31-32 where Jesus refers to not only blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, but that those who commit such a sin will not be forgiven. This is the famous passage that speaks of the unforgivable sin. And many Christians, upon reading this text, truly struggle. Why? Because they wonder if theyve committed this particular sin and being unsure what Jesus really means here, the same Christians then grow anxious about their eternal state, fearing that they may be living under some kind of delusion of thinking theyre Christians on their way to heaven when in reality theyre lost on their way to hell. As for all of these tough texts, there are options of interpretation. So in our time tonight I will give you the options for this passage, make some comments on each one, and then give you some final words on this thorny issue. I want to give you three options tonight, and you might be surprised to hear me say it, but all three options are good options held by godly men and women. Option 1: Andy Naselli view This view is represented by an article on The Gospel Coalition website written by Andy Naselli, one of their writers. Though it represents one interpretive option it is a common and popular view among many interpreters. What does this view teach? This view teaches that the unforgivable sin is specifically what the Pharisees did in Matthew 12, attributing Jesus miracles to Satan. We see this in v24 of Matthew 12, which says, But when the Pharisees heard it (referring to the miracle in v22), they said,It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this man casts out demons.This view says the Pharisees statement in v24 is a deliberate, conscious choice to reject the Spirits clear witness to Jesus in the miracle itself, not just by denying it, but by saying it was Satan who really performed it. Naselli comments further saying the Pharisees clearly saw undeniable evidence of Jesus power in this miracle. And instead of submitting to Him and bowing before Him as they should have done, they declared this was the work of the prince of demons. This wasnt ignorance, it was willful rejection. A refusal to embrace with their hearts, what their eyes clearly saw. Naselli concludes that their sin is unforgivable because it reveals a final hardened unbelief present in them, which reveals Gods hardening work on those who continually reject Him. This isnt a modern view alone, it was originally held by the early Church theologian and preacher Chrysostom. For Chrysostom, any attributing the work of God to Satan is demonic and unforgivable. Naselli is keen to encourage tender consciences though, by reminding us at the end of his article that those who worry about committing this sin should be encouraged because their worry is evidence that they havent. If you have committed this kind of sin, you wouldnt worry about it. The kind of rejection here is temporary doubt, or a struggle with sin, not even like Peters denials here, but a decisive knowing rejection of Christ. Option 2: John Piper view This view is represented by John Piper, from many different sources. Over the years he has taught on this passage many times, and written about it in various articles and books. Particularly helpful to discover and trace out his view is his sermon Beyond Forgiveness: Blasphemy Against the Spirit. In this sermon Piper makes the argument that the unforgivable sin is a settled hardened resistance to the Spirit, so deeply entrenched in the soul that the Spirit withdraws His convicting work. Without this work, repentance is truly impossible, and without repentance, forgiveness is impossible as well. In the sermon I just referred to Piper says, The unforgivable sin is an act of resistance which belittles the Holy Spirit so grievously that he withdraws forever with his convicting power so that we are never able to repent and be forgiven. As Naselli did in the first view, Piper also stresses that this sin isnt just one slip of the tongue or a moment of doubt. Its a deep, ongoing resistance to Gods Spirit. From this Piper warns us against sin. He says this passage warns us against toying with sin in all possible ways. The longer we resist obedience to the Lord, the more well sin, and the more we sin, the more numb well grow to the things of God. Once we get to that point well refuse to heed the inner conviction of the Spirit which will in turn harden our hearts more toward the Lord and increase sins grip on us. You should know this isnt just a modern view, it was originally held by the early Church theologian Origen. Though at times Origen interpreted this text in Matthew 12 allegorically, he most often spoke just like Piper speaks here. Piper also encourages us that if you fear youve committed this sin, that very fear is evidence you havent. Only a soft heart worries about it, while a hardened heart refuses to worry about much of anything. At this point you might wonder what the difference between the first two views are. While there are overlapping realities in both these first two interpretive options, the emphasis is different. Naselli believes the unforgivable sin is what the Pharisees did, attributing the work of God to the devil, while Piper believes the unforgivable sin is not so much what the Pharisees did as it is a settled hardened resistance to the Spirit, so hardened in fact that the Spirit withdraws His convicting work. Naselli focuses more on the action of the Pharisees, while Piper focuses more on the heart behind these actions. Option 3: R.C. Sproul view This last view is represented by R.C. Sproul. Like Piper he has taught on this many times, but mainly his view is clarified in his book Hard Sayings, chapter 15 titled The Unpardonable Sin. There Sproul makes the following argument. Sproul teaches the unforgivable sin isfinal, hardened unbelief. Its not one particular utterance or moment of sin, but a settled refusal to embrace Christ that ends at death. He does what neither of the other options does, when he says clearly that the only sin God will not forgive isrefusing His only way of salvation, Jesus Christ, through the Spirits testimony. One can sin grievously, but until they physically die, the opportunity to repent is always possible, if God in His sovereignty chooses to save the sinner. Again, this isnt a modern view only, it was originally held by Augustine. Like Sproul did our own day, Augustine did in his, emphasizing that the unforgivable sin does not just to apply to the Pharisees but applies more broadly, to anyone persisting in sin long enough to die in it without repenting. Others who held views very similar to this are Thomas Aquinas and John Calvin. Sproul emphasizes, as the others do, that only unbelievers can commit this sin. Believers may sin grievously like David, and many others, or even deny Christ like Peter, and yet they are restored by repentance. Unbelievers, if they remain in their unbelief, will never repent, hence, they will never be forgiven. Sprouls large concern here is assurance. He often tells of how he speaks to encourage Christians anxious about this unforgivable sin. He tells them thatif they are in Christ, they cannot commit this sin.The Spirit has sealed them and will not let them go. But for unbelievers, however, the danger is real: reject Christ until your dying breath, and forgiveness will no longer be available. Conclusion: What have our three interpretive options showed us? First, Andy Nasellianchors the unforgivable sin in the context of Matthew 12, namely, calling Jesus Spirit-powered works satanic. Second, John Piperhighlights the danger of hardening our hearts until repentance is impossible. And lastly, R.C. Sproulgives pastoral assurance that the only unforgivable sin is dying in unbelief. All three of these views find their origin in theologians from Church history, and all three are truly good options. Common to all three options is that the unpardonable sin is not a one-time slip or moment of weakness. It is not ordinary doubt, or even serious sins like murder or adultery. It is a settled, willful rejection of the Spirits witness to Christ. And if you fear youve committed it, that very fear is proof you havent. So what are we to take away from this tough text in Matthew 12? We can takeaway both warnings and comforts. First, the warnings: -Dont play with sin. It hardens the heart. -Dont resist the Spirit. When He convicts, repent quickly. -Dont slander the works of God. Speak carefully about what is and what is not the work of the Spirit. -Dont presume upon grace. A heart that refuses to repent may one day find repentance impossible. Second, the comforts: -Every sin, every failure, every blasphemy, every denial canbe forgiven in Christ. -If you fear youve committed this sin, that very fear is proof you havent. A tender conscience is the Spirits gift. -The Spirit who drew you to Christ will keep you in Christ until the end. So let this passage drive us not to despair, but to a deeper trust. Dont resist the Spirit, run to Christ. Dont harden your heart, humble it. Dont doubt Gods mercy, believe it. Because heres the good news: the only unforgivable sin is refusing the only forgiver. But to all who come to Him, forgiveness is full, and free, and forever.
What this episode covers
Matthew 12:22-32, Then a demon-oppressed man who was blind and mute was brought to him, and he healed him, so that the man spoke and saw.And all the people were amazed, and said,Can this be the Son of David?But when the Pharisees heard it, they said,It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this man casts out demons.Knowing their thoughts,he said to them,Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand.And if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand?And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul,by whom doyour sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges.But if it isby the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, thenthe kingdom of God has come upon you.Orhow can someone enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? Then indeedhe may plunder his house.Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, butthe blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.And whoever speaks a wordagainst the Son of Manwill be forgiven, butwhoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either inthis age or in the age to come. Why is this text a tough text? When reading this passage its clear the difficulty comes from v31-32 where Jesus refers to not only blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, but that those who commit such a sin will not be forgiven. This is the famous passage that speaks of the unforgivable sin. And many Christians, upon reading this text, truly struggle. Why? Because they wonder if theyve committed this particular sin and being unsure what Jesus really means here, the same Christians then grow anxious about their eternal state, fearing that they may be living under some kind of delusion of thinking theyre Christians on their way to heaven when in reality theyre lost on their way to hell. As for all of these tough texts, there are options of interpretation. So in our time tonight I will give you the options for this passage, make some comments on each one, and then give you some final words on this thorny issue. I want to give you three options tonight, and you might be surprised to hear me say it, but all three options are good options held by godly men and women. Option 1: Andy Naselli view This view is represented by an article on The Gospel Coalition website written by Andy Naselli, one of their writers. Though it represents one interpretive option it is a common and popular view among many interpreters. What does this view teach? This view teaches that the unforgivable sin is specifically what the Pharisees did in Matthew 12, attributing Jesus miracles to Satan. We see this in v24 of Matthew 12, which says, But when the Pharisees heard it (referring to the miracle in v22), they said,It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this man casts out demons.This view says the Pharisees statement in v24 is a deliberate, conscious choice to reject the Spirits clear witness to Jesus in the miracle itself, not just by denying it, but by saying it was Satan who really performed it. Naselli comments further saying the Pharisees clearly saw undeniable evidence of Jesus power in this miracle. And instead of submitting to Him and bowing before Him as they should have done, they declared this was the work of the prince of demons. This wasnt ignorance, it was willful rejection. A refusal to embrace with their hearts, what their eyes clearly saw. Naselli concludes that their sin is unforgivable because it reveals a final hardened unbelief present in them, which reveals Gods hardening work on those who continually reject Him. This isnt a modern view alone, it was originally held by the early Church theologian and preacher Chrysostom. For Chrysostom, any attributing the work of God to Satan is demonic and unforgivable. Naselli is keen to encourage tender consciences though, by reminding us at the end of his article that those who worry about committing this sin should be encouraged because their worry is evidence that they havent. If you have committed this kind of sin, you wouldnt worry about it. The kind of rejection here is temporary doubt, or a struggle with sin, not even like Peters denials here, but a decisive knowing rejection of Christ. Option 2: John Piper view This view is represented by John Piper, from many different sources. Over the years he has taught on this passage many times, and written about it in various articles and books. Particularly helpful to discover and trace out his view is his sermon Beyond Forgiveness: Blasphemy Against the Spirit. In this sermon Piper makes the argument that the unforgivable sin is a settled hardened resistance to the Spirit, so deeply entrenched in the soul that the Spirit withdraws His convicting work. Without this work, repentance is truly impossible, and without repentance, forgiveness is impossible as well. In the sermon I just referred to Piper says, The unforgivable sin is an act of resistance which belittles the Holy Spirit so grievously that he withdraws forever with his convicting power so that we are never able to repent and be forgiven. As Naselli did in the first view, Piper also stresses that this sin isnt just one slip of the tongue or a moment of doubt. Its a deep, ongoing resistance to Gods Spirit. From this Piper warns us against sin. He says this passage warns us against toying with sin in all possible ways. The longer we resist obedience to the Lord, the more well sin, and the more we sin, the more numb well grow to the things of God. Once we get to that point well refuse to heed the inner conviction of the Spirit which will in turn harden our hearts more toward the Lord and increase sins grip on us. You should know this isnt just a modern view, it was originally held by the early Church theologian Origen. Though at times Origen interpreted this text in Matthew 12 allegorically, he most often spoke just like Piper speaks here. Piper also encourages us that if you fear youve committed this sin, that very fear is evidence you havent. Only a soft heart worries about it, while a hardened heart refuses to worry about much of anything. At this point you might wonder what the difference between the first two views are. While there are overlapping realities in both these first two interpretive options, the emphasis is different. Naselli believes the unforgivable sin is what the Pharisees did, attributing the work of God to the devil, while Piper believes the unforgivable sin is not so much what the Pharisees did as it is a settled hardened resistance to the Spirit, so hardened in fact that the Spirit withdraws His convicting work. Naselli focuses more on the action of the Pharisees, while Piper focuses more on the heart behind these actions. Option 3: R.C. Sproul view This last view is represented by R.C. Sproul. Like Piper he has taught on this many times, but mainly his view is clarified in his book Hard Sayings, chapter 15 titled The Unpardonable Sin. There Sproul makes the following argument. Sproul teaches the unforgivable sin isfinal, hardened unbelief. Its not one particular utterance or moment of sin, but a settled refusal to embrace Christ that ends at death. He does what neither of the other options does, when he says clearly that the only sin God will not forgive isrefusing His only way of salvation, Jesus Christ, through the Spirits testimony. One can sin grievously, but until they physically die, the opportunity to repent is always possible, if God in His sovereignty chooses to save the sinner. Again, this isnt a modern view only, it was originally held by Augustine. Like Sproul did our own day, Augustine did in his, emphasizing that the unforgivable sin does not just to apply to the Pharisees but applies more broadly, to anyone persisting in sin long enough to die in it without repenting. Others who held views very similar to this are Thomas Aquinas and John Calvin. Sproul emphasizes, as the others do, that only unbelievers can commit this sin. Believers may sin grievously like David, and many others, or even deny Christ like Peter, and yet they are restored by repentance. Unbelievers, if they remain in their unbelief, will never repent, hence, they will never be forgiven. Sprouls large concern here is assurance. He often tells of how he speaks to encourage Christians anxious about this unforgivable sin. He tells them thatif they are in Christ, they cannot commit this sin.The Spirit has sealed them and will not let them go. But for unbelievers, however, the danger is real: reject Christ until your dying breath, and forgiveness will no longer be available. Conclusion: What have our three interpretive options showed us? First, Andy Nasellianchors the unforgivable sin in the context of Matthew 12, namely, calling Jesus Spirit-powered works satanic. Second, John Piperhighlights the danger of hardening our hearts until repentance is impossible. And lastly, R.C. Sproulgives pastoral assurance that the only unforgivable sin is dying in unbelief. All three of these views find their origin in theologians from Church history, and all three are truly good options. Common to all three options is that the unpardonable sin is not a one-time slip or moment of weakness. It is not ordinary doubt, or even serious sins like murder or adultery. It is a settled, willful rejection of the Spirits witness to Christ. And if you fear youve committed it, that very fear is proof you havent. So what are we to take away from this tough text in Matthew 12? We can takeaway both warnings and comforts. First, the warnings: -Dont play with sin. It hardens the heart. -Dont resist the Spirit. When He convicts, repent quickly. -Dont slander the works of God. Speak carefully about what is and what is not the work of the Spirit. -Dont presume upon grace. A heart that refuses to repent may one day find repentance impossible. Second, the comforts: -Every sin, every failure, every blasphemy, every denial canbe forgiven in Christ. -If you fear youve committed this sin, that very fear is proof you havent. A tender conscience is the Spirits gift. -The Spirit who drew you to Christ will keep you in Christ until the end. So let this passage drive us not to despair, but to a deeper trust. Dont resist the Spirit, run to Christ. Dont harden your heart, humble it. Dont doubt Gods mercy, believe it. Because heres the good news: the only unforgivable sin is refusing the only forgiver. But to all who come to Him, forgiveness is full, and free, and forever. Watch at: https://youtu.be/ZeemKDi0wyI
NOW PLAYING
What is the Unforgivable Sin
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.