When More Isn't Better: Questioning the Efficacy of Common Cardiovascular Treatments episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 31, 2011 · 14 MIN

When More Isn't Better: Questioning the Efficacy of Common Cardiovascular Treatments

from Heart Matters

Host: Janet Wright, MD Guest: Robert Harrington, MD Recent studies have raised doubts about the efficacy of some common treatments for cardiovascular disease, including: the use of PFO closures (based on the CLOSURE trial); some methods of cardiac resynchronization therapy (or CRT, based on the SMART-AV trial); telemonitoring for patients with congestive heart failure (based on the Tele-HF trial); and doubling the dose of clopidogrel in patients who had a poor response to the drug after percutaneous coronary intervention (based on the GRAVITAS trial). Dr. Robert Harrington, director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, reviews the evidence in each of these trials, and gauges the clinical impact of their findings. Dr. Janet Wright hosts. Produced in Cooperation with

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 31, 2011

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

When More Isn't Better: Questioning the Efficacy of Common Cardiovascular Treatments

0:00 14:59

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Heart Matters?

This episode is 14 minutes long.

When was this Heart Matters episode published?

This episode was published on January 31, 2011.

Can I download this Heart Matters episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!