When Should Courts Overturn Precedent? episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 27, 2019 · 29 MIN

When Should Courts Overturn Precedent?

from "Briefly" by The University of Chicago Law Review · host "Briefly" by The University of Chicago Law Review

This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we’re discussing when courts should overturn precedent. We're joined by two legal scholars who have studied this question: Professor William Baude of the University of Chicago Law School and Professor Richard Re of UCLA School of Law. We discuss the value of stare decisis, competing theories of precedent, and the current Supreme Court justices' views on when precedent should be followed. Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/ Music from bensound.com.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 27, 2019

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

When Should Courts Overturn Precedent?

0:00 29:18

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of "Briefly" by The University of Chicago Law Review?

This episode is 29 minutes long.

When was this "Briefly" by The University of Chicago Law Review episode published?

This episode was published on November 27, 2019.

Can I download this "Briefly" by The University of Chicago Law Review episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!