When Wikipedia Feels Less Reliable Than AI

After years as a Wikipedia defender, reader Daniel describes a striking inversion: his trust in the encyclopedia has collapsed while his trust in AI systems has risen. He argues that entire topic areas like Israel and Zionism have been structurally captured by a tiny group of persistent editors, and that Wikipedia's governance model cannot prevent systematic bias. On the show, we explore what this means for epistemic trust—whether an institution is designed to converge on truth over time—and why the "encyclopedia anyone can edit" may be facing its most serious credibility challenge at 25 years old.