Hello, I'm John Allor. Before you listen to this episode, a couple of things. These are podcasts from the first season of Who Killed Theresa. They haven't been heard in over four years.
They're raw. It took me a while to develop a style. A lot of people like them that way. Unvarnished.
Others commented that it was amateurish. Nonetheless, here they are. I'm edited. I haven't gone back and listened to them.
I haven't cleaned them up. Thanks for listening. And once again, life is unfair, justice is blind and dysfunctional, and some cops aren't smart and dedicated, like on television. This is Who Killed Theresa.
This is Who Killed Theresa and I'm your host, John Allor. We need to talk about the Sharon Pryor case. We need to talk about the Sharon Pryor case. I think you're going to want to listen to this episode all the way through.
When we conclude, I'm going to talk about some specific, well, some information that if you've been following all of these things all these years, you could have put together yourself. But I think when you look at this stuff so often, obvious things escape you. But I think you're going to want to hear the end of this. There's something new geographically that I'm going to reveal that I think you'll find very, very interesting.
But before we get to that, I kind of want to give my spiel about what this is all about. We discussed a series of cold cases in the Quebec region of Montreal and the Eastern townships from approximately 1975 to 1981. The distance between Montreal and Sherbrooke Quebec is about 100 miles. And in this podcast, the related or possibly related cases, some of the related cases that we will specifically focus on are the cases of Sharon Pryor.
Le Chocquette, Louise Camarran, Jocelyn Hool, Chantel Connery, Joanne D'Orion, Helen Monast, Catherine Hawks, Denise Bazzignet, Manuel Cervais, Lise en Bleis, Theresa Allor, Nicole Goudreau, Tammy Leakey, and two unidentified bodies of young women. Now the Sharon Pryor case. This is an early case. It's from 1975.
And of the cases we've discussed so far, unlike the cases we've discussed so far, this one has gotten a lot of exposure, chiefly because the family, the prior family has been so engaged in the matter of Sharon's murder. So when I say that, so the cases we've already discussed, the Menon du Beis, Louise Camarran, Tareza Allor, Helen Monast, Lise en Bleis, Denise Bazzignet. For instance, if you Google any of those names right now, your search engine will probably turn up first a link that will lead you back to my website Who Killed Theresa. It's because I'm the first one who ever discussed those cases.
That's not so with Sharon Pryor. Google Sharon Pryor, the Sharon Pryor website will come up, which their family started. And I'm saying this, for me, the importance of this is I am by no means an expert on the Sharon Pryor case. There are other people who know it better.
There are other people who know more about it than I do. There are all kinds of, there's all kinds of attention on Sharon's case. So what I say is my version of it, but if you want to dig deep, you can find all kinds of information. I could probably devote two, if not three episodes on this matter.
Eventually, I will invite Sharon's sister, Maureen and Dorian, and their mother, Yvonne, on the show for an interview. But for now, what I'd like to give you is kind of the bare bones details of what happened to Sharon. And was from Montreal, and the family lived in a neighborhood called Point St. Charles, which is just kind of the southern eastern side of Montreal.
It's just adjacent to the St. Lawrence River. You cross the Victoria Bridge, and you're on your way to the eastern townships to show books. So it's right on the edge.
Montreal case, body found, crossed the Victoria Bridge in the suburb of Long Bay. So Sharon disappeared on Saturday evening, March 29th, 1975. She had been at her home at 445 Congregation Street in Point St. Charles with friends and family.
When she decided to go out to meet friends, including her boyfriend. And she was headed to a local pizza parlor, which was just a few blocks away. She left her house around 7.30 p.m. that Saturday evening.
And of note, she leaves behind her bus pass and her money, which may be of significance later. And she declines the offer of a friend to accompany her there. So her destination is five, five blocks away. It's a pizza parlor called Marina's Pizza, which is at 205-0 Wellington Street.
And that's at the corner of Avenue Ash. And she never makes it to her destination. She leaves at 7.30. She does not show up to meet her friends.
So during the initial phase of the disappearance of Sharon, because she disappeared from my St. Charles, the case falls under the jurisdiction of the Montreal police, the call the NUC police. But when the body is found off the island of Montreal in Long Bay, the case quickly will transfer to the Long Bay police. And the best of my knowledge, the Cauberti Quebec, the provincial police were never involved in this case, although who knows.
But again, so now we have a, we have another case with cross-jurisdictional blurred lines. And now of the cases we've discussed, we have three forces. The majority of them are Septédé Quebec, provincial police. But if you recall, Lise en Blais, the woman who was strangled in the East End of Montreal, that's a Montreal case.
And now we have the Long Bay police force being involved in a case when Sharon's body is found. So let's move to the discovery of Sharon Pryor. So Pryor's body was found just three days later on April 1, 1975. And she was found in a field at Chamonn du Lac and Guillermo in Boulevard in Long Bay.
She's found by a fellow named Jacques Bertrand, who is a beekeeper. Bertrand kept bees on this property in an industrial area of Long Bay. It's industrial now. I'm not quite sure what it was like back then.
I think it was still industrial, but you still had the olds and things. And anyway, Bertrand was told that he should go to the property and check the lock on the gate because someone had observed that the lock on the gate that would have led to the apiary was open. So obviously he goes, he finds a body, a police are called in. Now Pryor had been, I say badly beaten, severely beaten.
She had choked marks on her neck, she had choked on her own blood, her nose was broken, and the assailant had crushed Sharon's chest with her knee. And I apologize if it's graphic, but this is marked, I think, on SoundCloud as a built content. You need to know it. You need to know some of these things.
Pryor was dressed in her suede coat. She had her sweater on, shoes and socks. Her pants were about six feet away from the body. Her underwear was hanging from a tree.
A branch was clutched in her hand. There was blood in branches in her hair. So very, very disorganized crime scene. A man's shirt was found at the scene and detectives concluded that this was probably used to bind her.
And the receipt was found at the scene with Sharon's name on it. So that's how they know immediately that this was Sharon Pryor, probably Sharon Pryor. There was a tire mark observed along with the footprint of a man thought to have weighed about 200 pounds. And it was included, concluded that the loose items that were thrown around were probably thrown from the window of a vehicle.
So very abruptly, possibly a vehicle leaving the scene. So the autopsy is performed by Jean Houd. Two long gay police detectives are present at the autopsy. And among many things, the autopsy concludes number one that Sharon had been raped.
There was a spermazoa found in her vagina. The blows to her head were most likely caused by a pointed instrument, possibly a ring on a finger. There was partially chewed tape found in her hair, which possibly probably meant that Sharon was gagged. And they also concluded, although I'm not quite sure that Sharon most likely died that Tuesday afternoon that she was found, which would mean that she was probably held captive from Saturday evening through the Tuesday morning.
Now, a few other things, factors to talk a little bit about. About a half hour before Sharon left her home on March 29, 1975, a 23-year-old woman named Cheryl Rowell was attacked in Point St. Charles by a man wielding a knife. This suspect has eventually been become to be known as mustache man, white English, six feet tall, about 200 pounds with a mustache.
That incident occurred on Wellington Street, so within the corridors that Sharon would have been traveling. And also that's the same street where Marina's pizza was on. And I bring this up because this eventually led to nothing but you might as well know about it because it figures prominently in a lot of the writings on Sharon's case. So in 2004, police received a tip that Sharon may have been held captive at a garage space at 2-1-0-7 roof of our one block south of Marina's pizza.
Police tested the site for DNA, but results were inconclusive. Sharon's blood was not identified. And the mother of Sharon Yvonne Pryor stated on April 3, 2016 that this, later this all proved to be a bogus, in her words, a bogus tip. Now hindering the ability to look at possible DNA pieces of evidence and all of this is that all of the evidence in Sharon Pryor's case was destroyed by the Longgate police.
And this has been confirmed to the family of Sharon Pryor. In fact, I visited Yvonne Pryor, their mother, I guess about eight years ago, at her home in Point St. Charles. And she showed me the letter that the Longgate police had written to her, saying that they had lost her evidence.
What's frustrating about that is did they lose it or did they not? Years after that event, Sharon's coat was found among, you know, in their sort of long-gay evidence repository. Someone found it and it looked familiar, so they kind of contacted the priors and said, hey, do you recognize this? Is this meaning anything to you?
And it's like, yeah, it's Sharon's suede coat. Which leads you to must ask yourself if something was lost in such a haphazard fashion and then found in such a haphazard fashion. What else haven't they found? What else hasn't any of these police agencies found?
If they say the underwear that my sister was found in was destroyed, or in the case of the Catherine Hawks case, which we'll get to, if they say, if they tell you that that evidence was destroyed anecdotally, how sure are they? How confident can we be? Or is it just misplaced? Is there evidence that just is sitting somewhere that nobody has found?
Again, very, very frustrating these matters. Now, if you go to the area where I am on my website where I wrote about the prior case, there's a lot of other stuff that I have written down there. But a lot of it is related to a narrative I was investigating at that time with the full moon murderers and the young man who was arrested in that matter. That is one narrative, but that's not the narrative I want to discuss now, because I don't think it's the most likely thing.
Frankly, at the time that I wrote that, I was trying to stir up controversy and interest. So again, I brought it up as a possible probable, but really the relation to Sharon Pryor and the Chategae murders from that period, possible, not probable, in my opinion. But what I do want to do is talk about Sharon in this context. So a couple of things to know here, 1975.
So one of the earliest of these cases, it pre-8s the 77 and 78 cases that we primarily talked about so far by a couple of years. Also, in my opinion, Sharon's case is a real puzzle. It's what I'm going to identify as a nexus case. Recall that we talked about the forest locations south of Meghog as a nexus location where there seems to be a convergence of potential evidence and cases.
Much like that, Pryor is a nexus in that it depends on how you frame it. She could be related to the cases we've already talked about, although she could also pivot and have nothing to do with those cases and related to another series of cases that we'll get to. It sort of depends on which of the pieces of evidence you focus on. It certainly means it can all be right.
I don't think that all 20 to 30 cases are connected. I don't think one serial killer preying on all of them. I think it's a variety of serial offenders potentially copy-cating each other or committing these crimes because they're seeing that people are getting away with murder. So why shouldn't they?
But because of that, most obviously in the Pryor case, they're not all right. There's potential for bias here. Some of the clues, we one way, some of the clues lead the other way. One or the other is being led down a garden path and we don't even know it.
Some other things to note and we brought this up before. I want to talk a little bit about Point Charles in the 70s. This neighborhood that Sharon grew up and lived in. Point St Charles, it was called at time the Point, with a rough, rough neighborhood.
It was ghetto-wise in this industrial area and is virtually surrounded by the railroad yards and container offloading areas where all these containers are stacked on that. So it was a physical ghetto, incredible poverty in that area, incredible with poverty you get. Alcoholism and drug abuse and violence. I will post online website, a documentary by the National Film Board of Canada called The Point, which was made at this time, which kind of talked about the damaging poverty in that area.
It's a fascinating time capsule of Point St Charles in that area. A really great thing to watch and it kind of gives you an instant window into the lives that these people were going through at that time. So with poverty and abuse, substance abuse, come gangs. It's pretty well known that the street just north of where Sharon lives on congregation, the street north of that is Sebastopol.
That's the last street in that area. Beyond that is the frontier, the rail yards. The Satan's Choice biker gang, which is a sort of predecessor of the Hell's Angels, they got patched in with the Hell's Angels, had like a bunker house or at least a home there. So they were block away from that area.
And biker lore has it. And before I say this, there are so many people who are who know more about a biker culture than me. I know a little, not an area of expertise. But I do know this.
One of the rumors was that there's a member of Satan's Choice and his name was Mike French. And he may possibly have been on that Sebastopol street, living in that bunker at that time. It is wildly rumored that Mike French was eventually, he was murdered in November 1982, supposedly because he had bragged about having raped and murdered a Sharon Pryor in 1975. So that may or may not be true.
We don't know. But he's clearly what we do know is the Satan's Choice biker gang was in the environment. They were block away in Point St. Charles.
And that's simply something to just parking lot that information for right now. I don't want to make too much of a big deal of it, but we will eventually discuss that. So I've talked about this before about how when you make a public records request on a lot of these cases, you will get medical legal records and then you'll get a few surprises. And that's certainly the case with Sharon Pryor.
So in addition to the autopsy report, what was included was several police reports from the Longay Police Department. And so they tell us some things. The official cause of death is this asphyxiation by bronchio aspiration of blood, meaning Sharon eventually, despite multiple things that could have killed her. She eventually choked on her own blood and that's what they determined had killed her.
As well, and here is detailed listings of everyone that they initially interviewed in the matter, certain family members, but also getting into suspects. The boyfriend was suspected at one initially. The police officers involved in the matter, etcetera, etcetera. I won't bore you with it.
It's all on the website, but it is in here. And the detectives were Pierre Robido, Sergeant Detective with the Longay Police, René Longcom, also with the Longay Police. And then much detail about the exhibits at the scene of the crime are interesting. The jeans, bra, coat, sweater, I believe drivers license translating from the French English bracelet with the inscription, love on it, or earrings, a Timex watch.
I think that's the third time we've heard a Timex watch, every time I a Timex watch at that time, I won't make too much of that, etcetera, etcetera. And then just kind of recapping the similarities and dissimilarities of the cases we've talked about so far. So asphyxiation with Sharon, but again, brutal beating, the most brutal beating that we've encountered so far in these matters. The only one close to it is the Lise en Blais case, where Lise en Blais died of strangulation, but she had been a beat about the head.
We don't see that in Theresa Lorre. We don't see that in the Lise camera. Certainly, camera on brutalized around the vaginal area, but not no beating about the header body. No evidence of that in the Bazzini case, although much in the Bazzini cases, there's an air of mystery to it that we're not sure about.
And then I do want to address the matter of false leads. Over the years, with all of these cases, I've heard a lot of disinformation about things. One of the things I heard in the Sharon, in the prior case, that came up is years later, almost, I think 30 to 40 years later, someone came forward and said they saw Sharon on a bus that night headed out of Point St. Charles.
And I doubt that for two reasons. One is clearly is documented that Sharon did not have money, and she did not have a driver's license with her. So that's improbable. The second thing is people remembering things 30 years later in the suspect and dangerous.
And I don't think anyone ever remembers something with malice or malintent. I think just the opposite. People feel bad and they want to help. And so in their desire to help, this bias comes in, I imagine the first thing is that person could have been Sharon Pryor, and then over the years with memory, you can convince yourself that that person was Sharon Pryor.
A similar thing happened with the Louise Camino-Hain case. Someone came forward years, decades later and said, no, wait, Louise was actually out clubbing that night at a disco tech and drinking, etc. Well, no, why was that never brought up initially? There's nothing to that effect in the initial documented evidence that she was out.
In fact, all indications say that she was on King Street, which is again, Highway 112 in a dippanur buying milk, etc. And then she traveled a block and a half along King Street, Highway 110 back to her apartment and somewhere within that time she disappeared. And then, but again, I think people want to help so they remember false information. And lastly, I'll bring up in a matter of my sister.
Initially, I think in the first episode I read a report from the private investigator, Rockwood Drow, it's well known at the weekend before she said it disappeared. She was hiking at Mount Orford, which is actually along Highway 112, just buttresses Highway 112, and she went for a hike with students from Champlain College. Years later, a woman came forward, convinced that her brothers had killed Teresa. All kinds of information brought forward.
It was very spooky, but her chief piece of information was that she saw Teresa on Mount Orford the week before she died in the company of her brothers and that they were on the mountain and together in a group, so like they were friendly with each other. Now, when pressed on this information, the woman's story got changed. It was then that Teresa was skiing on the mountain with her brothers. Now, we've not heard anything about skiing before, we heard hiking.
And then, of course, lastly, what skiing implies is snow. It is a fact that the week before November 3, 1978, late October 1978, there was no snow on Mount Orford. There just wasn't snow in the region whatsoever. In fact, the day that Teresa disappeared, it was a beautiful sunny day, unusually sunny.
That's what led her to not wear a jacket. She was wearing a sweater. So there's no way that this memory is anyway grounded in fact. This is a this is a false memory.
Again, I don't think this woman wanted to mislead anyone. She merely wanted to help and thought by providing additional details and facts that would lead to helping an investigation. And it happens all the time. So I want to turn now here in the second half back to the historical highway between Sherbrooke and Montreal at that time, Highway 112.
We talked about this a lot. So before we we talk about it in terms of these cases, I want to talk about my own personal history with Highway 112. Because for a guy who has not lived in Quebec in over 30 years, over all we're pushing on 40 years, my association with Highway 112 just on a personal level is kind of fascinating. I have touched it several times in my life.
So beginning beginning in Sherbrooke, Highway 112 is as we've said is King Street, one of the main drags that cuts through the city. I have stayed at Oberge de Guvenere, the hotel that is right along Highway 112. I have visited the headquarters of the Certa de Guvenere, which is right across the street from the Oberge, which is on Highway 112. I have had dinner in restaurants along King Street with Champlain College administrators and with Sue Sutherland and friends of Theresa's from that era, again, Highway 112.
I have gone grocery shopping with Senator Pierre Bovenu, who is as you know a victim's advocate, along Highway 112. We went and bought scallops and salmon there before we had dinner. If you continue on Highway 112 into Megag, I held a press conference with Pierre Bovenu and Sue Sutherland in a restaurant in the back garden of the restaurant, and that was Highway 112. The main drag that cuts through Megag is Highway 112.
I had lunch on Highway 112 in Megag last summer. I met a former Certa de Quebec investigator in a coffee shop on Highway 112 last summer. Mount Orford, where Theresa, as we say, was hiking, is along Highway 112. So there's lots of things that touch this road.
It's just often, because it's a former highway, you're not aware of its significance. I wasn't really aware that Highway 112 went right through Megag until I just related to you all the points that I've touched along the way with it. So as I say, before the Highway 10 was constructed, this was the artery that would take you back and forth between Sherbrok and the Eastern townships and Montreal, a further west, 100-mile distance. So let's recap Highway 112 in terms of the cases.
So we've already just said it. Louise Gemmera disappears off Highway 112 between the Dippener, Corner Sword, and her apartment. The location of the evidence, the body of Louise Gemmera, the purse that may belong to Lise en Blais, and the clothing that may have been there belonging to Theresa Lour, and several other articles of women's clothing is found just south of Highway 112 in the Megag area. We just talked about the body of Denis Baziné is found just south of Highway 112 in Saint-Germain, Surrucion.
The murder of Helen Monast occurs along Highway 112 in Shumbly. The body of Sharon Pryor is found in an industrial area just north of Highway 112 in Long Gay, but then the final thing. Where is Highway 112 in relation to where Sharon Pryor disappeared? It turns out the fastest way out of Point St.
Charles is Highway 112. If you want to get out of there, you could go south, but if you go south, you cross a number of streets. You are putting yourself in great risk of being seen. But if you go north, again, you have all those rail lines.
You're in relative seclusion. And let me walk you through how it is. So, Sharon is on route congregation, and she's headed west towards Wellington. Well, if you're at the corner of Wellington in congregation, you need only drive up the street approximately a half mile, and you're on Highway 112.
You take the right, you head east, you cross the Victoria Bridge, and you are on your way. And again, there's no other way out of, you'd have to look at a map, but trust me, there's no other way out of Point St. Charles, because you are completely buttressed by rail yards. There's no route to lead you out of there.
As well, we talked about Shumain, Subasipal. Subasipal, although it runs parallel with congregation, it does not intersect with Wellington. In fact, if you're traveling west on Subasipal, you have to hang a right, and you are forced to intersect with congregation. And then you can take congregation to Wellington.
And I think I've referred to this. I've walked this area, I think last spring, because I'd never been here. So I went and I wanted to see it. And that frontier area along Subasipal is creepy now.
And all rail yards with rail containers and all that, the houses are not in great shape. I can't imagine what they look like back then. But I mean, I'll give you credit. The point is, is obviously it's definitely come back.
It's come a long way. But even today, it's an intimidating place. So here's some things that I'm going to submit to you. Just how close is Highway 112 to some of these places?
Well, Highway 112 to Shumain Duval, that's the wooded area where Cameron's body and Theresa Lawrence clothes might have been seen, and the purse was found. It's three miles. It's three miles from that wooded area to Highway 112. The distance from room congregation and Wellington, where Pryor was headed, the distance from that corner to Highway 112 is 650 meters.
It's less than half a mile. The distance from Highway 112 to where Helen Monast's body was found. It's 250 meters. It's less than 2-10th of a mile.
And in fact, I drove on it and I wasn't even aware I was driving on it. The side street that is adjacent to the park where Helen was found, you head up barely half a block and you are on Highway 112. And then finally where Cameron disappeared is Highway 112. That's how close these points in these murders are to that route, which was the main route in the late 1970s for traversing back a back region.
If you wanted to make a quick escape after killing Helen Monast, quick, quick, I can't even describe it. 250 meters. If you needed to get out of Point St. Charles, yes, you could go south, but it's a bit more of a convoluted path to get out of Montreal.
The expeditious way is to drive half a mile up the street and you are on your way. You are out of Point St. Charles. Now we talked about this a little last time.
The last time I checked in with the Helen Monast case, as we've said, it's on the Sarticke-Bex cold case site. It's gotten some attention, but it's not getting any movement. That was the first case on the cold case site. I think it's been there for close to 10 years, five to 10 years, and still nothing new.
It's because they're looking in the wrong place. They started to give back a huge deal. They all showed up once Saturday in the town circle or wherever in Chondley. They set up a tent for the 30 or 40,000 locals to come forward and if they remembered anything to give the information to the police detectives.
They didn't get anything. They didn't get anything because whoever did that was murdered Helen and was on their way out of town within two-tenths of a mile. They were gone. You're not going to find anything by looking inward there at all.
Recently, I think the Montreal Gazette wrote a story or was either Helen's sister who told me that they were very intent on getting that they asked me that I have photos of Helen's funeral so that they could comb the funeral photos and see if they could see anybody lurking in the background who might have done this. Look, the guy who did this didn't come back to the funeral because he was gone. He was out of town. He was long gone and the same can be said with Sharon Trier.
There's been a lot of effort over the years to drum up. Let's talk to people in the point. See what they might have remembered. Whoever did this wasn't there long enough to hang around, man.
Crime of opportunity at the corner of a congregation in Wellington and bam within half a mile on 112 out of town. The start to take it back is looking in the wrong place and they're looking in the wrong manner because they simply don't understand the importance of geography in these matters. They refuse to entertain the notion that Helen Monast is related to anything. They're looking at it in complete isolation.
They refuse to entertain the idea that approximately 10 to 20 miles just south you have the body of Benis Bezzie Nae found within a month of Helen Monast, but they contend there's absolutely no way we know they say that these cases aren't connected. Well, if you know, tell us why you're not or at least tell the families why you don't know because I can tell you that the brother of Benis Bezzie Nae, Josh Bezzie Nae, is operating to this day completely in the dark and their family was operated in the dark for decades. He said it on French television, he said it to me. They knew absolutely nothing.
The police had been entirely unforthcoming about any information. They won't tell them anything. Why is it so outrageous to look at these unsolved murders as a collection? Why is that a matter of fantasy?
What else do you have to lose? What else do you have to go on? There is nothing to go on. Somebody's not going to suddenly remember something because all they're remembering is salt-felt's memory at this point.
No one's going to confess anything. Why would you? You've got to wait with it for decades. So you're going to come forward now or you're going to clear your conscience?
I don't really want to hear this fantasy that on your deathbed you make amends with God. That's great for movies, but that doesn't happen in real life. It's nonsense. So what else do you have?
What other opportunity do you have other than to look at these matters? Toutoncant, altogether, and see if you can find connections. I might add the other thing that is missing, of course, is the evidence. So the only other thing we would have is the potential to use modern DNA techniques, forensic techniques, to test the evidence.
But if you continue to throw out the evidence, what you're doing is you're practicing systemic genocide on cold cases. I can't describe it anyway else. So that's who killed Theresa for this episode. That's all I got.
It's a short episode, but like concentrated orangestries. There's a lot packed in there. There's a lot to unpack from that. I might want to just kind of let that digest.
If you came in, and this is your first listening, you might want to go back and listen because there's a lot here. If I didn't say so before, I'm your host. My name is John Allure. I am the brother of Theresa Lure who was murdered in November 3, 1978, and maybe possibly connected in these matters.
You can listen to us on SoundCloud, iTunes, Stitcher, etc. Although if you're listening right now, I probably know that. But give us a review. Give us a little love.
It boosts up the listenership, and we want people to listen because we want to solve crimes. You can reach me on Twitter. I'm at JusticeGuy. That's at JUSTUY.
And as always, please check the Theresa Lure website. If you want more information on these matters, if you need a textual reference to these things that we discuss in a podcast, that's at TheresaLure.com, T-H-E-S-A-L-L-O-R-E-L-1. I'll post some links to this broadcast that may be of interest to people. I'll certainly post the NFB documentary on the Plan San Charles at the point, which I think you will enjoy, as well as some links to the Sharon Pryor website that her family has created, amongst other things.
If you want to contact me privately, you can email me at TheresaLure.com, T-H-E-R-E-S-A-L-L-O-R-E-L-1 word at gmail.com. I will entertain your tips, your theories, your requests, anything at all. Nothing is silly until I'm beside it. It's silly.
But believe me, you're sitting on a piece of information or sort of a wing nut theory. Don't be too embarrassed. I've heard it all at this point. I'll entertain anything.
Okay, so that's it. I'm going to check out here and enjoy the afternoon, because it's a beautiful day where I am. I hope it's a beautiful day where you are. Have a great day.