Who Really Owns Free Speech After Charlie Kirks Death?

Who Really Owns Free Speech After Charlie Kirk’s Death?https://rumble.com/v6zcq32-who-really-owns-free-speech-after-charlie-kirks-death.htmlhttps://gorightnews.com/who-really-owns-free-speech-after-charlie-kirks-death/https://youtu.be/j7PNtzRTa8whttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/who-really-owns-free-speech-after-charlie-kirks-death--67864387A deep dive into the cancel culture paradox after Charlie Kirk’s death, exposing how his name is being misused to justify censorship and government coercion, with a spotlight on Jimmy Kimmel’s hypocrisy, Disney’s selective punishments, and the wider dangers of cancel culture.#CharlieKirk, #FreeSpeech, #CancelCulture, #JimmyKimmel, #Disney, #GinaCarano, #SheHulk, #FirstAmendment, #GoRight, #BoykinCommentary, #DefendLibertyNever Justify Losing Freedom#GoRight with Peter BoykinLet’s talk plainly about the First Amendment and what it really means, because too many people today only seem to defend free speech when it benefits their side. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution says: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”That is not fancy legal jargon, it is a firewall against tyranny. It means the government cannot decide which voices get heard and which voices get silenced. It does not exist to protect the comfortable or the popular. It exists to protect the uncomfortable, the offensive, the dissenting. Because the second you let the government decide what counts as acceptable speech, you have already given away your freedom.And yet here we are, in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death, watching people twist his name to justify censorship and cancel culture, the very things he stood against. Kirk built his career on open debate. He believed all voices should be heard, even when they clashed with his own. He rejected cancel culture on principle. He warned against government overreach because he knew a government powerful enough to silence one side will eventually silence everyone.So when I see people standing with Kirk while calling for cancelations in his name, I have to say it: you are not honoring him, you are betraying him. If you think canceling others in Kirk’s memory somehow protects his legacy, you are spitting on what he lived and died for.Freedom is not tested by how we treat the voices we love. Freedom is tested by how we defend the voices we despise. That is the hard truth. You do not get to cherry-pick liberty. If you cheer when your opponents are silenced, do not be surprised when the same blade is turned against you.The First Amendment is not a suggestion. It is the backbone of this Constitutional Republic. And once we start excusing its erosion, because “they deserved it” or because it feels convenient, we lose it for everyone.Never justify losing freedom. Because once it is gone, it does not come back.For more unfiltered truth, visit GoRightNews.com and tune in to #GoRight with Peter Boykin across Rumble.com/GoRightNews, Spreaker, Spotify, Apple, Amazon, YouTube, GAB, Truth Social, TikTok, Facebook, and X. Support the fight for free speech at Cash App $GoRightNews.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/go-right-with-peter-boykin-the-constitutionalist-for-liberty--3096608/support.📰 Read More About Peter Boykin:📖 Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Boykin📖 https://PeterBoykin.com📢 LISTEN & WATCH:🎧 Podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin📺 Rumble Videos: https://rumble.com/GoRightNews📺YouTube Videos: http://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial🌐 Visit the Hub  — Home of #GoRightNews:  https://GoRightNews.com 💬 Follow Peter Boykin:🔵 Telegram: https://t.me/RealPeterBoykin