Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 9, 2021 · 27 MIN

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast

from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society

On November 1, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson on whether a state can insulate from federal-court review a law that may prohibit the exercise of a constitutional right by delegating to the public the authority to enforce that prohibition; and in United States v. Texas on the authority of the federal government to bring suit and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief against a state, state court judges, and other states officials or all private parties to prohibit SB 8, a Texas abortion regulation, from being enforced. A distinguished pair of scholars joined us to discuss the cases, their history, the legal issues involved, and the implications going forward. Featuring:Prof. Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolProf. Howard Wasserman, Professor of Law, Florida International University College of Law

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 9, 2021

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast

0:00 27:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of SCOTUScast?

This episode is 27 minutes long.

When was this SCOTUScast episode published?

This episode was published on December 9, 2021.

Can I download this SCOTUScast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!