Why California is Rethinking its Nuclear Exit episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 24, 2026 · 55 MIN

Why California is Rethinking its Nuclear Exit

from KQED's Forum · host KQED

California’s only remaining active nuclear power plant, Diablo Canyon on California’s Central Coast, was supposed to shutter in 2025, but a series of heat waves and stress on the grid prompted state leaders to keep it running through 2030. And now, as demand for electricity skyrockets, a new push is growing to reverse the state’s decision to abandon nuclear power, and to extend the plant’s life through 2045. We’ll talk to advocates who have been fighting the nuclear plant since the very beginning about the risks of continuing operations, and from those who believe nuclear power is necessary to meet California’s mandate to switch to 100% carbon-free energy by 2045. Guests: Jane Swanson, president and spokesperson, Mothers for Peace Michael Wara, policy director for the Sustainability Accelerator at the Doerr School of Sustainability and director of the Climate and Energy Policy Program and senior research scholar at the Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University Adrian Covert, senior vice president of public policy, Bay Area Council Laura Klivans, climate reporter, KQED Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 24, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Why California is Rethinking its Nuclear Exit

0:00 55:14

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of KQED's Forum?

This episode is 55 minutes long.

When was this KQED's Forum episode published?

This episode was published on August 24, 2026.

Can I download this KQED's Forum episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!