Why Cut Elimination is More Complicated than Normalization

from Iowa Type Theory Commute · host Aaron Stump

Cut elimination for sequent calculus is more involved that normalization of detours for natural deduction. There are more cases of cuts that must be transformed than correspond to detours (introductions followed by eliminations). In this episode, I explain why that is.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 5, 2021

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Why Cut Elimination is More Complicated than Normalization

0:00 12:06

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Iowa Type Theory Commute?

This episode is 12 minutes long.

When was this Iowa Type Theory Commute episode published?

This episode was published on October 5, 2021.

Can I download this Iowa Type Theory Commute episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!