Skip to content
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Verdict Came Down to One Person episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 9, 2026 · 24 MIN

Why Lindsay Clancy’s Verdict Came Down to One Person

from Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary · host True Crime Today

Seven days of deliberation. More than thirty-six hours behind closed doors. Eighty-plus witnesses. Three hundred exhibits. And when the jury in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial finally reported to Judge William Sullivan for the third time that they could not agree, the split was eleven to one. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington said the eleven wanted to acquit. The holdout, reportedly a male juror, would not follow the majority. Sullivan declared a mistrial at Plymouth Superior Court. Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication drove her actions. Prosecutors said she planned the killings and acted rationally. Reddington tried everything in the final hours. He asked Sullivan to dismiss the holdout. He asked for a lesser-charge poll. He filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court denied it. The mistrial stood. DA Timothy Cruz must now decide whether to retry. Sullivan scheduled a September 29 status conference. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines why one holdout can override eleven and what the split tells us about the prosecution’s evidence. He asks what a retrial means for the survivors who just endured five weeks of testimony. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #HungJury #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 9, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Why Lindsay Clancy’s Verdict Came Down to One Person

0:00 24:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary?

This episode is 24 minutes long.

When was this Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary episode published?

This episode was published on September 9, 2026.

Can I download this Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!