Why Rigorous Homeopathic Studies Should Be Part of the Scientific Record – Not Retracted

from The MAHA Report · host MAHA™ Action

Peter Gold examines four retracted homeopathy studies and argues they were pulled for unwelcome findings rather than fraud, making the case that disagreement shouldn't erase research from the record.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 25, 2026

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Why Rigorous Homeopathic Studies Should Be Part of the Scientific Record – Not Retracted

0:00 7:54

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The MAHA Report?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this The MAHA Report episode published?

This episode was published on June 25, 2026.

Can I download this The MAHA Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!