Why SCOTUS's Callais Decision Is a Gigantic Step Back for Fair Voting Rights episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 29, 2026 · 20 MIN

Why SCOTUS's Callais Decision Is a Gigantic Step Back for Fair Voting Rights

from The Contrarian Pod · host The Contrarian, Katie Phang, Leah Litman, Norman Eisen, and Ciera Stone

The Supreme Court essentially nullified the last remaining provision of the Voting Rights Act in a 6-3 decision. The ruling in the case of Louisiana v. Callais opens the door to racially-motivated gerrymandering at Jim Crow levels, and overturns one of the biggest landmark civil rights laws in U.S. history.Leah Litman is a professor of law at the University of Michigan, she’s also cohost of the Strict Scrutiny podcast. She spoke with Contrarian contributor Katie Phang about the ramifications of the Callais decision and why this was a gigantic step back for fair voting rights.The Contrarian is owned by nobody. Your paid subscription helps us bring you the brightest voices in politics & culture and fight every day against the Trump chaos machine. Join us on Substack. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.contrariannews.org/subscribe

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 29, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Why SCOTUS's Callais Decision Is a Gigantic Step Back for Fair Voting Rights

0:00 20:22

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Contrarian Pod?

This episode is 20 minutes long.

When was this The Contrarian Pod episode published?

This episode was published on April 29, 2026.

Can I download this The Contrarian Pod episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!