Why the Cakeshop Case is So Delicious episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 25, 2017 · 33 MIN

Why the Cakeshop Case is So Delicious

from Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

As the high court continues through its unprecedented session, Dahlia speaks with Adam Liptak who covers the Supreme Court for the New York Times and knows the ins and outs of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. And he gives his insight on what a jaw-dropping brief from the Solicitor General's office means for relations between the Court and the Trump administration. Plus, a look into how the Supreme Court Justices seem to be the last grown-ups left in Washington.  Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 25, 2017

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Why the Cakeshop Case is So Delicious

0:00 33:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts?

This episode is 33 minutes long.

When was this Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts episode published?

This episode was published on November 25, 2017.

Can I download this Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!