Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 15, 2019 · 55 MIN

Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media

from Cato Event Podcast

Until recently, private social media companies have been free to moderate content on their own platforms. But accusations of political bias have caused some to call for government regulation of the efforts social media companies make to moderate content. Some have even suggested that social media entities ought to be nationalized to ensure they operate in the public interest. Is there a role here for government to play, or would government intervention create unintended consequences while simultaneously stifling free speech? These are just some of the questions addressed in John Samples’s recently published policy analysis, “Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation by Social Media.”Join us on Monday, April 15, to hear from author John Samples and the director of Cato’s project on emerging technologies, Matthew Feeney. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 15, 2019

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media

0:00 55:10

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cato Event Podcast?

This episode is 55 minutes long.

When was this Cato Event Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on April 15, 2019.

Can I download this Cato Event Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!