EPISODE · Sep 9, 2026 · 35 MIN
Why We’re Being Criticized for Covering the Lindsay Clancy Trial
from Sisters Uncensored Podcast · host Jessica Labita and Ashley LaNeve
In this episode, we address the backlash we received over our coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial, including jury deliberations, reasonable doubt, the burden of proof, and the possibility of a mistrial. We discuss why questioning the evidence or legal process does not mean supporting the tragedy, while also exploring women’s health, postpartum mental health, and the complexities of human behavior. We also discuss the Netflix documentary about Micah Lussier, the pastor’s wife, and share our thoughts on the case and investigation. Then we turn to a deeply personal case involving the death of our friend Daniel Akers and his partner Lacy in Georgia, breaking down what we know and our questions surrounding the investigation. If you are a lawyer in Massachusetts or Georgia or have relevant insight into any of these cases, send us a DM. Subscribe to Sisters Uncensored for more true crime discussions, uncensored opinions, real-life stories, and conversations where absolutely no topic is off limits.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
In this episode, we address the backlash we received over our coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial, including jury deliberations, reasonable doubt, the burden of proof, and the possibility of a mistrial. We discuss why questioning the evidence or legal process does not mean supporting the tragedy, while also exploring women’s health, postpartum mental health, and the complexities of human behavior. We also discuss the Netflix documentary about Micah Lussier, the pastor’s wife, and share our t...
Ready to play
Why We’re Being Criticized for Covering the Lindsay Clancy Trial
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.