EPISODE · Sep 27, 2022 · 30 MIN
Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism by Erwin Chemerinsky
from Listen to Premium Digital Audiobooks in High Quality · host Concepcion Marquardt
Please visit https://thebookvoice.com/podcasts/1/audiobook/601292 to listen full audiobooks. Title: Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Author: Erwin Chemerinsky Narrator: Daniel Henning Format: Unabridged Audiobook Length: 7 hours 9 minutes Release date: September 27, 2022 Ratings: Ratings of Book: 5 of Total 1 Ratings of Narrator: 5 of Total 1 Genres: Current Affairs, Law, & Politics Publisher's Summary: Why originalism is a flawed, incoherent, and dangerously ideological method of constitutional interpretation Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Three of the Supreme Court's nine justices explicitly embrace the originalist approach, as do increasing numbers of judges in the lower courts. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know what the 'original intent' of any particular provision was. Perhaps worst of all, though its supporters tout it as a politically neutral and objective method, originalist interpretation tends to disappear when its results fail to conform to modern conservative ideology.
What this episode covers
Please visit https://thebookvoice.com/podcasts/1/audiobook/601292 to listen full audiobooks. Title: Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Author: Erwin Chemerinsky Narrator: Daniel Henning Format: Unabridged Audiobook Length: 7 hours 9 minutes Release date: September 27, 2022 Ratings: Ratings of Book: 5 of Total 1 Ratings of Narrator: 5 of Total 1 Genres: Current Affairs, Law, & Politics Publisher's Summary: Why originalism is a flawed, incoherent, and dangerously ideological method of constitutional interpretation Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Three of the Supreme Court's nine justices explicitly embrace the originalist approach, as do increasing numbers of judges in the lower courts. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know what the 'original intent' of any particular provision was. Perhaps worst of all, though its supporters tout it as a politically neutral and objective method, originalist interpretation tends to disappear when its results fail to conform to modern conservative ideology.
NOW PLAYING
Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism by Erwin Chemerinsky
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Mar 26, 2026 ·1m
Mar 19, 2026 ·34m
Feb 18, 2026 ·11m
Feb 11, 2026 ·45m