You Must Have Misunderstood Law episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 4, 2022 · 1H 18M

You Must Have Misunderstood Law

from Advisory Opinions · host The Dispatch

Trump’s legal drama — Judge Cannon returns! Ken Paxton opines! Fraud alleged! — will be discussed at last... But first, Sarah and David preview what promises to be a spicy term for the Supreme Court (with not one, but two Section 230 cases!). They then pass through a culture war cul-de-sac via Judge James Ho’s clerkship boycott of Yale law students, and conclude with a tribute to Judge Laurence Silberman.  Plus: the committed listener will learn the truth about how Sarah ended up in The Federalist Society. Show Notes: -David’s amicus brief -Twitter at the Supreme Court -Ken Paxton’s amici for Fulton County v. Lindsey Graham -David Lat on Ho v. Yale reactions -Josh Blackman supporting on Yale Law sellouts -Laurence Silberman’s WSJ obit Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 4, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

You Must Have Misunderstood Law

0:00 1:18:38

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 18 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on October 4, 2022.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!