You Must Have Misunderstood Law

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

Trump’s legal drama — Judge Cannon returns! Ken Paxton opines! Fraud alleged! — will be discussed at last... But first, Sarah and David preview what promises to be a spicy term for the Supreme Court (with not one, but two Section 230 cases!). They then pass through a culture war cul-de-sac via Judge James Ho’s clerkship boycott of Yale law students, and conclude with a tribute to Judge Laurence Silberman. Plus: the committed listener will learn the truth about how Sarah ended up in The Federalist Society. Show Notes: -David’s amicus brief -Twitter at the Supreme Court -Ken Paxton’s amici for Fulton County v. Lindsey Graham -David Lat on Ho v. Yale reactions -Josh Blackman supporting on Yale Law sellouts -Laurence Silberman’s WSJ obit

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

You Must Have Misunderstood Law

0:00 1:18:38

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Beyond the Neutral Zone beyondtheneutralzone We are 4 idiots that like to talk about sports but will follow the conversation wherever it leads.Year-round general sports conversation and opinions with a main focus on the NFL. Daily Cuts The best interviews from CNA 938 on current affairs, health, entertainment and money, curated dailyThe views and opinions shared during this podcast series are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mediacorp Pte. Ltd. or its group of companies.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 18 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on October 4, 2022.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.