PODCAST · science
BJPS Short Reads
by British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
BJPS articles, but shorter. Also louder.
Episodes
-
Getting to Basecamp with Everettian Quantum Mechanics
Can Everett justify the quantum-mechanical probabilities? By Jake Khawaja. Read the essay here.
-
Correlation, Causation, and Choice
Reuben Stern on when interventions are evidence for their non-effects. Read the essay here
-
Questioning Self-Location
Emily Adlam on whether there is a rationally compelling way to assign pure self-locating credences. Read the essay here
-
Scientists on Tap, Not on Top
Stephen John on why scientists cannot, and should not, care about policymakers’ values. Read the essay here
-
Why Does Causal Reasoning Work?
Naftali Weinberger, Porter Williams and James Woodward on the role of worldly infrastructure. Read the full essay here
-
Death in Mind
Susana Monsó and Laura Danón on what the opossum’s playing dead tells us about animal minds. Read the essay here
-
Exploitative Informing
David Thorstad on how to exploit someone by giving them relevant information Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/exploitative-informing-thorstad/
-
Black Holes and Reality
Siddharth Muthukrishnan on how our philosophy of science affects our response to the information paradox Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/black-holes-muthukrishnan/
-
Explaining Human Mind-Reading
Armin W Schulz asks how humans became stand-out mind-readers Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/mind-reading-schulz/
-
Ambiguous Decisions in Bayesianism and Imprecise Probability
Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden, and Francesco De Pretis on whether imprecise beliefs lead to worse decisions under severe uncertainty Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/bayesianism-radzvilas-et-al/
-
The Promise of Precision Medicine
Axel Constant on whether there are alternatives to reductionism in precision psychiatry Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/precision-medicine-constant/
-
Making Science Funding Policy Fair
Jamie Shaw on lotteries, biases, and affirmative action Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/science-funding-shaw/
-
Physical Dimensions Are Real
Caspar Jacobs on why the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures is wrong Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/dimensions-are-real-jacobs/
-
Binary Categories, Messy Individuals
Alex Thinius and Rose Trappes on how scientists construct sex as a binary and categorical variable Read the essay here: www.thebsps.org/short-reads/binary-categories-thinius-trappes/
-
Institutional Decision-Making Heuristics
David Thorstad on what lies beyond simple rules Read the essay here: https://www.thebsps.org/short-reads/thorstad-institutionaldecisionmaking/
-
Drawing the Line
Davide Serpico and Valentina Petrolini on rethinking mental health and pathology through epigenetics. Read the essay here: https://www.thebsps.org/short-reads/drawing-the-line-serpico-petrolini/
-
What Do Newtonian Forces Have to Do with the Standard Model?
James Ladyman and Lorenzo Lorenzetti on understanding effective realism through the lens of structural realism Read the essay here: https://www.thebsps.org/short-reads/standard-model-ladyman-lorenzetti/
-
The Function of Biochemical Functions
Francesca Bellazzi on what it means to say that a biochemical has a function. Read the essay here: https://www.thebsps.org/short-reads/biochemical-functions-bellazzi/
-
Accuracy and Calibration
Robert Williams and Richard Pettigrew ask how we should measure the accuracy of probabilities. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-2iw
-
Is the Free Energy Principle for Real?
Ian Robertson, Julian Kiverstein, and Michael Kirchhoff on the literalist fallacy and realism about the free energy principle. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-2iw
-
To Err Is (Not Only) Human
David Oderberg, Jonathan Hill, Christopher Austin, Ingo Bojak, François Cinotti, and Jon Gibbins ask what mistakes mean for philosophy and biology. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-2ix
-
Accuracy and Coherence
David Thorstad asks if bounded agents can have both accuracy and coherence. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-2ba
-
What Cognitive Science Has Forgotten about Computation
Analog computation, properly understood, is the best candidate for characterizing neural computation, argues Corey J Maley. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-29f.
-
The Perfect Time to Reform Peer Review
Liam Kofi Bright and Remco Heesen ask how we determine what to pay attention to. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1SW
-
What If Light Doesn’t Exist?
Mario Hubert on how an investigation of the initial-value problem challenges our view of electromagnetism. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-22Z
-
Haecceitism, Rigid Designation, and Thermodynamic Equilibrium
Michael te Vrugt asks if exchanging two indistinguishable particles changes anything. Read the essay here: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-22Z
-
How to Open Two Locks with One Key
Eddy Keming Chen offers a new solution to the puzzles of time’s arrow and quantum ontology. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-20r.
-
Why History Matters in Biology
Justin Garson on the study of mechanisms and the study of history. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1LN.
-
Mind the Gap
Elanor Taylor on what makes a good explanation. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1IZ
-
Blurring the Line between Laws and Initial Conditions
Caspar Jacobs on what's wrong with the pristine interpretation. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1TD
-
Why 'Not'?
Luca Incurvati and Giorgio Sbardolini on the evolution of negation. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1TT.
-
On the Limits of Scientific Objectivity
Richard Healey on whether there are objective facts in the quantum world. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1SZ.
-
Tune in and Find Out
Florian J. Boge explains why it may be epistemically acceptable to tune models for experimental analysis. Read essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1U9.
-
Models of Scientific Explanation and Inference to the Best Explanation
Yunus Prasetya on what substantive accounts of explanation say about inference to the best explanation. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1Rd
-
Digital Humanities and the Philosophy of Science
Oliver M Lean, Luca Rivelli, and Charles H Pence on what philosophers can learn from a ‘distant reading’ of science journals. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1Ql
-
Against Authorship
Josh Habgood-Coote on whether authorship is an obstacle to recognising the division of labour in science. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1NS
-
COVID-19, Induction, and Social Epistemology
Igor Douven on evolutionary modelling and trust in science. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1No
-
Does Economics Need Micro-foundations?
Nadia Ruiz and Armin W Schulz offer a complexity-based reconceptualization of the debate. Read the essay: https://wp.me/paiQQ4-1J4
We're indexing this podcast's transcripts for the first time — this can take a minute or two. We'll show results as soon as they're ready.
No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.
No topics indexed yet for this podcast.
Loading reviews...
ABOUT THIS SHOW
BJPS articles, but shorter. Also louder.
HOSTED BY
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
CATEGORIES
Loading similar podcasts...