Celebrating Justice

The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

The phone rang three times before six-thirty in the morning. Mu'min Islam almost let it go — and the case on the other end became the one he still measures every other one by.Mu'min Islam did not set out to be a trial lawyer. At Temple University's business school, he noticed how many corporate executives held law degrees and saw law school as a runway toward the C-suite. Graduating in 2008, into the teeth of the financial crisis, rerouted that plan — his Philadelphia firm laid off nearly its entire first-year class — and a corporate lawyer who insisted he "didn't want to litigate" slowly became one who lives for it.What carries through his story is a particular kind of tenacity he traces back home. "You can Google, what is a Philadelphia lawyer?" he says — shorthand for a grind he argues you had to have to survive in Philly. Now managing partner at Ace Law, LP, splitting his time between the Atlanta area and Philadelphia, he brings that grind to a Georgia market where, he observes, plenty of firms will take a case, try to settle it quickly, and refer it out if they can't. Islam works a file, in his words, to the umpteenth degree, and handles matters soup to nuts — from intake through trial — rather than passing them along.He credits range, too. Raised in a Jamaican family where he says he worked every job under the sun, he relates to the UPS worker and to the client who made one bad decision alike — an everyman fluency he thinks sets him apart as much as any courtroom aggression.Then there is the case that stuck. It began with that early-morning call: an immigrant day laborer killed on a construction site, electrocuted when the hook of a bucket he was raising struck a live wire. Because the man was not a citizen, the threshold question was whether his family could recover at all. Islam dug up case law from other states, reconstructed the man's earnings from the money-transfer receipts he had kept each time he sent money home, and flew to Mexico with an interpreter so the family could settle the estate. He negotiated a settlement with the utility company. Years later, he returned to hand the man's now-grown son — today living in the United States — a couple hundred thousand dollars held in trust.It is that long arc — the client you helped years ago resurfacing through someone they sent your way — that Islam returns to in his "Closing Argument," a reflection on why this work, for all its stress, is the kind that stays with the people you do it for.Key Takeaways·       Tenacity is a habit, not a talent — working a file to the umpteenth degree is what separates a quick settlement from a real result.·       Taking a case from intake through trial, instead of referring it out, keeps a lawyer accountable to the client the whole way through.·       A lawyer who has worked every kind of job can meet clients where they actually are, whatever their circumstances.·       Threshold questions — like whether a non-citizen's family can recover — are won with research and creativity, not assumptions.·       The impact of a case can outlast the verdict by years, resurfacing when a former client sends the next one your way.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Some trial lawyers walk into a courtroom hoping they are ready. Rich Ruohonen walks in the way a world-level athlete steps onto the ice — because he has already thrown the shot a hundred times before it matters.Rich Ruohonen never set out to be a trial lawyer. Raised to never give in and to win every argument, he drifted toward the courtroom after a high-school mock trial, briefly imagined a career in contracts or as a sports agent, then discovered in his first business law class that behind-the-scenes work would never suit him. He wanted to be out front, helping people. Nearly three decades and roughly 90 trials later, he is one of Minnesota's most recognized plaintiff personal injury lawyers — and, improbably, the oldest U.S. Winter Olympian in history.That second life as a nationally ranked curler is not a footnote; it is the key to how he practices law. Ruohonen draws a direct line between elite competition and trial work: thinking several moves ahead like a chess match, weathering the roller-coaster of good and bad days across a week-long trial, and above all, preparing until the outcome feels inevitable. "People don't practice," he says. "They just think they can walk in and give an opening statement or give a closing argument without having ever said it, without having ever done it before." At TSR Injury Law he built a ritual the firm calls Fight Club, where a lawyer delivers an opening in front of roughly 20 colleagues who offer nothing but criticism. Then does it again, and again. Before one of his biggest cases he rehearsed his opening more than ten times.He is just as deliberate about the psychology of persuasion: how a single word can plant an image in a juror's mind, why belief in your own case is contagious and how a well-run focus group can expose which defense arguments jurors simply do not care about. The case that shaped him most was a three-year-old boy beaten and raped at a daycare where he was left unwatched for over an hour. Told he would never beat a million-dollar ceiling, Rich won a 13 million dollar verdict, watched the trial court set it aside, and tried the entire case a second time to secure another multimillion-dollar result. The child is now a thriving young adult; an outcome Rich counts among the most meaningful of his life, and one that pushed him to reduce his fees for children and to testify for stronger daycare-safety laws.For his "Closing Argument," Rich turns from craft to conviction, the duty he believes lawyers carry to use whatever platform they are given,and the courage it takes to speak up for the rule of law and for people who need help.Key TakeawaysPreparation is the line between hoping you are ready and knowing you are — rehearsing an opening ten times before trial is not excessive, it is the job.An athlete's mindset transfers directly to the courtroom: think several moves ahead, expect good days and bad, and compete to the last shot.How you frame a sentence to a jury matters as much as what you say — tell them your client had the green light, never that he did not run the red.A well-run focus group can reveal that the defense's favorite argument means nothing to jurors, and give you the confidence to ask for a case's full value.Belief is persuasive; if you do not fully own what you are asking a jury for, they will sense the doubt.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

For years, the defense insisted the case was worth $10,000. Kate Feroleto believed her client — and the truth — were worth far more, and she spent four years proving it.Kate Feroleto did not have a single aha moment. She grew up inside the practice of law in Buffalo, New York — her father a plaintiff’s trial lawyer raised on the city’s West Side, her mother a defense attorney who later became a judge. She heard both sides of the coin at the dinner table, but what stuck with her was watching how deeply her father cared about his cases, and how he kept friendships with clients long after the matters had settled.Determined to build her own path, Feroleto started on the defense side rather than joining her father straight out of law school. It was deliberate: learn how insurers evaluate, deny, and minimize claims, then carry that knowledge to the plaintiff’s side — which is exactly what she does today at Feroleto Law PLLC, the Buffalo firm she now leads.What sets her apart is not a billboard (her face is on any), and she likes it that way. She calls herself an “extroverted introvert,” and for a long time she wasn’t sure you could be kind and also be a trial lawyer. Experience taught her the opposite: warmth with a client builds the trust that wins cases. She traces her analytical streak to childhood, when she was the one who wanted to know why the sink was leaking — the same instinct she brings to trucking and catastrophic-injury litigation, stepping back to trace where a system broke down months or even years before a crash.The case that captures all of it involved a 77-year-old client whose landlord repeatedly failed to fix a broken lock on her kitchen window. An intruder climbed through it and brutally attacked her. For years the defense valued the case at $10,000 and built a theory that blamed the victim’s own kindness toward her neighbors. Feroleto spent four years earning the trust of a woman from a generation that does not speak about trauma — until, sitting in her client’s living room, she heard the words that changed everything: “I trust you. I’ll testify.” One week before trial, the defense paid the full available policy.In her “Closing Argument,” Feroleto returns to that case to make a larger point for every trial lawyer listening — that kindness was never the weakness she once feared, but the very thing that built the trust to hold the line when it would have been easier to accept less.Key TakeawaysStarting on the defense side can teach a plaintiff's lawyer exactly how insurers evaluate, deny, and minimize claims.Kindness and warmth toward a client aren't a weakness in the courtroom — they build the trust that lets you hold the line.In trucking and catastrophic-injury cases, the real cause often traces back months or years before the crash itself.Preparing every case as if it will go to trial changes what the other side is ultimately willing to pay.A genuine personal relationship with a client can be the turning point that decides whether a case is winnable.Being human with your client and relentless with your opponent are not in tension — paired with preparation, they are a force multiplier.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

He was seventeen when a torn meniscus ended a professional soccer career in Ukraine — and put him on a plane to a country whose language he did not yet speak. Boris Grushko has been building on that improbable start ever since.Boris Grushko, a Brooklyn-based personal injury trial lawyer whose road to the courtroom ran through two arenas most attorneys never see: a professional soccer pitch and a Marine Corps boot camp. Grushko arrived in the United States at seventeen with little English, worked weekends as a busboy, and slowly found his footing before enlisting in the Marines out of a search for discipline and direction. Nearly four years of service, he says, gave him the perseverance, the organization, and the leadership that now shape how he prepares a case.The law itself came later, and largely through his sister — an accomplished tax attorney who became mentor, role model, and something like family after his parents stayed behind in Ukraine. Every decision she made with him, he says, was a positive one. Grushko tried on criminal prosecution and criminal defense, enjoying the latter for a full year, before a veteran solo practitioner named Robert Marcus showed him the craft of plaintiff-side injury work.What emerges across the conversation is a through line of care. Grushko is an extrovert by his own description, someone who can walk into a room and find common ground with almost anyone — a judge, a colleague, a client. He ties that ease partly to his own nature and partly to the perseverance the Marine Corps drilled into him: the strength to stand up, introduce yourself, and keep going whether or not it lands. That same discipline shows up in the small habits of his practice — clearing his desk and writing tomorrow’s notes before he leaves each night — and, he argues, in how he treats the people he represents. As he puts it, “you tend to represent people better with care.”He is candid, too, about the losses. Grushko walks through a bruising small claims matter where the law, as he read it, was on his side and the outcome still went the other way — a case where he put in hours of preparation, presented his evidence, and watched the court sympathize with the other party anyway. It taught him to adjust his approach, to sometimes absorb a setback, and to carry on with the plan of his day. Now practicing at Karasik Law Group, P.C., he treats each proceeding as a place to learn as much from difficult results as from favorable ones.Perhaps what stays with the listener most is where Grushko lands in his “Closing Argument,” a reflection on gratitude, opportunity, and what his adopted country made possible for a young man who arrived with almost nothing.Key TakeawaysDiscipline built outside the law — in sport, in the military — often becomes the foundation of a trial lawyer’s daily practice.Caring genuinely about clients is not soft; it is a competitive advantage that sharpens attention to their needs and details.The ability to find common ground with anyone in the room — judge, opponent, or client — is a skill worth cultivating deliberately.A loss you believe was wrongly decided can teach more than a win, if you use it to adjust your strategy rather than stew in it.Sometimes the right move is to absorb a setback with composure and carry on with the plan of your day.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

As a kid, Denis Delja wanted to be a gunslinger — the man with no name who lives by his own code and always ends up fighting for the weaker guy against the bully or the land baron. He grew out of the cowboy stage, but never out of the ethos. Delja found his way to that fight through the courtroom. Raised in the San Fernando Valley on the classic Westerns of the 1950s and '60s, he was drawn to the figure who takes up someone else's cause — and later learned in law school that trial lawyers trace back to the champions people once hired to settle disputes by combat. He went to Yale Law School, then followed the well-worn track to a big corporate firm, doing litigation for companies like Monsanto and Visa. The salary was large and the actual courtroom work was nonexistent. A pro bono opportunity to co-chair a murder trial changed that; afterward, going back to managing document reviews felt impossible. He quit without another job lined up and crossed over to the plaintiff's side, drawn to the idea of representing a person he could actually know rather than a corporation. As he puts it, "For me, being a trial lawyer is the epitome of what it is to be a lawyer."Today he runs Delja & Delja | Injury Attorneys in Monterey with his wife, Tara — a deliberately small, home-based practice where clients work directly with the attorneys instead of a case manager. What makes the firm unusual is exactly that partnership: two lawyers who live, breathe, eat, and sleep their cases, trading strategy over dinner or on a walk, building a depth of understanding of each client that a volume shop simply can't match.It also produces results. Delja recounts the firm's first seven-figure case — one he took despite breaking his own "rule of three": never be the third attorney, never take a case more than three years old, never one with a file thicker than three inches. This one had all three. The client, a Gulf War combat veteran, had stepped through a rotted board on an apartment stairway and injured his knee, and prior counsel had been signaling to the insurer that they would never try it. With roughly five months to trial, Delja and his wife deposed the landlord and the workers who had repaired the stairway, lined up the medical experts, filed some fifteen motions in limine, and served a statutory settlement demand — moving fast enough that the insurer couldn't reassess a case it had undervalued for years. It settled five days before trial for a million dollars plus the client's costs. The lesson he draws is blunt: being genuinely ready to try a case, and having the other side know it, is what wins.But the segment that lingers is his "Closing Argument," where Delja steps away from strategy to talk about the emotional toll of this work — the case that first made him feel the weight of making a living from someone else's loss, and why he believes sharing in a client's grief, rather than guarding against it, is what keeps a trial lawyer from becoming the very stereotype the profession is accused of.Key Takeaways·       Being genuinely ready to try a case — and having the other side know it — produces better settlements than any billboard ever will.·       The "rule of three" (never the third attorney, never a case older than three years, never a file thicker than three inches) is worth breaking only when the client and the facts are compelling enough.·       Moving quickly on a case can lock in an insurer's stale valuation before it has a chance to reassess the real risk of trial.·       A husband-and-wife practice that lives and breathes its cases builds a depth of client understanding a high-volume shop can't replicate.·       Aligning the lawyer's incentives with the client's — no billing by the tenth of an hour — changes how the work actually gets done.·       Sharing in a client's grief rather than guarding against it is what separates real advocates from the ambulance-chaser stereotype.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Jason Green never planned to be a trial lawyer. He grew up watching Perry Mason and LA Law with his father — a former civil rights attorney — and went to law school thinking he would practice law, not try cases. Then a mandatory first-year moot court competition changed everything. He entered because it was required, barely tried, and kept advancing until he reached the round of eight. That was the first inkling. The path, as he puts it, was chartered.What followed was a career built on a single conviction: prepare every case as though it will go to trial. Green spent more than a decade as a prosecutor, trying serious felony and death penalty cases, before crossing into civil law. He learned the defense side first — five years in insurance defense — and it taught him how insurers weigh a claim, where the levers are, and what moves them. But it also convinced him he was on the wrong side. Too many files crossed his desk where, in his words, he felt he wasn’t using his powers for good. He made a hasty exit, and, as he says, "ever since then I’ve been on the side of truth and justice."That prosecutorial bent is what Green believes makes him unique in the courtroom. Criminal trials in Georgia are often tried by ambush, with little of the discovery that governs civil practice, and he learned to think on his feet, to stay fearless, and to build a case from the first day it lands on his desk. Above all, he learned to let one thing guide him: "I’ve learned to let the truth of the matter be my North Star." Sift through the spin and subterfuge, he says, and the truth eventually gets you where you need to go.The episode moves through cases that have stayed with him. A capital arson trial in which five people died in a hotel fire, reconstructed piece by piece alongside the ATF. The Espinoza case — a working mother of three, sole caregiver for a bedridden husband, seriously injured in a T-bone collision and left with far worse deficits after she flatlined during a medical procedure. Green won by refusing to let the case be reduced to medical bills, showing instead the full human toll on a family that could not afford to lose. It is a tension he names honestly: the very facts that devastate a client are the ones a trial lawyer knows how to use. You are happy as an advocate and distraught for them as a human, all at once.Green now serves as Lead PI Attorney at Bader Law Injury Lawyers in Atlanta, representing plaintiffs in complex personal injury and wrongful death cases. In his "Closing Argument," he shares the case of a young professional fighter — struck by an Atlanta police detective while riding a dirt bike — whose career was sidelined for two and a half years, and how a trial-by-human approach turned a nuisance offer into a seven-figure verdict that let his client buy a home and start a nonprofit for troubled young men.· Building every case for trial from the first day it lands on your desk changes how you investigate, prepare, and negotiate.· Time spent on the defense side reveals how insurers evaluate claims — knowledge a plaintiff’s lawyer can turn to a client’s advantage.· Letting the truth of a case serve as your North Star keeps you oriented through subterfuge, spin, and shifting defenses.· The most persuasive cases are told through human toll, not medical bills — the daily, personal cost of an injury on a client and their family.· Fearlessness and quick thinking, forged under pressure, often matter more in the courtroom than any script.· A life-changing verdict can become a force multiplier, giving a client the means to rebuild and to lift others up.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

When Alexis Bale was eleven, her sister told her — not entirely as a compliment — that she was good at arguing and should become a lawyer. She took it as one. In Episode 60 of "Celebrating Justice," the "newer" (or young, how ever you'd like) trial attorney at Breit Biniazan traces a path that started early and kept accelerating: dual-enrollment college classes at sixteen, a bachelor's degree at nineteen, and law school at William & Mary before most of her peers had finished undergrad.Along a legal program advisor sat her down and said she was too young, that no law school would admit a nineteen-year-old, that she lacked life experience. For Bale, that became fuel.“Because you said I can't,” she recalls thinking, “that means it's absolutely gonna happen.” It's a posture that has shaped her career — the conviction that being underestimated is an advantage, not an insult. The episode moves through the turning points that gave her open-ended ambition its shape. During COVID, amid the social reckonings of 2020, she watched "Murder on a Sunday Morning" — the Academy Award-winning documentary about a fifteen-year-old wrongfully charged with murder — and felt a sense of justice consume her. She set out to be a public defender, interned in state and federal defender offices, then discovered plaintiff-side work through mock trial and the mentors who would become her bosses. Two sides of the same coin, she calls it: people who need representation and a voice, whether they sit as a defendant or a plaintiff.Today Bale handles sexual abuse cases at her firm, work she describes as critically important and genuinely exhausting — the vicarious trauma of carrying clients' stories, and the responsibility of telling them well. She is candid about the challenges of being a young woman in the profession, from elevator strangers assuming she's a paralegal to the quiet, persistent underestimation she has learned to laugh off and turn to her advantage. She would rather prove someone wrong, she says, ten times out of ten. “The perseverance you put in can really impact the outcome that you walk away with,” she says. That idea becomes the heart of her "Closing Argument," where she shares the story of a motorcyclist catapulted from his bike on a poorly marked construction road — a case the defense valued at four thousand dollars, right up until a prospective juror's offhand comment during jury selection changed everything, and a $1.3 million agreement materialized on the eve of trial.Key TakeawaysBeing underestimated can be a strategic advantage — it's better to walk into a courtroom and surprise people than to meet their expectations.Relentless follow-through, like repeated motions to compel, can pressure a defendant into a resolution that spares a client the trauma of trial.Criminal defense and plaintiff-side injury work are two sides of the same coin — both rooted in giving people a voice they might not otherwise have.Staying involved with the next generation of advocates, such as coaching mock trial, sharpens a lawyer's own creativity and courtroom storytelling.Trauma-heavy practice areas demand honest support systems and a safe place to process the vicarious weight of clients' stories.Knowing when to stop negotiating — and what it takes to reach the best outcome — matters as much as the willingness to keep fighting.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Jason Doucette will tell you he doesn’t have a great origin story — no lawyers in the family, a pre-med track abandoned somewhere between organic chemistry and an intro-to-criminal-justice elective that happened to fit his schedule and happened to hold his attention. But origin stories, it turns out, are exactly what he’s built a career on telling.Now a Lead Trial Attorney at The Dominguez Firm in Los Angeles, Doucette has spent sixteen years — going on seventeen — building a practice around a simple, hard-won conviction: most trials are boring, and the lawyer who can make one interesting is the lawyer who wins. “If you can tell your client’s story in a way that is engaging,” he says, “then jurors will return verdicts that recognize the full extent of what they’ve lost.”That conviction didn’t arrive by accident. Doucette grew up in Montana on wrestling mats, then found his way to the Gerry Spence Method at Thunderhead Ranch — three weeks, no phone, no clock, nothing but the discipline of standing up cold and giving an opening statement you didn’t know you’d have to give. He supports The Moth, the storytelling nonprofit whose stage he’s yet to be called up to (he insists it’s just the luck of the draw). And he trains jiu-jitsu — a discipline he says shares DNA with trial work: you need a system that’s comprehensive, and a system that’s actually yours, because a lawyer who’s warm during jury selection and cold on cross reads as exactly what he is. Fake.The proof shows up in the verdicts. In Monterey County, Doucette and two co-counsel spent five weeks trying a case for a client electrocuted on a job site after a general contractor falsely certified that all energy sources had been locked out — a case against the world’s largest solar manufacturer, a company worth $22 billion. The jury came back with $46.8 million for the client and $4.5 million for his wife’s loss of consortium, with zero comparative fault assigned. It was, at the time, more than four times the highest verdict Monterey County had ever returned. A slip-and-fall case tried a couple of months earlier — pre-trial offer: $150,000 — ended in a $2.47 million verdict that grew to $3.7 million once an old settlement offer triggered interest. Between the two, Doucette picked up a nomination for CAALA Trial Lawyer of the Year and won the Gerry Spence Method's 2025 Alumni Civil Trial Warrior of the Year Award.None of it, he’ll tell you, came from racking up trial reps. It came from practice — the unglamorous, everyday kind. Which is exactly what he gets into in this episode’s "Closing Argument."Key TakeawaysThe lawyer who can make an inherently boring trial genuinely engaging is the one whose jurors return verdicts that reflect the full scope of what was lost.A trial system only works if it’s comprehensive enough to handle whatever the other side does, and consistent enough that jurors never catch you switching characters between jury selection and cross-examination.Sometimes the most persuasive move in a courtroom is restraint — moving evidence into the record without publishing it, and trusting jurors to go looking for it themselves.Career strength in trial work isn’t measured by the number of cases tried, but by what a lawyer does, every single day, in between them.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

The most powerful advocates are often born from the most painful experiences. Sarah Klein knows this better than most.A survivor of Larry Nassar’s abuse and a trial lawyer who has dedicated her career exclusively to child sexual abuse civil cases, Sarah brings a perspective to her work that is unlike almost anyone else in the legal profession.Sarah grew up in Lansing, Michigan, in the late 70s and early 80s — a world of unlocked doors and kids playing outside until dark. What started as an invitation to a gymnastics open house became a decade-long ordeal. By age eight, she was competing on a full team, training 40 to 45 hours a week. It was around 1988 that a young volunteer athletic trainer named Larry Nassar entered the gym — and Sarah’s life was never the same.The environment Nassar exploited was, as Sarah describes it, perfect for the scene of a crime. The head coach — who would later lead the gold-medal-winning “Fierce Five” at the 2012 Olympics — ran a culture of fear, aggression, and control. Nassar offered the opposite: warmth, snacks, kindness, and what felt at the time like real care. He was a constant presence for years, attending events and becoming what felt like family. Decades would pass before he was charged, pleaded guilty, and sentenced. The head coach, too, finally faced 24 counts of child abuse — before dying by suicide the day those charges were filed in 2021.Sarah attended Columbia University, spent time living and working in New York City, and ultimately pursued law — shaped in part by her stepfather, a Detroit judge who served on the bench for nearly 30 years. When she stood in court as Victim 125 in the Nassar case, she was already a practicing attorney. Though she couldn’t officially represent survivors in that litigation, she served as a vital intermediary — helping families and young survivors navigate an extraordinarily complex legal process in plain, human language.Today, Sarah is a trial lawyer at Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, a firm that handles nothing but child sexual abuse civil cases. Her experience as a survivor, she says, gives her skills that simply cannot be taught: “Being a survivor, having gone through a civil lawsuit myself brings a very unique set of skills.” She knows what it means to be entrusted with walking a client through arguably the worst thing that’s ever happened to them — and to leave them stronger for it.In this episode, Sarah shares a case that has stayed with her: a pediatrician who abused children under the guise of medical treatment for over 40 years, with parents present in the room, and institutions consistently failing to act. Her point is clear and sobering: “It doesn’t look the way you think it’s going to look.” Abuse isn’t in a dark alley. It’s dressed in a white coat, wrapped in trusted language, and sustained by institutional silence.She draws a striking parallel to other high-profile failures — Nassar, Epstein, Diddy — and makes the case that pedophiles do not operate in a vacuum. Governing bodies, the FBI, medical boards — all failed. Civil lawsuits, she argues, are one of the most powerful tools available to shine a light on those systemic fractures, hold institutions accountable, and return power to survivors who were silenced for years.In her “Closing Argument,” Sarah issues a direct challenge to every adult listening: identify the red flags, understand the recurring themes, and take responsibility. As she says, “It is not the child’s job to protect themselves. Children are not tiny adults. They are children and it is our job to keep them safe.”Key TakeawaysChild sexual abuse rarely looks the way people expect — perpetrators rely on grooming, trust-building, and institutional cover to operate in plain sight, sometimes with parents in the room.Civil lawsuits accomplish what criminal trials cannot: they expose the layers of institutional failure that allowed abuseThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Rob Bilott never planned on any of this. He wanted to be an architect, maybe a city planner. It was his father — a retired Air Force officer who enrolled in law school chasing a dream of being Perry Mason — who nudged him toward the LSAT.He landed at Taft Law in Cincinnati in 1990 and spent eight years defending chemical companies. Then a West Virginia farmer named Wilbur Tennant called about dying cows, and everything changed.What followed was a nearly three-decade fight against DuPont that unearthed millions of pages of internal documents, helped establish the first federal drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS, and produced over $13 billion in settlements. It also became a New York Times Magazine cover story, a Mark Ruffalo film, and a memoir. But maybe the most striking thing about this conversation is how Bilott talks about the work — not as a crusade, but as a series of risks he kept deciding were worth taking. "If people can see these facts," he says, echoing the farmer who started it all, "things will change." He's still at Taft. Still pushing. And perhaps still a little uncomfortable being the one standing at the front of the room.Key TakeawaysA law degree opens doors you didn't know existedTime on the defense side is an advantage, not a contradictionModern discovery rules could bury the next big caseThe courtroom alone isn't enough — storytelling isPFAS is not a political issue — it's a public health oneThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Mike “Pap” Papantonio didn’t set out to be a lawyer. He trained as a journalist, ready to chase revolutions abroad — until a conversation with the legendary Perry Nichols reframed the craft of trial work as storytelling grounded in literature, culture, and human truth. That idea stuck. So did Pap’s upbringing with working-class families across central Florida, people living paycheck to paycheck. It left him with a lifelong instinct to side with the underdog and, later, to build a career holding the most powerful institutions to account.In this wide-ranging conversation, Pap explains the decision that has defined his practice: using the same law license as everyone else, but choosing higher-impact fights — cleaning up ecosystems, taking bad drugs off the market, getting “mom and pop’s money back” when Wall Street steals it. He rejects volume for significance. The goal is scale — of harm, of remedy, of cultural impact.Mentorship runs through the narrative. From Nichols to Fred Levin, Pap learned that technical skill is necessary, but courage is decisive. “What holds lawyers back?” he asks. Too often, it’s fear. Fear of rejection. Fear of stepping outside the safe path shaped by credentials and country-club comfort. He contrasts the lawyer who sells “used cars” with the one who sells jets — harder, rarer, but transformative when it lands.Pap revisits origin moments in mass torts: the first PFAS trials in Ohio, early results that some mocked as too modest — until verdict by verdict the science and momentum became undeniable, catalyzing what is now the largest toxic-tort litigation in the country. He talks candidly about the opioid wars and the $75 billion in settlements that followed disclosure of damning internal documents. He is equally unsparing about institutional failures — especially a Department of Justice that, in his view, too often refused to prosecute white-collar crime.The conversation pivots to his novels — thrillers that read fast but educate quietly — including The Middleman, which indicts pharmacy benefit managers as “gangster” middlemen extracting kickbacks and inflating drug prices while hiding in plain sight. Corporate media won’t tell these stories, Pap argues, so trial lawyers have to.Finally, he shares a communicator’s toolbox — the “Five C’s,” the power of visuals, and the discipline of radical simplicity — illustrated with iconic ads from Coke, Nike, and Apple that moved people without a single wasted word.It all leads to his simple credo, the one that undergirds his firm’s culture at Levin Papantonio" do significant work that changes systems and lives, and the economics will follow. In his Closing Argument, Pap urges lawyers to overcome the fear of rejection and to align ambition with purpose — to “do well by doing good.”Key Takeaways (4–6)·       The highest-impact plaintiffs’ work prioritizes cultural change over case volume — choose the bigger fight, not just more files.·       Fear of rejection is the invisible limiter of legal careers; courage and teachability unlock growth.·       Early, “small” verdicts can be strategic beachheads that build science, narrative, and momentum in mass torts.·       Institutions often fail to police corporate wrongdoing — trial lawyers must surface documents, tell the story, and force accountability.·       Clear, visual storytelling — distilled to essentials — persuades more effectively than long arguments.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

As a middle school track coach, she taught kids to breathe on the back stretch and relax their arms on the far turn. They won. More importantly, they believed in themselves. Years later, a worn-down client sat across from her and, in a quiet handshake, asked a different question: Can I trust you? Ortega heard what wasn’t said and took an oath to care. That moment — that feeling — became her compass.She describes the years spent “living someone else’s expectations,” checking feelings at the door, and chasing success by template. The turn came at Thunderhead Ranch, where the Gerry Spence Method demands lawyers first confront their own pain. Why? As Ortega puts it, "How can we sit in the ashes of someone else’s pain if we’ve never faced our own?" In that work, the scars she once hid became superpowers. Community followed, then craft — trial as an act of human connection, plain language over performance, a conversation with jurors rather than a lecture.Her defining case — the road to Spence’s Civil Trial Warrior of the Year — centered on Mr. Curry, a sheriff’s deputy and pillar of his community who suffered a life-altering brain injury, neck surgeries, and dystonia after a head-on collision. Ortega left her firm, built her own practice, and bet everything on doing the case the right way. Nineteen defense experts. Endless motions. Delays engineered to exhaust a solo shop. Still, she and a small team pressed on, learned the science, found the story, and tried the case. The jury listened. Justice followed.Why fight this hard? Because, Ortega says, settlement mills often leave clients on the “dirt track” even when they can afford the stadium track — and clients live with the pain long after the check clears. “Because when the money runs out, the pain will still be there…” That’s why she treats each client like family and why she insists on real healing — not just diagnoses but specialists, treatment, and dignity.Ortega’s path is personal, too. Her family’s loss informs how she shows up for others. It also fuels her view of what makes a trial firm different: relentless investment of time, spirit, and resources to secure full justice.In her "Closing Argument," Ortega reframes the job entirely: it’s never about the trial lawyer. It’s about listening to the client, then answering the jury’s real questions — the waiting-room questions: How bad is it? Will he be okay? What does this mean for his family? And it’s about honoring the sacrifice of teams and families who make the work possible. The calling, she says, is a life in service of others — lifting chins, pulling back shoulders, helping people believe in themselves again.Learn more about Tanya at The Ortega Firm.Key TakeawaysReal trial craft starts with courageously examining your own pain so you can truly sit with a client’s.Jurors don’t want jargon; they want clear “waiting room” answers that speak to human stakes.Building a case means investing time, spirit, and resources — not defaulting to a settlement template.The right trial team and community are lifelines when the defense tries to delay, overwhelm, and exhaust.Healing matters alongside verdicts: connect clients with specialists and care that improve quality of life.Purpose beats business models — full justice endures long after the money is gone.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Michael Alder’s entry into plaintiff’s work wasn’t planned at all — it started in a tiny 700-person Louisiana town with preacher-teacher parents, took a surprising turn on a fraternity lawn, and ultimately led to a clerkship with a Mississippi Supreme Court justice who changed everything by sharing war stories after hours. That exposure to real trial practice, plus a single job offer from legendary med-mal lawyer Dave Harney in Los Angeles, set him firmly on the plaintiffs’ side.Michael talks openly about getting fired, firms collapsing, and starting his own practice out of his house with one case while his then-wife’s entertainment law income kept them afloat. There was no “burning bush” moment — just necessity, training, and a willingness to try “anything that moved,” which led to eight, nine, ten-plus trials a year and a reputation built on reps, not branding.“I’ve always felt like we all can rise together. I’m very much a true believer in giving unconditionally without asking anything back. It’s good life. It’s good karma. It’s good business. It’s just good.”That philosophy underlies everything from his relationships with referring lawyers to his and his wife Gina’s heavy community work — from pro bono services for the Latino community to COVID food relief and rapid-response aid during the 2025 Pacific Palisades and Altadena fires.He’s equally blunt about the damage done by mill and billboard firms that oversell injuries, pad demands with diagnoses they don’t understand, and leave clients with pennies on the dollar. That behavior, he says, feeds the dark defense narratives that portray plaintiffs, lawyers, and doctors as crooks — a tactic he faced head-on in a recent Santa Barbara trial where the defense opened by attacking “astronomical” asks.  For his "Closing Argument," Alder speaks directly to lawyers and staff about perspective. He urges firms to see frequent calls as signals of fear, not annoyance; to stop calling cases “dogs”; and to remember that “Obstacles are not in the way. Your ability to solve and get through those obstacles is the way to help the person who has relied on you to help them.”Key Takeaways- Building a successful plaintiff practice often comes from necessity, repetition, and saying yes to trial opportunities rather than from a perfect, pre-planned career path.- Genuine generosity — handwritten notes, remembering personal details, showing up for community — can be a more powerful business driver than any billboard or ad campaign.- Reframing “difficult” clients and cases through empathy and fiduciary duty turns frustration into purpose and leads to better outcomes for both clients and lawyers.- Treating obstacles in a case as the actual work — not as an excuse to give up — is central to honoring the trust injured people place in their legal team.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Pasadena trial lawyer Michael S. Carrillo didn’t plan on following in his father’s footsteps. Growing up, he watched Luis Carrillo pour time and money into righteous, pro bono fights — even when the family struggled. The myth of guaranteed wealth in the law? He saw the opposite.But Michael found his way into the courtroom — and, eventually, into the work that now defines him: representing survivors of child sexual abuse and pursuing civil rights cases with a distinctly community-centered lens.What sets his practice apart, he explains, is deep cultural connection and language fluency born of a 45-year family legacy serving Latino clients in Los Angeles. Compassion isn’t a slogan; it’s the firm’s operating system. “I always tell every lawyer that comes to work in our office, lead with compassion,” he says. Carrillo recounts joining his father on the Miramonte Elementary School litigation, where a teacher’s horrific abuse of children galvanized both their practice and the community’s trust. That experience foreshadowed the years-long battle in Jane and John Does v. Mountain View School District (El Monte), a case that stretched more than seven years and wound through the trial court, the court of appeal, and the California Supreme Court. When the defense sought to introduce evidence of a survivor’s unrelated, later incident of abuse to muddy causation, Carrillo and team pushed back. Working with Senator Anna Caballero, advocates helped pass SB 1386 (Suzy’s Law), strengthening California’s civil rape shield protections.That perspective crystallizes in his “Closing Argument,” where he returns to a painful loss in an earlier LAUSD trial. After the defense verdict, he walked into his conference room to tell survivors the news. Braced for collapse, he heard something else: “You know what, Michael, that’s okay. Thank you for believing in me and fighting for me. You gave me my voice back.”Key TakeawaysLead with compassion first; strategy and results follow when clients feel seen and safe.Cultural and language fluency deepen trust with clients and jurors, especially in community-rooted cases.Appellate and legislative advocacy can be essential trial tools — sometimes the fight moves beyond the courtroom.Strengthened civil rape shield protections (SB 1386 / Suzy’s Law) prevent retraumatizing detours into unrelated incidents.Streamlined, coordinated trial presentations respect jurors’ time while amplifying each survivor’s distinct story.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

“True advocacy starts and begins with a well-trained lawyer that is providing independent legal counsel in the best interest of the client, not in the best interest of shareholders or a corporation.”Lance K. Brubaker traces an uncommon arc — from oil-and-gas and creditors’ rights work to founding a boutique plaintiff practice focused on catastrophic injury cases. Early in his career, he says, the paychecks were fine, but the purpose was missing. A Rick Friedman speech — the kind that sticks in your head when you’re dissatisfied — nudged him toward representing real people. That shift eventually became Brubaker Injury Law in South Florida, where he now personally shepherds cases from intake through resolution, resisting the assembly-line model that dominates high-volume practices.Brubaker talks candidly about the leap from a steady salary to the uncertainty of building a firm — learning trust accounting, marketing, even the uneasy feeling of spending into growth and waiting for results. Those pressures, he argues, made him a stronger advocate. And they reinforced his hands-on approach, especially with “second look” matters: cases rejected by larger firms that, with time and persistence, can turn into life-changing outcomes. He shares a recent example — two years of work on a case another shop had dropped — that resolved just shy of seven figures. The point isn’t the number; it’s restoring hope for clients who were told they had none.Lance also discusses the policy fight over Arizona’s Alternative Business Structures and the deletion of Ethics Rule 5.4. Brubaker worries that private equity–driven ownership undermines lawyers’ independence and invites national end-runs around states that have rejected non-lawyer ownership. He contrasts Arizona’s approvals with Utah’s stricter sandbox, calling for vigilance and, frankly, for more of the profession to engage now that players like KPMG are in the mix. Access to justice is real, he says — but contingency-fee personal injury isn’t where the crisis lies.Threaded through the episode is a commitment to clarity at trial: show the rule, show how it was broken, and refuse to let insurers minimize what’s been taken. It’s a philosophy that fits a small, elite team that stays with the client from day one.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Trial lawyer Tom Scolaro of Scolaro Law P.C. shares why the motto “Hustle & Heart, Set Us Apart” isn’t marketing fluff for his firm, it’s operating instructions.Scolaro grew up in a blue-collar upstate New York town, the son of an immigrant truck driver who admired lawyers and pushed his kids to aim higher. Law school originally meant a prosecutor’s path (think Jack McCoy on “Law & Order”), until life swerved: his older brother was catastrophically injured by a drunk driver while Tom was a 1L. Navigating hospitals, fear, and a maze of legal decisions with the help of a civil lawyer changed his trajectory. The lesson stuck — people need an advocate who picks up the phone, answers questions, and stands in the gap.Scolaro’s practice philosophy is blunt and human: be the boxer in your client’s corner, not the tuxedo in the hallway. He tells prospective clients to interview multiple firms and ask, word for word, “Ask your lawyer, ‘What is your why? Why do you do this?’” If the answer is canned, keep looking. The work is too hard — and the stakes too high — to fake purpose.The episode’s centerpiece is the retelling of a harrowing house-fire case in Cudjoe Key, Florida. Initial officials blamed an 18-year-old survivor, calling it a “marijuana fire” from a balcony ember. Scolaro refused that narrative. He moved fast with fire, electrical, and metallurgical experts, stripped outlets, and mapped fire dynamics to relocate the origin inside — near a defective electrical receptacle that arced, ignited blackout curtains and a sofa, and filled the home with toxic smoke. Policy change threads through Scolaro’s work, too. He recounts a fatal carbon-monoxide poisoning at a Key West hotel that helped spur code requirements for CO detectors in new hotel construction — and, years later, a similar cross-border case with thorny choice-of-law issues that he pushed through to accountability. The pattern is clear: meticulous investigation, relentless pressure on corporate defendants, and a refusal to let clients walk alone.In his “Closing Argument,” Scolaro explains why he stayed in this arena: to champion people through life-rocking harm, to get accountability and justice, and to help clients recover personally — not just financially. Key TakeawaysPurpose drives performance — clients should ask every lawyer to articulate a real “why.”Winning isn’t only monetary; clearing a client’s name and preventing despair are “human verdicts” that matter.Litigation can inspire safety reforms (e.g., carbon-monoxide detector requirements) that protect future guests.Authentic accessibility — sharing a cell number, taking late-night calls — builds trust when lives are upended.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of “Celebrating Justice,” trial lawyer Daniel Schneiderman traces that arc from early Toastmasters triumphs and DA’s training to a deliberately client-first personal injury practice.Daniel’s candid about what actually fuels his fire: living the case alongside clients, from hospital to courthouse steps, and doing high-quality work at a deliberately capped caseload so he can be present at every turn. “Small, hungry, and we know what we’re doing,” he says — not as a slogan, but as operating philosophy.Schneiderman’s origin story is textured. The grandson of a NASA engineer who worked around the Mariner missions, he grew up seeing precision and curiosity modeled in the most practical ways — darkroom photography, notebooks dense with rocket-science math, even early GPS tinkering before the internet era. A different path was possible, even tempting, but the courtroom called. He loved English and writing, loved to present, loved the emotional resonance of a story well told. And there was a formative moment at home: after a freak blender accident injured his mother’s hand, he calmly took charge, asked “Whose fault was this?” and began to see how law touches real life.In Southern California’s crowded PI market, he’s resisted the volume game. Instead of chasing leads with ads, he invests in reputation — relationships, thoughtful LinkedIn presence, and trust that compounds into referrals. That human-centered posture crystallized during a catastrophic-injury trial he worked with mentor Roger Dreyer.Key TakeawaysClient-first PI work scales on trust, not volume — cap caseloads to stay present and deliver quality.Mentorship in the heat of trial teaches the hardest lesson: separate lawyer ego from client decisions.Strong personal branding (done thoughtfully) compounds into organic referrals and immediate trust.Contingency work invites a gambler’s mindset; disciplined risk framing keeps the client in control.Today’s tools and mentors lower the barrier to launching or reinventing a legal practice.Total commitment — time, resources, and energy — is the hallmark of a true trial lawyer.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of “Celebrating Justice,” trial lawyer Jeremy Citron, founder and partner at The Hurt Boss, traces an unconventional path to the courtroom — from dreaming of becoming a Major League Baseball umpire to finding his calling in personal injury law. The journey starts with a nudge from his father to take the LSAT “as a fallback,” turns into early academic momentum in law school, and then shifts through big-law training at Holland & Knight. A pivotal fellowship at Atlanta Legal Aid reframes everything. Perspective changes when you work with people who have nothing, he says — and the courtroom quickly becomes home.Citron’s early trial reps at Legal Aid deepened through criminal defense work and even a stint as a part-time municipal prosecutor. The accumulation mattered: quick thinking, comfort on his feet, a taste for real trials. What ultimately sets him apart, he explains, isn’t perfection — it’s presence. “Nobody is expecting perfection in a trial. They’re just looking for a human presentation — someone who can get the client’s perspective across and engage the jury.” The goal, always: be the most authentic version of himself on his feet.For his "Closing Argument," Citron closes with a clear charge to the plaintiff bar: embrace the role and the responsibility. “Trial lawyers help people who will never be able to speak for themselves because the system isn’t designed for them to do so.”Key TakeawaysAuthenticity persuades: juries seek a human presentation, not perfection.Early trial responsibility — especially at legal aid — accelerates courtroom growth.Career detours (big law, prosecution, defense) can compound into a trial-ready toolkit.Truth-finding is its own remedy — clients often want accountability as much as compensation.Passion plus preparation fuels endurance in long, complex litigation.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

From fraternity consultant to defense associate to plaintiff’s trial lawyer and now a solo personal injury attorney at Hudson Injury Law in New Mexico — Damon Hudson has taken the "scenic route" to meaningful advocacy. In this episode of "Celebrating Justice", he shares how a winding early career (including a brief stop in tax law) ultimately clarified what he wanted from the law: real human connection, real outcomes. Damon frames litigation like offense on a football field, pushing tempo and refusing to let cases gather dust. As he puts it, “I liked being on offense. I liked being in control and dictating the pace....” That mindset shows up in discovery battles, scheduling fights, and the day-to-day discipline of moving matters toward resolution rather than letting them idle for years.In his “Closing Argument,” Hudson emphasizes confidence, steady courage, and service. He reflects on how far he’s come in six years and challenges himself to double that growth — not for accolades, but to better support his family and the people who call him on their hardest days..Key TakeawaysMomentum wins cases — consistent, respectful pressure prevents files from languishing and gets clients to resolution sooner.Human connection is the payoff: outcomes matter, but relationships and closure are what clients remember.The plaintiff’s path offers direct ownership, client contact, and responsibility that many lawyers never see on the defense side.Respecting client goals — not just lawyerly glory — leads to smarter choices between trial and settlement.Confidence isn’t the absence of fear; it’s the practiced habit of acting through it to serve others.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Charleston trial lawyer Roy T. Willey IV traces a path from a skinny, freckled kid who hated seeing people pushed around to a courtroom advocate who measures success by the lives he can improve — not by the percentage of policy limits recovered. Raised largely by a single mom, Roy carried a simple vow into adulthood: don’t let people be taken advantage of.Roy describes his “trial ready process” — building every file like it will be tried, even though, as he notes, most will settle. It forces clarity on themes early and keeps leverage real. And it keeps promises to clients.He then walks us inside the wrongful-death case that produced a $700 million verdict for the mother of a 17-year-old abducted and murdered in South Carolina — a case as much about truth-telling as it was about compensation. The path was long: a missing-person investigation, the FBI’s eventual involvement, a confession corroborated by recovered remains, and civil suits targeting not just the perpetrator but institutional actors who enabled harm. Roy emphasizes that juries understand money cannot restore a life; damages are our non-barbaric alternative to eye-for-an-eye justice. The verdict — historic in scale — functions as moral accounting and public accountability than a bank deposit.Roy is candid, too, about what comes next. He may one day trade trial travel for a pulpit, but the vocation — serving people in their worst moments — won’t change. In his "Closing Argument," Roy reminds us that justice is chosen, daily — that our greatest asset isn’t doctrine but humanity — and that worthy fights, not easy ones, are where trial lawyers prove their value. Learn more about Roy at Anastopoulo Law Firm and www.roywilley.law.Key TakeawaysService-first lawyering — not profit-maximization — can shape case selection, strategy, and impact.Building every matter to be trial-ready strengthens leverage, storytelling, and client trust.Damages are society’s imperfect but necessary substitute for eye-for-an-eye justice.Historic verdicts can be about truth and accountability even when collectability is limited.Faith, empathy, and disciplined preparation can coexist with hard-edged advocacy.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Yale Spector, founder of Spector Law Group, was raised in a family of attorneys — his grandfather serving as a Hague-appointed legal officer after WWII, his parents both practicing in Baltimore, and his brother pursuing the same calling — Spector grew up at a dinner table where debate was constant and justice was considered a family responsibility.In this episode of "Celebrating Justice", he traces that path from early years at big plaintiff firms, where he handled complex medical malpractice cases across state lines, to becoming a trusted litigator known for representing clients that others turned away. He built his reputation on catastrophic injury and birth injury cases, often traveling far from Maryland under pro hac vice admissions. Those experiences gave him a front-row view of how a few seconds in medicine — or law — can change an entire life. The Exxon groundwater litigation in Maryland consumed years of his career and left him questioning the structures of Big Law. Burnout and disillusionment pushed him to reimagine his practice. What emerged was bold: Spector bought a 30-foot RV, transformed it into the LAW Truck (Legal Assistance on Wheels), and began offering free legal advice in grocery store lots, church parking lots, and community events. Spector also shares two cases that shaped his understanding of law’s true weight: a catastrophic birth injury case where the child, once expected not to live past six months, went on to graduate high school and college because of the resources secured in court; and a case where a perfectly healthy baby suffered brain damage due to dehydration — a reminder of how quickly negligence can shatter expectations.In his "Closing Argument," Spector turns to scripture. He explains that Proverbs 31:8–9 has been his anchor, a reminder that justice isn’t abstract but a calling — to speak up, to stand firm, and to ensure that those most vulnerable are not forgotten. Key TakeawaysJustice must meet people where they are — accessibility is itself a form of advocacy.Seconds in medicine and law can change lives; precision and timeliness matter in both.Burnout can spark reinvention — innovation in law practice often comes from struggle.Faith and family legacies can deeply shape a trial lawyer’s path and endurance.Cases are not just legal battles but human stories, often reshaping what is possible for families.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

From billion-dollar deals in Dubai to billion-dollar settlements in Texas, Murtaza Sutarwalla’s legal journey is anything but ordinary.In this episode of Celebrating Justice, Murtaza traces his path from elite corporate law to the frontlines of human trafficking litigation. Early in his career, he represented governments and major corporations, drafting M&A contracts and shaping foreign law — but he ultimately traded prestige for purpose. Now a founding partner at ESS Law Partners in Houston, Murtaza applies his insider knowledge of corporate defense to fight for the vulnerable.Listeners will hear how Murtaza helped craft and later litigate Texas’s landmark biometric privacy law — culminating in a historic $1 billion settlement against Meta. He also opens up about his firm’s focus on labor and human trafficking cases, and how undocumented workers and vulnerable teens are too often exploited in silence. For Murtaza, law is more than advocacy — it’s a divine responsibility. “Every client that walks through my door was sent by God,” he says.In his powerful Closing Argument, Murtaza reflects on the dual roles listed on his bar license — attorney and counselor at law—  and why both titles define his mission: “If I do my job as an attorney and a counselor at law, to me, that means that I have done the best job possible for my clients… and helped them heal.”Key TakeawaysExperience in corporate law can be a major asset in plaintiff litigation, especially against large institutionsHuman and labor trafficking cases are becoming central to the modern fight for justice.Strategic venue selection can shift power dynamics in high-stakes litigationTrial lawyers can and should help clients heal— not just win.Laws written decades ago can resurface as vital tools in present-day litigation.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In Episode 44 of "Celebrating Justice", Alan Ripka — a seasoned New York trial lawyer whose career was shaped by personal tragedy — shares his remarkable journey. Growing up in Queens, Ripka was on track to become a doctor until his brother Robbie was killed in a ski accident just before graduating high school. The loss ignited a passion to advocate for others who couldn’t speak for themselves, leading him to law school and eventually the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office, where he honed his skills in the courtroom.Ripka recounts his early days as an ADA, including a first trial win that hinged on persuading a jury that a man’s beloved lion-head ring was essentially a weapon. From there, his reputation for identifying the precise issues at the heart of a case only grew.In private practice since 1992, Ripka has represented clients in high-stakes injury and medical malpractice cases, from amputations to wrongful death. He recalls an elevator accident case that was halted mid–opening statement due to the COVID-19 courthouse shutdown — forcing a two-year wait before resolution. That patience, combined with deep empathy for his clients, is at the core of his approach: “You have to be them,” he says, “not you.”Ripka also discusses his pioneering work under the 2019 Stayskal Act, which carved out a rare exception to the Feres doctrine, allowing active-duty military members to bring medical malpractice claims against the Department of Defense.In his Closing Argument, Ripka delivers an unflinching message about what it truly means to be a trial lawyer: a relentless readiness to sacrifice personal time, shoulder immense responsibility, and remain laser-focused on giving clients “the best opportunity to present what happened to me” — no matter the cost.Key TakeawaysPersonal tragedy can ignite a lifelong passion for justice.Early courtroom experience, especially in public service, builds unmatched trial skills.Conceding non-essential points can sharpen focus on winning issues.Empathy and client connection are essential to effective advocacy.The Stayskal Act opened unprecedented avenues for active-duty military malpractice claims.Total commitment — time, resources, and energy — is the hallmark of a true trial lawyer.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Justin Blitz never planned to be a trial lawyer. In fact, he swore he wouldn’t follow in his father’s footsteps. He spent his early career immersed in New York’s music scene — booking bands, promoting shows, and working for music legend Chris Blackwell. But after law school and a brief stint in entertainment law, he found the work uninspiring. As his mother had always told him, his greatest gift was using his voice to persuade. That gift would soon be tested.When Justin joined his father’s firm, he was given a trial no one else wanted. He had never tried a case before. Three weeks later, a jury returned a $3.95 million verdict. "That was when I was like, I got the bug," Justin recalls.His journey was far from easy. Corruption within the firm forced him to start over with no cases, no capital, and an uncertain future. He built his new practice through sheer grit, often trying multiple cases in a single day in Queens County. Along the way, he endured personal tragedies — losing ten friends by age 40, his father’s passing, and surviving a near-fatal motorcycle accident. These experiences deepened his empathy for clients facing life-altering loss.In his "Closing Argument," Justin shares the story of a seven-year battle against the world’s largest construction equipment manufacturer. The case involved a defective solenoid valve that caused a massive machine to move while turned off, crushing a man’s legs. The company knew about the defect but chose not to issue a costly recall. Justin painstakingly uncovered the evidence, cross-examined the chief engineer for days, and ultimately resolved the case for $10 million. For Justin, it was a reminder of why he fights — to hold powerful corporations accountable and deliver justice for those with no voice.Today, as founder of Blitz Law Group in Manhattan, Justin blends street-smart instincts with deep compassion. He credits his success to relentless preparation, honesty, vulnerability, and the belief that learning never stops. His story is a testament to resilience, persistence, and the enduring power of using one’s voice for good.Key TakeawaysFollowing one’s instincts can lead to unexpected and fulfilling career paths.Personal tragedy can deepen empathy and strengthen advocacy skills.Corruption or setbacks can be catalysts for growth and reinvention.Thorough investigation and persistence can turn complex, unwinnable cases into major victories.Vulnerability and honesty are essential traits for connecting with juries and clients.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this moving episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer James Vickaryous shares the deeply personal experiences and convictions that have shaped his decades-long journey in the legal profession.​A first-generation lawyer with roots in a Navy family, Jim grew up with a strong ethic of service. That sense of purpose — instilled by his parents — became a guiding principle throughout his career. His mother encouraged him to become a lawyer, not out of ambition, but because he was terrified of needles and couldn't stomach blood — two obstacles to her dream of raising four doctors. Ultimately, Jim’s father's advice, however, would leave the bigger mark: "Do something that’s going to help people."With a job market stacked against him in 1993, he got his first break through a spontaneous phone call from a law school roommate. That chance encounter launched him into commercial litigation, and eventually into personal injury, where he found his calling. It was in the rural corners of Florida — running a general practice with a fellow law school buddy — that Jim first saw how everyday people struggled after life-altering injuries, often unaware they had any recourse at all.What sets Jim apart is his exceptional risk tolerance — both financially and professionally. He regularly takes on cases others would shy away from, often hearing, "Are we really doing this?" from his paralegals. But Jim sees the light at the end of the tunnel and pushes forward when others won’t. He describes himself as diplomatically firm with opposing counsel, willing to let the jury decide when insurers refuse to acknowledge the truth.One of the most poignant moments of the episode involves a tragic case in which a distracted billionaire driver killed a mother and her young son. The father — a good Samaritan who unknowingly came upon the wreck — realized too late that it was his own family. Despite unimaginable grief, he chose to donate his loved ones’ organs, saving many lives. His surviving daughter, just 13, later forgave the man who killed her family in a handwritten note that left even the defense stunned. Jim has remained close with the family, drawing deep inspiration from their strength and grace.In his "Closing Argument," Jim recounts his military service in the U.S. Army Reserves, including a deployment to Bosnia during NATO’s peacekeeping mission. Witnessing the aftermath of a collapsed justice system — entire valleys razed because ethnic groups had lost faith in legal protection — he came home with a renewed appreciation for the rule of law. "Nothing is perfect — certainly not American justice. But after seeing the world, I like our system a lot more than any other."To learn more about Jim and his work, visit The Vickaryous Law Firm.Key TakeawaysA deep-rooted belief in service has shaped a lifelong legal mission.Career-defining opportunities often begin with risk and improvisation.High risk tolerance enables the firm to take on — and win — difficult cases.The human element of legal work can be transformative for both lawyer and client.Personal experiences in failed justice systems underscore the value of rule of law.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Sharif's path to trial law was anything but conventional, but each step along the way — from valedictorian at Virginia Military Institute, to Army JAG officer defending elite soldiers, to prosecutor and finally personal injury lawyer now at Broughton Injury Law — deepened his calling to stand up for others.As an Army JAG officer, Sharif discovered the power of advocacy in defending clients others had already written off. Representing soldiers accused of serious misconduct, he learned how much was truly at stake in every trial. One of his most unforgettable cases involved a senior officer with a federal conviction and serious PTSD — a case Sharif fought and won, earning his client an honorable discharge and medical retirement. “We created a chart — green, yellow, red — to show how his health and evaluations deteriorated together,” Sharif recalls. “That case stays with me.”Transitioning from military to civilian life, Sharif clerked for federal judges, spent time at a major law firm, then returned to courtrooms as a Richmond prosecutor. But it was in personal injury law where he found his purpose: helping people during the worst moments of their lives and holding others accountable. He recalls a $1.5M trip-and-fall verdict in Virginia—a state known for harsh contributory negligence laws—as the moment he knew that thorough preparation and belief in his client could overcome the odds.Sharif also speaks candidly about imposter syndrome, doubt, and the emotional highs and lows of trial work. His passion is sustained by relentless learning—from Trial Lawyers University, to an LL.M. in Trial Advocacy, to the life-changing experience of attending the Gerry Spence Method at Thunderhead Ranch. “The day you say you’re done learning or that you know the right answer — you need to hang it up.”In his “Closing Argument,” Sharif challenges the idea that good lawyers don’t need to market. A pivotal conversation changed his perspective: “If you think you provide a good legal service and you’re not marketing — shame on you.” Now, he embraces tactful, meaningful outreach so that people who need help can actually find him.Key TakeawaysA non-linear path can still lead to purpose-driven work if you stay open to unexpected opportunities.Trial law is about more than compensation—it's about accountability, deterrence, and restoring dignity.Believing in your client and preparing thoroughly can overcome even the toughest legal obstacles.Continuing education is critical for growth and sustained success in trial practice.Marketing done ethically allows the right clients to find the right lawyer at the right time.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Chris Blackburn, a seasoned trial lawyer at Blackburn Romey in Fort Wayne, Indiana, shares his journey from finance and farming back to trial law, led by a simple question when working with clients: “Do they need help?” That guiding mindset shaped a practice rooted in humility, teamwork, and purpose. Returning to the family firm meant reconnecting with childhood memories — riding along on home visits with his dad, working with his siblings, and serving clients from all walks of life.His experience as a semi-truck driver lends real-world perspective to trucking cases, while his courtroom approach keeps trials fast , focused, and jury-friendly (inspired by Joe Fried, "Celebrating Justice" Ep. 33). Drawing parallels between farming and trial work, he talks about investing in people, planting seeds, and trusting the process. In his “Closing Argument,” he reflects on a firm-wide culture shift driven by self-analysis, resulting in core values like integrity, collaboration, and adaptability. For him, real advocacy means knowing who you are — and being unafraid to go to trial.Key TakeawaysPurpose over profit: any case worth taking is one where someone needs help.Family roots and teamwork form the bedrock of a values-first legal culture.Real‑world experience — like trucking knowledge — can sharpen trial edge.Firm culture matters: humility, vulnerability, integrity, accountability, and innovation define true advocacy.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In Episode 39 of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer Maggie Bopp of Rappaport, Glass, Levine, & Zullo LLP brings her fierce advocacy and heartfelt integrity to the spotlight.From her upbringing in a family rooted deeply in law enforcement and military service, to her decorated tenure in the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, Bopp shares an inspiring journey shaped by duty, grit, and compassion.Early on, Bopp stood out — playing boys lacrosse with her braid hidden beneath a helmet and taking on the unofficial role of “lawyer” among her four brothers. Her competitiveness, sharpened on the field and honed in courtrooms, became a hallmark of her legal style: “Try me,” she says, is her unspoken message when underestimated.Bopp recounts harrowing cases from her time in the Vehicular Crime Bureau. One tragedy still haunts her: an Uber crash that killed four young passengers. The intoxicated driver who caused the accident died before he could be prosecuted, leaving victims’ families with unanswered questions and unfulfilled justice. But another case, involving the fiery deaths of a father and two children, led to a landmark conviction after months of tireless investigation — one that tested Bopp personally and professionally.She credits her background in criminal prosecution for preparing her to build strong cases and connect with jurors. “People just want to be heard,” she says. Whether it’s a bartender or a trial attorney, that need for connection and empathy bridges all.In her “Closing Argument,” Bopp reflects on a case that tested her instincts: a defendant who faked mental incapacity to delay proceedings in a DUI fatality trial. Her gut told her something was off — and it was right. Pole camera footage captured the defendant walking, talking, and lifting boxes just before donning a wheelchair and acting nonverbal in court. Her persistence exposed the deception, secured a conviction, and brought closure to a grieving widow and her four children.Key TakeawaysGrowing up in a law enforcement family instilled a deep sense of justice and public service.Playing boys lacrosse and bartending taught valuable lessons in grit and human connection.Vehicular homicide cases require both emotional resilience and precise legal skill.Gut instincts can be critical in uncovering truth and securing justice.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Patrick O’Hara’s path to personal injury law began with a love for advocacy, justice, and literature — from "To Kill a Mockingbird" to real courtroom trials.In Episode 38 of "Celebrating Justice," the founder of OHARA Law Firm reflects on how formative experiences — from clerking at the Lanier Law Firm to leading high-stakes mesothelioma trials —shaped a deep conviction: always put the client first.Mark Lanier hired Patrick straight out of Pepperdine, launching a career that would span three bar exams and numerous jurisdictions. But what stands out most is Patrick’s steady moral compass. “The Golden Rule… is really one of the foundations of my beliefs,” he shares. That ethic extends far beyond the courtroom —like taking in four children after a colleague’s cancer diagnosis, or waiving fees when insurance falls short for an injured child.Patrick also recounts powerful stories: a dying client who stood up to a judge to demand justice, and a custody case that required proving murder in a family courtroom. Through it all, his stance is clear — clients deserve the full truth and agency, even if it’s not best for the firm.It’s that blend of intellect, integrity, and empathy that defines both his practice and this conversation.Key TakeawaysThe Golden Rule guides every decision, including waiving fees when justice for children outweighs financial return.Early exposure to courtroom dynamics and advocacy can spark a lifelong commitment to justice.Seeking autonomy and work-life balance often leads professionals to forge their own path.Gaining exposure and experience can inform a deeper understanding of race, identity, and justice.Challenging flawed systems sometimes requires creative legal approaches and persistence across multiple venues.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

[Theme Music Plays]Gary L. Bailey Jr.: If you wanted to sue Santa Claus, tell me where the North Pole is at. They offered us $5,000 because they thought it was the dumbest case we could even bring. His own lawyer got up during "Closing Argument"s and said, well, know, some cops make mistakes and things get... I promise you it was one of my best closings ever. You should have saw it because I was outraged.Narrator: Welcome to "Celebrating Justice" presented by the Trial Lawyers Journal at CloudLex, the next-gen legal cloud platform built exclusively for personal injury law. Get inspired by the nation's top trial lawyers and share in the stories that shape our pursuit of justice. Follow the podcast and join our community at triallawyersjournal.com. Now here's your host, editor of TLJ and VP of marketing at CloudLex, Chad Sands.Chad Sands: Welcome back friends to "Celebrating Justice". In this episode, we welcome Philadelphia Bay's trial lawyer, Gary Bailey. From a fourth grade reenactment of the Dred Scott case to fighting civil rights violations and tough personal injury cases, he's built his reputation on taking the hard cases others pass on and winning. To get to the stories, I asked him, why did you want to become a trial lawyer?Gary L. Bailey Jr.: My story starts back when I was about 10 years old, fourth grade. I went to a Catholic school here in Philadelphia and my teacher, Ms. Kayette, I'll never forget her at the time, she had us do a demonstration of a famous Supreme Court case. And I was excited to know as a kid, but I found out once we came in law, it is considered the worst opinion in Supreme Court history. It was, I believe, 1862, 63, something like that. Why is that important? was a couple years before slavery ended. It's called the Dred Scott case. Here it was in a nutshell. It was a case to where a former slave bought his freedom with money from the owner and then on top of that moved to the North, which as most people know, slavery was outlawed. Some plantation owner went up to the North, brought him back, jailed him, basically brought him back. And the court basically said that the law was not made for former slaves, free slaves, Africans, et cetera, et cetera, and basically put this man back in bondage. As fate would have it, Lincoln took office right after a couple of years later, Civil War, slavery was outlawed. Again, think about a 10 year old going through this example, myself, one other friend of mine, and then two other people on the side and we're doing this demonstration without any knowledge, only for the teacher to say, Mr. Bailey, you're part of the YouTube Lose. I'm like, what? Hold on. This is what's going on or what's happening? Oh, I want to be a lawyer. It just stuck with me. So as I got older, I understood more and more about the profession and what it meant in terms of the amount of influence and responsibility and power in a way you could change people's lives. And then it just so happened that my personality fits the profession and family members and friends for the past 40 some odd years are saying, you like to argue, you should be a lawyer. So it was just at that point, just confirmation bias and me sticking with it more and more. And then finally decided, all right, it's time to go to law school. Best decision never made, never looked back.Chad Sands: You went to temple. Yes. so tell me about your first kind of years as an attorney after graduation and what that was like.Gary L. Bailey Jr.: After graduation, I worked for two different firms, both doing personal injury. And it's funny because even though I knew I wanted to do it, I wasn't as sure. And even more importantly, here in Pennsylvania, and in particular Philadelphia, 99 % of the personal injury firms do not hire young lawyers, which means I had no shot of getting a job, especially with a plaintiff's firm. And a good friend of miThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Verónica Vázquez’s journey to becoming a trial lawyer began in a small Puerto Rican classroom, defending her cousin with nothing but instinct and a strong sense of justice.That same energy now fuels her work in one of the largest environmental litigations in U.S. history. A black belt in Taekwondo and a mother of two when she entered law school, Verónica’s early career was forged in adversity—studying by candlelight after Hurricane Maria and launching her solo practice from scratch. Today, she serves at Napoli Shkolnik, where she leads PFAS litigation across the country, representing public water systems impacted by toxic chemical contamination. Her human-first approach sets her apart. “Everything is work and guided by humans,” she says, emphasizing the empathy and discipline behind her advocacy. She’s not only been a voice in the courtroom but also a tireless researcher—often studying environmental law and science after hours. Her work on the PFAS MDL led to historic settlements with 3M and DuPont, and she continues to pursue justice against smaller manufacturers still polluting U.S. water supplies. For Verónica, being a trial lawyer isn’t just a job—it’s about rebuilding trust, especially in communities that have long been overlooked.Key TakeawaysOvercoming both personal and environmental challenges, this trial advocate began a legal career grounded in resilience.Leading PFAS litigation has resulted in major victories for public water systems and environmental justice.A deeply human-centered approach fosters trust and connection with clients across diverse communities.Discipline and mental toughness from martial arts training directly inform preparation and courtroom performance.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this heartfelt episode of "Celebrating Justice," Jon Groth, founder of Groth Law Firm, S.C. in Wisconsin, reflects on a career rooted in doing the right thing—even when no one else will. From his blue-collar upbringing to a short-lived dream of jazz saxophone stardom, Groth’s path to personal injury law was shaped by grit, gratitude, and an unwavering commitment to helping others. “Helping others with strategy,” as he puts it, is where he thrives. Groth shares the emotional story behind a half-million-dollar verdict for a client injured while visiting Wisconsin — a case built not just on skill, but on connection, perseverance, and empathy. He also recounts a recent $6 million dog mauling verdict in a case with no clear recovery path. “Other attorneys would not look at this case,” Groth says. But he did, because, as he reminds us, “It really comes down to four words: do the right thing.” Whether he’s driving seven hours round trip for a deposition or opening a coffee shop door for a struggling mom, Groth’s message is clear: small actions, big impacts. This episode is a powerful tribute to standing tall for justice — even when the odds say walk away.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," Joe Fried of Fried Goldberg LLC brings decades of insight and unmatched dedication to transforming highway safety through truck wreck litigation. A former police officer and judge, Fried shares how his journey began with a desire to protect others — “I always had a heart for the underdog.” His life’s work has become a crusade against corporate facades that obscure responsibility, especially in cases involving Amazon’s sprawling delivery network.A nationally recognized leader in truck wreck cases, Fried reflects on his commitment to understanding “the human animal” and the decision-making forces that shape both people and corporations. “I’m in awe of the human being,” he says, underscoring his belief that authenticity and empathy drive the most impactful advocacy.The episode explores Fried’s influence in pioneering truck litigation, his push for industry-wide accountability, and his personal investment in becoming a “student of everything”— from truck driver training to logistics systems. His ongoing efforts to expose Amazon’s hidden control behind so-called independent delivery drivers exemplify his mission: ensuring safety becomes a business imperative, not a casualty of profit.Key TakeawaysA background in public service can deeply inform a human-centered trial strategy.Truck wreck litigation reveals how corporations obscure responsibility behind complex systems.Empathy, curiosity, and deep study elevate advocacy beyond legal tactics.Industry change begins when safety is valued over profit margins.The courtroom becomes most powerful when it's used to pursue truth, not just victory.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

Gigi Grasska didn’t set out to become a trial lawyer. A reserved presence growing up, she was the “quiet one,” expected by many — including her own mother — to choose a different path.​But once a Pepperdine professor spotted her legal mind in an undergrad class, the game changed.Now practicing personal injury law in Los Angeles, Gigi has carved out a reputation for empathy, tenacity, and hands-on client care.In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," Gigi opens up about turning doubt into fuel. “Even my own mom didn’t want me to go to law school,” she admits. But she kept showing up, proving naysayers wrong one case at a time. Whether it’s advocating for overlooked clients or securing policy limit settlements, she thrives on the same adrenaline rush that once drove her to swim with sharks and fight wildfires—literally.For her "Closing Argument," her story about protecting her family home during the 2025 Palisades fire offers a raw, powerful look at how personal battles shape professional resolve. The aftermath — facing hostile insurance adjusters — deepened her empathy for clients navigating trauma.For Gigi, it’s simple: “Persistence and trust are everything.” And that belief is stitched into every case she takes on.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this deeply personal and unflinchingly honest conversation, veteran trial lawyer Gary Gwilliam opens Season Two with a story unlike any other.Founding partner of Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer and the author of “Getting a Winning Verdict in My Personal Life: A Trial Lawyer Finds His Soul,” Gary reflects on a 60-year legal career marked by grit, grace, and a long walk toward healing.From 180 jury trials to the presidency of the Consumer Attorneys of California (formerly California Trial Lawyers Association) during a high-stakes ballot war, Gary’s professional journey is as storied as it is human. But what sets him apart isn't just the big verdicts—it's his candor about what trial work costs the people who do it. “We don't get anything unless we take it away from somebody,” he says. “Almost always money.”He talks openly about substance abuse, devastating personal losses, and what finally pushed him to get sober. That turning point led to a spiritual reckoning—one that shaped how he mentors younger lawyers today. Gary isn’t afraid to talk about his losses, in or out of court. And maybe that’s the legacy he’s most proud of: helping fellow trial lawyers find the courage to show up honestly, for their clients and themselves.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer Adam Rossen details his transition from pre-med student to passionate criminal defense attorney. Initially inspired by his love for arguing and watching "Law and Order," Adam pursued law to become a trial lawyer and started his career as a prosecutor. He appreciated the hands-on experience and quickly realized his desire to help people extended beyond the confines of the state attorney's office. Adam's transition to criminal defense was initially challenging, requiring a mindset shift from prosecuting to defending. He eventually founded a successful defense firm with his colleague. His ability to relate to clients, explain complex legal concepts in simple terms, and build trust has set him apart in the courtroom.Adam shares notable cases that have shaped his career, including a memorable trial where a client was found not guilty of DUI despite blowing twice the legal limit, thanks to the unique defense involving a shark bite injury. In a more recent case involving a contractor dispute after a hurricane, Adam's firm worked for five years to secure justice for their client, ultimately resulting in a mistrial due to the prosecution's mishandling.In his “Closing Argument,” Adam highlights the profound impact his mentor, Ben Glass, had on his career. Ben's advice to grow the law firm to help more people has been a guiding principle. Adam emphasizes the importance of expanding the practice to create a larger positive impact on the community.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this compelling season finale of Celebrating Justice, we sit down with Mike Morse of the Mike Morse Law Firm, the largest personal injury firm in Michigan. Known for his groundbreaking Fireproof methodology, Mike shares his personal journey marked by resilience, innovation, and a deep commitment to justice. Starting with his early inspirations and challenges, including his father's influence, tragic setbacks, and a literal fire that gutted his office, Mike explains how these "fires" led to his Fireproof approach to business resilience. He shares insights on everything from crafting the memorable advertising campaigns that propelled his success in Detroit's competitive market to his expertise in mastering law firm operations.Mike’s two standout cases illustrate his profound dedication to his clients. In one case, he won a $75 million wrongful death verdict for a grieving family. In another, he secured the release of a wrongfully convicted man who was set to spend the rest of his life behind bars for a crime he didn't commit. For his "Closing Argument," Mike concludes by sharing his passion for helping law firms achieve their potential through strategic planning and “Cherry Garcia” differentiation by pursuing cases that elevate you, focusing on client outcomes, and building a law firm that’s truly “fireproof” against adversity.Key TakeawaysStanding Out in a Competitive Field: Memorable ads helped Mike dominate the crowded personal injury market and he urges lawyers to find their unique “Cherry Garcia” to connect authentically with their audience.Resilience Through Crises: From losing 70% of his business in 2011 to an office fire in 2007, Mike shares how he overcame challenges by betting on himself.Fighting for Justice: Highlighting his $75 million wrongful death verdict and freeing a wrongfully convicted man, Mike illustrates his commitment to seeking justice beyond financial rewards.Building Sustainable Firms: Through masterminds and Fireproof, Mike teaches lawyers how to run efficient, disaster-ready practices that focus on delegation, strong leadership teams, and work-life balance.Community Engagement: Mike's initiatives, like pet adoption events and outreach programs, reflect his belief in building strong ties with the community that supports his firm.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

This episode of Celebrating Justice, we hear stories about the career journey of Adam Wolk, Chair of the Trial Team at Liakas Law, in New York City. Adam’s career is as unconventional as it is inspiring — he grew up with dreams of storytelling, originally through film, and found himself navigating life’s many detours, from driving a cab in Montauk to working on fishing boats. After some difficult crossroads and significant personal reflection, he eventually followed in his father and grandfather's footsteps and turned to a life law. But, for Adam, the courtroom has become a new kind of theater — a place where he can present powerful narratives on behalf of those who need their stories heard most.Adam’s rich life experiences shape his deeply empathetic and determined approach to trial work. He’s a natural storyteller, but his approach is grounded in more than just charisma; he gets to know his clients intimately, meeting them where they are in their pain and vulnerability. Adam believes that the role of a trial attorney is more than seeking compensation — it’s about bringing justice to real people. Adam’s belief in what the American justice system can accomplish is clear: it’s not perfect, but it’s built to protect and support those who need it most.Key Takeaways:Unconventional Paths Lead to Purpose: Adam’s varied life journey taught him how to relate to people from all walks of life, which is invaluable in his work with juries.The Power of Storytelling in Law: Adam’s approach to trial law centers on storytelling, giving voice to those who have been hurt and emphasizing their humanity.Justice as a Communal Responsibility: Adam emphasizes that personal injury law keeps communities safer by holding wrongdoers accountable and incentivizing care and responsibility.Balance and Resilience in Practice: Adam’s career reflects the importance of perseverance, but also the need to take on challenges that align with personal values and family commitments.Contact him at:  AdamMaxWolk @ gmail.comAwolk @ liakaslaw.com Or follow him on Instagram @trialattorneywolkThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of Celebrating Justice, Derek Hays shares his compelling journey from a career in advertising and animation to a life devoted to personal injury law. Drawing on values from his upbringing in a preacher’s family, Derek reveals how empathy and sympathy became the cornerstone of his practice, enabling him to connect deeply with clients and juries alike. Derek recounts pivotal cases, from representing a single mother managing disability care while injured, to standing by a family devastated by a trailer fire that took the life of a young child. His narrative showcases his commitment to unearthing every detail to advocate fully for his clients’ lives and stories.In his “Closing Argument,” Derek stresses the importance of truly knowing clients, beyond the facts of their injuries. He emphasizes the necessity of storytelling to convey the full impact of clients' experiences, particularly against efforts by insurance companies to depersonalize victims. Through meticulous case preparation, Derek explains how he brings clients' humanity into the courtroom, allowing juries to truly connect and understand the depth of loss or injury faced.Key TakeawaysClient Connection is Crucial: Derek emphasizes that getting to know clients personally — understanding their family, background, and community roles — strengthens the case by making it real for the jury.Empathy and Sympathy in Advocacy: He believes a true advocate must empathize with clients’ situations while also feeling genuine sympathy for their struggles to present their stories effectively.Uncovering Every Detail: Derek discusses how a diligent approach to evidence and company culture led to revealing substance abuse issues within a trucking company, deepening the case’s impact.Human Stories Over Legal Facts: Facts alone don’t suffice; Derek finds that clients' stories must be told authentically so that juries feel the emotional weight of their experiences.Countering Insurance Company Tactics: By personalizing clients’ narratives, Derek helps juries see past the insurance companies’ attempts to minimize clients' trauma.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of Celebrating Justice , Matt Nakajima of Rittgers Rittgers & Nakajima shares how his mother’s dreams and struggles inspired him to become a voice for those in need. Her unfulfilled wish to practice law, after a severe car accident and subsequent hearing loss, drove Matt to pursue justice on behalf of others. But his own path was far from easy, including a fight that took him all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court. Supported by two pro bono lawyers, Matt learned the importance of perseverance, later choosing to help everyday people rather than large corporations.In his "Closing Argument," Matt reflects on why advocacy matters: “As trial lawyers, we are the last line of defense against corporate greed and injustice.” He encourages fellow lawyers to take on challenging cases, emphasizing the collective power in fighting for justice.Key Takeaways:Inspired by His Mother's Strength: Matt’s career is rooted in his mother’s desire to advocate for others after her own struggles.Perseverance Defined His Path: He overcame a difficult battle for his law license with the support of mentors, shaping his commitment to clients.Authenticity in Practice: Matt prioritizes genuine connections with clients over marketing, building a reputation through word-of-mouth.Call to Action: Matt urges fellow attorneys to remember their purpose, encouraging them to fight for clients even in tough cases.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of Celebrating Justice, Michael Cohan from Cohan Law Firm takes listeners through his remarkable journey from working at a high-profile firm on the 75th floor of the Empire State Building to launching his own personal injury practice in New York City. He discusses the challenges he faced when starting out, working from Starbucks with nothing more than a laptop and determination. Michael shares how his competitive spirit and commitment to helping those often overlooked in the system have driven his success. He explains his frustration with inefficiencies in the legal system and his efforts to innovate through technology and client communication. In his Closing Argument, Michael passionately addresses the stigma surrounding personal injury lawyers, calling for a renewed sense of responsibility, integrity, and client care in the profession. He reminds his peers that clients are not case numbers but people whose lives depend on their dedication.Key Takeaways:Building a law firm from scratch requires perseverance, creativity, and a willingness to start small."Bad cases" can become life-changing victories when approached with dedication and the right mindset.Strong client communication can set a firm apart and create a better client experience.The legal industry must adopt new technology to improve efficiency and client service.Lawyers should remember that their clients are people, not files, and should treat them with the care they deserve.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of Celebrating Justice, we dive into the career and advocacy of Texas-based trial lawyer Jason DeSouza. From his beginnings in Toronto, Canada to settling into San Antonio, Texas, Jason shares his journey from considering tax litigation to becoming a champion for personal injury clients in underserved communities. He recalls his transition to plaintiff work, driven by his passion for fighting against insurance companies and corporations that mistreat individuals who lack resources. Jason recounts powerful client stories, including how he once lent his personal car to a client in need and emphasizes how his blue-collar upbringing and family experiences motivate him to serve those who are often neglected by the system. In his Closing Argument, Jason highlights the reality of how corporations and insurers devalue human lives and explains his commitment to exposing their negligence in court.Key Takeaways:Fighting for the Underserved: Jason’s mission is to represent those overlooked or mistreated by big business and insurance companies.Career Shift to Personal Injury Law: His passion for advocacy and competition led him away from tax law into personal injury, where he could make a real impact.Client Dedication: Jason goes above and beyond for clients, including lending his car to one in need.Maintaining Personal Connections: Despite managing a growing firm, Jason ensures every client receives direct attention and support.Exposing Corporate Negligence: In his closing argument, Jason stresses his commitment to holding corporations accountable for prioritizing profits over people.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of Celebrating Justice, Karen Munoz, partner at Dolan Law, shares her inspiring journey from being the first in her immigrant family to graduate college, to becoming a leader in the field of wrongful death and catastrophic injury law. Karen discusses her passion for mental health advocacy, emphasizing the importance of wellness and mindfulness in the legal profession. Her work as a yoga instructor has played a critical role in maintaining balance in a high-stress field. Additionally, Karen highlights her approach to trauma-informed lawyering, focusing on how lawyers can better support clients dealing with significant emotional and psychological challenges.In the Closing Argument segment, Karen shares a moving story about a wrongful death case involving a Mexican family that underscores the disparities in the healthcare system, particularly for non-English speaking patients. This experience deeply shaped her view on justice and her mission to advocate for those who are often overlooked by the system.Key Takeaways:Trauma-Informed Advocacy: Karen’s approach focuses on understanding clients’ trauma and using that knowledge to better communicate and represent them.Mental Health and Wellness: As a certified yoga instructor, Karen believes in the importance of mindfulness and meditation for managing stress in the legal profession.Diversity in Law: Karen highlights the need for more diverse representation in the legal profession to better serve immigrant and working-class communities.Justice for All: In her Closing Argument, Karen discusses how the wrongful death case of a Mexican family illuminated the disparities in healthcare and the importance of empathetic legal representation.Community and Mental Health Advocacy: Karen’s involvement with the Illinois Lawyers Assistance Program (LAP) emphasizes her commitment to addressing mental health challenges in the legal community.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer Kaitlin Nares shares her inspirational journey from a fourth-grader wanting to become Ruth Bader Ginsburg to becoming a successful civil rights and personal injury attorney at her own firm, the Nares Law Group. Her childhood fascination with law translated into a passionate career in civil rights, ultimately leading her to work on the landmark Central Park Five case. Kaitlin discusses her role in securing a $40 million resolution for the wrongfully convicted men and highlights the subsequent establishment of the Innocence Project at the University of Colorado Boulder by one of her clients, Corey Wise. This significant case marks a lifetime involvement, spanning her early childhood to her mid-level attorney years. Her unique career path also includes being featured in the documentary "False Confessions," showcasing the adverse effects of coercive interrogation tactics. Kaitlin also highlights her transition to personal injury law, where she leverages her civil rights background to address issues like police brutality and brain injuries. Her commitment to advocacy continues as she fights to change laws, ensuring better protection for vulnerable individuals, such as children injured by caregivers without proper insurance coverage.In her “Closing Argument,” Kaitlin emphasizes the importance of balancing a demanding career with personal life, having founded her own law firm to achieve this balance. The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer Gabriel Christian of the Law Offices of Gabriel J. Christian and Associates, LLC shares his unexpected journey to becoming a trial lawyer, underscored by a rich family history of military service and community involvement. Gabriel's legal journey began with his education at the University of DC Business School, followed by mentorship from renowned figures like Dr. Albert Carter and Admiral William Ryan, which eventually led him to Georgetown University Law Center. Gabriel’s ability to build strong personal relationships with mentors and colleagues significantly impacted his career trajectory. One of Gabriel’s early unforgettable courtroom experiences involved deftly dismantling the testimony of an orthopedic surgeon by uncovering unrevealed prior injuries of the plaintiff. Gabriel also talks about his involvement as the former president of the Tuskegee Airmen, a legacy of African-American fighter pilots who were instrumental during World War II. He underscores the importance of not just excelling in law but also serving the community, sharing lesser-known stories about the Tuskegee Airmen.In his “Closing Argument,” Gabriel strongly affirms the significance of relentless dedication and community service in law and the power and importance of the judicial system.Key TakeawaysThe influence of family and mentors can shape one's career pathPersonal relationships are important in career developmentCivility, grace, and integrity should drive the practice of lawThe legal profession plays a crucial role in promoting justice and serving the communityThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial lawyer Craig Murphy of Murphy & Murphy Law Offices shares his inspiring journey to becoming a successful trial lawyer despite having no initial connections to the legal world. He recounts how his determination and strong underdog mentality set him on a path to law. Initially practicing family law and then insurance defense (working as the Major Case Unit Trial Attorney for the State of Nevada for the Travelers Insurance), Craig’s diverse experience on the opposing end gave him a comprehensive understanding on how to build a personal injury case. Craig recalls two of his most memorable cases, including a slip and fall case against Walmart, where meticulous, persistent documentation earned him the nickname "Mr. Supplement." His other case involves a chef whose serious injuries from an accident nearly left him homeless, and Craig shares how he leveraged a chance incident on the defensive to win a substantial settlement for his client.In his “Closing Argument,” Craig reflects on his firm’s motto: “Winning is no accident.” He believes that the key to success is putting in hard work and being willing to take time to build a solid foundation for a case, practicing relentless dedication to the client’s cause.Key TakeawaysHaving an underdog mentality and putting in the necessary practice can help overcome limitations and achieve success.Making the decision to pursue a career in law and taking the necessary steps to achieve that goal is important to avoid future regrets.Working on the defense side can provide valuable insights and knowledge about the personal injury practice.Building a strong foundation for each case and being willing to fight and put in the necessary hard work for the underdog is crucial in personal injury law.Winning is no accident: Winning cases requires dedication, hard work, and a determination to do what is necessary.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," trial attorney Aparna Pujar of Napoli Shkolnik shares her inspiring journey from studying law in India to becoming a trial lawyer in the United States. Motivated by her love for performing and inspired by legal dramas and Bollywood films, Aparna had a dream of being a trial lawyer. Starting her career in commercial litigation and arbitration in India, Aparna never experienced a trial due to the slower legal process. In 2020, she moved to the U.S. and attended Columbia Law School. Despite the challenges posed by COVID-19, she landed a job with Joe Napoli’s team, a renowned personal injury trial firm. Aparna discusses the cultural and procedural differences between practicing law in India and the U.S., including her quick transition into courtroom appearances. She emphasizes the importance of empathy and approachability, traits that have helped her connect with personal injury clients more effectively. In her “Closing Argument,” Aparna highlights the importance of courage and persistence in overcoming adversity. Despite numerous challenges, including struggling to find a job due to visa issues, her determination and family support saw her through. Key TakeawaysOvercoming cultural and procedural differences in a new legal system requires adaptability and a willingness to embrace change.Empathy and approachability are valuable traits for lawyers, particularly in personal injury law, where client relationships are crucial.Initial setbacks and unexpected outcomes in trials can provide important lessons and shape future legal strategies.Persistence and determination are essential in the face of adversity.The Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn

In this episode of "Celebrating Justice," we hear the compelling story of trial lawyer Adam Shapiro, founder of Shapiro Law Firm.Starting in criminal defense but repelled by the immorality present in the field, Adam switched to insurance litigation. However, he eventually found his calling in fighting for the plaintiff’s side instead, making a “leap of faith” into personal injury law.Listen as he recounts one of his most significant cases involving a girl who was severely injured at an intersection in Jackson Heights, New York, which resulted in the installation of traffic lights and an increase in public safety in the area. With this being just one example, his genuine care for clients and his diligent efforts have led to several successes throughout his career. In his “Closing Argument,” Adam emphasizes the crucial role personal injury lawyers play in people's lives, acting as essential advocates during times of crisis. He stresses the importance of treating clients with the care and empathy they deserve, as if they were family members. Key TakeawaysWorking from a place of honesty, empathy, and humanity is key to understanding clients and maintaining long-term success and referrals.Successful litigation can lead to real-world changes and broader societal benefits that make an impact on public safety.Sustained success as a trial lawyer isn't immediate; it often involves extensive groundwork.Be prepared to work extremely hard, especially during career transitions.Selflessness and kindness are important traits that are often overlooked in personal injury lawCaring about clients beyond a financial perspective will take you a long wayThe Trial Lawyer's Journal is Presented by CloudLex and Lexvia.ai.TLJ InstagramTLJ YouTubeTLJ LinkedIn