Code Black with Madison King Podcast

“When Did We Give Power to Our Government?” by Madison King examines the origins and evolution of governmental authority, questioning how and when citizens transferred power to political institutions. The piece explores historical foundations such as social contracts, democratic consent, and constitutional frameworks, while also considering whether modern governments still reflect the will of the people. It challenges readers to think critically about authority, accountability, and the balance between individual freedom and state control in contemporary society. Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

“Beers vs. Billion-Dollar Mines: Who Really Pays the Price” by Madison King explores the hidden costs behind large-scale mining projects compared to everyday consumer spending. The piece contrasts the relatively small, visible price of products like beer with the massive, often overlooked economic, environmental, and social impacts of billion-dollar mining operations. It examines who truly bears these costs—local communities, ecosystems, and taxpayers—while corporations and consumers remain distanced from the consequences. Ultimately, the article challenges readers to rethink how value and accountability are distributed in modern economies. Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Do not compare me to other “influencers.” I conduct my own research, raise substantive issues, and do not simply repeat mainstream narratives.Despite this, I am consistently restricted and effectively silenced. My content is prevented from reaching a broader audience, I am excluded from monetisation opportunities, and even my ability to grow an audience is being interfered with—followers are removed, or people are unable to follow or subscribe.Come back to me when so-called reporters and 'influencers' call out real issues.🫵🏻 AFFIDAVITForm 115Magistrates Court of South Australiawww.courts.sa.gov.auCourt Use🫵🏻Date Filed:Registry: Adelaide Magistrates CourtAction No: AMC-17-11092💕Full Name: Commissioner of Consumer Affairs (Mr Dini Souliou)😬😬😬I, the abovenamed deponent DO TRULY AND SOLEMNLY AFFIRM:1.  In the mid 1970’s at Thevenard Rd Thevenard South Australia, Christopher John Kourakis (now Chief Justice of the South Australian Supreme Court) and a friend of Kourakis attempted to rape and sodomise a male child.🤐2.  That the friend held the victim down and Kourakis was attempting to sodomise the victim.🤐3.  The attempted rape was stopped when the female resident of the house walked in on the attempted act.🤐4.  I was at the time talking with the female’s resident partner who was employed as a school teacher at Ceduna Area School.🤐5.  The female resident stated to her partner out loud which I clearly heard in Greek language in words to the effect that they (referring to Kourakis and his friend) that they holding the victim down and attempting to have anal sex with the victim.🤐6.  Later I asked the victim who I knew very well what has happened to which he replied “That Kourakis was trying to fuck me up the arse and the other was holding me down”.🤐7.  That I name the victim and the two witnesses at a later date.[Signature block]Renee Lesley MHYYS, J.P. TH31608A Justice of the Peace for South Australia15/7/17 [or similar date notation in scan]This is a direct, verbatim transcription with only the specified redactions applied. No content has been added, altered, summarized, or interpreted.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

My commentary throughout these clips. SAS Soldier Crimes in Afghanistan.🪖 How many SAS soldiers spoke out?•At least 20+ SAS soldiers were involved in giving evidence or coming forward•Specifically:◦21 current/former soldiers were set to testify in court ◦Dozens overall gave evidence across inquiries and the defamation trial◦32 soldiers were actually called as witnesses in the civil case 👉 Many were anonymised as:•“Person 1”•“Person 4”•“Person 7”•etc.💣 What they said (key allegations)1) Prisoner kicked off a cliff (Darwan, 2012)•A soldier (Person 4) said he saw Roberts-Smith kick a bound Afghan off a cliff•The man was still alive → then allegedly ordered to be shot2) Execution of detainees•Witnesses said unarmed, detained Afghans were killed during raids•Example:◦A disabled man with a prosthetic leg allegedly machine-gunned while detained3) “Blooding” – ordering junior soldiers to kill•Multiple soldiers testified that:◦Junior troops were allegedly told to execute prisoners as initiation (“blooding”)4) Killing of a teenage prisoner•One SAS witness said Roberts-Smith:◦Shot an unarmed teenage detainee◦Later bragged about it5) Internal reporting & whistleblowing•Some soldiers:◦Raised concerns internally as early as 2013◦Later went public or testified despite risks6) Intimidation and threats•Witnesses also said:◦He threatened fellow soldiers◦Created a culture of fear that stopped people speaking earlier ⚖️ What courts have said so far•In 2023 civil court:◦A judge found (on balance of probabilities) he was involved in multiple murders•In 2026:◦He’s now criminally charged with 5 counts of war crime murder👉 Important:•He denies all allegations•Criminal case still not decided yet🎯 Bottom line•This wasn’t one or two people➡️ It was a large group of SAS soldiers, many eyewitnesses•The allegations include:◦Killing detainees◦Ordering executions◦“Blooding” practices•Some soldiers risked careers and legal trouble to speak outSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Friend or foe? The U.S. is about to find out whether Trump is more serious about Cuba, oil, or his relationship with Russia. With two Russian oil tankers en route to Cuba and expected to arrive Monday, the message couldn’t be clearer.” #russia  #cuba  #oil  #wars  #australiaSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Maddy says "General Wesley Clark talks about how they were going to bomb Iraq 10 days after the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, and that there was no clear reason to go to war with Iraq, as the focus was supposed to be on addressing terrorism—yet Iraq was blamed all the same.The second clip is about Bibby. For over 40 years, since the 1980s, Bibby has been talking about conquering the Middle East, as you can see in each individual clip. You also need to bear in mind that Israel had only been established for about 40 years before Bibby began speaking about conquering the Middle East.The third clip gives us a glimpse and insight into which countries could be next, and the fourth clip seals the deal.”Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Maddy Says " Of course I’ve changed. It’s called growth. It’s called research—something most people don’t do. I don’t sit in front of a TV all day. I don’t own one. I spend my time in books, learning.If you’re not changing your mind, you’re stuck in concrete thinking. You don’t care about world politics—or even your own backyard.Australia is 50 years behind countries like China, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, even though we have the same resources. China buys from us, yet they’re decades ahead. Meanwhile, we watch the U.S. start war number seven in the Middle East, and now we pay with fuel and food shortages. Should that surprise anyone? No. We only have three weeks’ worth of fuel in reserves—and politicians from every party knew it. They sold off our manufacturing and refineries decades ago.Don’t play dumb, Australia. If you’re still cheering for the same parties that ruined us, that’s on you.There are two clips in this video—maybe you’ll educate yourself. At the end, you’ll see how Thailand, Dubai, and China surged from the 1980s while we stagnated. And look at us today: clapping for train stations 30 years behind. The clips? They reference Hitler’s speech in English.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

The Rothschild family is a wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt, Germany. The family's documented history starts in 16th-century Frankfurt; its name is derived from the family house, Rothschild, built by Isaak Elchanan Bacharach in Frankfurt in 1567. The family rose to prominence with Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744–1812), a court factor to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel in the Free City of Frankfurt, Holy Roman Empire, who established his banking business in the 1760s.[2] Unlike most previous court factors, Rothschild managed to bequeath his wealth and established an international banking family through his five sons,[3] who established businesses in Paris, Frankfurt, London, Vienna, and Naples. The family was elevated to noble rank in the Holy Roman Empire and the United Kingdom. The only subsisting branches of the family are the French and British ones.[4][5]During the 19th century, the Rothschild family possessed the largest private fortune in the world, as well as in modern world history.[6][7][8] The Rothschild family dominated international finance in Europe between the 1820s and the 1870s, when their hegemony over European finance was broken by joint stock banks.[9] The family's wealth declined over the 20th century and was divided among many descendants.[10] Today, their assets cover a diverse range of sectors, including financial services, real estate, mining, energy, agriculture, and winemaking. The family additionally has philanthropic endeavours and nonprofits.[11]Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Imagine if the Middle Eastern countries actually united instead of being divided.They would likely regain control of their own land and resources, and the balance of power in the region would shift dramatically.Add in blocs like BRICS pushing alternative currencies and financial systems, and the global order we know today would look very different.It also raises an uncomfortable question — how much of the current system survives if nations stop funding or supporting the same power structures our taxes keep propping up? #australia #fypシ #viral #fypシ゚viralシ #politics #share #epsteinfiles #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚ #aus #usa #iran  #syria  #lebanon  #egypt  #saudiarabia  #dubaiTranscriptSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

The historical situation in 1947–1948When Harry S. Truman was president, the region then known as the British Mandate for Palestine was nearing the end of British rule. Jewish and Arab nationalist movements were both demanding their own states.The international proposal that shaped events was the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine (1947).That plan suggested dividing the territory into two states — one Jewish and one Arab — with Jerusalem under international administration.Many Jewish leaders accepted the plan as a basis for a state.Arab leaders and neighbouring Arab governments rejected it.Why did Truman talk about population and conflictAt the time, there were millions of Arab residents already living in the region, and roughly 600,000 Jews. Any solution raised huge questions about:bordersminority populationsdisplacementwhether the two communities could coexist.Truman and other officials were trying to manage pressure from different political groups, humanitarian concerns after the Holocaust, and the risk of regional war.What actually happened nextIn May 1948, Jewish leaders proclaimed the Israeli Declaration of Independence (1948), creating the state of Israel. Soon after, several neighbouring Arab states intervened militarily, starting the Arab–Israeli War (1948).That war produced the long-running conflict between Israel and the surrounding Arab countries.Key takeawayThere were intense political negotiations and competing plans before Israel was created, but historians generally describe them as contested proposals and diplomatic struggles, not a single coordinated plan to engineer conflict across the region. Different groups had very different goals, and the situation quickly escalated into war.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Don't Stand So Close to Me by The Police (from the album Zenyatta Mondatta) is about a teacher who develops a sexual attraction to a teenage schoolgirl, and the tension, fear, and consequences surrounding that situation.The song is written from the perspective of the teacher. He’s aware the attraction is inappropriate and dangerous, and he’s anxious about:Rumours spreading at schoolThe scrutiny of colleaguesThe legal and moral consequencesThe power imbalance between teacher and studentThe line referencing “that book by Nabokov” is a direct nod to Lolita, which is about an adult man obsessed with an underage girl. That comparison reinforces the theme of forbidden, exploitative attraction. #australia #fypシ #viral #fypシ゚viralシ #politics #share #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚ #epsteinfiles #ausSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Did South Australia Investigate the Allegations? Prince Andrew Arrested Overnight—Time for Australia to Act!” We’re not accusing anyone. We’re asking one question: Why hasn’t South Australia investigated the Australian names—starting with a presiding judge—in the US Epstein files? Prince Andrew was arrested yesterday. Norway charged its ex-PM. If the law applies to them, it must apply here. Equal justice isn’t optionalAFFIDAVITForm 115Magistrates Court of South Australiawww.courts.sa.gov.auCourt UseDate Filed:Registry: Adelaide Magistrates CourtAction No: AMC-17-11092Address: 260-280 Victoria Square, Adelaide SA 5000Telephone: 08 8204 0670Facsimile: 08 8204 0481DX: [omitted]Email: [email protected] Name: Commissioner of Consumer Affairs (Mr Dini Souliou)Address: Ground Floor (Street Level) 91 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000Telephone: [redacted in original scan context]Facsimile: [redacted]DX: [redacted]DefendantFull Name: [REDACTED]Address: [REDACTED] Street, Glynde SA 5070Telephone: [REDACTED]Facsimile: [redacted]DX: [redacted]Email: [redacted]Deponent/Person Swearing or Affirming AffidavitFull Name: [REDACTED]Occupation: AccountantAddress: [REDACTED] Street, Glynde SA 5070Telephone: [REDACTED]Facsimile: [redacted]DX: [redacted]Email: [redacted]I, the abovenamed deponent DO TRULY AND SOLEMNLY AFFIRM:1.  In the mid 1970’s at Thevenard Rd Thevenard South Australia, Christopher John Kourakis (now Chief Justice of the South Australian Supreme Court) and a friend of Kourakis attempted to rape and sodomise a male child.2.  That the friend held the victim down and Kourakis was attempting to sodomise the victim.3.  The attempted rape was stopped when the female resident of the house walked in on the attempted act.4.  I was at the time talking with the female’s resident partner who was employed as a school teacher at Ceduna Area School.5.  The female resident stated to her partner out loud which I clearly heard in Greek language in words to the effect that they (referring to Kourakis and his friend) that they holding the victim down and attempting to have anal sex with the victim.6.  Later I asked the victim who I knew very well what has happened to which he replied “That Kourakis was trying to fuck me up the arse and the other was holding me down”.7.  That I name the victim and the two witnesses at a later date.[Signature block]Renee Lesley MHYYS, J.P. TH31608A Justice of the Peace for South Australia15/7/17 [or similar date notation in scan]This is a direct, verbatim transcription with only the specified redactions applied. No content has been added, altered, summarized, or interpreted.#justice starts when the laws apply to everyone! #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Lindsey Graham doesn’t hide it anymore — he’s the loudest, most unapologetic warmonger in the United States Senate. While others pretend to care about peace, Graham openly calls for dropping bombs on Iran and Gaza, even citing America’s nuclear strikes on Japan as the right model to “end the threat once and for all” and keep Israel forever safe.🤖To him, human lives are irrelevant. American blood and treasure are just the cost of doing business. War doesn’t bother him — it enriches the people he actually serves.He doesn’t represent South Carolina. He doesn’t represent America.He represents Israel in the United States Senate.The only real question left is whether the American people have finally woken up to who Lindsey Graham truly works for.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Short history of Israels influence on wars in the Middle East and Soviet Union.Since early 2026, the United States has moved a large number of naval and air forces into the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran over its nuclear program and potential military action. Two U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups and dozens of warplanes and support aircraft are in the region, and advanced jets have even been deployed to Israel as part of military cooperation — moves that signal preparation for possible operations.The U.S. Embassy in Israel has authorized non-emergency staff to leave and encouraged those wishing to depart to do so today, noting there may not be many outbound flights if tensions continue to rise.Diplomatic talks between Washington and Tehran continue in hopes of avoiding conflict, but some officials warn that these may be the last opportunities to negotiate before military action escalates.Could there be a war in the next 24 hours?It’s impossible to know for sure — heavy military positioning and embassy departure notices reflect serious concerns about escalation, but decisions that trigger war (like authorizing strikes) are still unfolding and not publicly confirmed.Watch until the END and press the Subscribe button #australia #fypシ #viral #fypシ゚viralシ #politics #share #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚ #epsteinfiles #aus #usa  #israel  #iranSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

 An opinion-style commentary discussing reactions to reports that Israeli Prime Minister “Bibi” Netanyahu initiated military action against Iran. The piece reflects on escalating Middle East tensions, political leadership decisions, and the broader geopolitical consequences, while capturing the tone and impact of viral social media discourse surrounding the event. Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

An explosive investigation examines newly surfaced Epstein files, alleging decades-long institutional failure, judicial protection, and government inaction. Drawing on official documents and testimony, the investigation questions whether legal institutions tasked with protecting children instead enabled abuse, suppressed evidence, and shielded powerful figures from accountability.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

On the Code Black podcast, Madison King dives into Australia’s long-running foreign aid commitments, questioning why tens of millions of dollars have been sent overseas — including to Afghanistan — while transparency, accountability, and domestic needs remain hotly debated. Featuring discussion around Foreign Minister Penny Wong and the Australian Government’s aid priorities, the episode challenges listeners to rethink where public money goes, who it serves, and who decides.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

As of now, I’m putting my full support behind Pauline Hanson.Yesterday’s vote was a strategic play by both the Liberal Party of Australia and the Australian Labor Party — and if you’ve been following my last four posts, you already know that. Australians have been duped.What people need to understand is this: Liberal and Labor are no longer opposing forces — they’re closing ranks. And right now, they’re closing in on Pauline Hanson because she’s popular, gaining momentum, and resonating with voters.I believe Liberal and Labor will preference each other at the next election, because at the rate Pauline Hanson is going, one of those two parties is at risk of being pushed out. That’s no longer speculation — it’s evident, and the public support is growing.And here’s the part people need to act on.You don’t need to post hate.You don’t need to argue.You block. You unfollow. You delete.You remove their voices the same way they’ve removed ours. That’s power. Quiet, collective, lawful power.And if I run for politics again, I won’t be joining the old machinery.I’ll be running my own party — unless something changes in the next 12 months. #australia #fypシ #viralSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Protecting 3rd Party who instructed Australian Electorial Commission to interfer with my platform during the Federal Election Last Year.  Documents are located in last post CBMK 23 Jan 2026 No 54From the AEC FOI decision:Page 1 — The AEC confirms my FOI request relates to documents about the “removal or restriction of my social media content by Meta Platforms Inc. (Facebook and Instagram).”Pages 3–6 — The AEC refuses to release full details of how decisions were made or how communications with platforms occurred, citing internal deliberations, operational harm, and third-party business secrecy.Pages 1–2 — The AEC expressly states it “did not contact TikTok in relation to my account.”They disclose TikTok.They refuse to fully disclose Meta.What has happened to me raises serious questions about transparency, fairness, and democratic integrity in Australia.A government authority withholding information from a federal election candidate, while actions are taken that restrict that candidate’s ability to reach the public, strikes at the core of our democracy. When political communication is curtailed, hidden, or selectively enforced, the public’s right to freely choose their representatives is undermined.Under the Australian Constitution, sections 7 and 24 give rise to an implied freedom of political communication. That freedom exists so the people can hear competing political views and make informed choices at elections. Any action that burdens that freedom — particularly during or leading into an election — must be lawful, proportionate, and transparent.I was penalised for social media posts well before I had even applied to run as a candidate, at a time when I was not subject to electoral authorisation requirements. Those penalties later followed me into my candidacy. That raises serious concerns about jurisdiction, retrospectivity, and fairness.During my campaign, my content was restricted in a way that disproportionately affected Western Australia, despite my audience being national. This explains why, throughout the election period, the majority of my engagement came from the east coast. Yet immediately after the election — between 3 May and 1 June — I gained approximately 50,000 followers, demonstrating that the suppression of my reach was not organic, but lifted once the election had passed.Despite this, restrictions and compliance notices remain attached to my Facebook and Instagram accounts. My reach has remained capped at approximately 86,000 followers since November, with people continuing to be removed from my page. I have been penalised for music content despite agreements being in place, and despite repeated correspondence with Meta.The seriousness of this cannot be overstated. These actions may have materially interfered with my ability to campaign and with the public’s ability to hear from me. They did not just affect my candidacy — they affected the democratic process itself.I have been forced to escalate this issue beyond Australia, including contacting United States senators, due to the lack of accountability and transparency shown by both Meta and Australian regulatory bodies, including the eSafety Commissioner.If someone like me — who has fought to break cycles of disadvantage, who grew up in poverty, who has worked relentlessly to create a voice and platform — can be undermined in this way, then what message is being sent to Australians who dare to challenge the status quo?What message does this send to children in Australia who grow up believing that hard work, integrity, and courage matter?Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Plain-English Summary of Every ScheduleThis appendix is a navigation map, not the deep dive.Each Schedule below tells people what to pay attention to and why.🔴 SCHEDULE 1 — Criminal Law Amendments (Speech & Expression)What it doesIncreases penalties for using postal or carriage services (internet, phone, messaging, social media) to “menace, harass or cause offence”.Expands racial vilification offences.Lowers the bar from intent to impact or risk.Why it matters“Offence” is subjective.Online speech becomes criminal without a clear intent to harm.Protests, political commentary, memes, reposts, and private messages can all be captured.What Australians loseClear free political communication protections.The requirement that criminal intent be proven.🔴 SCHEDULE 2 — Intelligence, Privacy & Data Sharing (ASIO / ACC / ACIC)What it doesExempts ASIO and ACC from spent-conviction protections.Allows use of pardoned, quashed, or spent convictions.Overrides State and Territory privacy laws.Allows intelligence use without court oversight.Why it mattersYour past never dies.Information can be shared across agencies indefinitely.No meaningful appeal process.What Australians loseRehabilitation protections.Privacy finality.Judicial oversight.🔴 SCHEDULE 3 — Customs & Prohibited MaterialWhat it doesExpands what is considered “prohibited material”.Allows seizure of goods based on future risk or suspected use, not actual illegality.Applies to imports and exports.Why it mattersMaterial can be seized before a crime exists.Academic, journalistic, or research material can be caught.“Purpose” is assessed by authorities, not courts.What Australians losePresumption of lawful ownership.Protection against arbitrary seizure.🔴 SCHEDULE 4 — Firearms (THIS IS THE BIG ONE)This Schedule is huge and deliberately fragmented.PART 1 — Firearms Background Checks (Buyback-Style Powers)What it doesAllows firearms decisions based on intelligence assessments, not convictions.Intelligence assessments are not reviewable in normal courts.Uses ACIC / AFP / police intelligence, not judicial findings.The loopholeDecisions shift from Parliaments & Premiers to:Police CommissionersFederal MinistersNational frameworksThis bypasses the John Howard model, where all States had to agree.Why it mattersThis is how a de facto buyback can occur without State votes.PART 2 — Firearms Background Checks (Expanded Agencies)ASIO, ACC, ACIC gain expanded authority.“Risk” replaces “crime”.Rights lost: due process.Fallout from overseas conflicts.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Let’s kill the lie once and for all.This bill did not appear overnight.It existed before 2025, and it passed with support from Labor, Liberal, Greens, and Nationals.That means every party already had the bill.They had it before the first vote, during the 2025 passage, and after.What just happened was not a new law — it was a wording tweak built on legislation they had already read, debated, and voted for.So the claim that senators were “given the bill on the day” is absolute rubbish.They had time.📌 FACT CHECK FIRST - They had the bill for YEARS before the 20th January 2026Every Senator had a copy of this bill at least a year ago.This legislation was circulated, briefed, and well-known before the vote.Being absent does not mean being unaware.It means letting it pass without stopping it.🔵 Liberal Party — Voting Record on the Hate Speech Bill✅ VOTED YESWendy Askew (TAS)Andrew Bragg (NSW)Michaelia Cash (WA)Claire Chandler (TAS)Sarah Henderson (VIC)Linda Reynolds (WA)Paul Scarr (QLD)Dave Sharma (NSW)🚫 ABSENT (Let the bill pass anyway)Andrew McLachlan (SA)Leah Blyth (SA)Slade Brockman (WA)Richard Colbeck (TAS)Jonathon Duniam (TAS)David Fawcett (SA)Hollie Hughes (NSW)Jane Hume (VIC)Maria Kovacic (NSW)Kerrynne Liddle (SA)Matt O’Sullivan (WA)James Paterson (VIC)Anne Ruston (SA)Dean Smith (WA)❗ WHAT THIS ACTUALLY MEANSThe Liberal Party had the bill.The Liberal Party knew the bill.Some voted YES.The rest stayed ABSENT — which helped it pass.👉 Absence is not neutrality. It’s consent.This voting pattern shows the Liberals were never meaningfully opposed.They either backed it openly — or stepped aside quietly.ONE LINE FOR YOUR AUDIENCE“They all had the bill. Some voted yes. The rest didn’t bother turning up — and that tells you everything.”Andrew Hastie, the Liberals, Nationals, Labor, and Greens all had this bill THREE times.• 2024 — first draft• February 2025 — voted on it• 20 January 2026 — final passageSo the story that they “only got the bill on the day” is absolute nonsense.This legislation was already passed last year, with the consent of every major party.Nothing about this was rushed.Nothing about this was accidental.If they’re pretending they didn’t know — that should tell you everything.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Protecting 3rd Party who instructed Australian Electorial Commission to interfer with my platform during the Federal Election Last Year.  Documents are located in last post CBMK 23 Jan 2026 No 54From the AEC FOI decision:Page 1 — The AEC confirms my FOI request relates to documents about the “removal or restriction of my social media content by Meta Platforms Inc. (Facebook and Instagram).”Pages 3–6 — The AEC refuses to release full details of how decisions were made or how communications with platforms occurred, citing internal deliberations, operational harm, and third-party business secrecy.Pages 1–2 — The AEC expressly states it “did not contact TikTok in relation to my account.”They disclose TikTok.They refuse to fully disclose Meta.What has happened to me raises serious questions about transparency, fairness, and democratic integrity in Australia.A government authority withholding information from a federal election candidate, while actions are taken that restrict that candidate’s ability to reach the public, strikes at the core of our democracy. When political communication is curtailed, hidden, or selectively enforced, the public’s right to freely choose their representatives is undermined.Under the Australian Constitution, sections 7 and 24 give rise to an implied freedom of political communication. That freedom exists so the people can hear competing political views and make informed choices at elections. Any action that burdens that freedom — particularly during or leading into an election — must be lawful, proportionate, and transparent.I was penalised for social media posts well before I had even applied to run as a candidate, at a time when I was not subject to electoral authorisation requirements. Those penalties later followed me into my candidacy. That raises serious concerns about jurisdiction, retrospectivity, and fairness.During my campaign, my content was restricted in a way that disproportionately affected Western Australia, despite my audience being national. This explains why, throughout the election period, the majority of my engagement came from the east coast. Yet immediately after the election — between 3 May and 1 June — I gained approximately 50,000 followers, demonstrating that the suppression of my reach was not organic, but lifted once the election had passed.Despite this, restrictions and compliance notices remain attached to my Facebook and Instagram accounts. My reach has remained capped at approximately 86,000 followers since November, with people continuing to be removed from my page. I have been penalised for music content despite agreements being in place, and despite repeated correspondence with Meta.The seriousness of this cannot be overstated. These actions may have materially interfered with my ability to campaign and with the public’s ability to hear from me. They did not just affect my candidacy — they affected the democratic process itself.I have been forced to escalate this issue beyond Australia, including contacting United States senators, due to the lack of accountability and transparency shown by both Meta and Australian regulatory bodies, including the eSafety Commissioner.If someone like me — who has fought to break cycles of disadvantage, who grew up in poverty, who has worked relentlessly to create a voice and platform — can be undermined in this way, then what message is being sent to Australians who dare to challenge the status quo?What message does this send to children in Australia who grow up believing that hard work, integrity, and courage matteSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Let’s kill the lie once and for all.This bill did not appear overnight.It existed before 2025, and it passed with support from Labor, Liberal, Greens, and Nationals.That means every party already had the bill.They had it before the first vote, during the 2025 passage, and after.What just happened was not a new law — it was a wording tweak built on legislation they had already read, debated, and voted for.So the claim that senators were “given the bill on the day” is absolute rubbish.They had time.📌 FACT CHECK FIRST - They had the bill for YEARS before the 20th January 2026Every Senator had a copy of this bill at least a year ago.This legislation was circulated, briefed, and well-known before the vote.Being absent does not mean being unaware.It means letting it pass without stopping it.🔵 Liberal Party — Voting Record on the Hate Speech Bill✅ VOTED YESWendy Askew (TAS)Andrew Bragg (NSW)Michaelia Cash (WA)Claire Chandler (TAS)Sarah Henderson (VIC)Linda Reynolds (WA)Paul Scarr (QLD)Dave Sharma (NSW)🚫 ABSENT (Let the bill pass anyway)Andrew McLachlan (SA)Leah Blyth (SA)Slade Brockman (WA)Richard Colbeck (TAS)Jonathon Duniam (TAS)David Fawcett (SA)Hollie Hughes (NSW)Jane Hume (VIC)Maria Kovacic (NSW)Kerrynne Liddle (SA)Matt O’Sullivan (WA)James Paterson (VIC)Anne Ruston (SA)Dean Smith (WA)❗ WHAT THIS ACTUALLY MEANSThe Liberal Party had the bill.The Liberal Party knew the bill.Some voted YES.The rest stayed ABSENT — which helped it pass.👉 Absence is not neutrality. It’s consent.This voting pattern shows the Liberals were never meaningfully opposed.They either backed it openly — or stepped aside quietly.ONE LINE FOR YOUR AUDIENCE“They all had the bill. Some voted yes. The rest didn’t bother turning up — and that tells you everything.”Andrew Hastie, the Liberals, Nationals, Labor, and Greens all had this bill THREE times.• 2024 — first draft• February 2025 — voted on it• 20 January 2026 — final passageSo the story that they “only got the bill on the day” is absolute nonsense.This legislation was already passed last year, with the consent of every major party.Nothing about this was rushed.Nothing about this was accidental.If they’re pretending they didn’t know — that should tell you everything.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

I don’t believe Jacinta Price’s excuse.You don’t get “locked out” of Parliament during a major vote.There are phones, staff, security, texts, alerts — the entire system exists to make sure MPs are present.So either this was poor time management — and if you can’t manage a critical vote, you have no business putting your hand up to run the country —or you didn’t properly read the 140-page bill.And if you didn’t read it, that’s negligence.If you read it and still didn’t know how to vote, that’s incompetence.Either way, Australians are entitled to ask:what exactly do you bring that the rest of us don’t — except a taxpayer-funded seat? Let’s cut the bullshit.You didn’t vote NO.You didn’t vote YES.You didn’t vote at all.Waiting in an “alcove” while a major bill goes through is not opposition — it’s avoidance.If this legislation was as dangerous as you now claim, you would have been in the chamber, on the record, voting against it. Full stop.Instead, you missed the vote, let the bill pass, and then released a carefully worded statement pretending moral outrage after the fact.That’s not leadership.That’s political insurance.You can’t claim you “couldn’t support” legislation you didn’t actually oppose when it mattered. Statements don’t stop laws — votes do.Australians aren’t stupid.If you believed this bill threatened free speech, you would have stood up when it counted, not issued a press release once the damage was done.Silence, excuses, and hindsight are not courage.They’re how politicians dodge accountability.And people are done buying it.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

I said it then and I’ll say it now: what we are seeing from people like Andrew Hastie is not leadership — it’s obedience.There are soldiers, and then there are soldiers.Some are trained to question.Some are trained to follow orders.And in politics, that distinction matters.When an MP votes yes to a 140-page, bundled bill that expands executive power, weakens safeguards, and centralises control — without forcing it back to the table, without demanding it be split, without standing up publicly against the dangerous parts — Australians are entitled to draw conclusions.Not about what’s in his head —but about what he chose to do.If someone’s defence of that vote is a single talking point — “removing terrorists” — while ignoring everything else buried in the legislation, then one of two things is true:Either they didn’t properly interrogate the bill,or they decided obedience was easier than resistance.And neither is acceptable from someone elected to represent Australians.Military service is a job.An honourable job — but still a job.It does not automatically confer wisdom, independence, or political courage.Every profession has people who are excellent at following instructions.That does not mean they are equipped to challenge power when it matters.Australians should pay very close attention to who voted yes.Because votes are not symbolic.They are choices.And when MPs choose party alignment, optics, or personal positioning over scrutiny, accountability, and public interest — that tells you exactly who they are as legislators.These politicians are not accidents.They are products of the system we keep voting for.Democracy doesn’t fail by accident — it reflects its voters.If this angers you, don’t just lash out.Ask why.Because yesterday’s vote didn’t come from nowhere.It is the result of years of political complacency, lowered standards, and blind loyalty at the ballot box.We reap what we sow.#fypシ゚viralシ #australiaSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

The politicians who voted yesterday are not the problem. They are exactly what we elected.If you’re offended by the truth, ask why — because today’s vote is the result of years of bad decisions at the ballot box.We reap what we sow.It’s time to wake up.Australia needs new parties at the next election. THE CORE POINT AUSTRALIANS MUST UNDERSTANDThis Bill was sold as:“Stopping extremists.”But it is written to:Control Australians.It centralises power.It weakens rights.It lowers thresholds.It removes safeguards.And every MP who voted yes owns that.They didn’t slow it down.They didn’t split it up.They didn’t protect you.They protected the system. #australia #australia #fypシ #viral No — this is not AI.I’m just very, very, very sunburnt, and the lighting in my house is quite dark.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

A young Iranian man is about to be hanged for protesting — and people are urging us to tag every international leader and media outlet in the hope it saves his life.But here’s the uncomfortable truth:I don’t see the U.S. political class rushing to stop it.The Democrats are too busy trying to impeach Donald Trump to remember what power is actually meant to be used for. Their priority isn’t protecting innocent lives — it’s protecting the system.The left works for the machine.Trump works against it.That’s why impeachment becomes the agenda, not intervention.Not diplomacy.Not pressure.Not saving a young man whose only crime was wanting freedom — a Western life, and a peaceful Persian future.And that silence tells you everything you need to know.If President Donald Trump intervened and saved this young Iranian man, it would change everything.It wouldn’t just save a life — it would define a new era of leadership.Iranians would see a U.S. president willing to stand for people, not protect regimes.That single act would ripple across the Middle East.Freedom inspires courage.Hope travels faster than fear.This is how history is shaped — not through impeachment politics, but through decisive action that saves lives.#IranProtests #Iran #mediaSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

The UK prosecutes citizens for online speech, but political insiders remain untouchable. Speech laws aren’t enforced equally — they’re enforced selectively.Tony Blair’s sister-in-law can make inflammatory statements about October 7 and no one seriously believes she’ll ever see the inside of a prison cell. Don’t be ridiculous. There’s a class system in how laws are enforced — one rule for them, another for everyone else. And while 8 billion people on this planet are expected to comply, self-censor, and obey, a tiny political class operates above consequence. Imagine if the many stopped accepting that.CBMK 11 Jan 2026No 29https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

If accountability actually mattered, why was Barack Obama never held to account?Under Obama, the United States carried out more bombings and airstrikes than any modern U.S. president, across multiple countries, many without declared wars, many with civilian casualties, and with virtually no transparency or consequences.Entire regions were bombed.Millions of lives were destabilised.And nothing happened. No tribunals. No arrests. No accountability.So here’s the uncomfortable question no one wanted to ask:Was Obama shielded from criticism because he was the first Black president — and no one wanted to be called racist?Because let’s be honest — isn’t it strange that it took a Black president to bomb seven predominantly non-white countries, many of them in the Middle East and Africa, and yet he’s still hailed as a hero?If we’re going to be real, I’d call that black-on-black violence — carried out with drones, missiles, and silence from the so-called human-rights crowd.Yet when Donald Trump conducts targeted actions — an airstrike in Iran that removed a specific target, or extracting a foreign leader without flattening an entire country — he’s instantly labelled a criminal.That’s the hypocrisy.Trump didn’t carpet-bomb nations.He didn’t wipe out cities and call it “liberation.”He extracted what he needed to extract, dealt with it, and moved on.So ask yourself this:Why was Obama celebrated for mass destruction —while Trump is condemned for doing less, not more?The difference isn’t law.It isn’t morality.It’s politics.#australia #fypシ #viralSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Billy Joel, We Didn’t Start the Fire, history timeline, generational conflict, political events, cultural history, Cold War, social change, world events, historical commentary, generational responsibility, inherited chaos, global tension, 20th century history, protest music, political instability, pop culture history, war and peace, societal change, historical awareness, lyrical storytelling, music and history, political song, cultural reflection, historical legacy, world conflict, time and change, collective memory, modern history, protest anthemWhat the song is about:We Didn’t Start the Fire by Billy Joel is a rapid-fire timeline of major political, social, and cultural events from 1949 to 1989. The message is simple but sharp: each generation inherits chaos it didn’t create. The “fire” represents ongoing conflict, tension, and instability — it keeps burning regardless of who’s in charge, because history doesn’t stop.You sentSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Power, Deterrence, and the End of Automatic AlliancesDonald Trump’s remarks after Venezuela weren’t random. They raise a bigger question: was this chaos, or calculated strategy playing out in real time?Because when you listen carefully, what he’s describing isn’t a rush toward war — it’s a reordering of priorities. He talks about control, stability, feeding people, restoring industry, removing criminal networks. That language matters. It suggests a belief that failed states are no longer just humanitarian tragedies — they are strategic threats. And that tolerating collapse creates openings that hostile powers are only too happy to fill.That’s not theory. Russia, China, and Iran already have footholds in Venezuela — economically, politically, and strategically. When rival powers embed themselves in a collapsing country inside the Western Hemisphere, neutrality disappears. From that perspective, intervention stops being ideological and starts being defensive.This is also where the confusion around “war crimes” and “acts of war” needs clarity. War crimes apply to conduct during armed conflict. What Trump is describing is being framed as detention and intervention tied to criminal allegations and state failure, not a battlefield campaign. That doesn’t make it uncontroversial — but it places the argument in the realm of sovereignty, jurisdiction, and power, not indiscriminate warfare.And that’s precisely why this is bigger than Venezuela.Because once the United States acts without waiting for approval, it quietly challenges the post-World War II assumption that American power must always be exercised through allies, consensus, and inherited charters. Britain’s immediate insistence that it “had nothing to do with this” wasn’t just distancing — it sounded like divergence. A sign that old alliance reflexes may no longer apply in the same way.If Europe is determined to escalate with Russia, why should the United States automatically underwrite the risk, especially when its own security concerns are shifting closer to home?Seen through that lens, Venezuela looks less like a one-off and more like a signal. A statement that America’s priority is now its own hemisphere, its own borders, and its own people — and that helping neighbouring countries function is being reframed as national defence, not charity.So the real question isn’t whether this is uncomfortable. It is.The question is whether this is the beginning of a world where the United States no longer asks permission, no longer carries everyone else’s burden, and no longer treats post-war agreements as unbreakable vows.Is this interference — or a reset?Is it overreach — or deterrence?And if America steps back from underwriting Europe’s risks, what does that leave everyone else with?That’s the question Trump has put on the table — whether anyone likes his tone or not.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

 In this episode of Code Black, Madison King investigates allegations that Annika Wells has used Australian tax dollars to fund personal parties and vacations. Through independent journalism, she examines accountability, government spending, and ethical considerations in public office. This episode highlights the importance of transparency, challenges misuse of public funds, and encourages informed discussion on political responsibility and citizen oversight. Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

In this episode of Code Black, Madison King examines the role of the ABC in shaping public narratives and unpacks the growing national conversation around reparations. Through an independent journalism lens, she explores media bias, accountability, historical context, and the impact of government-funded broadcasting on public opinion. This episode challenges mainstream narratives and invites critical thinking, open dialogue, and informed debate on some of Australia’s most divisive social and political issues. Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Donald Trump is suing the BBC for five billion dollars.Not only does the case allege defamation against President Trump, it also serves as a clear and prominent signal that the relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom is at its lowest point in decades.This is not a routine legal dispute.It reflects a deeper breakdown — political trust, media credibility, and alliance cohesion between two nations that once described themselves as inseparable partners.That breakdown didn’t happen overnight.It began with Trump’s first election, continued through his removal, and has worsened again with the current presidency. Across that period, America’s supposed allies — particularly the UK and Australia — didn’t just distance themselves.They put knives in his back.Politically. Publicly. Strategically.And yet, despite undermining the US presidency, those same countries still expect the United States to come to their defence — to spill American soldiers’ blood on British soil or Australian soil if conflict erupts.Why should America be asked to do that?Why should American men and women die for governments that not only undermine the US presidency, but fail their own people?Look at the United Kingdom right now.The UK government is urging its citizens to prepare for war with Russia.Put your hand up. Enlist. Defend the nation.But defend what, exactly?A country where citizens are arrested and imprisoned for Facebook posts.Where mothers, fathers, and even children are dragged into the criminal system over speech.Where large sections of the population feel like outsiders in their own homeland.Where public consent has been replaced with pressure and fear.Why would anyone fight for a country that no longer listens to them?Australia is no different.Under Anthony Albanese, and under governments before him, the same pattern repeats:Loyalty demanded.Compliance enforced.Accountability absent.Australia, like the UK, expects protection from the United States while simultaneously undermining the leadership and interests of the very country it expects to bleed for it.These are not the actions of stable allies.They are the symptoms of alliances breaking apart.Trump suing the BBC for five billion dollars isn’t just about defamation.It’s a warning flare.When the media, the political class, and the alliance framework all collapse at once, what follows is not unity — it’s fracture.Everything after that — the speeches, the slogans, the calls for sacrifice — is theatre.The structure is already failing.And no amount of propaganda can hide it.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Political Language Is the Problem. Band-Aid Solutions Are the Result For more than four decades, Australians have seen terrorist ideology openly displayed in this country — on our streets, online, and in public forums. ISIS flags, extremist slogans, and hate speech have not been hidden. They have been filmed, photographed, shared on social media, and reported by mainstream media.Yet successive Australian governments have failed to act.Despite clear evidence — including police intelligence, court proceedings, and publicly available footage — laws have not been enforced in a way that matches the seriousness of the crimes. Judges routinely fail to apply full sentences to individuals involved in terrorism-related offences, illegal gun manufacturing, or hate speech directed at Australians.Now, instead of addressing this long-standing failure, the government has announced a gun buyback scheme.This misses the point entirely.Terrorists do not rely on lawful gun ownership. If firearms are unavailable, they will use bombs, vehicles, knives, or any other means necessary. The threat is not the tool — it is the ideology.As shown in this video, everything discussed here exists in the public domain. This information has not been hidden. It has been visible for decades. It has also been reported by mainstream media — yet too often without facts, context, or accountability. Media outlets have chosen emotional language over factual reporting, prioritising offence avoidance over public safety.Australia does not need more symbolic policy announcements.It needs:   •   laws that match the crimes,   •   enforcement without political fear,   •   full sentencing applied by the courts,   •   and factual reporting without ideological language.The issue is terrorism — not guns.#PoliticalNews #polticallanguage #viralpost2025 #TruthMattersSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Weak Governments 🇦🇺Import Terrorists They Can’t Control — Then Are Too Scared to Remove Them New Hate Speech Laws Won’t Fix What Albanese Ignored for Decades — The 1958 Immigration Act Already Gives Power to Remove Terrorists There is something fundamentally wrong with this country when we have a Prime Minister — and politicians from both major parties, including the Liberals — who have supported pro-Palestine movements not just now, but dating back to the 1980s and 1990s.People are constantly told to “do their research,” yet the truth is simple: Australia already has the laws.The Migration Act 1958 gives the government clear powers to remove non-citizens who fail the character test or pose a risk to the community.The problem is not a lack of legislation.The problem is a refusal to enforce it.Successive governments have chosen political comfort over public safety, while pretending their hands are tied. They are not.At the same time, we now have judges who believe they can override Parliament, reinterpret laws to suit ideology, and substitute their own views for the will of the legislature — even when it places Australians at risk. That is not justice. That is judicial overreach.For decades, Aboriginal people have had no say over who enters their front door, while white politicians in Canberra decide who comes and goes — and then fail to apply the law when it matters. They dictate outcomes without bearing the consequences.The result is a two-tier system:One rule for politicians, activists, and protected groups.Another rule for everyday Australians.Policing is selective.Borders are political.Accountability is absent.We do not need new laws.We need the guts to enforce the ones we already have.Apply the law.Use the evidence.End two-tier policing.Put Australians — including First Nations people — first.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Mainstream media doesn’t give the public the full picture — it gives people only what it decides they deserve to know.I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve published information before mainstream outlets later drip-fed the same facts, once it suited them. That alone should wake people up. If you don’t ask the right questions, and if you don’t have the grit to dig through documents, government reports, and timelines like a real investigator, you will never get honest or complete reporting from corporate media.Most journalists today are paid by large corporations. I’m not. I fund my own work, I do my own research, and I use the same public channels that are available to everyone. The difference is this: I actually use them. Mainstream media has everything at its fingertips — and still fails to properly inform the public.At the same time, independent voices like mine are routinely silenced. Over the past month alone, Facebook has removed more than 2,000 people from my page — followers who can no longer comment, share, or even engage. That’s not accidental. That’s suppression.I ran for federal politics this year. I dealt directly with the Australian Electoral Commission. I experienced first-hand how pressure is applied to silence candidates who don’t fit the approved narrative. When institutions can’t control what you say, they remove where you’re allowed to say it.So ask yourself: what kind of society punishes people for telling the truth?Why is independent investigation treated as a problem?This is exactly why public trust in mainstream media has collapsed. Younger generations don’t watch it — not because they’re disengaged, but because they know it’s disconnected, shallow, and often misleading. Morning television debates apples versus oranges while serious questions go unanswered.People aren’t turning away from the media.They’re turning away from media that no longer serves the public.#followersreelsfypシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ Follow the full investigations on YouTube and Rumble:👉 CodeBlackWithMadisonKingSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

I want to know why Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi turned up at Bondi Beach immediately after Australians and Israeli nationals were killed there.This is a woman who has been a long-time supporter of Palestine, and so is the Greens Party. That’s on the public record. I do not believe the Greens represent Australians. They represent a political minority, protected by the system.What Australians are entitled to ask is this: why was she there, and what was she doing?And there is another question that has not been answered.Did she know the father involved, given reports he was from the same place she grew up in?I am done listening to the lack of accountability of our govt and policing investigations because when politicians insert themselves into the aftermath of violence, scrutiny is warranted.Australians are done being told not to ask questions.I will not be silent and I will not allow a two tier policing and govt system to continue in our country.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

What we’ve witnessed is a complete failure of federal authorities, New South Wales Police, and government leadership—failure to enforce existing laws and failure to remove people who should never have been here in the first place.If you can freely return to your country of birth or your family’s homeland, you are not a refugee. Refugee status was never meant to be permanent convenience—it was meant to be protection when return is impossible.The only people who truly cannot be sent “back” are those with bloodlines rooted here: Aboriginal Australians, and the descendants of convicts and early settlers who built this country.We’ve been lied to before. John Howard’s gun law crusade followed Port Arthur—yet Martin Bryant was never given a public trial, never tested in open court, and Australians were told to accept the narrative without question.Disarming citizens while refusing to enforce borders, deport extremists, or hold agencies accountable is not public safety.It’s political cowardice dressed up as law.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

In the quiet sprawl of Sydney’s Bonnyrigg suburb—where kebab shops hum beside corner delis and neighbours rarely ask too many questions—the Akram family blended seamlessly into the multicultural backdrop for nearly three decades.Sajid Akram, 50, arrived from Lahore, Pakistan, in 1998 on a student visa, chasing education and opportunity in Australia, according to reporting by the Sydney Morning Herald Somewhere in Sydney’s western suburbs—possibly through Pakistani community circles—he met Verena Akram, an Anglo-Australian woman born and raised locally around Bankstown. Fair-skinned, unmistakably local in accent, with no recorded immigrant background, she worked part-time in administrative roles, according to interviews she later gave to SMH and Daily Mail Australia.They married in 2001.That marriage secured Sajid a partner visa, followed by permanent residency. Despite living in Australia for more than two decades, he never became a citizen, instead renewing his status through resident return visas after multiple overseas trips—primarily back to Pakistan—over the years, as confirmed by federal authorities.Their only child, Naveed Akram, was born in Sydney in 2001. An Australian citizen by birth. No siblings. Raised, schooled, and socialised entirely in Australia. By all outward appearances, an ordinary young man—working as a bricklayer until being laid off months before the attack, frequenting gyms, eating halal, keeping to himself.Yet behind the façade, warning signs had already surfaced.In 2019, ASIO questioned Naveed at the age of 18 over suspected links to a Sydney-based ISIS-aligned cell. No charges were laid, but he was flagged by intelligence agencies, a fact later confirmed by the Prime Minister and reported by ABC News.But questions linger.The family travelled frequently to Pakistan. Sajid’s visa history shows multiple returns since at least 2010, often accompanied by his son, according to immigration reporting and ministerial briefings. What conversations were had? What influences absorbed? What ideologies hardened quietly, out of public view?On December 14, 2025, the illusion of normality collapsed.Sajid and Naveed Akram drove to Bondi Beach in a rented SUV, arriving at a Hanukkah community event. According to police, witnesses, and forensic investigators, two black ISIS flags were displayed—one mounted on the vehicle’s bonnet and later recovered as evidence.From a nearby footbridge, they opened fire using six rifles legally licensed to Sajid.Sixteen people were killed. Among them, a 10-year-old girl and Rabbi Eli Schlanger. More than forty others were injured.Sajid was shot dead by police at the scene. Naveed was critically wounded and remains under guard in hospital, according to NSW Police and international reporting by Reuters, BBC, Al Jazeera, and The New York Times.After the attack, her public denial intensified.She told media her son had no firearms. No extremist views. No troubling associations.Yet authorities confirmed recovered jihadist material, ISIS symbolism, and a prior ASIO intervention. These facts sit uneasily beside claims of ignorance.This is no longer just a story about one violent act.It is about intelligence warnings that stopped short. About firearm licensing that remained intact. About years of radicalisation unfolding in plain sight—or just beyond the willingness to see.Bonnyrigg’s quiet streets now carry a different weight. Bondi’s shoreline, once synonymous with summer and celebration, bears the memory of bloodshed.Australia is oSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

These agencies exist for one purpose: threat identification and prevention.Not reaction. Not excuses. Prevention.If it is true — as has been reported — that one of the men involved was:   •   Known to ASIO, and   •   A registered firearms owner,then Australians are entitled to ask a very basic question:What is the point of a watchlist if it carries no consequence?A list that does not trigger mandatory intervention, monitoring, firearms removal, or lawful containment is not public safety. It is bureaucracy masquerading as protection.You cannot tell the public:   •   “This person is a security concern,”and then   •   Allow them to legally possess weapons, move freely, and act without restraint.That is not an intelligence failure — that is a policy failure.As Brigitte Gabriel has said repeatedly, it does not take large numbers to commit atrocities. It takes a small number of extremists, while the consequences are borne by the wider public. That is precisely why lists without enforcement are dangerous — they allow known risks to escalate until people are killed.If the state assesses someone as a genuine national security risk, then the state must act decisively and lawfully:   •   remove access to weapons,   •   impose restrictions,   •   intervene early,   •   or pursue removal under existing national security laws.Anything less is negligence.Bondi was not an accident.It was not unforeseeable.And it was not the responsibility of ordinary Australians to absorb.The failure belongs to the institutions that claimed they were watching — and did nothing.https://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Remember this: 8.3 billion people versus a few hundred elites.If you believe money is everything, you will never understand freedom — or happiness — because neither can be bought.No one should be preparing for war in 2025.We know better now.So ask yourself:Who are we really being told to kill?Innocent people.Strangers.Families just like ours.All in the name of elites who profit from destruction.They don’t rebuild countries out of compassion — they rebuild them for contracts, control, and profit off the dead.That’s why I call it the Sandcastle Effect:They build it up.They knock it down.Then they charge the world to rebuild it — again and again.That is how they keep making money.But here’s the truth they don’t want you to remember:There are 8.3 billion of us.And only a few hundred of them.Real power is not money.Real power is people saying NO — together.It’s time we finally stand as one.https://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

 CB Bonus 010 explores the history, meaning, and cultural significance of the Aboriginal First Nations Flag. This episode examines the origins of the flag, its symbolism, and its role in representing identity, resistance, and unity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Through historical context and reflection, Code Black with Madison King provides educational insight into how the flag has become a powerful national and cultural symbol within Australia’s social and political landscape. https://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

The Kimberley Plan explores a little-known historical proposal to establish a Jewish homeland in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. This concept, emerging during the early 20th century, examined alternative resettlement strategies for Jewish communities facing persecution and displacement. In this episode/article, we delve into the historical context, political discussions, and societal reactions surrounding the Kimberley Plan, highlighting its significance and the lessons it offers for understanding migration, colonization, and Jewish history.https://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Australia does provide reparations to Aboriginal people through funding, grants, and other means. However, it is the governments and our own leaders who often fail to deliver on these outcomes, and they are the ones we should be holding accountable. As I’ve always said, there is a group of people I refer to as the “purple circle.” Anyone sitting on boards should not be automatically viewed as good, decent people because, for the most part, they are not. Many are more interested in lining their own pockets and building their profiles, rather than achieving real, lasting change for our communities.https://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

In this year’s federal election, it’s time to vote out career politicians. Simply look up your suburb, your state, and the sitting MP from the Liberal, Labor, Greens, or National parties—then vote them out. Instead, support independents who align with your values. This is how we break the cycle of lifelong politicians and stop them from sending our money overseas instead of investing in our own country. Let’s start with the top two—Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton. It’s time for real change.Support the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Legal Powers Exist to DEPORT — Verified Australia 🇦🇺• Under Section 501 of the Migration Act 1958, the Minister (or delegate) can refuse or cancel a visa if a person fails the character test, which includes: • A substantial criminal record (sentenced to 12 months or more) • Convictions involving children or serious international crimes • Association with criminal organisations • Risk of disruptive or violent behavior • National security threats or INTERPOL notices • Ministerial Direction 99 (effective 3 March 2023 under Section 499) guided how these decisions should be made—especially weighing community safety and the individual’s ties to Australia.     • Since 21 June 2024, Direction 110 has replaced Direction 99, but the core remains: decision-makers still have the power to refuse or cancel visas based on character.   United Kingdom 🇬🇧 • Immigration Act 1971, Section 3(5)(a): the Secretary of State can deport any non-British national if their presence is “not conducive to the public good.” • Section 3(6): deportation may follow a court conviction for someone 17 or older. • UK Borders Act 2007 imposes mandatory deportation for foreign criminals sentenced to 12 months or more, unless exceptions apply.      Short, Fact-Based SummaryAustralia: • Yes, the law (Migration Act 1958, Section 501 + Direction 99/110) empowers the government to deport non-citizens who fail the character test. • Despite this, robust community-safety powers go unused. Legal challenges, vague wording in Direction 99, and high appeal success rates (AAT reversing about half of cancellations) have hampered enforcement.    UK: • Yes, under Immigration Act 1971 and UK Borders Act 2007, the Home Secretary must deport foreign nationals convicted of serious crimes or deemed not conducive to the public good. • Yet, in practice, human rights, family welfare (Section 55 duties), and treaty obligations can delay or block deportation decisions.    The UK and Australia already have clear laws allowing deportation of non-citizens who fail character or “good conduct” standards—under the Migration Act 1958 (Section 501 + Direction 99/110) in Australia and the Immigration Act 1971 + UK Borders Act 2007 in Britain.Why they’re not using them: • Australia: Weak political will, vague guidelines (Direction 99), and high appeal rates—courts and tribunals often overturn decisions. • UK: Human rights laws, child welfare duties, and legal safeguards slow or block deportations—even when the law allows them.http://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

Digital ID, Chicken Fences, and Foreign Aid: Australia Prepares for Surrender, Not Defence.” In the last 24 hours, two things happened in Australia that should terrify every single person in this country:1. A Chinese flotilla was spotted off the coast of Darwin.2. Chinese nationals were found in Kalumburu, right near Wyndham — the very top of WA, only a few hundred kilometres from Darwin.Are we putting the pieces together yet?A warship on the water… people showing up on land…This is exactly how foreign powers tested Australia in World War II.You don’t need to be a genius to see the pattern.And while all this is happening, the Australian Government’s response is what?Throw another $95 million at Ukraine.Build nothing. Fortify nothing. Protect nothing.Just send money overseas and pretend our own borders don’t exist.Meanwhile, our northern defences look like they’ve been designed by Bunnings:chicken wire fences and “she’ll be right”.Digital ID?Why rush it through now?Because the Government already knows Australia has been strategically compromised.They’re managing the population — not protecting it.Now look at the Chinese flotilla’s path.In the same 24 hours:• It circled Australia,• moved past the Philippines,• went near PNG,ALL while testing how close they can get without us doing a thing.China isn’t rattling sabres anymore — they’re mapping the battlefield.And they’ve already figured out the truth:Australia won’t push back.We CAN’T.Our Defence Force has been gutted for decades.Why?Because every government — Liberal and Labor — has sold this country off piece by piece.They secured THEIR futures, THEIR wealth, THEIR safety.Not yours.And here’s the part nobody likes to admit:Our Constitution wasn’t built to protect the people — it was built to protect corporations and those who serve them.That’s why you never see top lawyers or QCs defend Australians under it.Hello? Anybody awake yet?Japan relies on us.The Philippines relies on us.We send them hundreds of millions every year.But Australia?We haven’t strengthened our own military to defend a 20-kilometre beach, let alone an entire continent.We are the weakest link in the Pacific — and every country knows it.And don’t forget:During WWII, the plan was to sacrifice the Top End and defend the south.Looks like some things never change.So let me spell it out:Foreign ships on our doorstep.Foreign nationals appearing in our most remote communities.A Government sending billions overseas while leaving our north defenceless.And a population asleep because the media says everything’s fine.Australia, STILL SLEEPING 💤 We do not need war on our soil — but if we keep pretending nothing is happening,we’re inviting it.http://codeblackmk.comSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

You know what doesn’t make sense?Annika Wells’ little “$94,000 flight bill” to the UN in New York.Now, that’s supposedly for herself and two staff.But here’s the thing:Last-minute commercial flights to New York — even business class — DO NOT cost anywhere near that amount. You’re looking at around three to six grand a seat.So let’s be generous and say they paid top-tier, premium, fully-flex business class.That’s still around $18,000 to maybe $36,000 total for three people.You cannot stretch that to $94,827 no matter how hard you try.So what does that tell me?It tells me she didn’t fly commercial.It tells me she didn’t jump on Qantas like the rest of us peasants.No — that number screams private jet or a government VIP charter.Because those flights?Those sit right in the $80,000 to $150,000 range, especially if they’re booked on short notice.And here’s the best part:When the government uses a private jet, do they list it as a private jet?Of course not.They bury it under one word: “flights.”So let’s call it for what it is:You don’t get a $94,000 bill from Qantas.You get that from chartering a VIP aircraft and hoping nobody reads the fine print.#usa #astralia #australia #politics #fruad  #corruptionexposedSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

So, America’s tightening up its borders and now demanding up to 5 years of social media history for anyone entering the U.S. from Visa Waiver countries like Australia. Sounds like Big Brother, right? Actually, no. It's just a security measure. The goal? To stop bad actors before they get on the plane. Terrorists and criminals leave traces online. No, it’s not about checking if you posted your lunch; it’s about making sure that people trying to harm the U.S. aren’t slipping through the cracks.Meanwhile, Australia’s Government: Selling Us Out for Globalist PointsNow, while the U.S. is tightening up its borders, Australia’s government is busy laying the groundwork for a Chinese-style surveillance state. Just in case you missed it, December 2025 marked the start of banning kids under 16 from using social media unless they’ve got government approval. Let that sink in. Australia’s government has just made it mandatory for kids to get permission before they can post on TikTok, Instagram, or whatever. But don’t worry, it’s all for their safety, right?But here’s the kicker: this is just the beginning. They’re priming us for the day when the Digital ID becomes the ultimate tool for control. By the end of 2024, you’ll need one to access government services, and soon after, it’ll be required for everything. Want to fly, post on social media, go out in public? Better hope your Digital ID is in check. Don’t have one? Too bad. Enjoy being a non-person.The Digital ID: The Gateway to Your Freedom Getting StolenLook, the Digital ID isn’t just a convenient way to file your taxes. It’s a totalitarian tool designed to track your every move. It’s the kind of system China uses to make sure no one steps out of line. And it's coming to Australia, whether we like it or not.Sure, right now they’re calling it “voluntary” — like all the best totalitarian systems start out. But the Digital ID is just the first step. Soon, it’ll be mandatory for everything. Want to buy a plane ticket? Digital ID. Want to send a tweet? Digital ID. Want to leave the house? Digital ID. It’s not about convenience; it’s about control.Australia’s government is handing over our sovereignty to global elites, selling us on the idea that we’re just being kept safe. But when was the last time “safety” felt this much like control?America’s Leadership: At Least They're Not Wasting TimeBut here's the thing America sees clearly: While the UK and EU are crumbling under their own self-inflicted wounds (high taxes, open borders, loss of sovereignty), America’s keeping its head above water. Trump’s policies are preparing America to stand alone, to be the last Western country that isn’t drowning in its own globalist failures.The Endgame: Less Freedom, More ControlThe Digital ID? Just the first nail in the coffin. Australia’s government is setting us up for a future where everything we do is tracked, everything we say is monitored, and our freedom is just a distant memory. What’s it all for? So the elites can feel like they’re “progressive”? Meanwhile, we’re setting ourselves up to be nothing more than cogs in the machine.While America is putting its citizens first, locking down its borders, and saying, “We’re not going to let this happen here,” Australia’s leaders are handing us over to global elites, while selling us out for some false sense of “safety” and "progress."In Conclusion:The U.S. is tightening borders to protect its people. Australia’s government? They’re handing over our freedom on a silver platter, all in the name of “progress.” While AmeSupport the showFollow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?