Hey Not The Face! Podcast

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest UFC antitrust case(s) updates and a new case that was filed by a former employee. In our main discussion topic, we look at Conor McGregor’s career, including how much money he’s made both in and out of the octagon, his Kinahan cartel connection, and how his businesses have fared. We also weigh in on him being found civilly liable for the brutal rape of Nikita Hand, and how that’s affected his fanbase in Ireland, Europe, and the United States, as well as how it has been covered by the media in the weeks leading up to UFC 329. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going and allows you access to our paywalled content* Episode 265 Outline* Are there any new filings or updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Do you have any additional thoughts about Eric Wedin’s work in this case?* Are you surprised by the efforts of MMA media at large to sanitize Conor McGregor’s image?* How much of an impact do you think his rape case and subsequent civil liability affected his image with fans, both here and in Europe?* Bet US has a graphic showing that most of the USA’s fans support Conor McGregor’s return to fighting and are rooting for him. Did that graphic properly illustrate his fandom or is it just a gimmick to get people betting either on him or against him?* Our good friend, Fred Garvin, did some investigating into the ticket sales for this weekend’s card. I was surprised to learn it hasn’t sold out. What else did Fred’s investigation find?* Audie Attar, Conor’s manager, talked about his contract details recently in an interview. Did he reveal anything in the interview and do you have any guesses as to how his payout for this fight will compare to his other matches?* McGregor says he is happy to campaign for fighter pay. Do you think he does anything to raise fighter pay?* Conor made a hefty sum off the antitrust settlement. How much did he make?* Can you give us a summary of what you think McGregor has made during his career? * Is there any risk that he’s on the path to becoming another Mayweather?* Do you think his public ties with the Kinahan gang could be depleting his wealth?* Conor was recently ranting about how Khabib needs to come out of retirement and have a rematch against him. Why do you think he’s calling for that specific fight?* What do you think happens to Conor’s financial legacy after Saturday in both scenarios (wins fight/loses fight)?*PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF INTENT AND OPPOSITION TO PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, ECF No. 82*COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, John flew solo to break down the three days of the spoliation hearings in the UFC antitrust cases. There was a major bombshell revealed when Judge Boulware struck from the record all testimony from the expert witness. There was also more sworn testimony from matchmakers. The Defendants really lucked out, and John explains why. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*Today’s show is free, but we urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going, and allows you access to paywalled content* Episode 264 Outline* Overview of the 3 days of hearings* Maynard uses Dana White as a “CYA”* Maynard asked about deleted messages with managers* Maynard asking White for input on fighter pay* How post fight bonuses are now handled* Maynard knows nothing about arbitration agreements or class action waivers* Court appointed expert, Eric Wedin, apparently wiped Dana White’s phone* Wedin left mistakes in his final reports and maybe didn’t even read it* Court struck Wedin from the record* How they could ask Apple if a kill code was sent to the phone* Sean Shelby’s testimony* Matchmakers have no guidelines with regards to how much a fighter can be paid* Shelby also doesn’t discuss matchmaking or contracts with Dana White* Shelby too doesn’t know anything about arbitration agreements and class action waivers* What comes next?* Why the Defendants really lucked out*ECF 287 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS*The Hey Not the Face! Podcast is an independent publication. Please consider a paid subscription to keep up with our best work and learn how you can support us. With all forms of news media crumbling, especially in the combat sports space, we could really use your help. Thank you. We appreciate all of you.Thank you for checking out the Hey Not The Face! Podcast, a listener-supported publication. We’d be eternally grateful if you could help us by purchasing a subscription and spreading word of this episode by sharing it far and wide. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit heynottheface.substack.com/subscribe

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest UFC antitrust case(s) updates. We also discuss which promotions can actually compete with the UFC, and if traditional stick-and-ball sports view the UFC as competition. We analyze Paulo Costa’s contract situation, and the damage to Alex Pereira’s brand in the fallout from his loss to Cyril Gane. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 263 Outline* Are there any new updates or filings in the UFC antitrust cases?* UFC self-reported 34M global views and 126B social media views for the White House card. Do you believe those estimates?* Speaking of the White House card, Alex Pereira lost a bit of his shine in that loss to Cyril Gane. Since then, he’s been on a run of bad PR between continuing reports of sexual assault against his ex girlfriend, a concentrated attack on Herb Dean, and weird exchanges with fans on social media. What’s your take on his antics, and do you think he should dial it back?* Dana White seemed very concerned over Floyd Mayweather’s legal troubles, commenting the following, “I’ve talked to him about him. When somebody works as hard as he did, amasses the type of wealth he had, and then they lose it or it’s stolen, it’s horrible. Who knows, anything is possible, maybe we can do something to figure it out for him.” What do you think he meant by ‘maybe we can do something to figure it out for him’?* Dana recently commented, “We are not the same” in regards to a question about Eddie Hearn being competition to Zuffa Boxing. He noted that nobody is viewed as competition on either the boxing or MMA side, saying only the stick-and-ball sports were viewed as competition. Is he right?* What do you think of Paulo Costa’s contract situation right now?* PFL San Diego salaries were released, revealing a main event fighter only got $10K to show. What do you think of that?* What do you make of Rizin’s self reported PPV numbers a few weeks back?* BONUS: Does John have zucchini envy?*Minutes of the Court*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest UFC antitrust case(s) updates. We also discuss what fighters think managers actually do for them, Sean O’Malley’s purse dip, and Ian Machado Garry’s new representation. We weigh in on the UFC’s auctions from the White House card, and whether Paramount paid too much for their broadcast rights. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 262 Outline* Are there any updates in the UFC antitrust cases?* During an interview on One Night With Steiny, Sean O’Malley confirmed he was getting paid around $600,000, which Eddie Hearn picked up on and called out fighters like O’Malley for accepting it. What do you make of this drama?* Georgio Poullas had a video were he asked Aljamain Sterling and Joshua Van what a manager does. What did you think of their answers?* Eddie Hearn is apparently now representing Ian Machado Garry. What can he do for him?* Des Barry gave us an update on the collectible auction prices from UFC Freedom 250. No questions, just want to point out how insane those prices are.* There was some discussion on X between Rob Joyner and Dave Meltzer regarding whether or not Paramount overpaid for the broadcast rights for the UFC. What’s your take on the argument?* Johnny Fisher said Zuffa Boxing offered him 6 or 7 times as much as what Matchroom was offering him. Hearn’s response was to tell him to run to this offer. What do you make of Zuffa Boxing offering so much more?* October Red Media had an interview with DAZN VP Alfie Sharman discussing boxing on their platform. What do you think of what he had to say?* What’s going on with Floyd Mayweather? Can you give us an update on what’s going on with his finances and lawsuits?*PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING SUBPOENA COMPLIANCE*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking back at the latest UFC antitrust case(s) updates. We discuss how managers swore under threat of perjury that Dana White doesn’t negotiate contracts, as well as the Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s spoliation claims. We also weigh in on Justin Gaethje’s call for equity, the new UFC rankings system, and the ongoing feud with Dana White and Eddie Hearn. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 261 Outline* Are there any updates in the UFC antitrust cases?* Viewer numbers for the White House event have been a point of contention with Dana White commenting that ⅓ of Paramount subscribers tuned in. Is Dana just bad at math or did that feel like an intentional misrepresentation?* Justin Gaethje feels he deserves to be rewarded with equity for everything he’s done for the UFC, saying the following: “I’m in a place where I feel like I deserve to be compensated for what I have done, not for what I’m going to do. The UFC should create a company and give me equity in that company so I can build passive income.” What do you say to that?* Speaking of Gaethje, GSP says that he thinks Justin should retire. Do you agree with that sentiment?* Islam Makhachev said that the reason negotiations with Ilia Topuria went south after an initial agreement was made, was because the day after they agreed, Ilia came back with a demand for somewhere in the neighborhood of $20M. Do you think Ilia had enough standing to legitimately demand that amount?* Demetrious Johnson talked about the perils of losing a championship bout (or any fight), and how people tend to forget their expected purse is cut in half. Is there anything else that could be added to that conversation?* The UFC is introducing their new AI rankings system this week. Does this signify a further move away from being a true sport?* The feud between Dana White and Eddie Hearn keeps going, with Dana making fun of Eddie because Anthony Joshua signed a deal with CAA. What do you make of that?* Speaking of Hearn, he discussed DAZN’s new deal with TNT sports. Do you think that relationship will keep DAZN alive and thriving?* Do you think Turki Alalshikh will be able to broker the peace he hopes for among all the promoters?* What are your thoughts on the WBO refusing to allow ZUFFA Boxing to submit a purse bid on the Keshawn Davis-Devin Haney bout because ZB isn’t an officially licensed promoter?*Latest filings from the UFC antitrust cases*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTWe’re discussing viewership numbers from UFC Freedom 250 and why the estimates were so inflated compared to what they were in reality. We also look at the backlash to Conor McGregor’s media appearances, and the lingering effect of Josh Hokit’s comment on Michelle Obama. We weigh in on Floyd Mayweather’s ma…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking back at the White House card now that it’s happened. We discuss the sponsors, the political motivations, the questionable actions of in-fight officiating, and the hiring of the ABC to oversee the event. We also analyze the latest filings in the antitrust cases, which are very spicy, indeed. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 259 Outline* Are there any new filings or updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* What did you think of the White House card as a whole?* What did you think of the ABC being hired to regulate the event?* What did you think of the sponsors?* What did you think of the crypto bonuses?* What did you think of boxers being there but only 1 UFC superstar retiree in GSP, and that was only because he was cornering Aiemann Zahabi?* UFC commentary referred to Pereira as the biggest mixed martial arts star in the world about 15 minutes after a weird taped segment with Mcgregor and Holloway. Their hard launch of their next massive star failed in real time, and Ilia Topuria, as well. Can Justin Gaethje fill the shoes of either man?* White said the event merchandise sales doubled the next best event. He also said that it was a monstrous night. Do you think they lost a single nickel on that event?* White said this event had no political agenda and was simply to celebrate the 250th anniversary of America and further said the president trusted him to deliver a one-of-a-kind event. He said that he discussed the event on platforms of many different political leanings. Do you believe him?* How do you think the event was viewed by the public?* Do you have any thoughts on that Daniel Cormier post with the Eric Trump screengrab?* What did you think of all the UFC brass being there front and center, as well as old brass like Frank Fertitta?* Lots of politicians, including Corey Booker and Gavin Newsom were tweeting about the corruption of the event. Do you think there’s enough momentum to stop the Revival Act from passing?*Many new filings from the UFC antitrust cases*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest details of the lawsuit filed against the Trump administration that allege a “volcano of corruption” among other complaints. We discuss the new merchandise UFC will be selling online, as well as the on-site shops, and the way the sponsor packages may have been designed when the negotiations were underway before the Paramount broadcast rights deal was even signed. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 258 Outline* Are there any new filings or updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* In our last show, we discussed the lawsuit filed against the Trump Administration. Since then, there’s been a flurry of activity in those cases. Explain what’s been happening over the last couple days.* In a reply brief, Public Integrity Project attorneys say the UFC White House event is a “volcano of corruption” that will “mark an inflection point in American history.” POTUS’s “allies at the UFC will profit from the first private, for-profit sporting event ever held on WH grounds.” Would you agree with that sentiment?* They also stated the government “concealed the true nature of the event for months”. Did they?* Zach Arnold noted an item from the DOJ response regarding UFC White House card. There is a contract between UFC & the Feds to put on this event. Does that surprise you at all?* Can you lay out the deal that the govt. will have with the UFC that was recently announced by Marco Rubio.* The UFC dropped its UFC Freedom 250 merchandise shop on their website. Now that you’ve seen it, does their claim that they will lose money on this event hold any water when you tally up all the other revenue streams for this event?* The Washington Post is reporting that the White House will be closed to reporters during the UFC event - unless the UFC lets them in. The White House is ceding control of who gets into the fight event on the South Lawn, in a break with tradition. Is this another critical detail in the UFC’s growing political power?* In the grand scheme of things, do you think the White House card will have any significant impact on sports as a whole, outside the MMA landscape?* Dana White was named to TIME Magazine’s inaugural Top 100 Sports list that recognizes 100 of the most influential sports figures reshaping the sports landscape. Do you think he has a claim to be on that list?*COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTWe’re discussing the lawsuit filed against the Trump administration that looks to stop the UFC White House event from moving forward. We analyze the complaints and the odds that the Plaintiffs can prove and win their case. We also break down why the A-List celebrities that were invited by Dana White have d…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at how the White House card could end up backfiring for the UFC. We discuss Donald Trump’s investment in TKO, as well as the military troops the Pentagon is seeking to fill seats at the White House card, and if the UFC could theoretically afford to pay for their travel expenses and still stay in the black. We examine the significance of Zuffa Boxing’s signing of Shakur Stevenson, and GSP’s claims that he made great strides in fighting the UFC’s tyranny. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 255 Outline* Are there any new updates or filings to the UFC antitrust cases?* Late last week, it was revealed that Donald Trump invested in TKO. Why is that a problem?* Internal memos show the pentagon is trying to recruit a certain type of military troop to attend the White House card. Further, they want those troops to pay for their own travel to the card. Could UFC eat those costs and still stay in the black?* Is the UFC not telling the whole story with revenue streams for the WH card?* Eddie Hearn says that he wants to get Tom Aspinall out of his UFC contract and he uses some of Dana White’s ideology. “Dana said, ‘Eddie should want fighters to earn as much money as possible. He should be happy for Conor Benn that he’s making more money.’ ... Dana White should be happy for Tom Aspinall to receive that deal.” What do you make of that?* Speaking of Eddie Hearn, he is reporting that Shakur Stevenson has already signed with Zuffa Boxing. How significant is this signing?* GSP recently went on Demetrious Johnson’s podcast where he discussed why the bigger name stars in the UFC carry a responsibility to help other fighters get better pay, the way he says he did, himself. What are your thoughts on his comments?* Dana White quipped on the Pat McAfee show last week that TKO was “like the mafia, they’ve got a piece of everything” in regards to a question on whether TKO has a stake in Power Slap. What did you think of that statement?*Motion to seal exhibits, declaration of Lorraine Moise*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking Dana White’s latest media rounds. We discuss his comments on comparisons to WNBA base pay, and his false claim that UFC offers three fights per year. We provide a thorough breakdown of tolling provisions and why Dana’s claims are untrue with citations directly from UFC contracts. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 254 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* We talked last week about possible match-ups MVP could do to maximize a second card. After watching Rico Verhoeven vs. Oleksandr Usyk, what are your thoughts on that now?* Ronda Rousey is angling for a rematch with Holly Holm. How well do you think that fight would do as a main event on MVP’s next MMA event?* How is Netflix positioned, as far as MVP is concerned?* TKO is affiliated with Brand Risk, a celebrity influencer-based promotion that is under fire for fight-fixing. What are your thoughts on Brand Risk?* It’s been reported that Conor McGregor wanted to fight Michael Chandler, but UFC said it didn’t make sense for them. Has Conor’s leverage with the company evaporated?* The UFC 329 VIP packages are insanely priced, with some as high as $20K, and they’re completely sold out. What do you make of Conor’s drawing power?* Dana White has been making the interview rounds ahead of the White House card. What do you make of all the media he is doing and coverage he is getting?* When asked about the WNBA increasing their base pay minimum, he said it was ridiculous to compare salaries with the WNBA and that fighter pay has gone up every single year. Has it?* He also spoke about having to offer fighters 3 bouts per year. What part of his talking points in that conversation did you find issue with?*Minutes of proceedings from status conference, dated 5/18/26*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the news of Scott Coker’s re-entry to MMA as a promoter with seed money for a new promotion. We also discuss MVP MMA’s big numbers in viewership and at the gate and Nakisa Bidarian’s idea that they can help Conor McGregor maximize his value in free agency There’s a lot …

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the status conference held for the UFC antitrust cases regarding the possible spoliation by UFC officials. We’re also discussing the MVP MMA card in detail. We go over the payouts, Jon Jones’ comments about getting out of his contract, the proposed second event by year’s end, Nate Diaz’ intent to keep fighting, and Dana White’s timing on announcing Conor McGregor’s return fight. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 252 Outline* Today, the status conference for the UFC antitrust cases took place. What did we learn from the proceedings?* What’s next in these cases?* The Rousey vs. Carano Netflix card went down, and by all accounts, was a roaring success. What did you think of it?* The house was about 90% full (as reported by Casey Leydon, Alex Behunin and Josh Gross) by the time Gina and Ronda took to the cage. Does that sound like it might’ve been profitable?* What did you think of the timing of Dana White’s Conor McGregor fight announcement via his personal instagram (rather than a UFC channel or during an event)?* Nakisa Bidarian says that MVP has plans to do another MMA event by year’s end. What are your thoughts on that?* Nate Diaz is still ready to keep fighting. Do you think he still has value to extract by the promotion?* Francis Ngannou donated his $100K bonus to his opponent. What did you think of that?* The purses were released, and looked great for a debut event, but were the key players compensated well enough?* Jon Jones was on the desk and spoke about how great the production was and that he thought MVP did a better job than UFC. Do you agree with him?* He also spoke about wanting to get out of his contract so he could fight Ngannou. Nakisa Bidarian said he didn’t think that could happen. What did you think of what he said?* It seemed that Jake Paul was very much trying to sus out more fights, especially with Mike Perry and Francis Ngannou. How successful do you think fights with those guys would be?*Plaintiff’s renewed application for enforcement*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the letter Dana White sent to Donald Trump, the deal TKO struck with Arizona, and Kevin Nash’s crusade against TKO. We also discuss MVP’s bold claims that they’re cutting fighters in for more than 50% of the revenue from the Rousey-Carano card, and Jorge Masvidal’s comments on fighter pay. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 251 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* There have been several instances of boxers and promoters complaining about TKO’s proposed Ali Act amendment, most notably Roy Jones, Jr. and Eddie Hearn. What do you have to say about their arguments?* It’s being reported by Ring Magazine that Vasiliy Lomachenko is coming out of retirement now that his deal with Top Rank has expired. Where do you think he’ll end up if the report is true?* WWE legend Kevin Nash has been discussing TKO/WWE’s attempts at getting talent to take 50% pay cuts. Do you think he has a point in saying UFC is hemorrhaging money?* What about his idea that WWE talent should unionize and join SAG-AFTRA?* TKO reached an agreement with Arizona on a multi-event deal. What are the details and what do you think of it?* Dana White sent a letter to Donald Trump asking for relief on gambling legislation. What are the details of that?* Some state representatives have praised him publicly on this (Dina Titus). How likely is it that we’ll see more support from other state officials?* Jorge Masvidal discussed fighter pay. What points did he make and do you agree with what he said?* Nakisa Bidarian told Ariel Helwani that they are paying much more than 50% of the revenue to the fighters. Some were saying this is not a viable business model. Do you agree with them, and do you think MVP is really paying that high of a share?* Dana White gave a recent interview where he discussed Joe Rogan, and how some sponsors suggested to UFC that they fire him. Dana basically told them to get bent. How important is Joe Rogan to the UFC empire?* Matt Brown recently replied to a Twitter post about Dana White’s contributions to the UFC. He said, “The way I see it Campbell McLaren and the Gracie’s built a great product but couldn’t get the funding and/or business ability to scale it. Dana seen an opportunity, had the connections to make it happen, and got it done. Have to respect that. Learn from it rather than hate it imo.” There’s a lot of myth to Dana’s legend, so how close did Matt get to the reality of what Dana actually did?*Search term proposal*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the many comments Dana White has made during interviews and press conferences over the last several days. We discuss his comments on fighters having to work extra jobs and collective bargaining from his interview on the Breakfast Club. We also examine some of his commen…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases, and the latest TKO financials that were revealed in their latest SEC filing. We also discuss TKO’s earnings call where Mark Shapiro fielded questions and discussed their enduring ties to the Saudis. We also look at some wild ways the UFC is maximizing their value extraction of the White House card. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 249 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* TKO’s SEC filings came out this week. What did we learn from them about TKO and UFC’s finances?* Did it give us any information about Zuffa Boxing?* Mark Shapiro had some interesting comments during TKO’s earnings call. The first one that really caught my eye was his confirmation that the Saudis will not be pulling up their investment stakes in TKO. Is that mostly due to TKO’s very powerful ties to the Trump administration, or because they invested so much into the Paramount/WB deal?* Do you see any scenario where they might be forced to dump their stake in Zuffa Boxing?* Once again, Shapiro reinforced the plan to keep their scheduled events in the Middle East on track. Do you think that’s a wise move?* CFO Andrew Schleimer said that fighter compensation continues to grow as “we would never turn a blind eye to our most meaningful investment.” He only cited the doubling of the bonus structure, so my question is, have you heard whether they’ve made any increases to regular compensation?* It was reported that UFC has “partner investment” specialty tickets for the White House event. What do we know of them?* Shapiro also said that UFC was going to take a $30M loss on the White House event. After seeing the value extraction measures they’re taking with this card ($3500 posters, $5K names on canvas, and $1.5M specialty tickets), do you buy into that theory?* Shapiro said “we don’t buy it” referring to fan criticisms of card quality, both for UFC and WWE, citing their numbers and saying that there are always ebbs and flows. That’s something you’ve said as well, but you also noted that this seems to be an unusually long ebb. Do you still hold to that thought after seeing their latest finances?* When asked about other promotions having big, one-off events, Shapiro said that everything is competition in combat sports with other events, but didn’t seem to have any concerns about those competitors. Should he be concerned with the competitors?* MMA Junkie had an article written by MMA manager Alex Davis where he talked about how the UFC has MMA in a state of crisis. Do you agree with him?*Defendant’s motions to seal*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases, and the Florida case that’s been moved to Vegas under Judge Boulware’s purview. We also discuss PFL’s finances, including their loan status and international assets. We examine Karate Combat’s awful weekend, and look at some new information on the White House card. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 248 Outline* Do we have any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* We had a big weekend of boxing and there were plenty of soundbites stemming from it. Mark Kriegel’s comments on the sanctioning bodies saying “at best they’re a hack, at worst, they’re corrupt”. If you were to describe them, which way do you lean, hack or corrupt?* Kriegel also said that TKO’s Ali Act bill proposal would restore boxing to its former glory by bringing back competition. What do you say to that?* David Benavidez said the following: “I don’t know why he (Opetaia) went to Zuffa. I’m not gonna go over there and fight for a Zuffa title. I think Dana White has shown he doesn’t wanna do fights with PBC, DAZN. If we can come to an agreement, make a big fight, let’s do it.” Do you think he has a point on Dana’s unwillingness to co-promote?* Naoya Inoue’s fight was reported to have seen a crowd of 55K and a gate of $31M. How much has his star power increased over the last year or so?* There are rumors of him vs. Bam in Nagoya under the Riyadh Season banner for early next year. How would that promotional arrangement look?* The UFC White House event is offering canvas names for $5000. Is this $5K amount just for the name on the canvas alone? No package deal with tickets, no “experience” bundling? They also sold out of 100 signed posters at $3500/each. How much money do you think they could clear on stuff like this?* PFL uploaded a bunch of information on Company House. What stood out most to you?* There’s been a lot of negative publicity surrounding Karate Combat again. What’s going on with them and how are they still in business considering all the people they owe money to?* Dana White was interviewed on Fox and told Lara Trump that 4300 tickets would be available to mostly military members but 85000 free tickets to the park across from the White House would be available after a thorough screening. Do you think White House officials will be using the collected data for anything?*Kajan Johnson motion to transfer and PFL loan information*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases and Nick Khan’s 17-page version of his opening statement from last week’s Senate hearing on the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. We also discuss the class action suit filed by porn industry talent that could reveal the reasoning behind a very special provision in the contracts of UFC fighters and boxers signed to Zuffa Boxing. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 247 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* There is a big porn industry class action suit that was recently filed. What are the details and can a parallel be drawn between that case and what’s going on with the antitrust cases in combat sports?* The Senate website for the Commerce Committee posted a 17 page version of Nick Khan’s opening statement from last week. After you had a chance to go over it, what stood out to you?* Lou DiBella was recently on Ariel Helwani’s show and said the following: “It’s not just hobos that are signing with TKO...It’s not going to be very long before they’re gonna have a roster that compares favorably with every single other promoter.” Do you agree with him?* The Saudis have withdrawn from LIV Golf. We talked about the probability of them doing that over the last several weeks/months. With their big investment in the Paramount merger, what do you think the odds are of them pulling up stakes in boxing and combat sports completely?* The Saudis also cancelled their snooker contracts. What does this mean for Eddie Hearn and DAZN?* There was a Town Hall with Nick Khan recently. Was there anything he said that stood out to you in particular?* Mark Shapiro recently talked about TKO’s full embrace of AI technology. Do you think this helps or harms TKO’s businesses in the long run?* Zach Arnold posted a video of Harrison Whitman being introduced as the COO of Zuffa Boxing. Who is Harrison Whitman?* Once again, a UFC numbered event with a big headliner is experiencing terrible sales. When you look at that and combine it with the downturn in ticket sales they’ve been experiencing overall, how long do you think they’ll keep business as usual before a revamp or focus on building stars, if at all?* Recently, Ronda Rousey said she wanted to become MVP’s “Dana White” figure. We speculated on this a while back. Do you think she’s equipped to handle that role?*Instructions for court-appointed digital forensic analyst*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases surrounding the feud between the Plaintiffs and Dominance MMA. We also discuss WWE’s plethora of issues surrounding Wrestlemania 42, and what the future may hold for the company. In our final section, we discuss the curious case of Aljamain Sterling’s Funk Harbor rum, and his latest contract signing with the UFC. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 246 Outline* Do we have any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Last week, some TKO financials came out that detailed the 2025 salaries of TKO’s highest ranking officials. What did they look like?* There was a report stating that the White House card will have “Super Bowl level security” handled by federal agencies. Who eats the cost of that?* There was a lot of uproar over Wrestlemania 42 last weekend that ranged from ESPN’s Andreas Hale being denied credentials to flagging ticket sales. The event also drew tons of scorn and criticism for the content. Does this forebode of darker times ahead for WWE?* They also released a large swathe of talent a few days after the event. Does that signal anything to you?* Speaking of talent, Mark Shapiro told a University of Alabama class that TKO has full control over WWE creative and defended the use of celebrities like Pat McAfee, Mark Wahlberg and Logan Paul as a growth strategy. Are we at the point where they will no longer build stars, and instead will use Endeavor talent, Dana White (for UFC), etc to try and draw in viewers/subscribers/ticket purchasers?* One final story to round out our pro-wrestling coverage is that the Make-A-Wish Foundation had to purchase their own tickets, as WWE didn’t comp them. Doesn’t this seem like really bad optics?* Paddy Pimblett weighed in on Dana White and Eddie Hearn trying to box each other: “The funniest thing about it all. If they fought each other, they’d get paid well more than what the fighters are getting paid. $30 million each? No boxer’s getting that under Eddie and no UFC fighter’s getting it under Dana. But that’s just the way the world works.” What do you make of that?* Aljamain Sterling tried to do a big promotional push of his Funk Harbor rum at a pre-fight presser for last weekend’s Apex card but was shot down by UFC officials. What did you think of that whole situation?* Apparently, there are a lot of fighters, Aljo included, that have cigar brands too. That’s something that doesn’t get a lot of media or fan attention. Are these the “opportunities” Dana White says fighters should be thinking about rather than a UFC “career”?* What did you make of Aljo’s comments on his contract discussion with Hunter Campbell?*Plaintiff’s reply in support of attorney fees and Exhibits A-C*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases and the Senate hearing for the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. We discuss how the witnesses fared in their statements and questioning, who ended up being the better spokesperson for their arguments, and even break down how Ted Cruz did in his role today. We also get John’s wish list of questions and topics. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 244 Outline* What happened at yesterday’s UFC antitrust status conference?* There was a senate hearing concerning the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. What was your first gut reaction after watching it?* What was your opinion of the Senator’s questions?* How do you think each of the witnesses did?* Let’s go over some of the subjects raised in the questions and see what you thought of the witnesses answers and how you would have perhaps answered different. First, they asked about the Health and Safety aspects of the bill. What was the witnesses response to this?* There was some discussion about disclosure and transparency, with Nick Khan holding a completely different view from Oscar De La Hoya and Nico Ali Walsh. Who was right?* Nick Khan went after the sanctioning organizations, while Oscar defended them. Whose opinion do you think is closer to the truth?* Regarding the UBO system, what was the case Khan made for it and what was the case Walsh and De La Hoya made against it? Who was more effective?* Did they bring up the argument that a UBO is just another option? Did anyone contest this?* Ted Cruz brought up the current NCAA situation and mentioned that if the UBOs could negotiate collectively, they would extract much higher revenues. Is that argument right?* Did anyone raise any particular interesting points that you thought flew under the radar?* Is there any particular question or point you wished was raised?*Senate hearing witness statements*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest updates to the UFC antitrust cases and the Senate hearing for the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. We also discuss the possibility of the Saudis pulling up most of their sports investments, starting with LIV Golf and possibly extending through combat sports. We also examine Ronda Rousey’s comments about fighter pay, as well as all the principal fighters on that Netflix card appearing united in their message of being “free” and making lots of money with MVP. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 243 Outline* Are there any new updates or filings to the UFC antitrust cases?* What’s going on with the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act?* There’s a lot of chatter swirling around that suggests the Saudis are about to pull out of their LIV Golf investments. What does this mean for the athletes they signed?* Could we see them pull out of their boxing and MMA investments?* What would that mean for Zuffa Boxing if they did, because doesn’t Sela own 60% of the promotion?* MVP’s Rousey-Carano card is doing a press run with the principal fighters and Ronda Rousey has been scorching all the earth around her. What did you think of her comments about UFC pay, specifically regarding Kayla Harrison, and that the minimum purse on the card would be $40K?* She invited Paddy Pimblett to “come talk to me when your contract is up”. Is she possibly serving another role within MVP?* What did you think of Francis Ngannou’s “free fighter” comments?* Postwrestling released an overview of the revenue share of WWE with its talent. What did that look like?*Joint status report*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest filings for Matchroom’s finances, UFC’s rough night at the Miami gate, and POTUS’ UFC pep rallies. We also discuss Dana White being the face of MAGA in sports, the gambling skullduggery that continues to happen around UFC events, and Conor Benn’s free agency. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 242 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Judge Boulware has been staying busy, though. What else has he been up to?* What did you think of Trump and Marco Rubio’s presence at UFC 327 and Dana White’s comments that he’s not political?* What did you think of the announcements regarding the White House card?* Do you think Ilia might be reconsidering headlining the White House card since Trump and Rubio made threats to Spain?* Ilia Topuria’s promotion, WOW, is doing big numbers in Spain. Do you see UFC possibly trying to buy it from him?* UFC 327 went down as the worst card at the gate in their history in Miami. What do you make of that?* There was quite a bit of betting hijinx that went on around UFC 327 including Kalshi changing their rules on the fly to avoid paying out bettors and UFC changing the result of a fight 30 minutes after the initial result which led to all the betting issues, and also saw a bettor make $250K off a $500 bet. Are we possibly going to see some blowback from all this?* Conor Benn fought out his Zuffa Boxing contract. Is there anything we should take away from that?* You got some new filings on Matchroom’s finances. What did you learn from them?* What are your thoughts on a possible Fury-Joshua match?* We talked about Floyd Mayweather’s money problems a couple weeks back. Now it’s been reported he owes the IRS $7.3M in back taxes. Could this jeopardize his purse from the Pacquiao fight, assuming it happens?*Matchroom finances*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the Ali Act Preservation Alliance, the announcement that DAZN and TNT have formed a broadcast partnership for boxing, and the effects that the ongoing conflict in the Middle East is having on combat sports. We also discuss Donald Trump’s upcoming appearance at UFC 327, and MVP’s intent to take a serious stab at promoting MMA. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 241 Outline* Are there new updates or filings to the UFC antitrust cases?* What is the Ali Act Preservation Alliance?* Is it too late for something like this to impact TKO’s efforts to push the Revival Act through?* TNT Sports and DAZN Boxing have forged an alliance. What details do we have on it?* Do you think this could provide meaningful competition to Zuffa Boxing?* With the Saudi connection to DAZN, isn’t this counterproductive to Zuffa Boxing?* There are folks that think the Saudis may be ready to pull the plug on their boxing interests. Do you think that’s possible?* Ryan Garcia and Arman Tsarukyan discussed UFC and boxing pay. Did anything stand out to you?* Dana White announced that Donald Trump will be in attendance at Saturday night’s UFC 327 card. Why do you think that is considering the war and other political turmoil happening right now?* PFL announced they’ve postponed their May 8 Saudi Arabia card. They noted they will refund any purchased tickets and just keep moving along with their schedule. That sounds more like a cancellation than a postponement, right?* Do you think UFC will change their tune on postponing or cancelling their Middle East events?* It looks like MVP is serious about getting into the MMA business long term if next month’s Rousey-Carano card is a success. Do you think the way they established themselves over the last several years with influencer boxing has set them up better for success than upstart promotions just diving in with no buildup?*Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and F regarding Plaintiff’s request for Dominance MMA to pay attorney fees*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, John interviews longtime sports pundit, Luke Thomas, who has recently entered the political commentary landscape. There was a wide range of topics including: the UFC’s hard pivot to the right, the threat of Zuffa Boxing to the sport of boxing, if the Left hurts its own causes, and why Luke started covering politics. We have also included the latest filing in the Cirkunovs v. Zuffa antitrust case in our written post here. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen or watch:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 240 Outline* Why has the UFC pivoted towards the Right?* How much of the UFC’s support for Trump is transactional?* Does the UFC antitrust case represent the public’s view of monopolies overall?* Do boxing’s stakeholders understand the threat posed by Zuffa Boxing?* Why are so many overlooking what the Ali Act protections do?* 5.What have we gotten wrong in the past?* Why did Luke Thomas also start covering politics?* Does the Left sometimes hurt its own causes?* Does the Left take the threat of Trump seriously enough?* Should we be more optimistic or pessimistic?*PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AS TO DOMINANCE MMA PER COURT ORDER ECF NO. 471*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the latest UFC antitrust updates, including why about 10% of the Le v. Zuffa settlement hasn’t yet been paid out. We’re also discussing Floyd Mayweather’s reported breach of contract, and how PFL’s viewership numbers are faring. In our final section, we examine ONE’s latest filings, their current financial health, and what their future could end up being. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 239 Outline* Are there any new filings or updates in the current UFC antitrust cases?* You reported that there was some new information on the settled Le v. Zuffa case. What was it?* Floyd Mayweather is reported to be in breach of his contract regarding his upcoming fight with Manny Pacquiao. What are the details around this?* Some PFL viewership numbers came out for their Pittsburgh show from last weekend. Is there anything that says they’re doing better, or is it still trending the same or worse, downward?* What did you think of the reports that PFL is looking to rebrand and that going back to the Bellator name could be in consideration?* You got ONE’s latest filings. What do their basic finances look like?* Can we determine how much they are paying fighters?* Is this the entire company? What about all the other ONE ventures, like the Talent Agency?* How much total money have they raised and how much do they have left?* What does their future look like in your opinion?*ONE Championship 2024 partial financial statement*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the PPV estimates posted by the Wrestling Observer, whether UFC has a star power problem, and the UFC antitrust updates, as well as emerging information on why the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act passed the House so quickly. We also discuss MVP’s latest moves in MMA, ONE’s infusion of cash, PFL’s chances of survival and GFL’s latest attempts to get their promotion off the ground. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 238 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Are there any updates or new information for the Revival Act bill?* We saw some UFC PPV estimates provided by the Wrestling Observer. What information were you able to glean from those?* After last night’s event, many were discussing how Israel Adesanya losing a fourth, straight fight indicates the UFC is losing another bankable star (sold out arena and $4.2M gate). How important is star power to them considering they haven’t been selling out their on-the-road cards?* Dana White took questions at the post-event presser and discussed Jon Jones’ contract negotiations, specifically regarding the White House card. What do you think happened there?* He also said negotiations were ongoing for Conor McGregor’s return, which they’re hoping to secure for July, although he did say they weren’t close yet. What do you think of that?* Shu Hirata broke some news that MVP poached a UFC TUF staffer for the launch of their MMA-themed TV show. They’re hosting women from the Atomweight division through the Featherweight division and men from the Lightweight division through the Light Heavyweight division. The show is apparently going to be on a major platform and aims to rival TUF. Do you think MVP can really make a run at the UFC and be successful?* What’s going on with Floyd Mayweather’s lawsuit?* PFL is under new management but still experiencing significant pains in reaching their target audience. What do you think of their regime change and their chance of survival in the space?* ONE Championship has made significant changes to their roster, basically eliminating the MMA sector. What are we to make of that and their new infusion of cash?* Mike Russell sent me a new GFL pitch deck regarding their latest attempt to lure in investors. What exactly are they trying to do?*Joint status report for antitrust cases and Third party Plaintiff Showtime*

SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, John interviews UFC antitrust litigant Jon Fitch. The sprawling conversation covers a variety of questions with topics like AKA’s image rights, when he decided to sign on to the antitrust lawsuit, his thoughts on the new lawsuits, and his take on current fighters’ complaints about their pay. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 237 Outline* What he has been up to lately* His feelings about the lawsuit settlement* Fighter’s reaction/did anyone thank him?* Earlier reactions to first settlement* Reaction to earlier information* His career before becoming a top contender* The AKA image rights situation* Why didn’t fighters stand up at that time/why didn’t he sign up with the MMAFA then?* When did he decide to sign on to the class action lawsuit?* What was it like being a named plaintiff?* Thoughts on the new lawsuits* Thoughts on fighters reactions to the new lawsuits* Thoughts on fighters reactions to Zuffa boxing pay?* Thoughts on the new American Boxing Revival Act?* Do you think boxing underestimates the risk?* Reasons for wanting to expand Ali Act to MMA?* What would he like to see happen in the sport?* Why do you think it’s so hard for fighters to work together?The Hey Not the Face! Podcast is an independent publication. Please consider a paid subscription to keep up with our best work and learn how you can support us. With all forms of news media crumbling, especially in the combat sports space, we could really use your help. Thank you. We appreciate all of you.Thank you for checking out the Hey Not The Face! Podcast, a listener-supported publication. We’d be eternally grateful if you could help us by purchasing a subscription and spreading word of this episode by sharing it far and wide. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit heynottheface.substack.com/subscribe

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at all the suspect actions of TKO and Ari Emanuel, and trust that there are quite a few to go over. We weigh in on the way they’ve got their thumb on the scale in regards to the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act, the White House card’s oversight, and Ari Emanuel’s well-placed calls to the Trump Administration about Live Nation-Ticketmaster. We also discuss the UFC’s possible hard line on fight purses, and Gina Carano’s interview where she discussed Zuffa’s willingness to interfere with her legal and binding Strikeforce contract. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 236 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* You reported that a new version of the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act will be put forth for a vote this week. What day are they voting and is it a done deal that it passes?* What are the changes you noticed from the previous version?* What comes next?* The UFC has announced that the DC Athletic Commission won’t be overseeing the White House card. Instead, the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) will provide oversight in an advisory capacity. That wording sounds suspect. Does it mean anything different, by definition, than the duties the DC commission would perform?* Does this seem like a conflict of interest?* Dana White was asked if the UFC would be canceling any of its shows in the Middle East and he said there were no plans to move scheduled events from there. That can’t be a wise move, right?* Jon Jones said the UFC refused to budge on their offer of $15 million for him to fight on the White House card while Dana White says Jones was never going to fight on the card. Who do you think is telling the truth here?* Dana also said he met with Nate Diaz to talk about a UFC return but MVP made Nate an offer he couldn’t refuse. Considering the reports that they lowballed Ilia Topuria and Jon Jones, as well, what does this say about UFC’s future offerings?* Gina Carano talked about the offers UFC made to her while she was under contract with Strikeforce, noting that not only did they offer to help extricate her from her contract, they offered to help her sue the promotion, as well. Would this information have helped any of the class action suits against the UFC?* The Trump Administration intervened on behalf of Live Nation-Ticketmaster after Ari Emanuel made some well placed phone calls. Just how much power and influence does Ari wield?*Amended protective order and HR4624 amended bill *

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at new updates to the antitrust cases, things people are missing about the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act, and Top Rank’s new deal with ESPN. We’re also discussing the comments of Sean O’Malley and Jorge Masvidal saying that the UFC ‘made’ Ronda Rousey, and O’Malley predictably walking back his annoyance with TKO/Zuffa Boxing’s $15M purse to Conor Benn. We examine the latest addition of Nate Diaz vs. Mike Perry to the MVP Rousey vs. Carano card, Anderson Silva’s offer to be on it, and Alex Pereira’s new, 8-fight UFC contract. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 235 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* The Revival Act bill is inching closer to getting passed. What do you think is the most significant thing that people are getting wrong about it?* Top Rank and ESPN have reached a new broadcast rights deal. What do you think of it?* Is it the kind of deal that will save them?* Gareth Davies reported that Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua has been verbally agreed upon and will air on Netflix. Considering Netflix’ comments about wanting to be the home for the biggest combat sports events around the world, do they pose any threat to TKO?* Speaking of Netflix, Nate Diaz vs. Mike Perry will be on the Rousey-Carano card. What’s your take on that?* What do you think of Ronda waging war with Hunter Campbell?* What do you think about Colby Covington’s comments on Hunter giving no options to fighters in who they fight?* What about what he said in regards to fighters not making “a dime” off the UFC games?* Sean O’Malley and Jorge Masvidal both opined that UFC made Ronda Rousey. What do you make of their comments?* Sean kind of insinuated that the UFC makes all its stars including Conor McGregor, sort of walking back his previous annoyances over Conor Benn’s $15M purse. You predicted he would do this. Do you have any additional thoughts on it?* Anderson Silva said Nakisa Bidarian offered him a fight on the Rousey-Carano card but he turned it down, saying he only has a couple fights left in him and they would be boxing matches. Do you have thoughts on that?* Alex Pereira just signed a new, 8-fight deal with the UFC, and said they treated him so good that he just left it open for them to do whatever they wanted with his contract. Considering he was just complaining last year about pay, what do you make of this?* * How much help have MMA managers given to the UFC that contributed to their near complete dominance of the sport, whether intentionally or inadvertently?*Parties’ disputed instructions*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at new updates to the antitrust cases, the Congressional report on the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act and its additional views. We’re also discussing the comments of Ronda Rousey and Francis Ngannou regarding fighter pay and legacy, as well as Jon Jones asking for his release and whether that’s a feasible possibility. In our final segment, we ask the question: Is Eddie Hearn the savior fighters are looking for? There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 234 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* A congressional report on the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act came out yesterday. What is the purpose of this report?* It had a section called “Additional Views.” What were these “Additional Views?”* Speaking of the Revival Act, what did you think of USA Boxing revoking their support of the bill?* There was a presser for Rousey vs Carano that generated some interesting comments. Ronda Rousey said the UFC doesn’t pay its fighters well, but noted that if Dana White were running the promotion, they’d be paid much better. What do you think of that?* Francis Ngannou discussed legacy at the press conference, saying that legacy doesn’t pay the bills and that it was a construct for UFC to keep fighter pay down. Does legacy matter at all?* Both Jake Paul and Ngannou brought up Jon Jones asking for his release. Paul suggested he come over to get paid what he’s worth, and Ngannou tweeting that they [the UFC] should be rolling out the Red Carpet for him. Is there any chance Jones could be released or get out of his contract?* Jennifer Anderson, wife of Corey Anderson, said that Corey left the UFC at the height of his career to make more money with Bellator, but the media (save a few) care far less about covering him now. What are your thoughts on that?* Malki Kawa discussed how he was negotiating Ilia Topuria’s White House card fight and the focus was on Islam Makhachev, but the number UFC gave was too low so they came back and offered Gaethje instead. What do you think happened there?* Sean O’Malley said he didn’t even discuss his purse when accepting his fight on the White House card. How short-sighted was that?* He also talked about Tom Aspinall signing with Eddie Hearn and said that fighter management should be friendly to the UFC. What do you make of that?* Jake Paul and Nakisa Bidarian of MVP both spoke favorably of Eddie Hearn’s management skills and said they could see many fighters signing with Hearn in the future. What do you think of that?*Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s request for attorney fees and the Comittee report on the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at new updates to the antitrust cases and Dana White’s comments on UFC fighter reactions to Conor Benn’s purse. We also discuss Eddie Hearn’s new talent agency, what fighters can do if they don’t like their pay, and the Zuffa Boxing kerfuffle with the IBF. We weigh in on t…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTNote: Today’s episode will be our only one this week as John will be leaving Minnesota to fly back to LA this weekend, so he’s going to be busy with personal/family activities. We’ll be back on track next week.In today’s episode, we’re looking at new updates to the antitrust cases including a new filing directed at Dominance MMA. We also discuss topics Mark Shapiro spoke on during the Morgan Stanley Tech Conference, including the White House card and fighter pay. We weigh in on a whistleblower’s claims that Paramount’s president leaked details of the UFC broadcast deal, as well as how important the new WB merger is to TKO. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 232 Outline* Let’s start with updates to the UFC antitrust cases. There were some exhibits attached to the Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions. Was there anything of interest amongst them?* There was also a filing that was directed at Dominance MMA. What was it?* Mark Shapiro spoke at the Morgan Stanley’s Technology, Media, and Telecom Conference and one of the things he discussed was the White House event. Was there any new information there?* He talked about Zuffa Boxing a bit. Did he say anything interesting?* He also brought up UFC fighter pay. What did he have to say?* How important is the pending Paramount-WB merger to TKO?* A whistleblower claims Paramount president Jeff Shell leaked details of the $7.7B UFC deal. What did you think of that?* Do you think we’ll see Zuffa Boxing on a different platform next year, perhaps one of the others from the merger?* What do you think of the Usyk-Verhoeven matchup?* A NY Times piece on Zuffa Boxing came out a few days ago. Was there anything in it that caught your eye?* Don King has launched a lawsuit against TKO and Sela. What do we know about it?* Lucha Lily, a reporter who was present at the Navarette-Nunez card, asked Eddie Hearn why they didn’t air the prelims on Youtube or DAZN and was told that it would depend on the show/location/budget whether or not they’ll have preliminary bout production at all. Do you think that will be the trend for all promoters not named Zuffa Boxing?* Is Eddie Hearn suing TKO?* Aleksei Oleinik revealed that he only made $250 in 2025 for his royalties for the UFC 5 game. Does that sound right to you?* Jon Jones claims he’s in negotiations with the UFC to headline the White House card. What do you make of that?* Lots of active UFC fighters have been appearing on RAF wrestling cards on FOX Nation. How do they get around the UFC to do that?*Expert declarations of spoliation, Proposed order of UFC sanctions, Plaintiffs reply in support of sanctions of Dominance MMA*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at new motions for sanctions filed by the plaintiffs in the UFC antitrust cases, as well as a brand new, unrelated complaint seeking class action on behalf of fans that paid for subpar UFC events. We also discuss TKO’s latest earnings statement and their monthly earnings call. We analyze the available information about Connor Benn vs. Regis Prograis, and we take a listener question. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 231 Outline* Have there been any new filings in the UFC antitrust cases?* Has there been any movement with the Ali Revival Act bill?* A new earnings report was released about TKO’s finances. What did we learn from them?* There was an earnings call where Mark Shapiro discussed site fees and the White House card. What notable things did you derive from it?* They also discussed Zuffa Boxing. What was their take on it?* Why is Frank Warren’s Queensberry promotion exchanging legal letters with TKO and Sela?* News came out yesterday about Connor Benn vs. Regis Prograis as the co-main event for a Tyson Fury fight on Netflix, promoted by Ring. There seems to be some confusion about how this is all happening and if Zuffa Boxing will be promoting. Can you enlighten us about the details?* Terence Crawford was recently on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Was there anything significant that stood out to you?* Listener question from Eric Hamidi: Given the Conor Benn signing, what are starting salaries for the NBA, NFL, MLB, and NHL? Do you know and have the source of that info?*Notice of related cases, Class action complaint, Motion for sanctions*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at Ronda Rousey’s comments this week regarding how the UFC promotes fights in the current era and the way she plans to go up against them. We also discuss Dana White’s comments at the post-fight presser on a variety of topics including Ronda’s upcoming fight with Gina Carano, Sean Strickland, and Eddie Hearn We weigh in on the Floyd Mayweather vs. Manny Pacquiao II rematch, and we talk about the reported sabotage of Top Rank’s broadcast deal with ESPN. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 230 Outline* Are there any new updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Puck is reporting that the White House card could cost the UFC $60 million. Do you think that could be accurate?* There has been a lot of talk about Conor Benn signing with Zuffa Boxing for 1-fight and $15 million? What do you think of this signing and the amount?* It seems like a lot of fighters have taken note of how much they are paying Benn. Do you think this means Hearn is right that the boxing purses might cause problems with UFC fighters?* Ronda Rousey was interviewed by Jim Rome and spoke about why she & Gina Carano didn’t end up with their fight promoted by UFC. What did you think of the reason she gave?* She was in a filmed segment with Nikisa Bidarian discussing how she’d be “going hard in the trenches” promoting this fight against UFC. What did you make of her odd statement about the UFC “suffering from a lack of competition”?* When Dana White was asked about the fight, he said he was happy for them but that it just didn’t work out for UFC to promote. Do you have any thoughts on his comments?* After Saturday’s UFC Houston fight night, Dana took questions in the post-fight presser about several other topics. First being about Sean Strickland’s bigoted comments. He replied that it was basically the media’s fault for riling him up. What’s your take on that?* He was also asked about the Conor Benn signing in regards to his “beating up babies” comment where he referenced Eddie Hearn. He responded, ‘Is there a bigger pussy than Eddie Hearn?’ Is he being a little too bold right now, considering their proposed Revival Act bill hasn’t even been passed?* Eddie Hearn talked about how Zuffa Boxing would have to “do some crazy stuff” to land Bam Rodriguez. What did you make of his comment?* Brunch Boxing had a big story yesterday about how ESPN executives sabotaged the TOP Rank deal then left to join Paramount and/or Zuffa Boxing. What are your thoughts on that?* Reports are saying Top Rank is in talks with ESPN currently for a new broadcast deal. Do you think they’ll get a good one?* Floyd Mayweather vs. Manny Pacquiao II was announced yesterday for Netflix in September. Aside from this being way too late in their careers for it to be anything more than a cash grab, what did you make of the available details of the bout?* How do you think it will do?* Do you think Netflix is serious about combat sports or only these big name events?*Dominance opposition to Plaintiff’s motion of contempt*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at UFC’s Sean Strickland problem ahead of their first on-the-road Fight Night. Considering how Strickland always ramps up hateful commentary ahead of his fights, and how Dana White is staunchly supporting “free speech” among UFC athletes, is there a solution? We also discuss the twists and turns in the Golden Boy lawsuit, the Zuffa Boxing belt, and the WBC championship necklace. We analyze comments on the importance of Rousey vs. Carano, and weigh in on Marquel Martin’s astute observations. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 229 Outline* Do we have any updates in the UFC antitrust cases?* There has been some discussion on social media that Rousey vs Carano is not that big a fight, or would not have been a big fight in the past. Do you agree with this?* Eddie Hearn and Dana White have been going back and forth about Zuffa Boxing. Do you have any thoughts on their feud?* Matchroom and DAZN announced an extension on their deal. Is this good news for Matchroom?* Zuffa Boxing revealed their diamond encrusted belt yesterday. What did you think of it?* WBC also revealed a $40K diamond encrusted necklace. What are your thoughts on that?* Marquel Martin, who acted in an advisory position to Francis Ngannou, has moved on to getting his NFL agent license and had some sharp comments about working in the MMA space. What did you think of his statements?* Sean Strickland has made the headlines again, even bleeding into mainstream news, with incendiary comments about Bad Bunny, about women’s MMA, and women in general. Backlash has been mounting against Paramount and Toyota with calls to remove him from UFC’s roster. What are your thoughts on the situation?* Dana White was asked about the situation and he had this to say: “If you get your feelings hurt that bad you shouldn’t ask these questions when you know the response you’ll get from Strickland. I don’t tell any human what to say or think, there’s no leashes”. Do you think his approach is bad for UFC given how new their relationship with Paramount is?* Graham Boylan gave an interview where he discussed managing/developing fighters while simultaneously promoting them via his Cage Warriors. Did anything stand out to you?* Are there any new updates with the Golden Boy lawsuit?* Listener question from Eric Hamidi: Can PFL differentiate themselves and not be a walled garden by partnering with Rizin?*Golden Boy’s reply in support of restraining order*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at UFC antitrust updates regarding a third party vendor to review discovery, and how UFC seemed to dodge a major bullet in the spoliation of required evidence. We also discuss Ronda Rousey vs. Gina Carano from a business perspective, whether UFC should be worried about the White House card not delivering, how MVP ended up with the fight, and how Ronda and Gina likely got out of their previous contracts. We also analyze Vergil Ortiz’ formal opposition to Golden Boy’s restraining order, and we answer some listener questions. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 228 Outline* Do we have any new updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Were you surprised that Ali Abdel-Aziz now wants you to include him in your antitrust filing tweets?* The big news today is the announcement of Ronda Rousey vs. Gina Carano in a featherweight MMA bout for Netflix, promoted by MVP. What do you think of this fight?* Do you think it will outshine the WH card?* Should Dana and company be worried?* How did Ronda and Gina end up out of their contracts since both still had fights on them?* Do you think Ronda is still tied to TKO in any capacity via WWE?* Ronda said that they were in talks with Dana White last year for this match but couldn’t make it happen. Does that sound like it came down to money?* With MVP promoting, how big a purse do you think these women are getting?* Dana White has been making lots of comments about competitors for Zuffa Boxing. Was there anything he said that could possibly be pointed to for Revival Act changes?* Is there any hope this bill gets rejected?* Max Kellerman said he wanted Zuffa Boxing to introduce the BMF belt. What are your thoughts on that?* What in the world is going on with Casey Wasserman and Ari Emanuel?* Are there any new updates in Golden Boy’s lawsuit?* Emilio Destifano from Twitter asks: From your “Deep Dive Into Congress...” episode: Could the plaintiffs have allowed defendants to sneak in that particular clause which essentially guts any Ali Act restrictions in order to expose that tactic, in hopes it gets shot down sooner rather than later?* Emilio also asked this question from that episode: Could Zuffa Boxing have pushed added healthcare regs in order to not only price out competition of other promoters, but to have more control over fighters I.E. more leverage/opportunity to deny fighters? Just demand “testing” until they are able to secure a favorable result?* Eric Hamidi also had a question: Do you or John find it funny, ironic, or hypocritical that TKO staff and supporters talk about them revolutionizing boxing & it needs to be back on TV and yet, their first events are at the Apex on Paramount+?*Vergil Ortiz opposition to Golden Boy restraining order*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at major UFC antitrust updates regarding Dominance MMA’s “revolt” and failure to cooperate with agreed upon discovery measures. We also discuss Zuffa Boxing’s ability to ignore current Ali Act protections regarding the creation of their own belt, as well as Stepen Espinoza’s comments on the promotion in a recent interview. We also weigh in on the suit Golden Boy filed against Rick Mirigian and what their future looks like amid obvious financial struggles. In our final segment, we answer listener questions from Eric Hamidi. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 227 Outline* We had some happenings in the UFC antitrust case. First, tell us about filing to hold third party Dominance MMA in contempt?* There was a hearing yesterday. Do we know what happened?* What happens next?* TKO answered questions from Ilhan Omar last month during a hearing about the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. Did anything stand out to you?* Zuffa Boxing announced a title fight between Jai Opetaia and Brandon Glanton for their inaugural belt, well before the Revival Act has passed. What do you make of this?* Stephen Espinoza gave an interview where he was asked about Zuffa Boxing. Did he say anything that caught your attention?* Golden Boy just sued Vergil Ortiz’ manager, Rick Mirigian for $10M. What do you make of that suit?* It seems that Golden Boy is in serious trouble financially. What kind of future do they have in your opinion?* Social media influencer Adin Ross claims Dana White may pay him $6M a year to cover UFC. What do you make of that?* We had a listener question from Eric Hamidi who asked: Is this the only provision in the original Ali Act that prevents promoters from having their own championship belts?Excerpt states: “No officer or employee of a sanctioning organization may receive any compensation, gift, or benefit, directly or indirectly, from a promoter, boxer, or manager.”* Eric also asks if you’ve heard the same rumors Fred Garvin has, that democratic senators have been contacting people involved with boxing regarding the Revival Act, and how they (dem. senators) don’t support the proposed changes.*Plaintiffs’ request for Dominance MMA to be held in contempt, Golden Boy v. Rick Mirigian, answers to questions posed by Ilhan Omar for the official record*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at Zuffa Boxing’s lofty goal of becoming a $20B third arm of TKO’s combat sports empire and how that can be achieved. We also discuss Floyd Mayweather’s legal complaint in detail and whether we think it will be settled. We review the WBC’s latest failings and include Mauricio Sulaiman’s social media faux pas along with those. But in our introductory segment, we walk down Memory Lane with a discussion of the classic movie Taxi Driver which celebrated its 50th anniversary on Feb. 8th. John is a certified cinema nerd, so this was a rare treat for him. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 226 Outline* Taxi Driver 50th anniversary chat* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Now that we have Floyd Mayweather’s lawsuit available to look at, what are your initial thoughts after looking it over?* Does the complaint say how much he did make in his career and how much is unaccountable?* Is there a reason they are suing Showtime and Espinoza and not Al Haymon?* Stephen Espinoza seems unbothered by the accusations against him. Do you think he should be worried?* Do you think it will be settled?* The sanctioning organizations, specifically the WBC, are under fire again, with Shakur Stevenson declining to pay $100K in fees. What’s going on that we should know about?* Do you think Mauricio Sulaiman is handling things correctly considering his social media behavior (liking derogatory/demeaning posts about Shakur)?* An interview was conducted with Mark Shapiro and Ari Emanuel where they discussed the value of UFC and WWE being $20B/each. Do you agree with that valuation?* Shapiro said there are still ways they can cut costs from UFC and WWE. Are you surprised by that and do you have any ideas how they could possibly achieve that?* They said they will be announcing some international deals soon. What might those be?* They also discussed their goal of bringing Zuffa Boxing to that point. Do you think it’s possible, and how fast could they get it to that value?* Nakisa Bidarian noted in an interview that he felt Zuffa Boxing would be successful thanks to them playing the long game. Thoughts on that?*Floyd Mayweather’s lawsuit complaint PDF*

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at both days of the UFC antitrust spoliation hearing. It’s our comprehensive review of Dana White’s testimony, Tracy Long’s, Hunter Campbell’s, and the two assistants tasked with setting up phones, social media and clouds for UFC executives. We discuss Judge Boulware’s interactions, the believability of testimony, possible remedies if UFC is found to have malice with missing discovery and what comes next. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 225 Outline* What stood out most to you from Day 1 proceedings?* What were the most significant things revealed on Day 1?* Do you think people should fully invest in the idea that Dana White is no longer part of contract negotiations and matchmaking?* On the first day’s proceedings, Michael Dell Angelo seemed to irritate the judge on a couple occasions. Is that an accurate statement?* What was Tracy Long’s demeanor?* Do you believe the story of Ari Emanuel’s relative stealing crucial evidence?* What were the most significant things revealed on Day 2?* Personal assistants and tech advisors to the UFC were brought in to testify about the setting up of phones, social media, etc. Did you find their testimony particularly impactful?* Were you surprised by anything Hunter Campbell said?* Do you feel like he was in cleanup mode after Dana’s testimony?* Judge Boulware stated that the UFC’s failure to produce these messages, phones, et al were sanctionable offenses. What would be the most likely sanction?* What’s next for UFC; did Boulware issue any orders?*Chart Exhibit of Missing Data from Employee Devices*

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit heynottheface.substack.com/subscribe

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at boxing’s sanctioning organizations: how they’ve grievously injured themselves, how they lack transparency, how they could do better to protect boxers, and if they’re even worth saving. We also discuss Max Kellerman’s lip service to Dana White’s promoting ability and whe…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the possible measures UFC might try now that Judge Boulware and the Ninth Circuit have ruled against their emergency motions from last week. We also examine some of the things revealed in Thomas Hauser’s sprawling article about Zuffa Boxing, including the contracts and …

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the desperate maneuvering the UFC has done to stop Judge Boulware’s demand for six-and-a-half years of missing messages. We go over the risks the UFC faces if the Ninth Circuit doesn’t rule in their favor, the risks to the Plaintiffs if they do, and more. We also discus…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the new amendments introduced to the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act bill at the Education and Workforce Committee meeting. We go step by step through all the changes and what they mean for boxing from the top tier all the way down to the club level. We also talk about the emergency ABC meeting that happened right after the committee meeting. There’s also some very significant antitrust updates you won’t want to miss. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 221 Outline* Are there any updates to the UFC antitrust cases?* Can you explain what took place yesterday in the Education and Workforce Committee?* What changes were made to the UBO section of the bill?* Let’s go to Sec 4 Industry Standards. What changes did they introduce for Medical Examinations?* What did they change about the Insurance coverage?* Did they change the purse minimums?* What did they add into the bill about the number of titles?* What changes did they introduce regarding drug testing?* What is the concern for club shows from these last few changes?* The effective date was also changed. What does it say now?* What were the amendments that Ilhan Omar read off during the hearing?* Is this the end of it or will there be more changes before they vote on it?* So what happens next? What is the process before it becomes law, and do you think it will become law?* You reported that the ABC had an emergency meeting, what was that about?* So what is the ABC going to do about their concerns over the bill?* What impact would these changes have to the bill and the industry?* Do you think this bill is better or worse than it was before?* What’s your greatest concern about the bill?* What amendments would you like to see introduced?* For those that oppose the bill or certain parts of it what do you suggest they do?PDFs of the antitrust case filings & PDFs of the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act amendments

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the lawsuit Vergil Ortiz filed against Golden Boy Promotions and how Vergil’s contract illustrates the stark difference in boxing and MMA purses. We also discuss whether there’s cause for alarm over ZUFFA Boxing’s likely monopolization of the sport, Dana White being the centerpiece for the promotion, and the possible proposed changes to the ring and ruleset. Further along, in our final topic, we examine Queensberry Promotions’ latest financial filings in detail. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 220 Outline* Have there been any new filings or updates with the UFC antitrust cases?* The promo for ZUFFA Boxing came out and it was focused solely on Dana White. What did you think of that?* The belt was also unveiled and it has an octagon shape. What’s your take on that?* In a recent interview, Dana spoke about possibly changing the ring and the ruleset. How do you see that going down?* The House Committee on Education and Workforce is going to put the TKO-proposed changes to the Ali Act in markup this week. What does this mean?* The Sports Lawyers Association will be holding a webinar on January 22nd to discuss litigating the Ali Act and pending changes in Congress via the Revival Act, which you’ll be covering. Can you give us some details on it?* On social media there have been a lot of people that are nervous that the launch of Zuffa Boxing signals their takeover of the sport, while others seem to be dismissive of them based on the card they’re holding. Should fans be worried or not that they’re going to monopolize the sport?* Conor McGregor says that his UFC contract is void thanks to the Paramount broadcast deal. We talked about this several months ago. Do you have any additional thoughts?* Do you think UFC is likely to play ball with him, considering he’s linked himself to the Trump family somewhat through his business dealings?* Has there been any further developments with the reported San Francisco card and its promoter, Ed Pereira?* Vergil Ortiz is suing Golden Boy. What is the complaint?* Do you think he has a case?* His contract was attached as part of the complaint filing. What were the financial details of his contract with Golden Boy?* Queensberry Promotions recently filed their finances with Company House. Can you give us a summary of how they’re doing?* Does it give us any details on where their revenue is coming from or what their expectations are for the future?PDFs of Vergil Ortiz’ suit against Golden Boy Promotions and the financial statements of Queensberry Promotions

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at the top paid combat sports athletes in 2025 and it should come as no surprise that boxing is king, as it always has been. But the difference was so stark, it even gave us pause. We also take a look at new interview quotes from Dana White, Laura Sanko, and Ed Soares. The…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at a fresh infusion of cash for ONE Championship, and asking the question, ‘How much money from their massive fundraising efforts is left. We also discuss some of the things Dana White has said over the course of last week’s interview rounds, as well as a lawsuit being bro…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIn today’s episode, we’re looking at a Brazilian court case that has flown under the radar for months, but we’ve got the documents that reveal details of the relationship between fighter managers and the UFC. Behind our paywall, we’ll be going over What’s App messages between an MMA manager and UFC matchmaker Mick Maynard. We also discuss Paramount Plus’ big price hike that goes into effect next week and why Canadian fans will still have to buy UFC PPVs. We also talk about VICE TV’s forays into combat sports with the latest being LFA. There’s a lot more, so make sure to follow along with our outline as you listen:*We urge you to pick up a paid subscription, as it helps us keep the show going* Episode 217 Outline* Have there been any new filings in the UFC antitrust cases?* Sean Strickland said he was pressured into taking the Dricus du Plessis fight while recovering from a shoulder injury saying, “You don’t say no [to the UFC], they’re our pimps. You don’t say no to the master. I was backed up into a corner taking that fight.” What are your thoughts on what he said?* Our friend Rob Nashville reminded us a couple days ago of the price increase for Paramount Plus happening next week. The hike will see the annual plan skyrocket from $59.99 to $89.99. Considering how steep that increase is, do you foresee them hiking up prices as rapidly as ESPN did?* Why will Canadian sports fans still have to pay for UFC events as PPVs?* Will there be a change at some point so that they can also just pay one subscription price?* You quoted a post on Twitter about online gambling destroying young men in America. Remind listeners how much of an impact on sports gambling the UFC will have with Polymarket.* LFA recently announced it had signed a deal to air on VICE TV. Is that platform large enough to provide any real lifeline for them, or are they just delaying their own demise with this deal?* Are there any other outlets that could throw a lifeline to struggling MMA and boxing promotions?* Do you think Top Rank could end up on VICE TV?* PFL’s former CEO Peter Murray is out and additionally, several longtime key employees have been laid off. What do you make of that?* We have some documents from a Brazilian court case involving Taila Santos. Can you tell us more about what the case and what the documents we will be looking at are?* What do these filings reveal about the relationship between managers and the UFC?* Apparently, Mick Maynard explained why some fighters get 10/10 deals and other fighters 12/12 when they debut. What was the reason?* Do we have any examples of contract negotiations?* Do we see any communications from the UFC regarding extensions?*PDF (42 pages) of What’s App messages between Marcelo Brigadeiro and Mick Maynard

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTIt’s our first episode of the year and we’ve got a hodge-podge collection of topics to discuss. We’re looking at the latest filings in the UFC antitrust cases, Polymarkets and the UFC, why Joe Rogan’s statement all but says UFC is a monopoly, and the Paramount Plus broadcast rights deal. We also discuss so…

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit heynottheface.substack.com SUPPORT EXPANDING THE ALI ACTWe’re looking back at the biggest news of 2025 and giving it a thorough analysis. We’ve broken down what we think are the four most important news stories in both MMA and boxing, with two umbrella topics for each sport and a devoted group of questions under each topic. Make sure to follow along with our ou…