PODCAST · religion
Is the Higher Criticism Scholarly?
by Robert Dick Wilson
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
6
006 - Section 6
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
5
005 - Section 5
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
4
004 - Section 4
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
3
003 - Section 3
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
2
002 - Section 2
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
-
1
001 - Section 1
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
We're indexing this podcast's transcripts for the first time — this can take a minute or two. We'll show results as soon as they're ready.
No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.
No topics indexed yet for this podcast.
Loading reviews...
ABOUT THIS SHOW
Robert Dick Wilson firmly believed—and still believes passionately—that the textual and historical controversies surrounding the Bible should be grounded in objective, clearly established facts rather than subjective opinions. He dedicated himself to this mission, undertaking exhaustive and meticulous work to achieve his goal. Join us as we explore his unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor. - Summary by Philip E. Howard
HOSTED BY
Robert Dick Wilson
CATEGORIES
Loading similar podcasts...