Judging Judy | #1 comedy podcast

She was looking for a new house in Vegas, so she left her dog with her neighbor. Now, that neighbor says the dog is her’s to keep! Will Judy side with the lady who lost her dog or the neighbor who cared for it free?  And will we find Judy innocent or guilty? Because, of course, this is the Judging Judy podcast, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge.Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss.This week’s episode comes to us from 2008, when the times were real bad. You remember 2008, right? Or has the therapy worked and you’ve completely blanked it out. Either way, this case is about a lady who needed a few months to find a house. She claims her neighbor agreed to watch her dog and her jewelry, but that when she came back, the neighbor claimed it all as her own. Now she wants her money, and her dog, back. Judy’s going to if she gets it and we’re going to have to decide if Judy did her job or not. Did she really, truly deliver justice? Not just to the plaintiff and to the defendant, but to all of us! Judging Judy is in the spirit of other popular comedy podcasts like the Doughboys and All Fantasy Everything, but it offers a perspective all its own by examining the world through the lens of Judy Shendlin, a cultural icon for over three decades. She’s had the opportunity to judge us, and in the process, she’s made an enormous impact on our society. But we’ve never had the opportunity to judge her in turn — until now. 

This week, we’ve got two cases: one over an engagement ring after a failed engagement and one about a dog with one missing toe. Judy’s going to have to decide whether the defendant was right to sell the ring in the first case. Then, she’ll have to decide whether the dog owner should get a discount. And, more importantly, we’ll have to decide if Judy is innocent, because this is Judging Judy, the comedy podcast that finally, after all these years, turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge.  Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. Our first case has a couple whose engagement lasted than six months. When things were over, she gave him a check that covered some of the cost of the ring, but not the ring itself. She says she deserved some of the money herself both because she worked hard to find the ring and she owed her boss a kickback for helping her get it. The plaintiff says that since he can’t get the ring back, he wants to be paid in full.  Meanwhile, our second case has an elderly woman complaining the dog that she bought to breed didn’t come as promised because it’s missing a toe. Her claim is that now she won’t able to get more puppies out of it. The breeder says he’s more than happy to pay her back; but only if he gets the dog back. Judy’s going to have to decide who gets paid and who doesn’t. We’re going to have to decide whether Judy delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent.  But if not, she’s guilty. Judging Judy is an ideal podcast for fans of Stephen Colbert, the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything, and Cinephobe. Equal parts witty commentary and biting parody, Judging Judy examines America through the lens of Judy Shendlin, long-time cultural icon. For decades, she’s judged us. Now it’s our turn to judge her. ˜

Welcome back to 2008, and welcome to Judging Judy! This case comes to us from May 1st, and features cases about stolen phones and wrecked cars. We’ve got a divorced couple fighting it out and two former friends doing battle. We’ve got lots of yelling, care of Judy, too! But, will we have justice?! That’s for us to decide, because this is the comedy podcast that finally turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite TV judge. This, of course, is Judging Judy. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. In our first case, the plaintiff says her ex-husband stole her son’s phone and ran up a big bill. She also says he didn’t pick up their kids from day care, resulting in her getting fined. What does he say? Not much of anything — and it seems to be paying off for him, too! Which side of this broken home will Judy side with? Our second case has a plaintiff who says her car got wrecked by a jealous girlfriend. The defendant says that it wasn’t her fault and that the plaintiff parked there at her own risk. There’s also the matter of the defendant’s boyfriend cheating on her and not wearing pants in the courtroom, but we’ll let Judy sort out that mess! All of this, of course, leads up to the most important part of the show: when we get to Judge Judy. Because Judy shouldn’t be the only one making a ruling! For over 25 years, Judy has cast judgement on us without nary an opportunity for us to do the same. Well, that’s over! Each week, we look at Judy’s words, her actions, her behavior, her rulings and her attitude to decide if she truly delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty! A refreshing, unique comedy podcast that re-examines culture and society through the lens of daytime TV, fans of the Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Stephen Colbert, Kazuo Ishiguro and Hot Pockets will fall in love with Judging Judy. Equal parts pop culture commentary and witty take-down, Judging Judy is for fans of the original show and folks who’ve never heard of Judge Judy alike. 

Romance gone wrong! A friendship that leads to fisticuffs!  It’s back to 1998 this week on Judging Judy, and we’ve got juicy cases. First, we’ve got a plaintiff who needed money to rent a new apartment, but she wasn’t expecting her ex to demand her truck as security! And in Case 2, two old friends came to blows after a night on the town, but was it justified? Judy has two rulings to make and, even more importantly, we have to judge the Judge! Because this is the only comedy podcast that judges America’s favorite least favorite TV judge!Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss.In our first case, our plaintiff’s ex was willing to loan her money, but only at an absurdly criminal interest rate and only if she agreed to give him her truck as security. Now, he says she never paid him back — but she says someone else gave her the money, not him! Somebody’s not telling the truth; it’s up to Judy to decide who.In our second case, two men who are way too old to go out for a night of partying get into a scuffle over who should drive. But our defendant says that wasn’t the reason and that he was acting in pro-active self-defense. Plus, he says, the plaintiff is a con artist and this is just one more in a long line of scams. Who will the Judge decide REALLY won this scuffle?Ultimately, of course, it’s up to us to make the most important, the most pivotal judgement. We have to decide if Judy did her job. For over 25 years, Judy Shendlin has cast judgement on us. But now we get to decide if her behavior, her words, her actions, and her rulings really delivered justice. A pop culture icon and a multimillionaire, Judy got famous casting judgements on us. Now we get our revenge.Judging Judy is perfect for fans of podcasts like the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything, and Cinephobe. It’s a one of a kind, incisive, clever and culturally relevant riot.