Paranormal Lens - A Crossroads Of Curiosities, LLC Production

On this short and sweet episode of Paranormal Lens, we’re asking a deceptively simple question: does the amount of time you spend investigating a haunted location actually matter? We dig into our own experiences in the field and explore how the length of an investigation might influence what we experience, if at all.And, of course, we take the question to its extreme: if we were given an entire week to investigate any haunted location in the world, where would we go, and what would we hope to uncover? From our own anecdotal experiences to the ultimate paranormal dream investigation, this episode gets into how much time may or may not truly matter when you’re hunting for something you can’t necessarily predict.GEMINI SUMMARY: GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the question: does the amount of time spent ghost hunting actually matter? The hosts discuss their experiences and theories regarding how the duration of an investigation impacts the potential for paranormal encounters. Key discussion points: Investigation Duration: The hosts debate whether longer investigations inherently yield more results or if paranormal events are simply unpredictable, regardless of time spent on-site (0:00 - 28:45). The "Dream" Investigation: As a thought experiment, the team discusses what they would do if given an entire week to investigate a single haunted location, including where they would go and what they hope to uncover (throughout the episode).

This episode of Paranormal Lens is full of hot takes and potentially unpopular opinions.In a rare moment when we all actually agree on something, none of us can quite wrap our heads around why so many paranormal investigators come up with weird, convoluted, or just plain factually incorrect explanations for why they supposedly need to investigate at night.So, on this episode, we’re poking holes in some of the most common myths and misconceptions surrounding nighttime ghost hunting. We’ll examine the claims investigators often make about why the paranormal is supposedly more active after dark... and whether there’s actually any good reason to believe them.We also share some of our recent daytime paranormal experiences; and reveal our own, surprisingly simple reason for investigating at night. Spoiler: it’s probably a lot simpler than you think.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the common belief that ghost hunting must only be conducted at night and challenges the various myths used to justify this practice. Key takeaways regarding nighttime investigations: Debunking Myths: The hosts argue that nighttime is not a requirement for paranormal activity (3:02). Common excuses, such as ghosts being nocturnal or infrared cameras being necessary to capture them, are dismissed as illogical or just convenient excuses for filmmakers (15:58, 19:20, 21:36). The Real Reasons: The hosts admit that nighttime is preferred primarily for "spookier vibes" and to match the atmosphere people expect from paranormal media (10:42, 12:30). They also note practical factors like audience engagement, as viewers are more active in the evening, and location access restrictions during daytime hours (11:27, 31:27). Solo Ghost Hunt Challenge: The latter half of the episode focuses on a "scariest solo ghost hunt" challenge proposed in a previous episode (36:34). They brainstorm elements for this challenge, including being locked in a jail cell in an abandoned prison, having no communication with the outside, and using a strobe light flashlight (1:18:28 - 1:19:29). The hosts set a goal of 400 listens for the episode by September 1st to make this challenge a reality, promising to play a game of Jenga to decide who undergoes the solo investigation (1:20:47 - 1:23:22).

What if you visited a place that shouldn't exist... and then could never find it again? What if an object you know you had suddenly vanished without a trace, only to reappear somewhere completely unexpected?On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the strange phenomenon commonly described as “glitches in the matrix." Experiences that seem to challenge our understanding of reality, from mysterious locations to disappearing objects that feel like reality itself has briefly skipped a beat. Are these experiences evidence of time slips, alternate realities, or something far more sinister?Or is there a much more mundane explanation? Could the way our brains process memory, perception, and expectation create the illusion that something impossible has happened?Throughout the episode, we'll examine some of the our own "glitches in the matrix," including a recent experience in Marshall, Michigan.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of the Paranormal Lens podcast explores the concept of "glitches in the matrix," experiences where locations, buildings, or objects seem to appear and disappear or defy logical explanation. Key Highlights: The Marshall, Michigan Experience (06:15 - 17:30): Ben and Angela, share a personal story from several months prior when they visited an antique store in Marshall, Michigan, that specialized in paper ephemera and vintage books. Upon returning to the town recently, they were unable to locate the building or find any online record of the shop, despite extensively searching maps, social media groups, and local streets. Missing Objects (17:42 - 22:21): The discussion shifts to the phenomenon of disappearing items. Ben recounts an experience in college at Riverbend Park, where a static EMF detector he was using for a web series vanished while he was driving home. He confirmed through recorded footage that the device was in the car, yet it was never found again. The Antichrist Debate (00:00 - 00:15, 24:35 - 25:05): The hosts jokingly debate whether Bitcoin or Bigfoot is the Antichrist, a recurring humorous topic on their show. Community Engagement (25:55 - 28:05): The hosts mention a challenge for their listeners: if episode 55 reaches 400 listens by the end of August 2026, they will commit to a high-stakes, solo ghost-hunting challenge they previously designed.

On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we take a (slightly) more serious look at fear and the role it plays during paranormal investigations. The conversation takes some interesting turns as we explore how "clip culture" has shaped people's perceptions of investigators' experiences, and why every time we post ourselves reacting to something unusual or go live from an investigation, someone inevitably comments: "Don't show it fear!"We also discuss how some paranormal TV shows and investigation teams have made fear part of their brand and identity, and whether that alters their investigations or perceived experiences for better or for worse.GEMINI SUMMARY: In this episode of Paranormal Lens, the hosts explore the role of fear in paranormal investigations, specifically addressing why viewers often tell them not to show fear while investigating. Key Discussion Points: The "Don't Show Fear" Myth: The hosts discuss the common viewer sentiment that showing fear during an investigation makes an investigator vulnerable to demonic attachment or possession (2:37-3:00). They argue that while extreme vulnerability can be a concern, a natural, momentary reaction to a startling event is different from living in a state of perpetual fear (3:40-4:30). The Impact of Intent and Attitude: The team emphasizes that one's mindset matters. Going into an investigation with a negative, aggressive, or overly anxious attitude may influence the environment or create a self-fulfilling prophecy, whereas approaching it with a neutral, "clean slate" perspective is preferred (10:06-11:50, 12:52-13:40). Clip Culture and Perception: The hosts critique "clip culture" on social media, noting that 10-second viral clips of them getting startled do not accurately represent hours of steady, focused investigation. These snippets often lead to unfair judgments from audiences who don't see the full context (14:22-15:10, 24:09-24:45). Adrenaline vs. Reality: The team acknowledges that high-stress situations can make investigators more hyper-aware, sometimes causing them to misinterpret mundane shadows or sounds as paranormal (4:49-5:45). They argue that experienced investigators must learn to talk themselves down from these moments to objectively evaluate the evidence (5:45-6:00). Ultimately, the hosts conclude that getting "spooked" by an isolated event is a normal human reaction, not a dangerous mistake, and they remain committed to long-form, authentic investigation styles over the sensationalized content often found in the paranormal genre.

In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we’re asking a terrifying question: what would be the SCARIEST possible solo investigation for the Crossroads of Curiosities crew?(Spoiler alert: it does not involve handcuffs or bathtubs...)After nearly a decade of investigating some of the most haunted locations in the midwest, we’re turning the focus inward and designing the one ghost hunt that would truly test our courage, skepticism, and nerves.We're not creating the most "objectively" extreme investigation imaginable. We're creating the most terrifying one for us personally. What type of location would make us hesitate before walking through the door alone? What conditions would push us outside our comfort zones? And what paranormal scenarios would force us to confront our own fears?Oh, and there’s a catch…If this episode reaches 400 listens by September 1st, we’ve all reluctantly agreed to turn our hypothetical “scariest solo ghost hunt ever” into a reality.So give this new episode a listen, and be sure to share with your friends... we dare you.GEMINI Summary:In this episode of Paranormal Lens, the Crossroads of Curiosities crew brainstorms the most terrifying possible solo ghost investigation for themselves (1:38 - 1:53). Their goal is not to create an objectively extreme event, but to design a scenario that would personally test their nerves and fears.The "Ultimate" Scary Solo Cocktail:Setting: A large, abandoned haunted prison (7:16 - 7:20).Timing: Starts at 11:33 p.m. on the night of a new moon (24:26 - 25:12).Restraint/Isolation: The investigator is locked inside a cell with all cameras placed outside to ensure total isolation (8:14 - 8:28, 13:47 - 14:10).Environmental Factors: A random Craigslist coven is hired to perform a conjuring ritual on the prison grounds while wearing orange jumpsuits (23:07 - 24:17).Tools: A strobe light is used instead of a standard flashlight, and the investigator is provided with a word generator device (28:06 - 29:43).Psychological Hazards: Cat balls and Rem Pods line the hallway, a mirror is placed in the cell, and a Boo Buddy is kept just out of reach (12:42 - 13:06, 16:47 - 17:26, 25:45 - 26:15).The X-Factor: The crew aims to have a bat in the cell with the hope that it will leave droppings on the investigator (8:30 - 8:37, 30:45 - 30:52).The Challenge: The crew has agreed that if this episode receives 400 listens by September 1st, they will host a live-streamed Jenga match to determine who must perform this terrifying solo investigation within the next year (31:00 - 33:05).

Have you ever gotten a tarot card reading from a haunted deck? We can now officially say we have... and we received it live on air!This is a special episode of Paranormal Lens, the first of several "Tarot Topics" that we'll return to intermittently as the podcast progresses. We're joined by our good friend and tarot reader Lindsay to get an inaugural reading from her very haunted tarot deck. The resulting reading touches on some of our favorite topics like religious trauma as well as why some people (even those in the paranormal community) view tarot as something "evil" and 'demonic" when it's not.

Who wants another episode about egregores???*Crickets*Oof. Sorry to disappoint.. but on this episode of Paranormal Lens, we tackle our most controversial topic yet: is AI an egregore? Firstly, we tackle the huge and necessary question on if AI has a consciousness. Heck, do egregores even have a consciousness? Through billions of human interactions, are we collectively feeding a new thoughtform, or are we simply projecting age-old occult concepts onto cutting-edge technology? And where do ideas like egregores, tulpas, memes, archetypes, and collective consciousness intersect with artificial intelligence?Whether you're convinced AI is nothing more than sophisticated software or you're open to stranger possibilities, this episode digs into the folklore, philosophy, psychology, and paranormal implications behind one of the weirdest questions of the modern age.No easy answers. No fearmongering. Just an honest conversation about one of the most fascinating intersections of the paranormal and emerging technology.Also: Angela is 100% gonna try to reach out to Elias Thorne on our next TikTok Live, isn't she...GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the provocative question: Is AI an egregore? The hosts discuss whether human interaction with artificial intelligence is collectively feeding a new thoughtform, or if we are simply projecting occult concepts onto modern technology (2:03-4:28). Key themes and discussion points: Defining Egregores: The hosts describe an egregore as a "thoughtform" created by collective human belief and intent, which then takes on a life of its own (2:38-3:40). They draw parallels between this concept and the way people interact with AI, treating it like a conscious entity that learns from human input (5:21-6:06). The "Cloud" Analogy: The hosts compare AI, such as ChatGPT, to entities like the Hatman, suggesting that while individuals experience different versions of these "entities" based on their own personal inputs (algorithms), there is a collective "cloud" engine that connects them all (8:03-8:59). Shadow Self and Reflection: The discussion touches on the idea that AI acts as a "mirror" for human nature, potentially reflecting our fears, shadows, and subconscious intent, similar to how occultists view the interaction between a practitioner and an egregore (9:33-10:40). AI Inbreeding: The hosts discuss a recent Cornell University study mentioned in The Guardian regarding "AI inbreeding," where AI models generated consistent, fabricated stories about a non-existent person named Elias Thorne (22:04-23:45). They debate whether this phenomenon is a technological glitch or, in a paranormal sense, the birth of a new entity (24:36-25:27). Consciousness vs. Metaphor: The group remains skeptical about whether AI currently possesses actual consciousness but finds the metaphor for how these systems propagate through human belief and data extremely compelling (6:19-6:41; 16:44-18:11). The episode concludes by pondering if modern "shadow beings" might effectively be algorithms existing within our collective digital landscape (30:16-30:43).

In this truly one-of-a-kind episode of Paranormal Lens, Angela not only knows the topic, but she commands it! As a follow-up to something she alluded to in the 50th episode, she leads an intriguing conversation about why her views on death and the afterlife have changed since paranormal investigating. It's full of thought-provoking twists and turns, as the conversation veers from religious hypocrisy to free will and even the meaning of life! What a fun, summery topic. Just promise us you won't show her mom...

Welcome to Episode 51: Episode 50, Part 2 of Paranormal Lens. (That's a mouthful, yikes!)Turns out we couldn't cram 50 paranormal AMA questions into a single episode, so the chaos continues. We're picking up right where we left off with more rapid-fire questions, bizarre tangents, and whatever else happens when two rowdy employees and a disillusioned HR manager are left unsupervised at the Cheese Factory.This is the last part of our never-ending Episode 50, we swear. Or is it...?

Did you know that most podcasts never make it past Episode 7? And according to Forbes, only 1% make it beyond Episode 30. Well... our little podcast that could Paranormal Lens just hit its 50th episode! In the last 10 months alone, we've released three short films on PARAFLixx, a feature-length documentary, two classic Afterlife Road-style videos, and another short film on YouTube... all while never missing a beat and releasing at least one podcast a week.The secret? What you hear on the podcast is literally just our normal conversations and evolving opinions. We just so happen to hit "record" once a week. There's rarely any prep work and minimal editing, which has allowed us to stay consistent.So, to celebrate this milestone, we decided to shake things up.Instead of tackling one pre-determined topic like we usually do, we're going to speed-round 50 "AMA" (Ask Me Anything) style questions. These questions go beyond the typical "OMG you're a ghost hunter, have you ever seen a ghost??" and get into the nitty gritty of what our minds are like 9 years into investigating.Oh... Ben also found his sound effects machine. This should be fun!

This is an episode that wasn't planned. As you heard at the end of last week's episode, Angela dropped an impromptu topic on us... which we rolled right into discussing at the end of an already long and tiresome recording session. For a completely spontaneous topic, she didn't go easy on us either: are there some historic properties that shouldn't be investigated by ghost hunters? We discuss whether any property with reported activity is fair game, or if some (particularly those that bore witness to recent tragedies) should be off the table.During our conversation, we touch on the Bath School bombing and Ben's capstone documentary he made about it during his undergrad at MSU. It's six years old at this point, and only ten minutes (as was required for the capstone project). But if you're interested, you can watch it here.GEMINI SUMMARY: This impromptu episode of the Paranormal Lens podcast features the hosts—Angela, Ben, and Brienna—engaging in a spontaneous discussion regarding the ethics of investigating historic sites associated with tragedies (0:00–0:46). The conversation explores whether there is a point when it becomes "too soon" or inappropriate to ghost hunt at such locations. Key takeaways from the discussion: Defining "Too Soon": The hosts debate whether time is the primary factor, noting that while some argue for a waiting period until those directly connected to an event have passed, others feel that some sites (like the scene of a mass casualty tragedy) should simply remain off-limits entirely (0:46–1:04, 8:49–9:04, 17:44–18:31). The Case of Bath, Michigan: The hosts focus heavily on the Bath School bombing of 1927, which remains the deadliest school violence event in U.S. history. They share their own personal connection to this history, with Ben having produced a documentary about it. They express discomfort with casual ghost hunting at the site, specifically worrying about sensationalization and the potential for investigators to misrepresent the history to the local community (4:23–8:16, 9:16–11:36). Ghost Hunting as History Preservation: A significant portion of the debate centers on the role of paranormal investigators. While they agree that some sites should be respected and left alone, they acknowledge that ghost hunters can occasionally serve a positive role by keeping forgotten or "bad" history alive and preventing it from being whitewashed, provided the investigation is grounded, respectful, and accurate (15:28–16:42, 19:43–23:47). Final Consensus: The group concludes that while "anywhere can be haunted," certain locations (particularly those involving recent or sensitive human tragedy) should be avoided. They emphasize that the primary duty of an investigator should be to preserve history, not to sensationalize for "clicks" (18:14–18:59, 24:19–24:55).

Any time we post something even remotely spooky about a cemetery, we get flooded with comments insisting that "cemeteries aren't haunted" or that "ghosts wouldn't choose to hang out in cemeteries."(Okay, the comments are usually a little less polite than that).At Crossroads of Curiosities, we've always believed that the paranormal is full of nuance. We believe long-form conversations matter, and we think it's important to put our evolving thoughts and theories on the record as we continue learning in real time.So in this episode, we spend 45 minutes tackling a surprisingly controversial question: Can cemeteries be haunted?Our short answer is yes, but the long answer is that cemetery hauntings have more to do with egregores, thresholds, and residual energy than what you would traditionally call a "ghost." (Don't act surprised... it's episode 48, you knew that'd be the direction the conversation goes).GEMINI SUMMARY: In this episode of Paranormal Lens, the hosts tackle the surprisingly controversial question: Can cemeteries be haunted? (0:44) Despite frequent comments from viewers insisting that cemeteries are peaceful, final resting places, the hosts argue that hauntings there are possible, though often different from traditional "ghost" stories. Key Theories on Cemetery Hauntings Residual Energy and Emotion: The hosts propose that high-emotion events like funerals and the ongoing influx of grieving visitors create a build-up of residual energy (3:09 - 4:15). Egregores: Ben and Brienna suggest that many cemetery "hauntings" are actually egregores, collective thought-forms or manifestations born out of grief, intense emotions, and even fear from those visiting or hazing in these spaces (4:47 - 6:33). Thresholds and Time Slips: Angela discusses the concept of cemeteries acting as "doorways" or rips in the fabric of time where different layers of energy intersect (10:53 - 11:24, 26:12). Notable Investigations and Experiences Soop Cemetery: Brienna describes her first "vibe" experience, where she felt a literal "wall of heavy, dark energy" while approaching an infamous gravesite (8:07 - 9:50). Mission Hill Cemetery: The team encountered a shifting energy and potential portal opening in a secluded area, noting that these experiences often align with high-emotion or liminal locations (23:43 - 25:52). Striker Cemetery: The hosts recount one of their most intense experiences, involving a "growl" that sounded like a human mimicking a dog, a "witchy" figure seen in the mind's eye, and auditory laughter captured on equipment (27:46 - 38:35). Ethics and Respect Best Practices: The hosts emphasize that it is crucial to investigate ethically. This includes avoiding freshly buried graves, not sensationalizing the identities of the deceased, and always striving to leave a cemetery better than it was found (39:16 - 43:26). Conclusion: The episode concludes with the hosts agreeing that while not all cemeteries are haunted, the accumulation of human emotion makes them dynamic environments for paranormal phenomena. They end on a cliffhanger, promising a follow-up conversation on a new topic suggested by Angela (44:46 - 45:15).

This special episode of Paranormal Lens explores a topic suggested to us by our friends at Malice In The Mitten: are there animal ghosts? Do our pets visit us after they pass? And if so, how might an animal's spirit behave or function differently than a human's?As always, the conversation spirals into many different tangents and directions. By the end of the episode we end up talking about how there's literally dead circus elephants buried in unmarked graves scattered across the country. Who knew! (Besides Pete that is... Pete probably knew).GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the intriguing and often debated topic: Do animals have ghosts? The hosts dive into whether pets visit their owners after passing, how animal spirits might differ from human ones, and share personal experiences and theories on the matter. Key Discussion Points: Animal Ghosts vs. Residual Energy: The hosts debate whether animals can be "haunted" or if experiences are better described as residual hauntings / imprints of energy (like a pet running up stairs or a hamster wheel spinning) rather than conscious spirits (1:38 - 11:25). The Case of Pete the Lion: The conversation takes a fascinating turn to a story about a haunted theater where a circus lion named Pete is allegedly buried. The hosts discuss how this local legend led to reports of shadow sightings and growls, even though the lion likely never performed there (13:31 - 19:22). Unmarked Graves: The discussion expands to the broader, often surprising reality that many historical circus animals were buried in unmarked locations across the country, leading to the possibility that animal remains (and potential residual energy) could be resting in unexpected places, such as beaches or beneath parking lots (20:07 - 21:28). Grief and Coping: The hosts touch upon the human element, questioning if reports of seeing lost pets are supernatural encounters or a natural coping mechanism for the deep grief of losing a companion (6:56 - 7:45).

On this Monday Bonus episode of Paranormal Lens: We're taking a look back at our scariest public ghost hunt to date.Following last year's after-hours ghost hunt at the annual Haunting In ReoTown Marketplace, we immediately got on the phone with Brienna to recount everything that had just happened. Full bodied apparitions. Mimics. Poltergeist activity. Strange synchronicities. Guests dropping like flies. All culminating in an event that made Ben and Angela literally run out of the room in terror.Now, one year later, we're returning to the scene of the crime for the 5th annual Haunting In ReoTown Marketplace on Saturday, June 6. Before we step back into the building for another after-hours ghost hunt, we're re-releasing this chilling conversation as a reminder of what happened the last time we investigated there, and a potential preview of what may be waiting for us when we return.Will history repeat itself? There's only one way to find out. Limited tickets for this year's after-hours public ghost hunt are available at: https://form.jotform.com/voodoosoddtiques/HauntinginreoGEMINI SUMMARY: This Monday Bonus episode of Paranormal Lens serves as a retrospective, recounting the hosts' most intense and frightening public ghost hunt from the 2025 Haunting in ReoTown Marketplace in Lansing, Michigan (0:00-3:30). Key takeaways from the investigation: Structured Setup: The event featured a highly organized, small-group format (16 guests total, split into four rotating teams) designed to prevent cross-contamination of energy and evidence (7:10-8:50). Escalating Activity: The investigation began with relatively quiet, controlled experiments but gradually escalated throughout the night as different teams began experiencing distinct yet correlating phenomena, including physical interactions and electronic voice phenomena (EVP) (21:00-28:30). Terrifying Climax: During the final hour, the hosts and their remaining group experienced an intense, collective sighting of a black mass or shadow figure manifesting near a curtained area. The group felt an overwhelming sense of dread, leading them to abandon the room in terror (32:00-37:30). Uncanny Photographic Evidence: The investigators discuss a photograph captured by a guest during the same timeframe as the shadow figure sighting. The image shows a distorted, non-human-like figure wearing what appears to be a top hat, which the hosts describe as deeply unsettling and impossible to debunk as a simple human presence (39:45-45:30). The Aftermath: The hosts emphasize that this experience was unlike any they had encountered in eight years of investigating, with nearly half of the guests ultimately demanding cleansings due to the intense negative energy (9:00-9:50; 31:40). The hosts conclude by using this chilling account as a lead-up to their return to the venue for the 5th annual Haunting in ReoTown Marketplace on June 6, 2026, inviting listeners to see if history repeats itself (0:15-1:00; 48:00).

On this special Halfway to Hallowchristmas episode of Paranormal Lens: Are we being FOLLOWED by ghosts? After our “Yes or No” episode revealed that one of the few things we all agree on is that people themselves can be haunted, we dive deeper into the idea of paranormal attachments. From lingering spirits to past investigations where we believe we may have been interacting with our own ghosts as opposed to the location’s... this episode explores what happens when the haunting comes home with you.PS: Towards the end of the episode, Ben makes a joke about Santa Claus that spirals into a cringy bit that might just cost you your sanity. You've been warned.Be sure to FOLLOW Jezebel Michelle Creations:https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100092277383377GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the concept of paranormal attachments and whether spirits can travel with investigators from one location to another. The hosts delve into their own experiences with potential attachments and discuss the challenges of distinguishing between spirits tethered to a location and those that might be following them. Key Discussion Points: Human Hauntings: Building episode 39, the hosts affirm their belief that humans themselves can be haunted (1:05-1:19). Investigation Experiences: The hosts recount a session at the Doherty Hotel where they felt they were interacting with a spirit from their own apartment rather than the location's resident ghosts (7:29-9:02). They discuss the protective nature of certain spirits, like Jacques, who frequently intervenes during dangerous situations, such as a tense encounter at a cemetery in Grand Haven (10:52-14:40). The hosts describe a long-running, unexplained phenomenon involving Brienna and an entity that would repeatedly say her name during various investigations, regardless of the location (15:26-17:35). Best Practices: The team emphasizes the importance of setting boundaries at the end of an investigation, explicitly telling spirits that they are not allowed to follow them home (20:36-21:05, 25:35-25:50). Lighthearted Tangents: As is common for the show, the episode includes humorous tangents about Angela's interest in summoning Santa Claus or Bigfoot during investigations (4:07-5:15, 23:30-24:35), and Ben jokingly struggles with the concept of being possessed by the "Hallowchristmas spirit" (27:40-29:20).

HUGE NEWS! We're pleased to announce that our Remote Contact project was selected to be included in this year's Paranormal Research Symposium in historic Gettysburg, PA this August! Presented by the Association of Paranormal Study, the Symposium promises to foster "an atmosphere of rigorous academic discourse, where researchers, scholars, investigators, and enthusiasts converge to share their knowledge. Topics include methodologies, theories, research, emerging trends, and ethical considerations in the paranormal field."Not only will we host a workshop/panel about our ongoing Remote Contact research (where we've been integrating VR in paranormal investigations and meditation) at the Symposium this August... our work and research will be published in a journal. Like, that's unheard of! And super cool!!As they say on their site, "the Paranormal Research Symposium promises an intellectually stimulating and transformative experience for all who seek to unravel the mysteries that lie beyond the limits of conventional knowledge." This is right up our alley, and we can't wait to be a part of this year's conference!--Last night, we hopped on a quick Zoom to record a podcast episode that celebrates and formally announces this exciting news. It's a shorter than usual episode, but we hope you enjoy nonetheless. And we hope our excitement surrounding the Symposium shines through!GEMINI SUMMARY: In this podcast episode, the team from Crossroads of Curiosities shares exciting news about their project, Remote Contact, being selected for the annual Paranormal Research Symposium in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania this August (3:45 - 4:57).Key Highlights:Academic Recognition: Unlike typical paranormal conventions focused on celebrity appearances or vendor booths, this symposium prioritizes rigorous research, academic discourse, and collaboration (12:14 - 13:00, 17:23 - 18:10).Project Spotlight: The team will present a workshop/panel on their Remote Contact project, which explores the integration of VR technology into paranormal investigation and meditation (5:26 - 6:15).Journal Publication: A significant milestone for the team is that their research will be published in a journal alongside other contributors, a level of recognition they described as rare for their field (6:45 - 7:12, 9:50 - 10:20).Event Expectations: The hosts expressed excitement about networking with deep thinkers and researchers in a structured, non-commercial environment (18:46 - 19:00). They also plan to capture 360-degree footage of the Gettysburg battlefields for future research (21:58 - 22:15).

Last month, we live-streamed one of our most iconic ghost hunts yet: an investigation at the State House, where Brienna “volunteered” to do a solo while handcuffed to a haunted bathtub.In this special episode of Paranormal Lens, we break down the entire chaotic investigation and the experience behind it, which we just turned into a 20-minute short film "Beware The Haunted Bathtubs!" - now streaming on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/beware-the-haunted-bathtubs-paraflixx-paranormal-plus

Best. Episode. Yet.It only took 42 episodes, but we finally struck the balance between raw conversation, creepy paranormal theories with haunting implications, as well as a fair share of fun moments (including several callbacks to previous episodes.... cheese layers anyone?) Plus: at the end of the episode, one co-host reveals this very conversation might just change the way they view the paranormal forever.What kind of topic can elicit such a reaction, you ask?Mimics.That's right, on this episode of Paranormal Lens we're talking about one of the most terrifying topics in the field. More specifically, we're breaking down and analyzing the relationship mimic encounters have with time. Past, present, and future. The Dweller on the Threshold also comes up a great deal, because of course it does.This is an episode you don't want to miss.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens serves as a deep dive into the phenomenon of mimics and their haunting relationship with time, residual energy, and the concept of the self. The hosts analyze their past experiences, questioning if these entities are singular beings or manifestations of their own consciousness interacting across time. Key Discussion Points: The Nature of Mimics: The hosts share personal encounters where their voices—and even their physical appearance (as in Angela's 70-year-old doppelganger)—were mimicked (3:46, 8:14, 11:03). They discuss the "uncanny valley" aspect of these voices, which often sound like the hosts but feel fundamentally "wrong" (12:23). Time and Residual Hauntings: A major theory explored is that mimics may be manifestations of residual energy from different points in time—past, present, or future (13:54, 15:59). The hosts suggest that their process of creating non-linear films might be contributing to their frequent encounters with out-of-time phenomena (17:46-18:32). The Dweller on the Threshold: The hosts tie these experiences to the Dweller on the Threshold (the shadow self), suggesting that the fear and insecurity associated with this concept can manifest as terrifying doppelgangers (21:23-22:06). Shift in Perspective: The conversation leads the hosts to re-evaluate their beliefs about hauntings, moving away from the idea of "intelligent hauntings" toward the possibility that much of the paranormal activity they encounter is purely residual (31:32-31:49, 32:27).

This "ribbit-ing" episode of Paranormal Lens is not only timely... it's tipsy! Join us as we drink margaritas and talk about the BREAKING cryptozoology news: lawmakers in Ohio of all places are actively pushing to become the first state with an "official" cryptid, the Loveland Frogman. That's how the episode begins, at least. Drinks + Paranormal Lens = tangents! For an episode that starts off discussing the Frogman, and if it should be America's first "Official State Cryptid," we somehow end up talking about how Bigfoot may or may not be the Antichrist. You can't make this up...Link to the Loveland Frogman article:https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/ohio-lawmaker-seeks-to-name-loveland-frogman-as-state-cryptid-amid-growing-fame-jean-schmidt-state-representative-april-22-little-miami-riverLink to the Bigfoot article:https://thedebrief.org/new-legislation-aims-to-make-legendary-humanlike-creature-californias-official-cryptid/

On this electric episode of Paranormal Lens: we capture lightning in a bottle, as we have a candid conversation about thunderstorms and the paranormal. Can storms really increase paranormal activity? Does water retain spiritual energy? And... hold up, did Ben really just say he saw an alien in a mirror?All that and more from your trusted paranormal news source, AccuWeather! Wait, no. I meant to type Paranormal Lens. Definitely Paranormal Lens. Please do not get your paranormal news from AccuWeather…GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores whether thunderstorms and flowing water can trigger an increase in paranormal activity. The hosts critique an AccuWeather article that suggests these weather events are proven catalysts for spiritual manifestations, arguing that such claims lack scientific or factual basis (1:20-3:30). Key takeaways from the discussion: The Impact of Weather on Perception: The hosts emphasize that severe weather can physically and psychologically alter an investigator's environment. Factors like darkness, noise, wind, and the body's natural adrenaline response can make one more susceptible to feeling or seeing things that aren't there (9:42-10:10, 20:10-21:30). Anecdotal Evidence: The hosts share personal experiences, including a terrifying encounter during a tornado warning where one host claims to have seen a blue, big-headed alien in a mirror (10:40-12:00) and an instance at Maple Hill Cemetery where an approaching storm seemed to shift the energy of the area (13:10-14:05). The "Water Energy" Theory: They discuss the common belief in the paranormal community that water acts as a conduit for spiritual energy (16:15-16:50), similar to the "Stone Tape Theory," though they remain skeptical about whether these links can be definitively proven (28:15-29:10). Conclusion: While they agree that storms might provide rare opportunities—such as lightning illuminating a shadow figure (25:25-25:50)—they conclude that there is no solid evidence to establish a direct causal link between weather and hauntings. They advocate for more anecdotal data to better understand these potential correlations (32:50-33:45).

On this exciting new episode of Paranormal Lens: We always talk about how, as a ghost hunting group, our 3 core members don't agree on anything. And how that's actually a GOOD thing. EVERYTHING in the paranormal is nuanced, and there's rarely a simple yes or no answer to many of the common questions we get asked.So in this episode, we're proving it!We’ve gathered a series of deceptively simple “yes or no” questions, covering everything from classic definitions and popular theories to the ultimate question: do we even believe in ghosts? There’s just one rule… the episode doesn’t end until all three of us can agree on something!What starts as a straightforward exercise quickly unravels into debates, contradictions, and some unexpected moments of unified clarity.And we invite YOU to play along with us: How many of these questions can you answer with a simple yes or no? And do you agree with any of our takes? Let us know in the comments!

Part 2 of our discussion asking if there are ANY risks in simply watching paranormal investigations, whether live-streamed or pre-recorded? Can something truly cross the threshold from screen to home, or is that fear rooted in suggestion and atmosphere? In this episode we turn to TikTok specifically, and the hoards of people that impulsively comment "sorry" and/or "I claim no negativity from this post" on anything even vaguely paranormal-related on the platform. Why do they do this? What are all these people on TikTok "sorry" for? And how do we respond?We also react to a very well made and articulately stated TikTok by Paranormal Teej regarding all the "sorry" comments. Go give her a follow at https://www.tiktok.com/@paranormalteej

On this thought-provoking episode of Paranormal Lens: the team dives into a question sparked by their recent experiments with TikTok Lives: is there ANY real risk in simply watching paranormal investigations, whether live-streamed or pre-recorded? Can something truly cross the threshold from screen to home, or is that fear rooted in suggestion and atmosphere? The conversation pushes beyond the viewer experience and turns inward, asking a more uncomfortable question for creators themselves: does producing paranormal content come with a responsibility? From the ethics of broadcasting rituals and incantations to whether content advisories or even censorship should play a role, this episode explores the blurred line between entertainment, belief, and unintended consequences.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the question of whether there are genuine risks to viewers when watching paranormal investigations, particularly those involving live-streaming or the potential for triggering hauntings. The team debates the boundary between entertainment, belief, and the ethics of content creation. Key Discussion Points: The Risk of Viewing (4:00 - 18:06): The team discusses if watching investigations can invite spirits into a viewer's home. They debate whether this is a genuine supernatural risk or if it stems from the viewer's psychological state, heightened awareness, or the power of collective intent during live broadcasts. Live vs. Pre-recorded Content (19:00 - 20:25): There is a debate about whether live-streamed investigations carry more risk than pre-recorded videos, with some suggesting that live intent creates a more active "energetic" environment. The Ethics of Rituals and Incantations (21:30 - 30:00): A significant portion of the episode focuses on whether creators have a responsibility to censor or warn viewers about rituals and incantations shown on screen. The team questions where to draw the line—is simply asking "is anyone there?" the same as performing a ritual? Potential for Content Advisories (26:00 - 27:00): The hosts jokingly (but thoughtfully) propose a rating system for paranormal content, similar to movie ratings, to alert viewers about the presence of specific practices like EVP sessions or rituals. Technology and The Paranormal (34:25 - 38:00): The team reflects on the "static on the TV" trope and the use of spirit boxes (which scan radio frequencies), contemplating if these tools themselves could facilitate unintended connections or simply be sources of coincidence.

This is a rare, completely off-the-cuff and unplanned episode of Paranormal Lens. While prepping for a totally different episode, we got the longest, most specific and frantic Instagram DM ever on our main Crossroads of Curiosities page. It was from a frightened homeowner begging for us to come and rid an alleged "demon" from their home, that was scratching her children and attacking her husband. Unlike most paranormal groups out there though, we don't take on residential cases. And in this raw conversation, we explain why. We discuss all of our concerns regarding residential cases, ranging from the ethical to the psychological.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens features hosts Ben, Angela, and Brienna discussing why their team maintains a strict policy against taking on residential paranormal cases (1:17-1:26). The discussion was sparked by an intense, frantic message from a homeowner requesting help with a situation they believed to be demonic (0:53-1:03). Key reasons for their policy include: Lack of Expertise and Qualifications: The team emphasizes that they are not "paranormal experts." They highlight that there is no such thing as an expert in this field and warn against those who claim otherwise to gain money or attention (0:01-0:13, 20:14-20:51). Ethical and Safety Concerns: The hosts discuss the risks of entering a stranger's home, citing safety concerns for themselves—especially as young adults—and the potential for encountering volatile situations that require professional mental health or environmental help rather than paranormal investigation (18:14-19:42). The "Quick Fix" Fallacy: They argue that it is misleading and unethical to promise families a resolution, such as "cleansing" a home or "sending a spirit to the light," after only a single night of investigation. They believe such claims are often deceptive or based on misinterpretations of data (12:14-13:11, 16:14-17:14). Nuanced Perspectives: The hosts reject the idea that all haunting activity is inherently "demonic" or "evil," suggesting that much of it may be misunderstood, psychological, or simply environmental in nature (3:06-3:40, 11:36-11:53). Ultimately, the team explains that when they do receive these requests, they politely decline and suggest that individuals seek help from local resources that align with their personal beliefs or professional psychological support (7:29-8:02, 25:52-26:42).

This episode of Paranormal Lens dives into the eerie world of ritual “games,” including the infamous Hooded Man Ritual and the unsettling legend of Baby Blue, Blue Baby (which co-hosts Ben and Angela actually attempted on their 2nd date). Are these games merely modern folklore, or do intention, belief, and repetition open the door to something genuinely unexplained? This episode explores where imagination ends and where something else might begin...GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the eerie world of ritual "games," modern folklore dares or challenges that require specific steps to contact the supernatural. The co-hosts discuss these rituals, including a terrifying attempt Angela and Ben made together on their 2nd date. Key Highlights: The Hooded Man Ritual (2:12): Ben describes this ritual, which involves summoning an entity to drive you to the "other world" in a black cab. Despite a danger level of two (according to the Paranormal Rituals Wiki), Ben notes the steps are highly specific and seemingly impossible to fulfill in the modern world (15:33). Baby Blue, Blue Baby (19:53): Angela and Ben recount attempting this ritual, which involves summoning an angry ghost baby in a dark bathroom. The ritual requires balancing the weight of a ghost baby and involves specific rules to avoid being scratched or killed by the baby's mother (25:53). Egregore & Belief (7:10): The hosts discuss the concept of an egregore, a thoughtform created by collective belief, suggesting that rituals can become genuinely dangerous if enough people believe in them and put intent into the actions (33:53).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: we give a free-wheeling recap of the incredible 10th annual MidWest WeirdFest we attended in Eau Claire, Wisconsin.A slew of behind-the-scenes stories that honestly sound too weird to be true take center stage in this episode, as our trip to the MidWest WeirdFest turns into a whirlwind of uncanny encounters and bizarre coincidences. From strange interactions with people who seemed to know a little too much, to mind-blowing synchronicities that lead to even more mysteries of Jacques being revealed... we unpack the eerie energy surrounding the festival itself while also highlighting some of its standout films:The Philip Experiment - https://thephilipexperiment.comThe Hole Story - https://www.facebook.com/TheHoleStoryMovie/The Mid-Night Driver - https://www.instagram.com/alex_cherney/Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques - https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/seven-the-mystery-of-jacquesGEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens provides a recap of the 10th annual MidWest WeirdFest in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, highlighting the eerie energy of the city and various uncanny encounters (4:54). The hosts discuss their experiences at a haunted motel (5:17) and an antique store (Mabel's) where they encountered a strange mannequin (11:55). The conversation covers several standout films from the festival: The Philip Experiment (32:21): A film exploring the concept of creating a ghost through collective belief, known as an egregor. The Hole Story (22:15): A documentary paired with the hosts' own film, Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques. The Mid-Night Driver (38:53): A horror film loosely based on the Hooded Man ritual. Finally, they discuss future plans to turn their short film, Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques, into a feature film (47:35), fueled by real-life synchronicities and local legends. After the film screening, a stranger looked into Ben's eyes in the light and claimed that "there were 27 in Jacques" but "there's still five inside of you" (50:08 - 50:27)...

On this long-awaited episode of Paranormal Lens: we dive deep into music and the paranormal. We discuss the popular Singapore Theory, which proposes that playing familiar music could trigger paranormal activity. We also discuss music as a ritual; how it might heal or help the potential entities present; and why old theaters and opera houses are so haunted.This episode is dedicated to all the Swifties out there.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the intersection of music and the paranormal, specifically diving into the Singapore Theory, which suggests that playing familiar music can trigger paranormal activity (0:14). The hosts discuss music as a universal language that can transcend the mortal realm and act as a connector to spirits (1:36). Key Themes Discussed: Music as a Trigger (Singapore Theory): (23:18) The hosts discuss how playing familiar music or audio clips relevant to a location's history can evoke responses from entities, referencing an investigation at the Howell Opera House (9:31) and a cemetery investigation involving Beethoven (10:02). Emotional Energy in Theaters: (3:33) The intense emotional energy generated by concerts and plays in old theaters and opera houses is proposed as a reason for their high rates of haunting. Spirits and Emotions: (3:07) Spirits might be attracted to or communicate through the emotions and frequencies invoked by music. Music Therapy and Healing: (5:49) The conversation explores whether music can heal spirits, similar to how it works for the living, highlighting the Eloise Asylum (6:20) and suggesting unorthodox tests like playing musical chairs with spirits (7:19). Future Paranormal Research: (27:46) The hosts plan to use immersive technologies, like 360-degree cameras and surround sound, to project historical audio and visuals onto modern spaces to test these theories.

On this BIG episode of Paranormal Lens, we finally tackle America's favorite cryptid in-depth. Is Bigfoot really an elusive unknown creature? Or could it just be a bear? Or a hairy man? Or maybe Bigfoot is really an inter-dimensional being! And why is there a correlation between areas with a high Furry population and frequent Bigfoot sightings???This episode is a doozy, and might just serve as the inspiration for the next blockbuster smash-hit "Jacques vs. Bigfoot."Hollywood producers, you know where to find us: [email protected] Summary: This episode of the Paranormal Lens podcast features a lighthearted, non-serious discussion about Bigfoot, exploring whether the famous cryptid is a physical creature, a spiritual entity, or something else entirely (0:00-0:25). The hosts debate the lack of hard evidence despite numerous sightings, joking that Bigfoot might actually be a very hairy lost man or even a furry in a costume (1:52-4:43, 11:54-13:25). Highlights of the discussion include: Michigan Bigfoot: The hosts discuss Bigfoot's role as a mascot for Michigan's wilderness and share a humorous story about a local man in Midland, Michigan, who leaves pizza boxes as offerings for Bigfoot, leading to national news coverage and DNA testing on pizza box hair (3:01-3:37, 24:43-25:45). Interdimensional Theories: The conversation shifts to more esoteric theories, suggesting Bigfoot could be an interdimensional being or a spirit (10:02-10:41). The "Summoning" Debate: Host Angela proposes summoning Bigfoot like a spirit, leading to a humorous role-playing scenario about calling the police to report a Bigfoot inside an apartment (34:36-39:53).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: we discuss a recent Estes Method session that caught us all off guard, because it was conducted... telepathically. What are the implications of this session? Is telepathy real? And if so, what does it mean about psychic phenomena and the paranormal at large?

"Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" is now streaming on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/pere-cheney-plague-in-the-pines-paraflixx-paranormal-plusOn this episode of Paranormal Lens: we discuss the superstition, lore, and perceived risks surrounding whistling in the woods at night. Could merely whistling alert something supernatural to your presence? The conversation also veers (or as Brie calls it, "devolves") to discuss Bigfoot calls and their effectiveness. This episode has a little bit of everything, including references to our recent projects "Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" and "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques"!GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the superstition and perceived risks of whistling in the woods at night (0:00). The hosts share their varying opinions on whether whistling can attract supernatural entities (1:33), referencing folklore from different cultures (1:57) and the idea of whistling as a universal invitation (4:40).Key points from the discussion include:Personal Experiences with Whistling (1:41): One host accidentally whistles frequently, while another avoids it in the woods.The "Invitation" Theory (4:25): The idea that whistling acts as a call or invitation to unknown entities, akin to a universal language (4:55).The Pere Cheney Cemetery Incident (9:06): A detailed account of an experience during filming where both groups spontaneously started whistling at the same time in a haunted location, followed by coyotes howling (11:30).Bigfoot and Dogman Whistling (14:12): The conversation "devolves" into a discussion about Bigfoot and Dogman calls that incorporate whistling, raising questions about the existence and nature of these cryptids (14:26).Fear and Activity (29:45): The theory that being scared while whistling can influence paranormal activity due to the energy generated by fear.Individual Discretion (30:31): The hosts conclude that ultimately, the decision to whistle in the woods at night is up to the individual and their comfort level with potential risks.

"Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" is NOW STREAMING on Paraflixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/pere-cheney-plague-in-the-pines-paraflixx-paranormal-plusThe legend of Pere Cheney has long been one of Michigan’s most talked-about ghost stories. With the help of the local historical society, this documentary offers a fresh and entirely new perspective on Pere Cheney’s haunted history.By separating fact from folklore, putting real names to long-muddied legends, and uncovering a historical discovery that changes everything, the film reexamines what we truly know about this infamous piece of Michigan folklore.GEMINI SUMMARY: This special episode discusses our latest documentary "Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines," (0:43) which explores the history and paranormal phenomena of Pere Cheney, a well-known Michigan ghost town. (1:28) The discussion covers: Pere Cheney's History: The town was once a bustling village (2:30) with 1,500 residents that served as a county seat. (2:34) It declined after two diphtheria outbreaks (2:49) and was eventually burned down by people who believed it was cursed, leaving only 18 residents. (3:51) The Cemetery: All that remains of the town is its cemetery (4:36) and some building foundations. (4:45) The cemetery's headstones were heavily vandalized, (5:26) leaving only five or six readable names. (5:32) The historical society revealed that the cemetery was originally four times larger than what is visible today, with many graves extending into the woods, including a lost mass grave. (28:56) Paranormal Experiences & Technical Issues: The hosts share numerous paranormal encounters that did not make it into the film, such as a child apparition (7:34) and a "monster" sighting on the railroad tracks. (29:25) They also experienced recurring technical difficulties (8:50) while filming and editing, including corrupted footage (9:31) and internet outages (11:42) that they attribute to the location's haunted nature. The "Witch" Folklore: The documentary aims to separate fact from folklore, specifically addressing the legend of a witch who allegedly cursed the town. (3:25) The film intentionally minimizes the "witch" narrative (23:08) because it is not historically verifiable. (23:26) The hosts mention a "witch's tree" (23:47) or stump where the witch was supposedly hanged, but historical accounts vary, and they encountered odd weather phenomena when investigating it. (25:55) Filming Challenges and Goals: The film is feature-length (0:53) and was made in collaboration with A Non Sasquatch Production, What Goes Bump In The Night, and the Crawford County Historical Society. (1:22) Many paranormal occurrences and pieces of evidence were excluded from the final cut (14:38) to prioritize the historical narrative and create a cohesive story. (18:29) The documentary aims to shed light on Pere Cheney's overlooked history (20:25) and a significant historical discovery, which is revealed in the film. (38:32)

In this free-wheeling "old-school" episode of Paranormal Lens: We bring the FUN back to ghost hunting! What are the benefits of bringing joy, laughter, comradely, and fantasy to the haunted spaces we investigate? Brienna also educates us on the nuances and misunderstood history of Dungeons & Dragons; and we come up with a pretty interesting Stranger Things theory that surprisingly explains the lackluster ending (and excuses the Duffer Brothers in the process).GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens highlights the benefits of bringing fun and games to ghost hunting (0:00). The hosts discuss how playing games like Dungeons & Dragons (6:07) or "haunted" Jenga (25:38) can positively impact paranormal investigations. Key discussion points include: The "Man Eyes" ordeal (0:00-1:52): The hosts open with a humorous anecdote about Ben's inability to find a specific comment, leading to a playful discussion about "man eyes" and stereotypes (2:00-3:04). Stranger Things and Dungeons & Dragons (4:49-6:51): The conversation shifts to the show Stranger Things and its connection to Dungeons & Dragons, including a theory about the show's ending (19:12). D&D and the Satanic Panic (7:57-14:20): The hosts delve into the historical misunderstanding of Dungeons & Dragons, particularly how it was linked to the "satanic panic" of the 1980s. Bringing fun to ghost hunting (22:53-26:30): Inspired by a comment, the hosts explore the idea that joy and fantasy might help spirits wandering haunted spaces. They share their experience with "haunted" Jenga (25:38) and how excitement during the game seemed to feed paranormal activity. The importance of fun (27:47-28:26): The episode concludes with a call to bring more fun and games into paranormal investigations and everyday life, emphasizing that not everything needs to be serious.

In honor of Groundhog Day, we discuss strange "glitches" in the memory matrix: the Mandela Effect, deja vu, and the Backrooms. Come break your brains with us, as we analyze some of our favorite memory mind-f*cks!GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens discusses strange "glitches" in the memory matrix, such as the Mandela Effect and deja vu, relating them to the movie Groundhog Day (0:00-1:30). Key discussion points include: Deja Vu Experiences (1:55): The hosts share their experiences with deja vu. Brie and Angela both mention feeling like they've been in certain places before, even if they haven't (2:35-3:33). The Backrooms Phenomenon (5:21): They discuss the concept of the "Backrooms" and if they've experienced similar disorienting feelings of being lost in a mundane, never-ending space. Brie shares a childhood experience in her church that felt like a "backroom" moment (5:50-6:30). Mandela Effect Examples (9:42): The hosts delve into various examples of the Mandela Effect: South America's Map Location (10:52): Angela recalls South America being directly south of North America, differing from its current southeast position on maps (12:21). The discussion highlights how map projections can cause such distortions (12:30-13:20). Monopoly Man's Monocle (19:30): Ben and Brie recall the Monopoly Man having a monocle, but he does not in reality (19:34). "Possession Tape" vs. "Possession Tapes" (20:51): Ben points out that their own film title, "Possession Tape," is often misremembered with an "S" at the end (21:07). Fruit of the Loom Logo (23:41): They discuss the popular belief that the Fruit of the Loom logo used to feature a cornucopia, which the company denies (24:45). Berenstain/Stein Bears and Looney Tunes (26:46): The common confusion over the spelling of "Berenstain Bears" (E vs. A) and "Looney Tunes" (U vs. OO) are brought up (27:10). Theories on Mandela Effect (30:04): They offer theories for the Mandela Effect, ranging from changes in marketing and improved imaging technology to childhood memories being inaccurate, or even the idea of shifting universes/timelines (30:09-33:05). The Nelson Mandela example, where many recall him dying in prison before he actually did, is presented as the most puzzling (31:10-32:00).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: You’re probably using your phone to listen to this podcast... but could that same device be used to hunt ghosts? We break down the most popular “ghost hunting” apps and tools, examine which (if any) have legitimate investigative value, and debate our differing perspectives on whether smartphone tech belongs in a credible paranormal investigation at all.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the use of smartphone applications for ghost hunting (0:22). The hosts share their experiences and opinions on popular "ghost hunting" apps like Ghost Tube, Ghost Hunting Tools, and Ghost Radar. They explore whether these apps have legitimate investigative value (1:08) and if they should be relied upon by credible paranormal investigators (1:12). Here are the key takeaways from the discussion: App Functionality and Disclaimers (0:51-6:31): Many ghost hunting apps are word generators that use a database of words to seemingly communicate with spirits (0:51). The hosts highlight the humorous and sometimes serious disclaimers provided by apps like Ghost Tube, which advises users not to make important life decisions based on the app's output (5:30-5:48). Ghost Tube's Transparency (6:42-10:20): The hosts express surprising respect for Ghost Tube due to its transparency (6:52) regarding how it operates. The app's website explains that its tools are influenced by environmental sensors (8:32-8:40) (like the magnetometer, accelerometer, and gyroscope) and can be triggered by nearby magnetic fields, metals, electronics, and sudden movements (9:22-9:30). Tips for Investigators (9:34-10:14): Ghost Tube encourages skepticism and offers tips for serious investigators, including pairing evidence with multiple tools and techniques (9:45-9:50) and understanding how the tools work. Critique of Other Apps (11:54-12:12): The hosts criticize apps like Ghost Hunting Tools and Ghost Radar for making exaggerated claims about finding ghosts without explaining how they detect activity (11:54-12:12). The Problem with "Too Many Things" (17:35-18:09): A main criticism of apps like Ghost Tube is that they use too many factors to detect responses (17:44), making it difficult to discern if a response is genuinely paranormal or simply triggered by environmental factors like quick movements or nearby appliances. Reliability of Phone Apps (19:13-22:40): Angela generally believes that most phone-based ghost hunting tools are "total BS" (19:18) and that any matches are likely coincidental. However, Ben argues that Ghost Tube's transparency makes it more credible than some expensive tools like the Ovulus (22:21-22:39). Recommendations for Use (30:40-32:00): The hosts agree that while ghost hunting apps can be fun for entertainment purposes (31:02), they are not ideal for beginner ghost hunters (31:07-31:20) who are serious about finding evidence, as they may misinterpret every response as genuine paranormal activity. Best Use of a Phone in Ghost Hunting (36:14-36:28): The hosts conclude that the most effective way to use a phone for ghost hunting is to simply use the voice memo feature for EVPs (36:26-36:28), as it's not an app specifically designed for ghost detection and can potentially catch genuine voices.

On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we touch base on rituals: when, if ever, should they be utilized on our ghost hunts? The conversation uses our recent film "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" as well as last year's film "Dweller" (winner of Best TV/New Media Feature at the MidWest WeirdFest) to help articulate our points. We discuss what makes "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" different than some of the past rituals we've been a part of, as well as reveal what "Dweller" got wrong."Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" is now streaming on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/seven-the-mystery-of-jacquesGEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens dives into the nuanced topic of rituals in paranormal investigations (0:00). The hosts, Ben, Angela, and Brienna, explore when and if rituals should be used during ghost hunts, differentiating their approach from others in the field. Key discussion points include: The Rarity of Rituals (3:01): The team generally agrees that rituals are rarely needed in typical investigations, estimating that 99.9% of interactions are with human hauntings. Defining "Ritual" (8:45): The hosts discuss the broad definition of a ritual as a ceremony with specific actions and prescribed meanings, noting that even ghost hunting tools like a spirit box could be considered a form of ritual. Human vs. Inhuman Entities (3:37): They debate whether most hauntings are human or if a significant portion could be non-human entities like demons. While Angela suggests a 50/50 split, Ben and Brie lean towards a heavy proportion being human. The Dweller Film and Summoning (10:31): Ben shares insights from their film Dweller, explaining how the ritual depicted became problematic when it shifted from a metaphorical understanding of an entity to an actual summoning. He emphasizes that he does not condone summoning or conjuring entities. The Seven: The Mystery of Jacques Ritual (24:51): The team discusses their new film, Seven: The Mystery of Jacques, and the ritual performed. They clarify that this ritual was for "elevated communication" with an entity already present within a haunted object (Jacques), rather than summoning something new. This distinction is crucial for Ben. Preparation and Intention (32:09): All hosts stress the importance of thorough planning, clear intention, and understanding every aspect of a ritual, rather than performing spontaneous ones. Brie's Perspective and Limits (42:10): Brie, having a religious background, shares her stricter limits, including not using Ouija boards and being wary of actions that "open doors to something we don't fully understand." The episode concludes with the consensus that not every investigation requires a ritual, and such situations are rare, often presenting themselves when appropriate rather than being sought out.

Do paranormal re-enactments cross an ethical line, or are they a necessary storytelling tool? On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore how ghost hunting TV shows and documentaries recreate eyewitness encounters, and whether staging these b-roll shots could risk misleading audience. We also analyze these re-enactments from the spirits' perspective: could dramatizing their death trigger more activity to occur?This episode also contains a shocking revelation: not only is Brienna a blonde, but SHE'S ALSO AN OPERA SINGER. How did we not know this???GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the ethics of using reenactments in paranormal TV shows and documentaries (0:00-1:02). The hosts explore whether staged re-creations of eyewitness encounters mislead audiences or are a necessary storytelling tool (0:59). Here's a breakdown of the key points: Authenticity Concerns (2:19-5:15): A core issue is the concern among "purists" that reenactments diminish the authenticity of paranormal investigations. If viewers see staged scenes, they might question the legitimacy of genuine paranormal captures later in the show. Storytelling vs. Evidence (5:51-12:09): The hosts argue that reenactments are a creative choice to make content more entertaining and visually engaging for storytelling purposes, rather than proving the existence of ghosts. They emphasize that their goal is to tell a story, not to collect verifiable evidence, especially since visual evidence of paranormal activity is rare. Documentary Definition (13:14-15:25): The discussion touches on the true definition of a documentary as an "artistic representation of reality." The hosts suggest that since the presence of cameras already alters reality, reenactments are an acceptable part of this artistic representation, as long as they speak to the truth of the situation. Impact on Spirits (15:32-22:51): A unique ethical consideration is raised: how might intelligent spirits react to reenactments of traumatic events, such as their death, being staged in their presence? The hosts ponder whether such reenactments could stir up activity or be disrespectful, or if spirits, having transcended their earthly bodies, might not care. Future Experiment Ideas (22:55-25:38): The conversation veers into brainstorming ideas for future paranormal investigations, including using historical ambiance and sensory data from specific locations and dates to try and "tap back" into past conversations or energies.

In this episode of Paranormal Lens: hosts Ben, Brienna, and Angela discuss the infamous 18.9 Hz “ghost frequency,” a form of infrasound believed to trigger feelings of unease and dread. Is the fear we feel in haunted locations truly paranormal, or could our bodies be reacting to sound we can’t consciously hear?Ben also reveals the one time he intentionally used the ghost frequency in a film, sparking a discussion about the ethics of inducing fear through sound design. The conversation also dives into rumors that some well-known haunted sites may intentionally pump infrasound to enhance activity and mislead ghost hunters. Also: what is the connection between Bigfoot and infrasound?GEMINI Summary: This episode of "Paranormal Lens" discusses the "ghost frequency," also known as infrasound, specifically the 18.9 Hz frequency (2:00). What is Infrasound? Infrasound is a low-frequency sound that humans cannot consciously hear, but our bodies can react to it (3:16). Researchers have suggested that this frequency, when present, can cause feelings of unease, paranoia, and jitteriness, which people might attribute to paranormal activity (3:52). Infrasound and Paranormal Activity: The hosts reference a 2003 NBC News article titled "Infrasound linked to spooky events," which discusses a study by UK researchers on the connection between infrasound and odd sensations experienced at allegedly haunted sites (3:05). Infrasound in Media: The hosts discuss how horror movies often use infrasound in scary scenes to induce a feeling of fear in the audience before visual or auditory cues (4:32). Ben, one of the hosts, reveals he intentionally used the ghost frequency in their short film, "The Possession Tape," to enhance the unsettling atmosphere (11:41). Ethical Concerns of Using Infrasound: The hosts debate the ethics of using infrasound to induce fear. They conclude that it is not unethical in entertainment, such as films, where the audience expects to be spooked (14:42). Infrasound in Nature and Other Connections: Bigfoot: Infrasound is believed to be one of Bigfoot's vocalizations, similar to how lions use infrasound in their roars (7:55). Some Bigfoot hunting techniques involve using amplifiers to detect infrasound (8:41). Natural Events: Infrasound can be produced by natural events like volcanoes, earthquakes, and storms, as well as by animals and industrial machinery (19:49). Bad Driving: The hosts humorously note a random quote in the 2003 article that links infrasound to bad driving, suggesting it might be caused by sounds from cars or radios (5:43). Future Applications: The hosts discuss the potential for using infrasound in future paranormal investigations, particularly if they go Bigfoot hunting again (24:03). They also mention an upcoming project that might incorporate it (22:55).

In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the chilling lore and theories surrounding the Hat Man, one of the most commonly reported shadow figures in modern paranormal accounts. Often described as a tall, dark silhouette wearing a wide-brimmed hat or top hat, the Hat Man frequently appears during episodes of sleep paralysis, in haunted locations, and in altered states of consciousness. Is he a single entity, a type of shadow person, or a shared hallucination shaped by fear, culture, and expectation? The discussion also dives into connections between the Hat Man and older occult concepts like the Dweller on the Threshold, the shadow self, egregores, and doppelgängers, questioning whether witnesses are seeing an actual entity... or merely its shadow.GEMINI Summary: This episode discusses the Hat Man, a commonly reported shadow figure often seen during sleep paralysis or in haunted locations (2:18-2:22, 8:46-9:01). Key theories and points explored include: Nature of the Hat Man - The hosts debate if the Hat Man is a single entity, a type of shadow person, or a collective hallucination (8:09-8:16, 16:34-16:40). Sleep Paralysis and Hallucinations - The Hat Man is frequently associated with sleep paralysis and is sometimes considered a Benadryl-induced hallucination (2:18-2:22, 3:07-3:10, 8:46-8:51). Connection to "Dweller on the Threshold" - The discussion draws parallels between the Hat Man and the "Dweller on the Threshold," an occult concept described as a shadowy, demonic being that appears during a sleep paralysis-like state (10:00-11:07, 12:47-13:02). Shadow of an Entity - A theory is proposed that the Hat Man might not be the entity itself, but rather the shadow of an entity, connecting to the idea of the "shadow self" or doppelgängers (12:36-12:55, 13:11-13:18). Egregore Theory - The hosts consider if the Hat Man could be an egregore—a collective thoughtform that gains a form of reality through shared belief and repeated experiences (13:51-14:00, 14:09-15:15). The Pocket Watch Lore - A lesser-known piece of lore is introduced: some sightings describe the Hat Man checking a gold pocket watch, leading to speculation about his purpose or connection to time (17:29-18:01, 26:40-26:51). Appearance and Archetypes - The video touches on why ghosts, including the Hat Man, often appear in Victorian-era attire. It's suggested that intelligent entities might adopt these classic archetypes to fit in with perceived notions of ghosts (27:00-28:55).

First it was cheese. Then it was owls. Now, we're looking at Santa Claus through a paranormal lens. Who (or what) is Santa really? What if he's just a Coke-fueled capitalistic creation? Or worse: the devil in disguise? We sincerely hope this episode enhances your Christmas instead of ruining it...GEMINI Summary: This episode explores the origins and nature of Santa Claus through a paranormal lens, moving beyond the traditional figure to discuss his potential as a spiritual entity. The hosts discuss how the idea of Santa may have originated from various pagan gods, spirits, and saints, with popular belief potentially creating an "egregor" (2:53-3:08). Key points discussed include: Santa's diverse origins (3:51-5:24): Santa Claus is presented as a "hodgepodge" of different cultures, spirits, and gods, with Christmas itself being a holiday that combined various traditions, including the Yule log, Christmas tree, and St. Nicholas, when Christianity spread and absorbed local practices. Pagan influences: Odin: The Norse god Odin, known for riding an eight-legged horse (7:26-8:18), influenced the concept of Santa's sleigh and reindeer. Children would leave treats for Odin for blessings, similar to leaving cookies and milk for Santa (10:01-10:13). Odin's "all-seeing" nature also mirrors Santa's knowledge of who's "naughty or nice" (10:29-10:49). Hera: The goddess Hera, who appeared in fireplaces to bring good luck, contributed to the legend of Santa coming down the chimney (12:05-12:37). Santa as Satan? (12:47-16:50): The hosts explore the theory that "Santa" is an anagram for "Satan" and the use of "Old Nick" as a name for the devil. They discuss how Santa could be seen as a representation of greed and temptation, contrasting with the true meaning of Christmas. St. Nicholas (13:54-15:20): The historical figure of St. Nicholas, an actual priest who left coins on windowsills and front doors, is acknowledged as a component of the Santa Claus legend. Coca-Cola's influence (21:00-22:46): The discussion highlights how Coca-Cola significantly shaped Santa's modern image in the 1930s by using him in winter advertisements to boost sales, solidifying his red and white attire. Personal beliefs and the metaphysical Santa (31:00-33:29): The hosts share their childhood experiences of realizing Santa wasn't real and ponder whether they would believe in Santa as a metaphysical "spirit of Christmas" rather than a physical being. They also humorously caution against attempting to summon Santa due to the potential of accidentally summoning Satan (33:50-34:19).

This "Remote Contact" outtake/deleted scene broke my mind, and I knew we needed to discuss on the podcast. Can we trust our own memories, and recounts of paranormal experiences? We watch this interview outtake clip with Lauren Haunts together, and react in real time. What are the implications this has on one of our most impactful paranormal experiences EVER, at Madison Seminary this past May? This is a MUST-listen episode of PARANORMAL LENS.Lauren Haunts: https://www.laurenhaunts.comGEMINI Summary: This episode features an outtake from our "Remote Contact" film, delving into the reliability of human memory, especially concerning paranormal experiences (0:04). The hosts react to an outtake interview clip with Lauren Haunts, who discusses how our brains can create or alter memories based on beliefs, trauma, or preferences (3:40). This neuroplasticity suggests that even visceral paranormal experiences might not have happened exactly as remembered (4:10). The discussion then shifts to a specific, impactful paranormal experience at Madison Seminary (7:47). The hosts recount hearing a loud, disembodied voice that sounded amplified but not electronic, saying "I'm here" and something else they couldn't clearly make out (8:30). Immediately after, cat balls on the table turned on, and an EMF meter went berserk (10:33). What makes this particularly relevant to the memory discussion is that despite all being present, their recollections of the exact words and clarity differed (12:38). This leads them to propose a new method for future investigations: documenting experiences immediately by writing them down (6:18). They suggest comparing these written accounts with later recollections to see how memories might change over time, drawing parallels to a past investigation at Rosevear Park where four people experienced three things simultaneously, but none recalled the same combination of events (16:44). The episode concludes by emphasizing the importance of diligent documentation to ensure accurate recollection of paranormal events (22:56).

Watch "Remote Contact" - NOW STREAMING on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/remote-contactParticipate to our ongoing Remote Contact experiments: https://www.crossroadsofcuriosities.com/remote-contactWhat happens when you swap a blindfold for VR Headset while doing the Estes Method? "Remote Contact" details preliminary experiments using immersive, 360 degree renders of haunted locations in these investigations.What started as a fun twist on the traditional Estes Method quickly evolves into something more— Contemplating how these immersive spaces can open a person up to have a more impactful, meditative, and potentially "psychic" paranormal experience."Remote Contact" invites viewers to follow these preliminary trials, witness the strange data being collected, and discover how you can take part in this ongoing experiment.GEMINI Summary: The episode discusses "Remote Contact," a new film and ongoing experiment by Crossroads of Curiosities, LLC, now streaming on PARAFlixx Paranormal+ (0:58). The project explores a new take on the Estes Method by replacing the traditional blindfold with a VR headset displaying immersive 360-degree footage of haunted locations (0:00-0:13, 9:40-10:00). Key aspects of the "Remote Contact" project: Genesis of the Idea Ben, a film enthusiast, acquired a 360 camera and began using it to capture immersive renders of haunted locations, initially to preserve historical sites (2:10-3:29). This evolved into the idea of using these immersive videos with VR headsets for paranormal investigations (3:33-4:24). Modification of the Estes Method The core experiment involves participants wearing VR headsets with noise-reducing headphones, viewing 360-degree footage of known haunted locations, while an operator asks questions (9:40-10:00, 7:43-8:14). The goal is to see if responses from a spirit box (audio heard through the headphones) correlate with the virtual location (10:09-10:30). Controls and Validation The team intentionally uses locations they are intimately familiar with to validate responses (10:30-11:18). They also bring in individuals unfamiliar with the locations to minimize bias and enhance credibility (11:37-13:13). Meditative and Channeling Aspects The participants discuss how the Estes Method, especially with the immersive experience, can induce a meditative state and potentially lead to channeling or remote viewing experiences (14:40-15:07, 21:07-21:16). A pivotal part of the film involves experimenting with Madison Seminary's Resonance Chamber and guided meditation instead of the spirit box to further explore these meditative states (21:18-23:01). Call for Participation The project is designed as an ongoing experiment, and the creators encourage viewers to participate by downloading the 360-degree video footage from their website and conducting their own experiments (1:46-1:53, 28:50-29:01, 30:26-30:58). A questionnaire is available on their website for participants to share their experiences (30:31-30:58). Future Experiments The team also briefly touches on potential future experiments, such as attempting to catch EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomena) within the 360-degree audio from the locations (27:12-28:20). The film "Remote Contact" is 40 minutes long and is presented in a documentary style (25:58-26:10).

According to the Catholic Church, the amount of exorcisms are rising at a surprising rate. But what’s really behind the increase? In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we examine the official signs of “demonic possession” recognized by the Catholic Church, what actually qualifies someone for an alleged exorcism, and how these cases are evaluated alongside psychological and other explanations.Along the way, we share our candid, grounded thoughts on possession, spirit attachment, and channeling, exploring where belief, mental health, and the paranormal intersect, and why these conversations matter now more than ever."The Possession Tape" is available to stream for free on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZnKoemd7qwCatholic Exorcists Say They Are Overloaded With ‘Possessed’ People: Studyhttps://www.newsweek.com/catholica-exorcists-say-they-are-overloaded-possessed-people-1712382

In this chilling episode of Paranormal Lens, we recount the most intense paranormal investigations we’ve conducted in haunted basements and cursed attics. Why are these spaces so often the epicenter of ghostly activity?If you’re fascinated by true paranormal stories, haunted locations, ghost investigations, urban legends, and real-life horror, this episode will make you think twice before going into the attic, or down into the basement.Perfect for fans of ghost hunting, supernatural documentaries, haunted house lore, and true ghost encounters.

Welcome to the most "Michigan" episode of Paranormal Lens to date, as we discuss our personal run-ins with the elusive cryptid known as the Not-Deer. Join co-hosts Ben, Angela, Brienna, and Douglas the Kangaroo as they analyze these strange Not-Deer sightings and why they may or may not be as scary as you think. Whether you’re a cryptid enthusiast, a Michigan paranormal fan, or simply curious about the strange creatures said to roam our woods, this episode offers all of that and more. Ditto.

On this Monday Bonus episode of Paranormal Lens: we dive head-first into the frustrating phenomenon of "equipment malfunctions" during (and even after) investigations. We analyze our most recent, mind-boggling tech issue that prevented us from publishing last week's episode (apologies again about that). And we end on a plea to all paranormal filmmakers: back up your footage. Weird sh*t will happen... and you need to be prepared for anything!

In this thought-provoking episode of Paranormal Lens, we dive deep into the truth behind intelligent hauntings: those rare encounters where unseen forces are said to think, respond, and interact with the living. Are these spirits truly conscious entities... or something far stranger? Join us as we unravel one of our most existential and controversial discussions yet, questioning the very nature of what it means for a haunting to be “intelligent.”Whether you’re a ghost hunter, a skeptic, or someone fascinated by paranormal research and spirit communication, this episode challenges you to question what’s really communicating back during your investigations.Plus: get an exclusive behind-the-scenes sneak peek at a profound paranormal experience we had while filming the upcoming documentary, Pere Cheney: Plague in the Pines. Be sure to follow the project on Facebook and Instagram for real-time project updates!

In this thought-provoking episode, we explore the ethics, boundaries, and responsibility that come with creating paranormal content. Specifically, we're pulling back the curtain on one of the most uncomfortable trends in today’s digital paranormal space: TikTok “mediums” and YouTube spirit box sessions claiming to contact freshly deceased celebrities.Our conversation also naturally veers into how true crime culture is seeping into the paranormal world, blurring the line between curiosity and exploitation. Why are audiences drawn to “live spirit box sessions” minutes after a public figure passes away? How has the commodification of grief turned the paranormal and true crime genres into viral industries? All that and more on this episode of Paranormal Lens.

👻 In our Paranormal Lens Halloween special, Ben, Angela, and Brienna look back on eight years of ghost hunting, and their most chilling, poignant, and life-changing encounters that forever altered the way they investigate the supernatural.🕯️ The conversation naturally veers into recapping unforgettable moments from this year's Blood Moon Parafest at Stimson Hospital and MADCON 8 at Madison Seminary, sharing behind-the-scenes stories, eerie synchronicities, and a downright woo-woo experience that was too difficult to sum up in a mere Instagram post. 💀 Whether you’re a seasoned investigator or simply fascinated by real paranormal encounters, this episode is a must-listen. Tune in for spine-tingling stories, personal reflection, and a rare glimpse into the evolution of three investigators who have dedicated nearly a decade to exploring haunted locations across the Midwest and beyond.

In this chilling new episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the mysterious connection between owls, UFO sightings, and the paranormal. Are these nocturnal creatures mere birds of prey… or messengers from another realm?Plus, Angela dives deep into her strange fascination with these creatures, leading to some unexpected revelations.Stay tuned until the end… because this episode takes a terrifying turn you won’t see coming. Whoooooo knew an episode about owls could be this creepy?

In this chilling new episode of Paranormal Lens, hosts Ben Goldman, Brienna Shear, and Angela Wingard dive deep into the mysterious world of dreams and the paranormal. Can ghosts or entities visit you in your dreams? Can dreams predict the future, or even warn you about things yet to come?Ben recounts a haunting encounter in his sleep with the Dweller on the Threshold; and Brienna reveals one of her most terrifying nightmares, a dream that might be a premonition tied to their most feared paranormal investigation. And Angela brings some much-needed levity with a funny dream story that strangely may have predicted the future. Allegedly.Join the team as they explore how dreams blur the line between the subconscious and the supernatural, mixing science, folklore, and personal experiences. Whether you’re fascinated by lucid dreams, prophetic visions, or nightmares that feel too real, this episode is a must-listen for believers and skeptics alike.