Paranormal Lens - A Crossroads Of Curiosities, LLC Production

Best. Episode. Yet.It only took 42 episodes, but we finally struck the balance between raw conversation, creepy paranormal theories with haunting implications, as well as a fair share of fun moments (including several callbacks to previous episodes.... cheese layers anyone?) Plus: at the end of the episode, one co-host reveals this very conversation might just change the way they view the paranormal forever.What kind of topic can elicit such a reaction, you ask?Mimics.That's right, on this episode of Paranormal Lens we're talking about one of the most terrifying topics in the field. More specifically, we're breaking down and analyzing the relationship mimic encounters have with time. Past, present, and future. The Dweller on the Threshold also comes up a great deal, because of course it does.This is an episode you don't want to miss.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens serves as a deep dive into the phenomenon of mimics and their haunting relationship with time, residual energy, and the concept of the self. The hosts analyze their past experiences, questioning if these entities are singular beings or manifestations of their own consciousness interacting across time. Key Discussion Points: The Nature of Mimics: The hosts share personal encounters where their voices—and even their physical appearance (as in Angela's 70-year-old doppelganger)—were mimicked (3:46, 8:14, 11:03). They discuss the "uncanny valley" aspect of these voices, which often sound like the hosts but feel fundamentally "wrong" (12:23). Time and Residual Hauntings: A major theory explored is that mimics may be manifestations of residual energy from different points in time—past, present, or future (13:54, 15:59). The hosts suggest that their process of creating non-linear films might be contributing to their frequent encounters with out-of-time phenomena (17:46-18:32). The Dweller on the Threshold: The hosts tie these experiences to the Dweller on the Threshold (the shadow self), suggesting that the fear and insecurity associated with this concept can manifest as terrifying doppelgangers (21:23-22:06). Shift in Perspective: The conversation leads the hosts to re-evaluate their beliefs about hauntings, moving away from the idea of "intelligent hauntings" toward the possibility that much of the paranormal activity they encounter is purely residual (31:32-31:49, 32:27).

This "ribbit-ing" episode of Paranormal Lens is not only timely... it's tipsy! Join us as we drink margaritas and talk about the BREAKING cryptozoology news: lawmakers in Ohio of all places are actively pushing to become the first state with an "official" cryptid, the Loveland Frogman. That's how the episode begins, at least. Drinks + Paranormal Lens = tangents! For an episode that starts off discussing the Frogman, and if it should be America's first "Official State Cryptid," we somehow end up talking about how Bigfoot may or may not be the Antichrist. You can't make this up...Link to the Loveland Frogman article:https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/ohio-lawmaker-seeks-to-name-loveland-frogman-as-state-cryptid-amid-growing-fame-jean-schmidt-state-representative-april-22-little-miami-riverLink to the Bigfoot article:https://thedebrief.org/new-legislation-aims-to-make-legendary-humanlike-creature-californias-official-cryptid/

On this electric episode of Paranormal Lens: we capture lightning in a bottle, as we have a candid conversation about thunderstorms and the paranormal. Can storms really increase paranormal activity? Does water retain spiritual energy? And... hold up, did Ben really just say he saw an alien in a mirror?All that and more from your trusted paranormal news source, AccuWeather! Wait, no. I meant to type Paranormal Lens. Definitely Paranormal Lens. Please do not get your paranormal news from AccuWeather…GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores whether thunderstorms and flowing water can trigger an increase in paranormal activity. The hosts critique an AccuWeather article that suggests these weather events are proven catalysts for spiritual manifestations, arguing that such claims lack scientific or factual basis (1:20-3:30). Key takeaways from the discussion: The Impact of Weather on Perception: The hosts emphasize that severe weather can physically and psychologically alter an investigator's environment. Factors like darkness, noise, wind, and the body's natural adrenaline response can make one more susceptible to feeling or seeing things that aren't there (9:42-10:10, 20:10-21:30). Anecdotal Evidence: The hosts share personal experiences, including a terrifying encounter during a tornado warning where one host claims to have seen a blue, big-headed alien in a mirror (10:40-12:00) and an instance at Maple Hill Cemetery where an approaching storm seemed to shift the energy of the area (13:10-14:05). The "Water Energy" Theory: They discuss the common belief in the paranormal community that water acts as a conduit for spiritual energy (16:15-16:50), similar to the "Stone Tape Theory," though they remain skeptical about whether these links can be definitively proven (28:15-29:10). Conclusion: While they agree that storms might provide rare opportunities—such as lightning illuminating a shadow figure (25:25-25:50)—they conclude that there is no solid evidence to establish a direct causal link between weather and hauntings. They advocate for more anecdotal data to better understand these potential correlations (32:50-33:45).

On this exciting new episode of Paranormal Lens: We always talk about how, as a ghost hunting group, our 3 core members don't agree on anything. And how that's actually a GOOD thing. EVERYTHING in the paranormal is nuanced, and there's rarely a simple yes or no answer to many of the common questions we get asked.So in this episode, we're proving it!We’ve gathered a series of deceptively simple “yes or no” questions, covering everything from classic definitions and popular theories to the ultimate question: do we even believe in ghosts? There’s just one rule… the episode doesn’t end until all three of us can agree on something!What starts as a straightforward exercise quickly unravels into debates, contradictions, and some unexpected moments of unified clarity.And we invite YOU to play along with us: How many of these questions can you answer with a simple yes or no? And do you agree with any of our takes? Let us know in the comments!

Part 2 of our discussion asking if there are ANY risks in simply watching paranormal investigations, whether live-streamed or pre-recorded? Can something truly cross the threshold from screen to home, or is that fear rooted in suggestion and atmosphere? In this episode we turn to TikTok specifically, and the hoards of people that impulsively comment "sorry" and/or "I claim no negativity from this post" on anything even vaguely paranormal-related on the platform. Why do they do this? What are all these people on TikTok "sorry" for? And how do we respond?We also react to a very well made and articulately stated TikTok by Paranormal Teej regarding all the "sorry" comments. Go give her a follow at https://www.tiktok.com/@paranormalteej

On this thought-provoking episode of Paranormal Lens: the team dives into a question sparked by their recent experiments with TikTok Lives: is there ANY real risk in simply watching paranormal investigations, whether live-streamed or pre-recorded? Can something truly cross the threshold from screen to home, or is that fear rooted in suggestion and atmosphere? The conversation pushes beyond the viewer experience and turns inward, asking a more uncomfortable question for creators themselves: does producing paranormal content come with a responsibility? From the ethics of broadcasting rituals and incantations to whether content advisories or even censorship should play a role, this episode explores the blurred line between entertainment, belief, and unintended consequences.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the question of whether there are genuine risks to viewers when watching paranormal investigations, particularly those involving live-streaming or the potential for triggering hauntings. The team debates the boundary between entertainment, belief, and the ethics of content creation. Key Discussion Points: The Risk of Viewing (4:00 - 18:06): The team discusses if watching investigations can invite spirits into a viewer's home. They debate whether this is a genuine supernatural risk or if it stems from the viewer's psychological state, heightened awareness, or the power of collective intent during live broadcasts. Live vs. Pre-recorded Content (19:00 - 20:25): There is a debate about whether live-streamed investigations carry more risk than pre-recorded videos, with some suggesting that live intent creates a more active "energetic" environment. The Ethics of Rituals and Incantations (21:30 - 30:00): A significant portion of the episode focuses on whether creators have a responsibility to censor or warn viewers about rituals and incantations shown on screen. The team questions where to draw the line—is simply asking "is anyone there?" the same as performing a ritual? Potential for Content Advisories (26:00 - 27:00): The hosts jokingly (but thoughtfully) propose a rating system for paranormal content, similar to movie ratings, to alert viewers about the presence of specific practices like EVP sessions or rituals. Technology and The Paranormal (34:25 - 38:00): The team reflects on the "static on the TV" trope and the use of spirit boxes (which scan radio frequencies), contemplating if these tools themselves could facilitate unintended connections or simply be sources of coincidence.

This is a rare, completely off-the-cuff and unplanned episode of Paranormal Lens. While prepping for a totally different episode, we got the longest, most specific and frantic Instagram DM ever on our main Crossroads of Curiosities page. It was from a frightened homeowner begging for us to come and rid an alleged "demon" from their home, that was scratching her children and attacking her husband. Unlike most paranormal groups out there though, we don't take on residential cases. And in this raw conversation, we explain why. We discuss all of our concerns regarding residential cases, ranging from the ethical to the psychological.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens features hosts Ben, Angela, and Brienna discussing why their team maintains a strict policy against taking on residential paranormal cases (1:17-1:26). The discussion was sparked by an intense, frantic message from a homeowner requesting help with a situation they believed to be demonic (0:53-1:03). Key reasons for their policy include: Lack of Expertise and Qualifications: The team emphasizes that they are not "paranormal experts." They highlight that there is no such thing as an expert in this field and warn against those who claim otherwise to gain money or attention (0:01-0:13, 20:14-20:51). Ethical and Safety Concerns: The hosts discuss the risks of entering a stranger's home, citing safety concerns for themselves—especially as young adults—and the potential for encountering volatile situations that require professional mental health or environmental help rather than paranormal investigation (18:14-19:42). The "Quick Fix" Fallacy: They argue that it is misleading and unethical to promise families a resolution, such as "cleansing" a home or "sending a spirit to the light," after only a single night of investigation. They believe such claims are often deceptive or based on misinterpretations of data (12:14-13:11, 16:14-17:14). Nuanced Perspectives: The hosts reject the idea that all haunting activity is inherently "demonic" or "evil," suggesting that much of it may be misunderstood, psychological, or simply environmental in nature (3:06-3:40, 11:36-11:53). Ultimately, the team explains that when they do receive these requests, they politely decline and suggest that individuals seek help from local resources that align with their personal beliefs or professional psychological support (7:29-8:02, 25:52-26:42).

This episode of Paranormal Lens dives into the eerie world of ritual “games,” including the infamous Hooded Man Ritual and the unsettling legend of Baby Blue, Blue Baby (which co-hosts Ben and Angela actually attempted on their 2nd date). Are these games merely modern folklore, or do intention, belief, and repetition open the door to something genuinely unexplained? This episode explores where imagination ends and where something else might begin...GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the eerie world of ritual "games," modern folklore dares or challenges that require specific steps to contact the supernatural. The co-hosts discuss these rituals, including a terrifying attempt Angela and Ben made together on their 2nd date. Key Highlights: The Hooded Man Ritual (2:12): Ben describes this ritual, which involves summoning an entity to drive you to the "other world" in a black cab. Despite a danger level of two (according to the Paranormal Rituals Wiki), Ben notes the steps are highly specific and seemingly impossible to fulfill in the modern world (15:33). Baby Blue, Blue Baby (19:53): Angela and Ben recount attempting this ritual, which involves summoning an angry ghost baby in a dark bathroom. The ritual requires balancing the weight of a ghost baby and involves specific rules to avoid being scratched or killed by the baby's mother (25:53). Egregore & Belief (7:10): The hosts discuss the concept of an egregore, a thoughtform created by collective belief, suggesting that rituals can become genuinely dangerous if enough people believe in them and put intent into the actions (33:53).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: we give a free-wheeling recap of the incredible 10th annual MidWest WeirdFest we attended in Eau Claire, Wisconsin.A slew of behind-the-scenes stories that honestly sound too weird to be true take center stage in this episode, as our trip to the MidWest WeirdFest turns into a whirlwind of uncanny encounters and bizarre coincidences. From strange interactions with people who seemed to know a little too much, to mind-blowing synchronicities that lead to even more mysteries of Jacques being revealed... we unpack the eerie energy surrounding the festival itself while also highlighting some of its standout films:The Philip Experiment - https://thephilipexperiment.comThe Hole Story - https://www.facebook.com/TheHoleStoryMovie/The Mid-Night Driver - https://www.instagram.com/alex_cherney/Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques - https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/seven-the-mystery-of-jacquesGEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens provides a recap of the 10th annual MidWest WeirdFest in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, highlighting the eerie energy of the city and various uncanny encounters (4:54). The hosts discuss their experiences at a haunted motel (5:17) and an antique store (Mabel's) where they encountered a strange mannequin (11:55). The conversation covers several standout films from the festival: The Philip Experiment (32:21): A film exploring the concept of creating a ghost through collective belief, known as an egregor. The Hole Story (22:15): A documentary paired with the hosts' own film, Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques. The Mid-Night Driver (38:53): A horror film loosely based on the Hooded Man ritual. Finally, they discuss future plans to turn their short film, Seven: The Mystery Of Jacques, into a feature film (47:35), fueled by real-life synchronicities and local legends. After the film screening, a stranger looked into Ben's eyes in the light and claimed that "there were 27 in Jacques" but "there's still five inside of you" (50:08 - 50:27)...

On this long-awaited episode of Paranormal Lens: we dive deep into music and the paranormal. We discuss the popular Singapore Theory, which proposes that playing familiar music could trigger paranormal activity. We also discuss music as a ritual; how it might heal or help the potential entities present; and why old theaters and opera houses are so haunted.This episode is dedicated to all the Swifties out there.GEMINI Summary: This episode of Paranormal Lens explores the intersection of music and the paranormal, specifically diving into the Singapore Theory, which suggests that playing familiar music can trigger paranormal activity (0:14). The hosts discuss music as a universal language that can transcend the mortal realm and act as a connector to spirits (1:36). Key Themes Discussed: Music as a Trigger (Singapore Theory): (23:18) The hosts discuss how playing familiar music or audio clips relevant to a location's history can evoke responses from entities, referencing an investigation at the Howell Opera House (9:31) and a cemetery investigation involving Beethoven (10:02). Emotional Energy in Theaters: (3:33) The intense emotional energy generated by concerts and plays in old theaters and opera houses is proposed as a reason for their high rates of haunting. Spirits and Emotions: (3:07) Spirits might be attracted to or communicate through the emotions and frequencies invoked by music. Music Therapy and Healing: (5:49) The conversation explores whether music can heal spirits, similar to how it works for the living, highlighting the Eloise Asylum (6:20) and suggesting unorthodox tests like playing musical chairs with spirits (7:19). Future Paranormal Research: (27:46) The hosts plan to use immersive technologies, like 360-degree cameras and surround sound, to project historical audio and visuals onto modern spaces to test these theories.

On this BIG episode of Paranormal Lens, we finally tackle America's favorite cryptid in-depth. Is Bigfoot really an elusive unknown creature? Or could it just be a bear? Or a hairy man? Or maybe Bigfoot is really an inter-dimensional being! And why is there a correlation between areas with a high Furry population and frequent Bigfoot sightings???This episode is a doozy, and might just serve as the inspiration for the next blockbuster smash-hit "Jacques vs. Bigfoot."Hollywood producers, you know where to find us: [email protected] Summary: This episode of the Paranormal Lens podcast features a lighthearted, non-serious discussion about Bigfoot, exploring whether the famous cryptid is a physical creature, a spiritual entity, or something else entirely (0:00-0:25). The hosts debate the lack of hard evidence despite numerous sightings, joking that Bigfoot might actually be a very hairy lost man or even a furry in a costume (1:52-4:43, 11:54-13:25). Highlights of the discussion include: Michigan Bigfoot: The hosts discuss Bigfoot's role as a mascot for Michigan's wilderness and share a humorous story about a local man in Midland, Michigan, who leaves pizza boxes as offerings for Bigfoot, leading to national news coverage and DNA testing on pizza box hair (3:01-3:37, 24:43-25:45). Interdimensional Theories: The conversation shifts to more esoteric theories, suggesting Bigfoot could be an interdimensional being or a spirit (10:02-10:41). The "Summoning" Debate: Host Angela proposes summoning Bigfoot like a spirit, leading to a humorous role-playing scenario about calling the police to report a Bigfoot inside an apartment (34:36-39:53).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: we discuss a recent Estes Method session that caught us all off guard, because it was conducted... telepathically. What are the implications of this session? Is telepathy real? And if so, what does it mean about psychic phenomena and the paranormal at large?

"Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" is now streaming on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/pere-cheney-plague-in-the-pines-paraflixx-paranormal-plusOn this episode of Paranormal Lens: we discuss the superstition, lore, and perceived risks surrounding whistling in the woods at night. Could merely whistling alert something supernatural to your presence? The conversation also veers (or as Brie calls it, "devolves") to discuss Bigfoot calls and their effectiveness. This episode has a little bit of everything, including references to our recent projects "Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" and "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques"!GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the superstition and perceived risks of whistling in the woods at night (0:00). The hosts share their varying opinions on whether whistling can attract supernatural entities (1:33), referencing folklore from different cultures (1:57) and the idea of whistling as a universal invitation (4:40).Key points from the discussion include:Personal Experiences with Whistling (1:41): One host accidentally whistles frequently, while another avoids it in the woods.The "Invitation" Theory (4:25): The idea that whistling acts as a call or invitation to unknown entities, akin to a universal language (4:55).The Pere Cheney Cemetery Incident (9:06): A detailed account of an experience during filming where both groups spontaneously started whistling at the same time in a haunted location, followed by coyotes howling (11:30).Bigfoot and Dogman Whistling (14:12): The conversation "devolves" into a discussion about Bigfoot and Dogman calls that incorporate whistling, raising questions about the existence and nature of these cryptids (14:26).Fear and Activity (29:45): The theory that being scared while whistling can influence paranormal activity due to the energy generated by fear.Individual Discretion (30:31): The hosts conclude that ultimately, the decision to whistle in the woods at night is up to the individual and their comfort level with potential risks.

"Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines" is NOW STREAMING on Paraflixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/pere-cheney-plague-in-the-pines-paraflixx-paranormal-plusThe legend of Pere Cheney has long been one of Michigan’s most talked-about ghost stories. With the help of the local historical society, this documentary offers a fresh and entirely new perspective on Pere Cheney’s haunted history.By separating fact from folklore, putting real names to long-muddied legends, and uncovering a historical discovery that changes everything, the film reexamines what we truly know about this infamous piece of Michigan folklore.GEMINI SUMMARY: This special episode discusses our latest documentary "Pere Cheney: Plague In The Pines," (0:43) which explores the history and paranormal phenomena of Pere Cheney, a well-known Michigan ghost town. (1:28) The discussion covers: Pere Cheney's History: The town was once a bustling village (2:30) with 1,500 residents that served as a county seat. (2:34) It declined after two diphtheria outbreaks (2:49) and was eventually burned down by people who believed it was cursed, leaving only 18 residents. (3:51) The Cemetery: All that remains of the town is its cemetery (4:36) and some building foundations. (4:45) The cemetery's headstones were heavily vandalized, (5:26) leaving only five or six readable names. (5:32) The historical society revealed that the cemetery was originally four times larger than what is visible today, with many graves extending into the woods, including a lost mass grave. (28:56) Paranormal Experiences & Technical Issues: The hosts share numerous paranormal encounters that did not make it into the film, such as a child apparition (7:34) and a "monster" sighting on the railroad tracks. (29:25) They also experienced recurring technical difficulties (8:50) while filming and editing, including corrupted footage (9:31) and internet outages (11:42) that they attribute to the location's haunted nature. The "Witch" Folklore: The documentary aims to separate fact from folklore, specifically addressing the legend of a witch who allegedly cursed the town. (3:25) The film intentionally minimizes the "witch" narrative (23:08) because it is not historically verifiable. (23:26) The hosts mention a "witch's tree" (23:47) or stump where the witch was supposedly hanged, but historical accounts vary, and they encountered odd weather phenomena when investigating it. (25:55) Filming Challenges and Goals: The film is feature-length (0:53) and was made in collaboration with A Non Sasquatch Production, What Goes Bump In The Night, and the Crawford County Historical Society. (1:22) Many paranormal occurrences and pieces of evidence were excluded from the final cut (14:38) to prioritize the historical narrative and create a cohesive story. (18:29) The documentary aims to shed light on Pere Cheney's overlooked history (20:25) and a significant historical discovery, which is revealed in the film. (38:32)

In this free-wheeling "old-school" episode of Paranormal Lens: We bring the FUN back to ghost hunting! What are the benefits of bringing joy, laughter, comradely, and fantasy to the haunted spaces we investigate? Brienna also educates us on the nuances and misunderstood history of Dungeons & Dragons; and we come up with a pretty interesting Stranger Things theory that surprisingly explains the lackluster ending (and excuses the Duffer Brothers in the process).GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens highlights the benefits of bringing fun and games to ghost hunting (0:00). The hosts discuss how playing games like Dungeons & Dragons (6:07) or "haunted" Jenga (25:38) can positively impact paranormal investigations. Key discussion points include: The "Man Eyes" ordeal (0:00-1:52): The hosts open with a humorous anecdote about Ben's inability to find a specific comment, leading to a playful discussion about "man eyes" and stereotypes (2:00-3:04). Stranger Things and Dungeons & Dragons (4:49-6:51): The conversation shifts to the show Stranger Things and its connection to Dungeons & Dragons, including a theory about the show's ending (19:12). D&D and the Satanic Panic (7:57-14:20): The hosts delve into the historical misunderstanding of Dungeons & Dragons, particularly how it was linked to the "satanic panic" of the 1980s. Bringing fun to ghost hunting (22:53-26:30): Inspired by a comment, the hosts explore the idea that joy and fantasy might help spirits wandering haunted spaces. They share their experience with "haunted" Jenga (25:38) and how excitement during the game seemed to feed paranormal activity. The importance of fun (27:47-28:26): The episode concludes with a call to bring more fun and games into paranormal investigations and everyday life, emphasizing that not everything needs to be serious.

In honor of Groundhog Day, we discuss strange "glitches" in the memory matrix: the Mandela Effect, deja vu, and the Backrooms. Come break your brains with us, as we analyze some of our favorite memory mind-f*cks!GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens discusses strange "glitches" in the memory matrix, such as the Mandela Effect and deja vu, relating them to the movie Groundhog Day (0:00-1:30). Key discussion points include: Deja Vu Experiences (1:55): The hosts share their experiences with deja vu. Brie and Angela both mention feeling like they've been in certain places before, even if they haven't (2:35-3:33). The Backrooms Phenomenon (5:21): They discuss the concept of the "Backrooms" and if they've experienced similar disorienting feelings of being lost in a mundane, never-ending space. Brie shares a childhood experience in her church that felt like a "backroom" moment (5:50-6:30). Mandela Effect Examples (9:42): The hosts delve into various examples of the Mandela Effect: South America's Map Location (10:52): Angela recalls South America being directly south of North America, differing from its current southeast position on maps (12:21). The discussion highlights how map projections can cause such distortions (12:30-13:20). Monopoly Man's Monocle (19:30): Ben and Brie recall the Monopoly Man having a monocle, but he does not in reality (19:34). "Possession Tape" vs. "Possession Tapes" (20:51): Ben points out that their own film title, "Possession Tape," is often misremembered with an "S" at the end (21:07). Fruit of the Loom Logo (23:41): They discuss the popular belief that the Fruit of the Loom logo used to feature a cornucopia, which the company denies (24:45). Berenstain/Stein Bears and Looney Tunes (26:46): The common confusion over the spelling of "Berenstain Bears" (E vs. A) and "Looney Tunes" (U vs. OO) are brought up (27:10). Theories on Mandela Effect (30:04): They offer theories for the Mandela Effect, ranging from changes in marketing and improved imaging technology to childhood memories being inaccurate, or even the idea of shifting universes/timelines (30:09-33:05). The Nelson Mandela example, where many recall him dying in prison before he actually did, is presented as the most puzzling (31:10-32:00).

On this episode of Paranormal Lens: You’re probably using your phone to listen to this podcast... but could that same device be used to hunt ghosts? We break down the most popular “ghost hunting” apps and tools, examine which (if any) have legitimate investigative value, and debate our differing perspectives on whether smartphone tech belongs in a credible paranormal investigation at all.GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the use of smartphone applications for ghost hunting (0:22). The hosts share their experiences and opinions on popular "ghost hunting" apps like Ghost Tube, Ghost Hunting Tools, and Ghost Radar. They explore whether these apps have legitimate investigative value (1:08) and if they should be relied upon by credible paranormal investigators (1:12). Here are the key takeaways from the discussion: App Functionality and Disclaimers (0:51-6:31): Many ghost hunting apps are word generators that use a database of words to seemingly communicate with spirits (0:51). The hosts highlight the humorous and sometimes serious disclaimers provided by apps like Ghost Tube, which advises users not to make important life decisions based on the app's output (5:30-5:48). Ghost Tube's Transparency (6:42-10:20): The hosts express surprising respect for Ghost Tube due to its transparency (6:52) regarding how it operates. The app's website explains that its tools are influenced by environmental sensors (8:32-8:40) (like the magnetometer, accelerometer, and gyroscope) and can be triggered by nearby magnetic fields, metals, electronics, and sudden movements (9:22-9:30). Tips for Investigators (9:34-10:14): Ghost Tube encourages skepticism and offers tips for serious investigators, including pairing evidence with multiple tools and techniques (9:45-9:50) and understanding how the tools work. Critique of Other Apps (11:54-12:12): The hosts criticize apps like Ghost Hunting Tools and Ghost Radar for making exaggerated claims about finding ghosts without explaining how they detect activity (11:54-12:12). The Problem with "Too Many Things" (17:35-18:09): A main criticism of apps like Ghost Tube is that they use too many factors to detect responses (17:44), making it difficult to discern if a response is genuinely paranormal or simply triggered by environmental factors like quick movements or nearby appliances. Reliability of Phone Apps (19:13-22:40): Angela generally believes that most phone-based ghost hunting tools are "total BS" (19:18) and that any matches are likely coincidental. However, Ben argues that Ghost Tube's transparency makes it more credible than some expensive tools like the Ovulus (22:21-22:39). Recommendations for Use (30:40-32:00): The hosts agree that while ghost hunting apps can be fun for entertainment purposes (31:02), they are not ideal for beginner ghost hunters (31:07-31:20) who are serious about finding evidence, as they may misinterpret every response as genuine paranormal activity. Best Use of a Phone in Ghost Hunting (36:14-36:28): The hosts conclude that the most effective way to use a phone for ghost hunting is to simply use the voice memo feature for EVPs (36:26-36:28), as it's not an app specifically designed for ghost detection and can potentially catch genuine voices.

On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we touch base on rituals: when, if ever, should they be utilized on our ghost hunts? The conversation uses our recent film "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" as well as last year's film "Dweller" (winner of Best TV/New Media Feature at the MidWest WeirdFest) to help articulate our points. We discuss what makes "Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" different than some of the past rituals we've been a part of, as well as reveal what "Dweller" got wrong."Seven: The Mystery of Jacques" is now streaming on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/seven-the-mystery-of-jacquesGEMINI SUMMARY: This episode of Paranormal Lens dives into the nuanced topic of rituals in paranormal investigations (0:00). The hosts, Ben, Angela, and Brienna, explore when and if rituals should be used during ghost hunts, differentiating their approach from others in the field. Key discussion points include: The Rarity of Rituals (3:01): The team generally agrees that rituals are rarely needed in typical investigations, estimating that 99.9% of interactions are with human hauntings. Defining "Ritual" (8:45): The hosts discuss the broad definition of a ritual as a ceremony with specific actions and prescribed meanings, noting that even ghost hunting tools like a spirit box could be considered a form of ritual. Human vs. Inhuman Entities (3:37): They debate whether most hauntings are human or if a significant portion could be non-human entities like demons. While Angela suggests a 50/50 split, Ben and Brie lean towards a heavy proportion being human. The Dweller Film and Summoning (10:31): Ben shares insights from their film Dweller, explaining how the ritual depicted became problematic when it shifted from a metaphorical understanding of an entity to an actual summoning. He emphasizes that he does not condone summoning or conjuring entities. The Seven: The Mystery of Jacques Ritual (24:51): The team discusses their new film, Seven: The Mystery of Jacques, and the ritual performed. They clarify that this ritual was for "elevated communication" with an entity already present within a haunted object (Jacques), rather than summoning something new. This distinction is crucial for Ben. Preparation and Intention (32:09): All hosts stress the importance of thorough planning, clear intention, and understanding every aspect of a ritual, rather than performing spontaneous ones. Brie's Perspective and Limits (42:10): Brie, having a religious background, shares her stricter limits, including not using Ouija boards and being wary of actions that "open doors to something we don't fully understand." The episode concludes with the consensus that not every investigation requires a ritual, and such situations are rare, often presenting themselves when appropriate rather than being sought out.

Do paranormal re-enactments cross an ethical line, or are they a necessary storytelling tool? On this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore how ghost hunting TV shows and documentaries recreate eyewitness encounters, and whether staging these b-roll shots could risk misleading audience. We also analyze these re-enactments from the spirits' perspective: could dramatizing their death trigger more activity to occur?This episode also contains a shocking revelation: not only is Brienna a blonde, but SHE'S ALSO AN OPERA SINGER. How did we not know this???GEMINI SUMMARY: This episode discusses the ethics of using reenactments in paranormal TV shows and documentaries (0:00-1:02). The hosts explore whether staged re-creations of eyewitness encounters mislead audiences or are a necessary storytelling tool (0:59). Here's a breakdown of the key points: Authenticity Concerns (2:19-5:15): A core issue is the concern among "purists" that reenactments diminish the authenticity of paranormal investigations. If viewers see staged scenes, they might question the legitimacy of genuine paranormal captures later in the show. Storytelling vs. Evidence (5:51-12:09): The hosts argue that reenactments are a creative choice to make content more entertaining and visually engaging for storytelling purposes, rather than proving the existence of ghosts. They emphasize that their goal is to tell a story, not to collect verifiable evidence, especially since visual evidence of paranormal activity is rare. Documentary Definition (13:14-15:25): The discussion touches on the true definition of a documentary as an "artistic representation of reality." The hosts suggest that since the presence of cameras already alters reality, reenactments are an acceptable part of this artistic representation, as long as they speak to the truth of the situation. Impact on Spirits (15:32-22:51): A unique ethical consideration is raised: how might intelligent spirits react to reenactments of traumatic events, such as their death, being staged in their presence? The hosts ponder whether such reenactments could stir up activity or be disrespectful, or if spirits, having transcended their earthly bodies, might not care. Future Experiment Ideas (22:55-25:38): The conversation veers into brainstorming ideas for future paranormal investigations, including using historical ambiance and sensory data from specific locations and dates to try and "tap back" into past conversations or energies.

In this episode of Paranormal Lens: hosts Ben, Brienna, and Angela discuss the infamous 18.9 Hz “ghost frequency,” a form of infrasound believed to trigger feelings of unease and dread. Is the fear we feel in haunted locations truly paranormal, or could our bodies be reacting to sound we can’t consciously hear?Ben also reveals the one time he intentionally used the ghost frequency in a film, sparking a discussion about the ethics of inducing fear through sound design. The conversation also dives into rumors that some well-known haunted sites may intentionally pump infrasound to enhance activity and mislead ghost hunters. Also: what is the connection between Bigfoot and infrasound?GEMINI Summary: This episode of "Paranormal Lens" discusses the "ghost frequency," also known as infrasound, specifically the 18.9 Hz frequency (2:00). What is Infrasound? Infrasound is a low-frequency sound that humans cannot consciously hear, but our bodies can react to it (3:16). Researchers have suggested that this frequency, when present, can cause feelings of unease, paranoia, and jitteriness, which people might attribute to paranormal activity (3:52). Infrasound and Paranormal Activity: The hosts reference a 2003 NBC News article titled "Infrasound linked to spooky events," which discusses a study by UK researchers on the connection between infrasound and odd sensations experienced at allegedly haunted sites (3:05). Infrasound in Media: The hosts discuss how horror movies often use infrasound in scary scenes to induce a feeling of fear in the audience before visual or auditory cues (4:32). Ben, one of the hosts, reveals he intentionally used the ghost frequency in their short film, "The Possession Tape," to enhance the unsettling atmosphere (11:41). Ethical Concerns of Using Infrasound: The hosts debate the ethics of using infrasound to induce fear. They conclude that it is not unethical in entertainment, such as films, where the audience expects to be spooked (14:42). Infrasound in Nature and Other Connections: Bigfoot: Infrasound is believed to be one of Bigfoot's vocalizations, similar to how lions use infrasound in their roars (7:55). Some Bigfoot hunting techniques involve using amplifiers to detect infrasound (8:41). Natural Events: Infrasound can be produced by natural events like volcanoes, earthquakes, and storms, as well as by animals and industrial machinery (19:49). Bad Driving: The hosts humorously note a random quote in the 2003 article that links infrasound to bad driving, suggesting it might be caused by sounds from cars or radios (5:43). Future Applications: The hosts discuss the potential for using infrasound in future paranormal investigations, particularly if they go Bigfoot hunting again (24:03). They also mention an upcoming project that might incorporate it (22:55).

In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the chilling lore and theories surrounding the Hat Man, one of the most commonly reported shadow figures in modern paranormal accounts. Often described as a tall, dark silhouette wearing a wide-brimmed hat or top hat, the Hat Man frequently appears during episodes of sleep paralysis, in haunted locations, and in altered states of consciousness. Is he a single entity, a type of shadow person, or a shared hallucination shaped by fear, culture, and expectation? The discussion also dives into connections between the Hat Man and older occult concepts like the Dweller on the Threshold, the shadow self, egregores, and doppelgängers, questioning whether witnesses are seeing an actual entity... or merely its shadow.GEMINI Summary: This episode discusses the Hat Man, a commonly reported shadow figure often seen during sleep paralysis or in haunted locations (2:18-2:22, 8:46-9:01). Key theories and points explored include: Nature of the Hat Man - The hosts debate if the Hat Man is a single entity, a type of shadow person, or a collective hallucination (8:09-8:16, 16:34-16:40). Sleep Paralysis and Hallucinations - The Hat Man is frequently associated with sleep paralysis and is sometimes considered a Benadryl-induced hallucination (2:18-2:22, 3:07-3:10, 8:46-8:51). Connection to "Dweller on the Threshold" - The discussion draws parallels between the Hat Man and the "Dweller on the Threshold," an occult concept described as a shadowy, demonic being that appears during a sleep paralysis-like state (10:00-11:07, 12:47-13:02). Shadow of an Entity - A theory is proposed that the Hat Man might not be the entity itself, but rather the shadow of an entity, connecting to the idea of the "shadow self" or doppelgängers (12:36-12:55, 13:11-13:18). Egregore Theory - The hosts consider if the Hat Man could be an egregore—a collective thoughtform that gains a form of reality through shared belief and repeated experiences (13:51-14:00, 14:09-15:15). The Pocket Watch Lore - A lesser-known piece of lore is introduced: some sightings describe the Hat Man checking a gold pocket watch, leading to speculation about his purpose or connection to time (17:29-18:01, 26:40-26:51). Appearance and Archetypes - The video touches on why ghosts, including the Hat Man, often appear in Victorian-era attire. It's suggested that intelligent entities might adopt these classic archetypes to fit in with perceived notions of ghosts (27:00-28:55).

First it was cheese. Then it was owls. Now, we're looking at Santa Claus through a paranormal lens. Who (or what) is Santa really? What if he's just a Coke-fueled capitalistic creation? Or worse: the devil in disguise? We sincerely hope this episode enhances your Christmas instead of ruining it...GEMINI Summary: This episode explores the origins and nature of Santa Claus through a paranormal lens, moving beyond the traditional figure to discuss his potential as a spiritual entity. The hosts discuss how the idea of Santa may have originated from various pagan gods, spirits, and saints, with popular belief potentially creating an "egregor" (2:53-3:08). Key points discussed include: Santa's diverse origins (3:51-5:24): Santa Claus is presented as a "hodgepodge" of different cultures, spirits, and gods, with Christmas itself being a holiday that combined various traditions, including the Yule log, Christmas tree, and St. Nicholas, when Christianity spread and absorbed local practices. Pagan influences: Odin: The Norse god Odin, known for riding an eight-legged horse (7:26-8:18), influenced the concept of Santa's sleigh and reindeer. Children would leave treats for Odin for blessings, similar to leaving cookies and milk for Santa (10:01-10:13). Odin's "all-seeing" nature also mirrors Santa's knowledge of who's "naughty or nice" (10:29-10:49). Hera: The goddess Hera, who appeared in fireplaces to bring good luck, contributed to the legend of Santa coming down the chimney (12:05-12:37). Santa as Satan? (12:47-16:50): The hosts explore the theory that "Santa" is an anagram for "Satan" and the use of "Old Nick" as a name for the devil. They discuss how Santa could be seen as a representation of greed and temptation, contrasting with the true meaning of Christmas. St. Nicholas (13:54-15:20): The historical figure of St. Nicholas, an actual priest who left coins on windowsills and front doors, is acknowledged as a component of the Santa Claus legend. Coca-Cola's influence (21:00-22:46): The discussion highlights how Coca-Cola significantly shaped Santa's modern image in the 1930s by using him in winter advertisements to boost sales, solidifying his red and white attire. Personal beliefs and the metaphysical Santa (31:00-33:29): The hosts share their childhood experiences of realizing Santa wasn't real and ponder whether they would believe in Santa as a metaphysical "spirit of Christmas" rather than a physical being. They also humorously caution against attempting to summon Santa due to the potential of accidentally summoning Satan (33:50-34:19).

This "Remote Contact" outtake/deleted scene broke my mind, and I knew we needed to discuss on the podcast. Can we trust our own memories, and recounts of paranormal experiences? We watch this interview outtake clip with Lauren Haunts together, and react in real time. What are the implications this has on one of our most impactful paranormal experiences EVER, at Madison Seminary this past May? This is a MUST-listen episode of PARANORMAL LENS.Lauren Haunts: https://www.laurenhaunts.comGEMINI Summary: This episode features an outtake from our "Remote Contact" film, delving into the reliability of human memory, especially concerning paranormal experiences (0:04). The hosts react to an outtake interview clip with Lauren Haunts, who discusses how our brains can create or alter memories based on beliefs, trauma, or preferences (3:40). This neuroplasticity suggests that even visceral paranormal experiences might not have happened exactly as remembered (4:10). The discussion then shifts to a specific, impactful paranormal experience at Madison Seminary (7:47). The hosts recount hearing a loud, disembodied voice that sounded amplified but not electronic, saying "I'm here" and something else they couldn't clearly make out (8:30). Immediately after, cat balls on the table turned on, and an EMF meter went berserk (10:33). What makes this particularly relevant to the memory discussion is that despite all being present, their recollections of the exact words and clarity differed (12:38). This leads them to propose a new method for future investigations: documenting experiences immediately by writing them down (6:18). They suggest comparing these written accounts with later recollections to see how memories might change over time, drawing parallels to a past investigation at Rosevear Park where four people experienced three things simultaneously, but none recalled the same combination of events (16:44). The episode concludes by emphasizing the importance of diligent documentation to ensure accurate recollection of paranormal events (22:56).

Watch "Remote Contact" - NOW STREAMING on PARAFlixx: https://paraflixx.vhx.tv/remote-contactParticipate to our ongoing Remote Contact experiments: https://www.crossroadsofcuriosities.com/remote-contactWhat happens when you swap a blindfold for VR Headset while doing the Estes Method? "Remote Contact" details preliminary experiments using immersive, 360 degree renders of haunted locations in these investigations.What started as a fun twist on the traditional Estes Method quickly evolves into something more— Contemplating how these immersive spaces can open a person up to have a more impactful, meditative, and potentially "psychic" paranormal experience."Remote Contact" invites viewers to follow these preliminary trials, witness the strange data being collected, and discover how you can take part in this ongoing experiment.GEMINI Summary: The episode discusses "Remote Contact," a new film and ongoing experiment by Crossroads of Curiosities, LLC, now streaming on PARAFlixx Paranormal+ (0:58). The project explores a new take on the Estes Method by replacing the traditional blindfold with a VR headset displaying immersive 360-degree footage of haunted locations (0:00-0:13, 9:40-10:00). Key aspects of the "Remote Contact" project: Genesis of the Idea Ben, a film enthusiast, acquired a 360 camera and began using it to capture immersive renders of haunted locations, initially to preserve historical sites (2:10-3:29). This evolved into the idea of using these immersive videos with VR headsets for paranormal investigations (3:33-4:24). Modification of the Estes Method The core experiment involves participants wearing VR headsets with noise-reducing headphones, viewing 360-degree footage of known haunted locations, while an operator asks questions (9:40-10:00, 7:43-8:14). The goal is to see if responses from a spirit box (audio heard through the headphones) correlate with the virtual location (10:09-10:30). Controls and Validation The team intentionally uses locations they are intimately familiar with to validate responses (10:30-11:18). They also bring in individuals unfamiliar with the locations to minimize bias and enhance credibility (11:37-13:13). Meditative and Channeling Aspects The participants discuss how the Estes Method, especially with the immersive experience, can induce a meditative state and potentially lead to channeling or remote viewing experiences (14:40-15:07, 21:07-21:16). A pivotal part of the film involves experimenting with Madison Seminary's Resonance Chamber and guided meditation instead of the spirit box to further explore these meditative states (21:18-23:01). Call for Participation The project is designed as an ongoing experiment, and the creators encourage viewers to participate by downloading the 360-degree video footage from their website and conducting their own experiments (1:46-1:53, 28:50-29:01, 30:26-30:58). A questionnaire is available on their website for participants to share their experiences (30:31-30:58). Future Experiments The team also briefly touches on potential future experiments, such as attempting to catch EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomena) within the 360-degree audio from the locations (27:12-28:20). The film "Remote Contact" is 40 minutes long and is presented in a documentary style (25:58-26:10).

According to the Catholic Church, the amount of exorcisms are rising at a surprising rate. But what’s really behind the increase? In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we examine the official signs of “demonic possession” recognized by the Catholic Church, what actually qualifies someone for an alleged exorcism, and how these cases are evaluated alongside psychological and other explanations.Along the way, we share our candid, grounded thoughts on possession, spirit attachment, and channeling, exploring where belief, mental health, and the paranormal intersect, and why these conversations matter now more than ever."The Possession Tape" is available to stream for free on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZnKoemd7qwCatholic Exorcists Say They Are Overloaded With ‘Possessed’ People: Studyhttps://www.newsweek.com/catholica-exorcists-say-they-are-overloaded-possessed-people-1712382

In this chilling episode of Paranormal Lens, we recount the most intense paranormal investigations we’ve conducted in haunted basements and cursed attics. Why are these spaces so often the epicenter of ghostly activity?If you’re fascinated by true paranormal stories, haunted locations, ghost investigations, urban legends, and real-life horror, this episode will make you think twice before going into the attic, or down into the basement.Perfect for fans of ghost hunting, supernatural documentaries, haunted house lore, and true ghost encounters.

Welcome to the most "Michigan" episode of Paranormal Lens to date, as we discuss our personal run-ins with the elusive cryptid known as the Not-Deer. Join co-hosts Ben, Angela, Brienna, and Douglas the Kangaroo as they analyze these strange Not-Deer sightings and why they may or may not be as scary as you think. Whether you’re a cryptid enthusiast, a Michigan paranormal fan, or simply curious about the strange creatures said to roam our woods, this episode offers all of that and more. Ditto.

On this Monday Bonus episode of Paranormal Lens: we dive head-first into the frustrating phenomenon of "equipment malfunctions" during (and even after) investigations. We analyze our most recent, mind-boggling tech issue that prevented us from publishing last week's episode (apologies again about that). And we end on a plea to all paranormal filmmakers: back up your footage. Weird sh*t will happen... and you need to be prepared for anything!

In this thought-provoking episode of Paranormal Lens, we dive deep into the truth behind intelligent hauntings: those rare encounters where unseen forces are said to think, respond, and interact with the living. Are these spirits truly conscious entities... or something far stranger? Join us as we unravel one of our most existential and controversial discussions yet, questioning the very nature of what it means for a haunting to be “intelligent.”Whether you’re a ghost hunter, a skeptic, or someone fascinated by paranormal research and spirit communication, this episode challenges you to question what’s really communicating back during your investigations.Plus: get an exclusive behind-the-scenes sneak peek at a profound paranormal experience we had while filming the upcoming documentary, Pere Cheney: Plague in the Pines. Be sure to follow the project on Facebook and Instagram for real-time project updates!

In this thought-provoking episode, we explore the ethics, boundaries, and responsibility that come with creating paranormal content. Specifically, we're pulling back the curtain on one of the most uncomfortable trends in today’s digital paranormal space: TikTok “mediums” and YouTube spirit box sessions claiming to contact freshly deceased celebrities.Our conversation also naturally veers into how true crime culture is seeping into the paranormal world, blurring the line between curiosity and exploitation. Why are audiences drawn to “live spirit box sessions” minutes after a public figure passes away? How has the commodification of grief turned the paranormal and true crime genres into viral industries? All that and more on this episode of Paranormal Lens.

👻 In our Paranormal Lens Halloween special, Ben, Angela, and Brienna look back on eight years of ghost hunting, and their most chilling, poignant, and life-changing encounters that forever altered the way they investigate the supernatural.🕯️ The conversation naturally veers into recapping unforgettable moments from this year's Blood Moon Parafest at Stimson Hospital and MADCON 8 at Madison Seminary, sharing behind-the-scenes stories, eerie synchronicities, and a downright woo-woo experience that was too difficult to sum up in a mere Instagram post. 💀 Whether you’re a seasoned investigator or simply fascinated by real paranormal encounters, this episode is a must-listen. Tune in for spine-tingling stories, personal reflection, and a rare glimpse into the evolution of three investigators who have dedicated nearly a decade to exploring haunted locations across the Midwest and beyond.

In this chilling new episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the mysterious connection between owls, UFO sightings, and the paranormal. Are these nocturnal creatures mere birds of prey… or messengers from another realm?Plus, Angela dives deep into her strange fascination with these creatures, leading to some unexpected revelations.Stay tuned until the end… because this episode takes a terrifying turn you won’t see coming. Whoooooo knew an episode about owls could be this creepy?

In this chilling new episode of Paranormal Lens, hosts Ben Goldman, Brienna Shear, and Angela Wingard dive deep into the mysterious world of dreams and the paranormal. Can ghosts or entities visit you in your dreams? Can dreams predict the future, or even warn you about things yet to come?Ben recounts a haunting encounter in his sleep with the Dweller on the Threshold; and Brienna reveals one of her most terrifying nightmares, a dream that might be a premonition tied to their most feared paranormal investigation. And Angela brings some much-needed levity with a funny dream story that strangely may have predicted the future. Allegedly.Join the team as they explore how dreams blur the line between the subconscious and the supernatural, mixing science, folklore, and personal experiences. Whether you’re fascinated by lucid dreams, prophetic visions, or nightmares that feel too real, this episode is a must-listen for believers and skeptics alike.

In this week’s episode of Paranormal Lens, we tackle one of the most controversial topics in the world of paranormal investigating: the complicated legacy of Ed and Lorraine Warren. With the final Conjuring movie now haunting theaters, we decided it’s now or never to confront the inevitable: our mixed feelings about the Warrens, their impact on the field, and the line between faith, fear, and fabrication.Join us as we dive deep into our true, mixed opinions about the Warrens. We’ll discuss what the Warrens got right, where our skepticism might be justified, and why their work still divides believers and critics alike.Whether you’re a fan of ghost hunting, skeptical inquiry, or the history behind The Conjuring films, this episode offers an honest, unfiltered discussion on America’s most famous demonologists and the murky space between legend and legacy.

In this fun and free-flowing episode of Paranormal Lens, we take a lighthearted look at residual hauntings... but with a twist. What if the best way to understand them is actually through sandwiches?If you’ve been following along, you know food keeps finding its way into our paranormal theories. In episode 5, we made you scared to eat ramen noodles because a ghost named Andy might be trapped inside. In episode 7, we warned that your pumpkin spice latte might conjure spirits. Now in episode 8, we’re making you scared to eat sandwiches... because you might just be devouring residual energy!But it’s not just about food and fun metaphors. We also dive into dream states, time loops, and the most daunting question of all: is time even real? From playful analogies to deeper paranormal theories, this episode is a multi-directional conversation about residual energies, loops, and the strange ways time might work.Whether you’re a seasoned paranormal investigator, a lover of ghost stories, or just here for the cheesy jokes, this episode has something for you.

Event season is officially here, and Paranormal Lens is kicking it off with our first LIVE in-person recording after an unforgettable weekend at MAD CON 8! In this episode, we dive headfirst into Spooky Season, from whether Pumpkin Spice lattes could summon spirits, to debating if the veil between worlds really is thinnest around Halloween.But we don’t stop there. We reveal actual data on the most paranormally “active” time of year we’ve experienced as investigators... and the results may surprise you.Later, we share our favorite Halloween movies, and trust us, our picks will surprise you even more.Whether you’re a ghost hunter, horror fan, or just love all things paranormal, this episode is packed with creepy fun, supernatural insights, and seasonal laughs.

In this episode, Ben Goldman, Brienna Shear, and Angela Wingard sit down for a candid conversation about skepticism in the paranormal, and how it’s increasingly being overshadowed by sensationalism. From viral videos on TikTok to trending paranormal YouTube clips, the hosts explore how the focus on click-driven storytelling often sidelines critical thinking and evidence-based investigation.They discuss the pressures that content creators face in a culture obsessed with views and likes, and how even passionate investigators can feel pulled between curiosity and performance. Drawing on their personal experiences in both filmmaking and paranormal research, Ben, Brienna, and Angela reflect on why healthy skepticism is essential, how it has evolved in the digital age, and why maintaining a thoughtful, measured approach matters when exploring the unexplained.

In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we dive into the fascinating intersection of folklore, internet culture, and paranormal phenomena. From the iconic legend of Bloody Mary to the viral mystique of Zozo, we explore how social media can create modern-day egregores (entities created by collective belief).Join hosts Ben Goldman, Brienna Shear, and Angela Wingard as they discuss: viral paranormal trends on platforms like TikTok and their real-world implications,Whether you’re a paranormal enthusiast, folklore fan, or fascinated by the power of collective belief, this episode is a deep dive into how legends evolve and spread in the digital age.

In this episode, we dive headfirst into the shadowy world of curses, exploring the roles of intent, belief, and perception in paranormal phenomena. Can a curse really affect someone who doesn’t believe in it? Does the act of cursing serve more to empower the curser than the cursed? Our hosts unpack these questions with lighthearted humor and curiosity.Along the way, they share personal experiences, ponder psychological versus supernatural effects, and reflect on how negativity and positivity shape our approach to the unknown. Wrapping up on a note of hope and thoughtful insight, this episode is for anyone fascinated by the paranormal and the human psyche.We highly recommend watching Liam Le Guillou's new documentary A Cursed Man, available to rent on Amazon Prime and Apple TV.

Welcome to our podcast, where we take deep dives looking at various topics through a Paranormal Lens. On this Monday Bonus episode: we explain why if your "orb" evidence was seen only through a camera lens, it's nothing strange and likely caused by lens flares or backscattering. Audio of this episode was previously released in May on our old RSS Feed. The video version (with the complete slideshow) is posted on YouTube for the first time. Sources from the original presentation: 1. Heinemann, Klaus (2007). The Orb Project. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 23. 2. Hill, Annette (2010). Paranormal Media: Audiences, Spirits and Magic in Popular Culture. USA and Canada: Routledge. p. 45. 3. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/photo-booth/photographer-who-claimed-to-capture-abraham-lincoln-ghost 4. http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/the-man-who-photographed-ghosts/ 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20050727000507/http://home.fujifilm.com/products/digital/shooting/flash.html 6. Grimm, Tom; Grimm, Michelle (1997). The Basic Book of Photography. Plume (original from Pennsylvania State University). p. 509. 7. https://archive.org/details/crimescenephotog0000robi_03ed/page/558/mode/2up 8. https://www.fujifilm.com/news/n200331.html 9. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:House_Dust_Orbs.jpg 10. https://support.simplisafe.com/hc/en-us/articles/360042967411-Why-do-I-see-orbs-bubbles-when-my-camera-is-in-night-mode- 11. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-photography-and-the-camera-1992331 12. https://www.liveabout.com/enough-with-the-orbs-already-2594045 13. https://www.uwphotographyguide.com/backscatter-underwater 14. iPhone 8 Plus horrible lens flare and reflections | MacRumors Forums 15. White, round glare spots or orbs sometimes appear in a ...https://www.sony.co.uk › electronics › support › articles 16. https://web.archive.org/web/20110807234205/http://www.theorbzone.com/explanation.htm 17. https://photographylife.com/what-is-ghosting-and-flare

In this episode of Paranormal Lens, we explore the concept of retiring haunted locations: how investigators, historians, and property owners might balance respecting the supernatural while sharing these spaces with the world.The team also dives into cemeteries as liminal spaces, discussing why certain graves become legendary, how repeating stories can unintentionally cause damage, and the surprising role residual energy plays in hauntings. We share firsthand experiences with overwhelming energy, examine how the living leave emotional imprints, and consider the various frameworks for understanding spirits, demons, and angels.Join us for a mix of theory, experience, and conversation as we uncover the unseen energy lingering in places most of us walk past every day.Follow @spooky.scoundrel on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@spooky.scoundrel

Is the paranormal industry dead, or just evolving? In this debut episode of Paranormal Lens, hosts Ben Goldman, Angela Wingard, and Brienna Shear kick things off with a candid conversation about ghosts, shadow figures, and what it really means to investigate the unknown. With a combined 18 years of paranormal investigation experience, the team dives into one of the most debated questions: What is a ghost?From shadow people that defy physics, to disembodied voices coming through spirit boxes, to uncanny parallels between podcasts and paranormal dimensions, this episode explores how investigators define (and question) the supernatural.You’ll also hear about future topics coming to the podcast, from curses and vampires to the blurred line between entertainment and genuine unexplained phenomena. Plus, the team reacts to a headline-making post from renowned psychic medium Chip Coffey, tying current events into the wider paranormal conversation.If you’re fascinated by ghosts, hauntings, shadow figures, paranormal investigation, and supernatural phenomena, this is the perfect introduction to the Paranormal Lens podcast.(This episode is NOT sponsored by The Soundwave Booth)